UnbornTao

Fair.

Heresy. I'm sure there are, even if they aren't strictly or formally framed as 'epistemological' works. Gotta take a look at Being and Time and The Critique of Pure Reason.

Why do so many people pay attention to this BS?

@Carl-Richard I was just going to share that clip!

Exactly.

Correction, it's Sextus Empiricus's account. Sex + empiricism woohoo

Okay.

Square One: The Foundations of Knowledge is on my to-read list.

In my view, it is about the underlying principle of rigorous openness, and what we can learn from it. The foundation is worth breaking - or at least dissecting - and this might well be the goal of Pyrrhonism. Have nowhere to go. Maybe that's the end goal of openness. From that state, we can question things more powerfully.

Nothing against them

Damned if you believe? To use an example: both atheism and theism - even agnosticism and similar stances - are essentially conjecture-based. At their base they're the same activity. Disbelieving is more of the same. The direction here is recognizing and removing them, not believing the opposite of an established view.

OK then, thanks. Surrendering one's fantasies is sobering, albeit a bit discouraging in the short term, too. That's the direction being pointed at.