All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
I don't know if this specifically applies to him but I've noticed that a lot of people in the personal development space especially those who talk a lot about masculinity actually can't handle being contradicted. Since they have a delirium about appearing virile without actually being particularly so they cannot simply admit that something has hurt them; if it does hurt it is your fault, and so they will get angry and eventually punish you , without even being able to pinpoint exactly what the issue is.
-
These two public figures discuss consciousness and Alex O'Connor presses Kuhn on whether consciousness is fundamental. Kuhn has a PHD in brain sciences and he explains that not once in his PhD program did the question of consciousness come up.
-
ladelle replied to Razard86's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I want to hallucinate a lot of money in my bank account 😏 -
Yeh the last 2 iterations made a punch in llms. I builded a website with 3 free prompt on Claude better that if I asked someone. I just need to host it, but I'll also ask gpt. In and all it's a lot of work I'll not pay anyone for it. From 3000$ to 20$ of economy ( let's count 100$ for my time and energy )
-
Was fed up with his double standards before I even saw all the cult/demoting mods drama and the ban of @zurew, one of the few who engaged with effort and good faith. My first post above illustrate, using quotes from his own book list on cults that his epistemology is pre-rational and cult-like. I am yet to see his actual engagement with similar critiques that does not devolve to “you are close-minded”, “only I understand X”. There hasn’t been a bigger influence on my life than Leo over the decade I have been following the work and the 8 years I been on the forum. Was giving him the benefit of the doubt. But he has turned into an ogre in his own corner of the internet. Godspeed, to all of you.
-
AerisVahnEphelia replied to Stick's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
all religious people are stupid atheist included. -
Even in the u.s. patents can only last for 20 years
-
Jehovah increases replied to Jehovah increases's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun
Event Horizon, R.I.P. Sam Neill. Sphere. Color Out of Space. Pandorum. -
@Natasha Tori Maru Remove warning points, fairness
-
AerisVahnEphelia replied to Andrey's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
That's more nuanced. I always feel like it's a final output which need to be judged on that in the case of ai. Explicitly deceiving people is always bad. And honestly there is some people having result that already exist, without them self aware. In an ideal world if you removed the economical side ( space abundance star trek ) no one would mind about what the current ai does, quite the contrary. Hating ai theft is a low fruit of the tree problem, hate the system who enable this dynamic more. -
It still saves you hours of work Just sad that, for the example of programming, I loved the process of painting the planks
-
If your mind is making relative categories that would be an objective claim.
-
Thank you https://www.popsci.com/health/meditation-pyschosis-rare/
-
What exactly are you hoping to achieve here?
-
They're already here. Elon did it when he got Twitter https://www.thejesusai.com/ https://ldsbot.com/ https://textwith.me/en/jesus/ https://apnews.com/article/religious-chatbots-ai-technology-jesus-buddhabot-e1ed4832b25a23ee85292da681a0ec37 France 24 https://www.france24.com Musk's AI chatbot under fire for posts praising Hitler Jul 9, 2025 — These were just the latest in a series of controversies surrounding Musk's AI chatbot, which has already been accused of promoting racist Le Monde.fr https://www.lemonde.fr Why Grok is first and foremost a disinformation machine Nov 24, 2025 — NEWS ANALYSIS. Grok, the chatbot that has been integrated into the X social network and aims to rival ChatGPT, has recently spread Holocaust denial and false information about the November 2015 attacks in France. It was a reminder that Elon Musk's tool, far from being neutral, was designed to misinform.
- Today
-
@CARDOZZO Thanks man. Will check it out. Edit: Damn that post seems gangster, apart from the preachy and blue-pill replies.
-
If Spain win, they become record holders in not losing a competitive game. I think they are on a 37 streak without a loss. Spain got that Midas touch of football. A political sidenote , Spain is the western country that trump is most angry with and they are the favourite to win. I was rooting for Iran at the start but Spain is the next best thing.
-
enchanted replied to enchanted's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
What you said is a non sequitur and false. But at a higher perspective observe how much time you are spending tearing someone down that inspires others. What have you done with your life? Im proposing that Bryan Johnson is a good example of how to inspire others in whatever domain you choose. I hope you choose a more fruitful endeavor than whatever you are doing here with this post. -
I made a post about De Angelo in the past. Enjoy 😎 Post
-
For those with instagam account , this is specific for who deals with Avoidands. About giving changes to them https://www.instagram.com/p/Daz6KbmDUFl/?igsh=eXF0NzIzazlheHZv
-
Which programs of his have you gone through to reach that conclusion?
-
90% of what Todd teaches is something he learned from earlier teachers 10-20 years ago but just tried to explain with more nuance. Not ground breaking creative genius.
