Carl-Richard

The answer is always do what feels best (unless you're an automatized measurement freak like Bryan Johnson). Whether it's lifting weights or not, see what makes you feel the best, whether it's bodily or mentally or spiritually. If you start feeling bad, it's either a lack of adaptive response (too little training) or a buildup of fatigue (too much training). Both have their own signatures of presence or lack of vitality, clarity. If you value functionality over longevity, then you might trade-off some increased adaptive response for some increased fatigue (like professional athletes do: when a competition comes up, they often take a rest day to lower the chronically elevated fatigue temporarily). But this is longevity through proxy. Feeling good isn't necessarily a straightforward line to longevity, but it's a very good proxy.

Says who? I suggest to drop all preconceived notions and workout like a mystic would meditate. The knowledge you get from directly knowing your own self is much higher detail, much more sophisticated and real than some retarded estimate (which assumes 100 billion things about what even counts as a rep or how to execute a reo) based on bullshit studies. "Science-based lifting" is a bit like thinking getting a degree means you're now somehow something. No, knowledge itself, acquaintance with the thing itself, is the thing. If you can pull an insane 1-rep max, you can pull insane 10-rep maxes, and it will be reflected in your muscles. The strongest men who have ever lived are also the most muscular men who have ever lived. Don't let bodybuilders with their visual appeal fool you. A 434 lb Eddie Hall is more muscular (has higher FFM) than any bodybuilder who has ever lived (except maybe Greg Kovacs who is 5 cm taller).

That's exactly not what I was looking for. Give me like a theoretical rationale for why astrology works (other than "environment goes through cycles, cycles affect the person").

Do what works for you. I only listen to music while playing video games (which is unfortunately almost never 😥), making dinner or working out (and while driving and commuting).

Why would he call the ambulance unless you're in immediate danger?

So why did you go to the psychiatrist?

As far as I know, HPPD specifically refers to small visual disturbances, notably the "visual snow" which is given an increased intensity and may involve colors. If you have fully formed object or auditory hallucinations, that's something else.

You have to be very careful about what you mean by "intense" here. Just theoretically a priori (and on the extremes), if you do very intense training (i.e. very high BPM) but very low volume, that's more conducive to longevity than very low BPM and very high volume (almost per definition, as the latter at the most extreme is not considered exercise). Higher intensity gives more adaptive response (makes you healthier) per unit of time, a shorter window of stress, and a longer window of rest and recovery. And in that window of rest and recovery, you will of course be resistant to stress because of the adapative response (hence the longevity effect). The problematic aspects (again theoretically a priori) is when you keep stacking on volume and time spent in a state of stress, shortening the recovery window, and lowering the adaptive response per unit of time. I think that is what you are referring to. I've heard somebody say that for example jogging (low bpm, low adaptive response, more conducive to higher volumes, etc.) does not make you live longer than the time you spend jogging. But if you like jogging and you feel better the hours and days after jogging, then it can still be a positive thing for your life. 1 hour every other day is nothing. You spend more scrolling TikTok accidentally. Besides, high intensity low volume training is hip now (30-45 minutes, 1-2 sets per exercise). I personally prefer 3 sets per exercise, even 4 for the beginning set, because I don't feel I get the neurophysiological fatigue response and serotonergic/endorphinergic "feelgood" response that last throughout the day and next days if I don't. But if you simply prefer staying active through other means, that's fine, but it's not clear whether that is better for longevity than short, focused and intense training sessions punctuated with long periods of genuine rest. Try "staying active" by e.g. moving houses with a deadline and see how wore down and exhausted you will be. You will be very active during that time, but you will tend to eschew rest and consequentially probably severely drain your longevity. Now you're adding many confounding factors. The comparison is between going to the gym and staying active through other means. Again, I think high intensity and high rest times has a strong theoretical basis for longevity. But that is not to say longevity cannot be relatively assured through other means. Oh yes for sure. Those high volume masochistic bodybuilding freaks are not doing it for longevity, just like the drugs they're taking.

Everything is ego lifting. Lifting heavy to show off is just one case of it. But you can lift heavy because it's fun. It's not necessarily to show off.

What symptoms did you report?

Why would you want to confirm that? 😂

A teacher I deeply respect wrote a book on astrology. But I haven't looked into it. Give me your best argument.

"Snus" in Norwegian high schools (nicotine pouches). Probably the purest example of conformity I've seen. Joining the military is basically always conformity and basically the entire culture there.

You probably find meditation boring too. Or sauna. Or taking hot baths.

It's the problems of metaphysics-blind pop science and epistemically myopic and p-hacking nature of debunking videos all combined into one hot mess.