Breakingthewall

You mean here that others experiences could happen but not simultaneously. You say this because you're positioning the self, the center that perceives or receives experience, as the sole subject that has experiences. But this is precisely where the error lies. There isn't a subject that receives experience; the subject is experience. I don't have an experience; I am that experience, and without experience there is no self, no perceiving center. "I" can't have other experiences because if there are others experiences, as they are, they are not me. Not me as a self, as an observer. The absolute is not an observer, is what allows the observation. All this idea of creation, God, solipsism, stems from confusing the relative self with the absolute being. The absolute being is not someone, not a center; it is the fact of being that derives from total openness. It's not consciousness, consciousness is a form that happens. Is the reality reflecting in itself. Now you could say: everything is consciousness because without consciousness you aren't, then nothing is. Here is the problem: you as absolute are not a point of view, a perceptor, an observer. You are the totality where observation is possible. The difference is total. No, it's accurate for me.

Yes. It's mathematically impossible that there are not others experiences if we admit that reality has not absolute limits. The other possibility would be that the only experience in the totality of reality is that of a person who is currently writing on a phone and who lives in Spain, etc., etc. Since this is impossible, it is absolutely certain that in the totality of unlimited reality, other experiences will eventually occur. These experiences are not temporally linked, they are not successive, since temporality is something internal to this experience, not something absolute. Therefore, right now there are infinite experiences. It's absolutely sure, you don't need to have those experiences, same than you don't need to go to Jupiter to know absolutely sure that it exists. The logical mind is a perception tool as accurate or more than the qualia.

You're talking about a subjective assessment while high. I say assessment, not experience, because experience would be, for example, an experience of openness, expansion, fluidity, contraction, horror, glory, terror, etc. But knowing that you are God dreaming reality, which emanates from you and has no reality of its own outside of you, is an assessment. Psychedelic makes your mind have hallucinations, then it's better don't believe in them as they were more real than sober state. Are good to dissolve energetic barriers, but not to make a map about how reality is

Then it's your experience that you are god dreaming the reality?

I can absolutely prove that other experiences exist besides my own; it's very simple. My experience is limited, but reality cannot be limited, therefore there are other experiences, infinite ones. It's very simple: your experience is concrete, defined. It is absolutely certain that in eternity and infinity there will be other, completely different experiences. Then, your experience is not the only

What we are in form cannot die. It is absolute being. It is outside of time and outside of becoming. It cannot be grasped by the mind, since the mind occurs within it. It is total limitlessness, and limitlessness is, because it has no limits, and you are exactly that. It is total, and it is what we are in this very instant. Form is simply the inevitable consequence of limitlessness. There is always form changing , but the essence is always the same: you. You simply have to open yourself to it.

Well you could go further and understand that others have a real experience. Or maybe I could think that in eternity only the human that I am writing in a phone now is the only experience that happened and is going to happen? If other experiences are possible, where are them? In the future? In the past? Then infinity is a timeline?

I would say that death is the disintegration of this form, period. You might think: and then another form appears. But there is no "after." "After" is in this form. Reality simply continues being, in infinite forms. The form that you are integrates into the totality; there is no self that perceives it because self and perception are attributes of this form. Perhaps, or probably, another form with a similar energetic configuration, with a pattern that takes the current one as its basis, will begin, but "you" will not be there. You are a construct of this form, an apparent center that registers and identifies itself as disappearing into the total abyss. Hallelujah for that, right? Absolute freedom

Existence is relative movement, becoming. In absence of limitations there is not real movement, nothing arrives anywhere, then all movement is cyclical, ends in the start.

Sure, You might perceive a guy as very noble and then he turns out to be a professional con artist, but there's a guy with his own reality. The spirituality that says reality is a dream means that there isn't a guy; you're imagining him, he doesn't really exist, just like when you dream while you're sleeping

If you identify with everything, as you've said, what's the difference between me being tortured and you being tortured? It seems different, then. Aren't you equally identified with your limited human reality than with the totality of existence? Perhaps it's just a mind game that works until the guy with the red-hot irons arrives. Why to deny what's obvious? Same than affirm that you can realize that you are creating the reality as god but you can't change it

Then for you is the same if you are imprisoned for life or if someone in Iran is imprisoned for life?

Dreaming means that what appears doesn't have its own reality; it's your dream creation. It doesn't exist independently of you; you're creating it with your mind. Therefore, only what appears in your field of consciousness exists, and it's a creation of your mind. Then there is an absolute limit: you as creator. And another absolute limit: the field of your consciusness. Then reality is absolutely limited in all directions.

You don't identify with everything because you think you are the creator of what appears; therefore, there is a difference between you as the creator and what appears as an imaginary dream.

Enlightenment is the total openess , this implies absence of any identification.