Danioover9000

Member P3
  • Content count

    12,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Danioover9000


  1. @inFlow

    On 2023-09-20 at 1:09 PM, inFlow said:

    It's funny how the more conscious you become the less internet you consume. You just see how awful it all is, just to make a buck people do such stupid things and then think they are successful. Even the big start influencers are the same - STUPID. And the same goes when you get less conscious the more internet you consume thinking that you are getting somewhere with all this free info that you consume.

    Thanks for the video ♥

       You're welcome. Even Sam Harris deleted his twitter account, mindfully aware that it would piss off Elon Musk, Joe Rogan and Lex Fridman, knowing how much he hates Trumpism and what an example that'll set for some. He's like the trumpet that blows into the digital Twitter prison, shaking some awake from it's icy grips.


  2. @Scholar

    6 minutes ago, Scholar said:

    This is a type of problem that might not be able to be solved through the justice system, and it might be unlikely that it will be solved through social media witch hunts.

    One of the major problems is that in casual dating culture, females are inherently disadvantaged as the powerdynamic, especially when it comes to actual physical interactions, is biased towards men. So, every casual dating interaction is inherently risky for the woman. Women in general are also disadvanted on a psychological level because they are less assertive and aggressive.

    In practice, such a dynamic, combined with an inherent immaturity within the population, will constantly lead to such situations. Women are drawn to high status men, high status men are able to abuse their power due to being high status. So, in casual sex culture, high status men will have endless opportunities of sexual interactions with women, which over time leads to these types of depravities in some individuals, whether due to sex addiction or other types of dynamics.

     

    The whole situation is driven by a sort of immature hedonism, and because sexual interactions actually are a serious thing for most people, these types of situations will continue to occur.

       Of course this type of problem wouldn't be only solved in either justice system or social media/social witch hunt and mob justice, won't be solved using tier 1 cognition, and us vs them mentality. There needs to be a mixed method approach that's flexible and adaptable, otherwise if you look at the history of warfare, if they only relied on one method of war, then everyone wouldn't be adapting to battles and to wars, but in that history you'll see creative solutions and innovations to overcome certain defensive strategies or make offensive strategies, and it's almost always a mixed approach.

       The major problem is that men and women are mostly ignorant of many developmental factors like stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types and traits, 9 stages o ego development and shadow selves they suppress, life experiences and other lines of development in life to societal domains, ideological beliefs indoctrinated from culture, self biases and preferences. What you think are specific problems between male and female power dynamics in dating, is a feature of the male and female mind, male and female centric worldviews they see the world. How is that factor a problem and not a feature?


  3. @Yimpa

    1 hour ago, Yimpa said:

    In the early phases I would agree. But the more experienced you are, you’re gonna to want to challenge your ideas of what a proper mindset would be. And even the setting. You’d be surprised.. even if you get one or both “wrong”, the trip can turn out better than you could’ve ever expected.

    Again, only do this if you are experienced. Your intuition will guide you. 

    @acidgoofy  Is actual correct, especially if OP is a newbie, controlling the setting and making it safe, and making sure your mood is good to great is really important.

    1 hour ago, acidgoofy said:

    I prefer to smoke it indoors with as few distractions as possible, but if that's not possible then maybe find a good spot in nature. Set and setting are crucial with psychedelics, never neglect it

       For example, think of golfing, and what goes into the field of golfing. look at every type of shot from a driver, to iron clubs, even the putters. Let's take drivers for example, look at all kinds of shots done, from good to worst shots. Well, YOU are that golf ball, would you rather be hit in a good and ideal setting, controlled and safe from other distractions? Because I'll tell you, the mistake is mere degrees and decimals, that's all it takes to shoot out of the stratosphere and into HELL bad trips if your mood and setting is not safe and conducive to seeking deeper truths through psychedelics. 


  4. @Razard86

    1 hour ago, Razard86 said:

    Many people have described Michael Jordan as egotistical and uncaring but the man has a soft caring side as well. Listen to this story and find out for yourself.