-
Here is my original post. @Sincerity You say this was directed toward a user, there is clearly not even an @ on the original post. Also, I’m sharing this here because instead of communicating your name calling and shutting down the discussion. This is true. I recall having a 5meodmt trip and was like… “It was something but was it God? Was it infinity?” And Leo replied like “It’s infinity!!!!”… My response to that is still… yeah I’ve had profound experiences in it. But, I truly, totally, don’t understand it. And, I have more trips that would be required to do so. And, I can let Leo influence me, or Martin Ball or anyone else. I find when I’m not in that state that I’m distant from it, and it seems foreign and unrelated to my experience. I know the experience is profound, divine and I recall grasping that reality is infinite, that it’s mind, that qualia is God, and a realization of solipsism. But, it’s gonna take more trips for me, more contemplation, meditation, and true spiritual work to come to my own knowing. Leo’s proclaimations are interesting, other schools of spirituality and teachers provide useful concepts. But, I know ultimately I have to conclude what is true for me. I’m not gonna be pressured or brainwashed by Leo, or any other teacher. NN-DMT though, is u deniable in what it reveals about the nature of consciousness and reality. It’s literally an infinite mind. Infinite imagination is my conclusion from it. I have more work to do in my contemplative work, my spiritual maturity and developing my own epistemic foundation free from anyone else’s dogma, personality or bullshit. Everyone on this forum caught in their petty fucking bullshit too is beside the point of why I am here. Leo is the only teacher I’ve come across who taught me powerful principles all distilled into a single catalog and I’m grateful for that. But, I have to question everything. I have to build my own model, have my own experiences and awakening and live my own life. A challenge is I’ve spent hundreds of hours listening to Leo.. but also others like Osho, Lee Holden, Lester Levonson, eckhart Tolle, Sadhguru, and many others. I’ve read deep and profound non-dual books and dialogues like that of Ramana Maharishi, and Abn Arabi. I deeply enjoy these non-dual works. I’ve read and will continue to read Peter Ralston, Buddhist texts and books and that of Taoism. I like Bryan Johnson, learning about it health, fitness, different cultures, philosophy, etc. All of human knowledge interests me. Consciousness interests me, awakening does too and I’ve read various teachers on this subject. You wanna accuse me of being a small brain cult follower? Go fuck yourself you complete moron. Fuck you. You can put me into a box in your own mind but I don’t frankly care. I’m gonna keep learning, studying, growing and maturing and I don’t give a fuck about morons who don’t get the fucking picture of what we are doing here. Leo tries but can do better at encouraging followers of his work on their own contemplations. I think as a teacher he could improve by encouraging my own conclusion instead of just blurting this view. Leo doesn’t have enough data about anyone here to truly guide them on the forum, generally, in a lot of circumstances. There are serious flaws and challenges in all teachers and systems for learning. Get used to it. We are all lost out in the same sea.
-
None of that is good advertising, yet it still wanna do the program. Why do I have a desire for Truth when it's so horrible aka death? I came preprogrammed with some desire for it, cause deep down I know what I am, and some part of me is looking to reconnect?
-
Bro Todd V is your man for this. Dude is a wizard. But you have to get his programs of The System and Verbal Game Academy. His basic argument is the core of attraction is value + trust. I'll expand on Todd's view for the rest of my reply. Value: high-enough caveman high-survivability traits (value also has a flexible component based on girl's life history). Trust: That value being relatable + attainable. But the ratio and type of value will put you into either lover (i want bro's genes, even if he doesn't stick around; more value sided ratio needed) or provider (He'll protect me, provide for me and my kids; more comfort ratio needed compared to lover). Now, every fucking thing you do and associated to you implies a certain life history and present circumstance to the girl, which affects her value and trust levels. So, for example, its not that teasing is in itself attractive, but its that effective teasing conveys a certain understanding to her of you as having a high-value life history, and therefore high-value traits. Its like there are three conversations going on. Firstly, the outward one. Secondly, one where you're basically saying "I was ostracised growing up", "I was popular growing up", "I move through the world at ease". Thirdly, "I have social proof" "I have power/ influence" "I am competent", which are base value triggers. For example, when you ask for a number do you say "Can i have your number?" or "What's your number?" (Outward layer). The latter conveys the guy either (a) had a very successful life history with women so as to assume the number, or (b) that he was at least strong enough to deal with the social blowback of being cocky, or (c) that he had some other special quality that meant his cockiness wasn't beaten out of him (Second layer). (a) conveys social proof because implied social proof of other women liking him, (b) implies competence through strength implication, (c) implies competence through implication of a special quality. But, again, all these things mostly matter in respect to caveman survivability. Not present survivability. Hence, why IT guys aren't all having hugh hefner parties. ------ I don't get how Ralston or Wilber would be able to make even an intermediate model of attraction though, without just copying other models. Its like saying Ralston could've written his great meditation works if he had dedicated his life to studying history instead of meditation. But I also get that its reasonable to imagine an expert in one field of study being able to be an expert in another too. I'm interested about this David Deangelo course too. Please could you share the name. --- Fuck it imma nerd out some more on Todd stuff hahaha. One of the funniest things I learnt from him is role framing and frame racing. He mentions them without giving them a certain name, so i call them that. But essentially, there are high-value conversational roles like teaser, decider, objector, evaluator, obstacle-maker, leader. And because pre-framing (setting a frame) is much easier than reframing (changing an existing frame) you basically want to get there first. So, you can be the one to say you want to take things slow (objection-maker), you can be the one evaluating her, you can be the objectioner (saying something like "Im not sure you and i are compatible)
.thumb.jpg.02a50ba14b517437c8d8b4c8868ca217.jpg)
