Raze

Member
  • Content count

    1,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

7 Followers

About Raze

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb5zpo5WDG4 https://www.shinzen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/art_urges.pdf
  2. YES. Because like I already SAID, women and men are different and value different things. This is why on average in couples men are older and women are younger. You don’t even have an argument, you just accuse everyone who disagrees with you of being low value or immature. You are just wrong, I already showed you the data. You can have whatever preference you want, but that doesn’t change the reality of what makes someone more or less valuable on the sexual marketplace. Looks like I struck a nerve. Sorry but flipping out at me will not change reality. Also this is not very emotionally mature of you.
  3. Like I already said, you seem to think “high value” means anyone who agrees with you, “low value” means anyone who disagrees with you. It doesn’t. You do not understand the terms. Andrew Tate has fame, wealth, and a good physique, these make him high value because these are highly valuable traits. This is why he has a public dating history of many attractive women. It’s not up for debate, if someone is dating multiple very attractive women at one time they are “high value”, because if they weren’t they would not be able to attract said women. I know, those women are “low value” because they like someone you don’t like lol. There are plenty of men who are more emotionally mature than Tate, yet they do not date as many attractive women. Why is this? Because it’s not a “high value trait”. Its painfully clear you are insecure at the thought that men are attracted to younger women and have a bizarre warped belief that “value” now means anyone who dates older women. It doesn’t, any man dating an older woman even if he likes her for her personality would prefer she be younger. The data is clear.
  4. You seem to think “high value” means anyone who agrees with you, and “low value” means anyone who doesn’t agree with you. Nope. These are terms about the sexual marketplace. I don’t like Andrew Tate, but he would be a “high value” male because he has rare but valued traits such as fame, physique, and wealth. This is why he has a public dating history of seeing many attractive women. Being high or low value in the sexual marketplace has nothing to do with being morally right or wrong. You flipping out on any man who is attracted to women younger than you reeks of insecurity. You are clearly way too emotionally involved to judge this topic rationally.
  5. This simply isn’t true. To all ages of men, women in their 20’s look best on average, it isn’t the same for women on average, see this data https://www.businessinsider.com/dataclysm-shows-men-are-attracted-to-women-in-their-20s-2014-10 “High value” men on average go for women even younger than the average man, because they go for what they are most attracted to and have the resources to win them over. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-consumericus/201306/very-wealthy-men-marry-much-younger-women To say a older man who goes for a younger woman must be “low value” makes no sense and I’m sorry is complete cope. Unless somehow the wealthier a man is the more low value he is? Men primarily care about looks in women, so a woman in her 30’s would be less “value” than in her 20’s. Women when judging men care about looks, but they also care more about other things besides looks, such as resources, social proof, charisma, etc. , which is why on average they go for older men, because older men have acquired more of those features on average.
  6. Try ifs therapy
  7. Today tribes which don’t have contact with regular society live some what egalitarian, and it is believed that is what ancient humans lived like. However after the cognitive revolution and some genetic bottleneck human civilization formed with more male dominance. I also believe research has found societies that live with less competition become more egalitarian / slightly more female dominated but develop less, while societies with more competition / outside threats become more male dominated and have more development. So it could still be somewhat true in some form.
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az41hkLie6I
  9. You have to know how to attract women before you can have a relationship with commitment
  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwsWGfRHMQE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMsTke0Fo5g