     

        Incredible story. Shows the corruption of stage orange valued insurance companies, and some stage green values can do to help a bit.

       Although there's no clear link to climate change, current news events, government, politics and society, the moral of the story IMO is that sometimes the impossible can happen, so don't consider what is or isn't possible yet.

       Maybe this should be in the personal development sub forum?


  5. @Javfly33

    5 hours ago, Javfly33 said:

    When I have a date, my intention is not to go like I'm going to war. I feel nonsensical to play this games just because some people haven't healed some obscure aspects of themselves.

    Yes, this starts to feel like twitter in the era before Musk.

    Yeah I think I get the point. Unless I find an Unicorn women, dating is like a jungle. Constantly in fight or flight mode in order to defend myself and counterattack those "teasings". 

    Like for me is just ridiculous. If you go on a date with me why the fuck you going in "teasing mode"? The whole point of dating someone is to have ONE PLACE, one place in life where you can relax and connect and trust. Not to be again in that jungle push-pull mode. Is fucking pathetic that women play this game and I can't wait to fuck some more women and get sick of it and never come back to this dick shitty game of superior-inferior games. 

    I fucking hate humanity and so pathetic and unable to love is.

       Try watch some comedy, maybe go watch some Bill Burr or other comedians, watch and feel how your state of mind and being shifts. Try to do some visualizations and affirmations of being a funny guy. Really imagine trying to find the funny in all situations, and feel yourself go there.

       Drop your misanthropy, excuses of not loving, stop hating on women that have played you. Reframe and think how'll you out play them, and make them giggle and laugh. Remember those girls and women you're dating do have jobs, work maybe a 9-5 in a rational state, a logical state, which is against most average female minds and their female centric natures and can be mentally exhausting, so all you have to worry about is how to trigger them into being more feminine, and emotionally stimulate them. If I'm exhausted, last date I want is some robotic guy unable to emotionally stimulate me if I'm too exhausted. I'm there on the date to have fun, so should you, and so should both of you find the funny together.

       Go study NLP(neuro-linguistic programming), and learn some more dating advice, and try to think positively and feel that state. You can still enter back into that doom and gloom hating self, but put that part aside for later and be more positive and optimistic, and try to find the funny.


  6. Come you all, don't dodge the question:

    On 2023-09-15 at 5:19 PM, Leo Gura said:

    I got a question for all you lonely guys looking for hot girls:

    How would you feel if in your loneliest, horniest hour, a naked girl on a webcam promised to marry you, then swindled $10,000 from you, ditched you cold, and gave all that money to Tate so he could buy his Bugatti?

    Still a Tate fan?

     


  7. @Vrubel

    37 minutes ago, Vrubel said:

    "The (evil) rich elites control the economy, media and government." It is fertile ground for old-style antisemitism that is making a resurgence nowadays. When I was growing up that kind of antisemitism was viewed as utterly untrue and something from a different age. Now it seems to be making a comeback.
    Antisemitism has its own evolution: first people demonized Jews for being Christ-killers, then as malevolent controlling elites, Then came ww2 and the Holocaust. After which antisemitism significantly died down in the West. Then the new antisemitism became obsessing-over and hating Israel. But now we are making a comeback to the pre-WW2 era of Jews being controlling elites again. What's next hating Jews for being Christ killers again? 

       Not just antisemitism, but also anti establishment and anti mainstream types of ideologies, too anti government, anarchic communism or libertarianism, even neo liberalism.


  8. @Raze

    24 minutes ago, Raze said:

    No, it isn’t. You said he’s guilty because he’s upset, I’m saying he’d be upset even if he’s innocent. 
     

    Justice is making judgements based on evidence, not jumping on a bandwagon and openly declaring you believe in guilty until proven innocent and cheering on large corporations hypocritically restricting someone based on just allegations when they didn’t do the same to others on their platform who are actually guilty. 

       No, I stated to that user that his conditions for him being innocent is he's detached from the reputational and career lose, which makes him far more likely to be guilty IF that is the determination the users uses. Yes, him being upset even if he loses is, by the user's standards, makes him already guilty under his logical framework.

