aurum

The point I'm trying to make is that 2 cannot exist. There never was 2 of anything or a relative plane.

The contradiction is if you're thinking it can occur between two beings. Or that it even requires two beings at all. You don't need two supremely conscious beings, just one. Which is you.

You're just not considering how deep truth can go. Truth is way beyond some honest communication in a relationship.

It might be pure by human standards. But it's not unconditional, and it's not existential love.

"Existential love" "2 beings". A contradiction in terms.

The prioritization of truth is still very limited. Mostly you are talking about basic, relative truths that are needed for the relationship. And your relationship is a vehicle for your survival needs, not existential truth. Which is fine, but just admit what it is and what it isn't. How much truth do you want? There is a huge spectrum.

Seeking personal glory is the entire problem.

No this is false. Relationships ARE conditions. They are not about truth in any existential sense at all. Being more authentic is generally good, but that will only make your conditions more authentic. It does not remove them.

30s.

You will not recieve True Love from any human relationship. This is a trap. Stick to conscious, conditional relationships with humans.

Yes. It's extremely obvious.

You make many good points. You can connect the dots in all different kinds of ways.

This is makes me sad

Tangential point, but Rick Beato is also a great example of mastery. The guy has incredible knowledge.

Aubs and gang are self-deceived, but also some of criticism they are receiving is self-deceived. It's self-deception all around