Sugarcoat

I was thinking that when I wrote the response actually, sort of how that’s the idea, that the “disconnect” will just disappear each time you get what you want

You are basically implying that your daily experience is as common people’s, so that’s why you’re able to use common sense as your ground, because it’s based on the experience of common people

How do you enjoy the sex if you’re in the back of your mind holding an agenda?

I’ve seen that too, I think some of it is overcompensation for a sense of insecurity

That was funny tho😂😂

That applies to many humans in general, if women stand out in that regard feel free to share why you think so

If it was kinda directed at my comment, then yes I agree! Authenticity is core principle for me

I you go into spirituality seriously you should become a little "hippie" more or less sooner or later, otherwise you are lacking spiritual development imo.. (in regards to some comments I saw).

OMG the biases here☠️ You guys are so "heady" that you think all that is just "head stuff" (psychology), thats your own projection.

Very good word choice there, because thats exactly what I've been thinking, but I just haven't written it out, but the patterns are very familiar in a way, almost as if you unintentionally hinted at something there in your response.... hmmm

No, I cant come up with anything in partiuclar in that regard, im not so good at remembering words unless it really stands out. He does focus on relevant important things tho in general it seems, not like those "rational" people that obsess over what I sometimes call "non-issues" in society such as "oh this one feminist (extreme minority that almost nobody in society agrees with anyways) said this one thing!!!!!" *30 min analysis*. Maybe you could get a sense of what I mean, maybe not.

Idk what you consider "advanced guys" because if he "just switches it up" it could be in a shallow fake way where he is not much independent in how he is, so theres still significant portion of women who could smell that shallowness. In my comment I meant what i've most commonly heard in regards to "pick up", meanwhile advanced is rare.

You can have psychic experiences that you don’t control or chose, so that’s one reason it’s very difficult to “capture”, mine have been like that. But you said @Carl-Richard was trying to seem “innocent and egoless” or something when he said “it’s not my doing”. But I guess he meant what I said. The spontaneous ones are the most common, I’m convinced, although still rare, and being able to control is even more rare, exceptionally so And perhaps someone out there who can control it, or intentionally trigger them, maybe it’s limited in the way it can only happen with regards to “important things”. Because psychic abilities, those few who have control (I believe they exist), I bet they are highly developed somehow or have gone deep into spirituality so it’s not gonna be just used “for whatever”, maybe they couldn’t even do it ”unnecessarily” if they wanted to (but they wouldn’t even want to is my guess). Showing it to the world can be considered “important” yes I get that, but maybe it comes with significant risks. If someone showed the world super obvious psychic abilities that were captured, maybe they’d be put at risk as I said. Also people are very “sensationalist” not so deep, showing them to the world doesn’t mean it will help people get in touch with that dimension themselves, or in any way for that matter. Also, maybe there is already such evidence out there but it’s still not believed (I don’t have exact memory, just vague remembrances of seeing different clips and tv shows of people trying to prove such things, you are probably familiar with some too). But yes I’m also suprised why there it hasn’t come to the public eye so convincingly yet! Spiritual awakening is quite hard to describe yes, so “all encompassing” it is. So that is a huge topic in itself. I’ll let it that be

When I said “obvious” psychic phenomena I meant obvious in a way that if you told someone else (assuming they don’t think you’re making it up) they would also see it as obvious, simply based on the description of it. So I didn’t make claims about Carl’s experiences (I haven’t read through all his replies), and I don’t know what other kinds of stories you’ve heard. But maybe you’ve never heard an “obvious” one, or if you have, maybe you didn’t believe it because someone only described it rather than it also being captured scientifically, in experiment or something of the like. Imo someone could have an ambiguous sounding experience (from outside perspective) that from their pov is obviously psychic, becuase of the quality of the experience not just the content of it. But it’s difficult to argue that. If that’s some known model of the mind, it’s not what I referred to because I didn’t write based on any particular conceptual framework. I believe that we do have a local mind (on personal level, I’m speaking from dual perspective), but that it’s possible for connection between two minds and thus certain psychic phenomena, or that information from outside can enter your mind (clairvoyance perhaps), or you can perceive someone in deeper way where you can pick up on “inner world activity” that you couldn’t perceive based on just body language, tone etc (the typical non verbal communication), or even online, beyond just the writing. Mysterious? Yes but aren’t a lot of things… Maybe you agree that it’s possible to feel other people’s energies, more or less strongly, now that’s perceiving beyond the normal sense perception right? But when it comes to thoughts/mind or even worldly happenings etc, then maybe as I said before you need the more obvious evidence, from some source or maybe if it would happen to you. Maybe it did happen to you at some point but wasn’t obvious enough, and you also saw your self deception which was more obvious, so that’s partly why you hold the view you do now, just guessing a little. That’s great you are able to feel that “magical-ness” of life, we all want that I think, and I agree the physical is not exception from it. Why would it be? We feel like we exist in the physical world, and it’s also mysterious if we are honest. But you can call technology mediated communication something else than psychic phenomena because you’re just taking a term and changing the definition because you’re not convinced the “regular” psychic stuff is true ehehe. What science has done is amazing ofc but we could call it something else as I said… Speaking of psychic phenomena in the way I do doesn’t down-value science necessarily . But it happens here on this forum that people do, so I see the value in uplifting science too, just don’t steal words like that lol I just realized I’m guilty of the opposite actually, because sometimes when I use technology and its frustrating I will describe the experience as feeling “laggy” or even “hacky” in my brain, so I stole those words from the tech bros, so maybe I shouldn’t accuse you…. I don’t understand exactly what you mean by emotional sensitivity because people use the word emotion differently. I’m not super clear in these ideas myself but I think of sensitivity in very general way, related to perception. So if you for example feel someone else’s energy it can mean there is openness in your being and clearer perception that allows for it, and perhaps connection, so that’s a form of “sensitivity” meaning it’s able to be felt rather than someone being closed to it that is not able to feel it (not sensitive). Kind of. Maybe I’m vague in this reply overall but I want to be improve at explaining myself overall without needing explicit examples. Especially these less tangible things.

Sounds like increased sensitivity nowadays because of much less dense self in daily life maybe. I find that correlation being true for myself Ok maybe it's just difference in experience/awareness then because I tend to call it "impulse", don´t feel its much of a choice, choice makes me think of something else. "Drive of what you are" makes sense to me though, but I see it as your entire entity, if wiring etc is very strong then the self can feel quite passive ime I tried 10 mg vaporized. But just to try, I dont know what's usual for that amount, but yes I did experience mild effect as in significant thinning of the border between me and world, kind of "melting into environment" but not fully. Also a bit discomfort overall I guess it just comes with a state like that. Didnt quite like it. My guess at the time and now also is that id need it many many times to have strong long lasting effect, similar to you maybe I didnt start off "low density" but yes over the years it unravelled more and more and more, crazy how something still survived. Those who dont experience that, depending on the person, I wonder how much they suffer, some seem happier in proportion to the heaviness im percieving That last part about 5 meo makes sense to me, because my experience was very simple and clean like that, not fancy, so if you do higher doses and many times then it makes sense it could lead down the part you describe. Ive had this intuition for a long time "no matter how self aware I am, there is always something I cant see", I just cant because im "inside" somehow, so Id say I can agree with you there