       Justice is making judgments based on evidence, which makes this thread justice then and us advocates for justice, due to us judging the witness accounts and testimonies of these 4 women in that documentary? Which types of evidences or proofs do you consider valid? Which justifications do you consider valid? Also, how do you know if justice is objective here and in favor of the women, when the ruling authority groups of this justice is mostly male centric, and have much higher power and status? How do you know the current legal system is fair to these women, when people like Russell Brand and other celebrities can use their finance and influence to manipulate the system?? 


  9. @Consept

    55 minutes ago, Consept said:

    Not the BBC necessarily but youtube and the British government that requested his content be taken down, i think that is a bit excessive, im not sure its really their place to do that. Having said that the advertisers are more than free to not want their brands associated with (excuse the pun) Brand. So the result would most likely be the same as thats what happened with Rumble where brands wanted their advertising taken off his videos. 

    I would say it is on him to either justify what happened and tell his story or completely deny them, then at least he has made a stand and he can go on and sue those that reported on these false claims. Im not even saying justify it from a moral standpoint im saying if he wants to redeem his reputation this would seem like the obvious course of action. By not really addressing it directly it would lead people to believe that there is truth to it. Like imagine someone accused you of rape and you just started talking about how everyone is out to get you and you never flat out deny or tell your story about it. At the very least people would think youre hiding something. 

    Also he brings people down constantly without any evidence on his youtube channel and states they need to answer questions, so it is somewhat rich that he is not answering questions himself. 

       That is true to an extent. How can you not try to justify and defend yourself directly, but instead scapegoat to others and not address the accusations directly? At worst it makes him look more guilty and adds more credibility to those allegations, at best he's manipulating the narrative by blaming big tech or big pharma, mainstream news and get's more more attention to mind fuck more people.


  10. @Tobia

    18 minutes ago, Tobia said:

    @Understander

    What is Russell justifying?

    He openly admits that at some point he was sleeping with 80 women per month. He admits it was a pathetic and hedonistic behaviour.

    As for the anonymous allegations, he has nothing to justify until there is evidence in a court. 

    Until then, the allegations might be completely false

       What do you think Russel is justifying?

       Yes, he openly admitted at some point he slept with 80 women per month, and admits it was pathetic and hedonistic behavior.

       What do you mean he has nothing to justify for or against as for the anonymous allegations, by 4 women, until there's evidence in a court? Does one woman's account, from text messaging, to refusal for sex, to him forcing himself while high on drugs or alcohol, and her going to a medical clinic to do a rape kit test and take anti biotics, not considered hard evidence?

       Or, until then the allegations might be completely true? 


  11. @Tobia

    24 minutes ago, Tobia said:

    @Danioover9000 no, by his logic you don't convict someone of rape just by looking at his body language and being beaten down. That doesn't prove anything, one way or the other.

    You are not a judge after a long trial, you don't know shit.

       Why are you assuming I'm not a judge and me not knowing 'shit'?

       How is, by his logic, you don't convict someone of of rape just by looking at his body language and beating beaten down? What are you assuming that doesn't prove anything, one way or the other, about the science of body language analysis?

       Are you mistaking my opinions from my body language analysis?  


  12. @Raze

    3 minutes ago, Raze said:

    So if he was innocent he would be totally calm and happy while his entire reputation and career gets destroyed? 
     

    You all do not understand the slightest thing about how Justice works, this thread is a great example of how people willingly give up freedom to dictators and engage in hysterical witch trials and lynch mobs.

       That presumes the conditions you set for a person being innocent, as 'totally calm' and 'happy' while his entire reputation and career gets destroyed is true. Is it true? Probably not true, which means Russel Brand, in your logic, is guilty.

       So, in your view, explain to us what justice is and how justice works? How is this thread an example of people willing to give up freedom to dictators and engage in hysterical witch hunts and lynch mobs? 

       


  13. @Understander

    13 minutes ago, Understander said:

    A typical spiritual person: delusional and justifying their behavior all the time.

       That's a bit over simplified, and bad faith and uncharitable. Not every typical spiritual person is like Russel Brand.

       For example, @Leo Gura is a typical spiritual person, yet has a lot of critical thinking, independent thoughts, and doesn't justify delusions that much.


  14. @Butters

    2 hours ago, Butters said:

    I just got around watching some of the videos. You're actually quite right and I understand what you're saying. However keep in mind that his entire world has just collapsed, HIS ENTRIE WORLD. THE END. DEATH! Of course he doubles down on his (zen) devilry, that's how egos respond. 

    Look at the fear in his last video, he seems totally beaten down

    All your worth being attached to your image, it's just one of many reasons the entertainment business is so nasty. The power games and abuse are others, so here we see different sides of the same dirty coin. And that business attracts disturbed individuals, nothing new under the sun. 

    If he stays off the internet for a few years he could make serious spiritual growth and admit his wrongdoings. 

    Is anyone actually taking him to court? 

       He got beaten down because he knows deep down he is guilty, and kharma is oncoming.


  15. @Carl-Richard

    2 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

    Steps from most fundamental and metaphysical to concrete and practical:

    Orienting map for personal development.png

     

    Being (connect with reality):

    • Tell the truth
    • Accept yourself
    • Contemplate
    • Meditate

    Meaning (what should be happening in reality?): pursue what is meaningful.

    • Abstract principles and virtues (what is meaningful?):
      • goal-oriented movement
      • functionality
      • health
      • balance
      • holism
      • integration
         
    • Concrete domains (what is meaningful?):
      • Systemic: commit to long-term goals and daily habits; write lists, plans, journals; do yearly, biyearly, monthly evaluations of progress.
      • Bio - psycho - social (Engel); also, id - ego - superego (Freud); reptilian brain - neocortex - limbic system (MacLean); competence - autonomy - belonging (Deci & Ryan); monster - man - lion (Plato).
        • Bio: diet, exercise, pleasures, hobbies.
        • Psycho: knowledge, wisdom, self-insight, values, self-esteem.
        • Social: friends, family, partner, community.

     

    Summarized, you should connect with reality and pursue what is meaningful in reality; in alignment with abstract principles and virtues; using systemic techniques, habits, goals and practices; while covering all of the three bio-psycho-social domains.

    To illustrate with one example of each (not at all exhaustive): you should meditate, balance all aspects of your life, work for a set period every day, while going to the gym, expanding your knowledge base and hanging out with your friends.

    Another version: you should tell the truth, pursue health, write down everything your mind tells you is important to do or remember, engage in some short-term pleasures if you so desire, act in accordance with your inner values and keep up with your family members.


    As a side note, this map shows what happens when things work as they should. It's not a given that things will work as they should, and in those cases, you need to fix yourself. Often, fixing yourself is not a matter of knowledge or will, but of untangling unconscious mechanisms and trauma. For that, conventional therapy, energy work and even psychedelics might be useful. In other cases, it may boil down to medical problems, which require medical solutions. Even though the map will fall short of addressing certain pathology, it does lay the foundation of health (in my opinion), and it's therefore relevant to everybody.

        This is a very nice map. Is this from Daniel Schmachtenberger and his consilience project?


  16. @Say10

    4 hours ago, Say10 said:

    People have diverse views and beliefs, and it's not okay to label an entire group of people as "barbarians" based on the practices of some individuals or businesses.

    If you have concerns about mink farming or animal welfare, it's more productive to engage in constructive dialogue and advocacy to raise awareness and potentially influence change in the industry, rather than resorting to derogatory language or sweeping generalizations.

    You would probably love European history. In the 1800s, in France, for entertainment purposes, dozens of cases of cats were burned alive, either for entertainment or religious point-scoring. Cat burning was particularly common in France, where a dozen live cats were routinely torched in Paris every Midsummer's Day.

       And this is why I dislike the French.