Breakingthewall

The meaning of reality is being. This is absolute meaning, because being is everything. If you are open to what being is, you will see clearly that the meaning of reality is total. Sat chit Ananda, as the advaita say. Unbounded being that's is absolute joy in its unlimited freedom.

Why according to science reality should have an origin? Science uses the concept of infinite. For example many theories contemplate the possibility of infinite multiverses, another infinite rebounds, like the Penrose's theory, who got the Nobel prize some years ago.

Reality doesn't "come from", that's a paradox, then impossible. If reality come from it's something previous than reality, then reality would be secondary so not reality. That's why that explanation about dream is not logical, then not possible

the void is not origin because there is not void and after fluctuation, because there is not before and after. Time appears when change appears, then change is always and no change is never. This is logic, science can explain how time is not essential but relative to a system, same than space. There are logical deductions very twisted but still logical

This operational shift is called enlightenment, not because you understand something you didn't understand before, but because your operating system was previously entirely integrated with your social identity, making it dense and dull. Its source of functioning, of creativity, was this structure built throughout your life. When you manage to separate this structure, the act of being itself takes center stage; it becomes the source of functioning and creativity, illuminating the psyche because there is no longer a dense structure filtering it. That structure still exists, but as an operating system, not as the essential core of your being.

I think that those who don't ask themselves these questions are those who are comfortable in the self, those who can't even intuit that it's possible to free themselves from it, and those who wouldn't want to do so even if it were possible because they are totally focused on it. There are many of these latter types in spirituality; they use spirituality to elevate the self.

Id say that the self with all that it implies, its entire narrative and attachments, its emotional needs for validation, status, and position in society, it reveals itself as secondary or not essential, not illusory. That is, it continues to be perceived as real. You know you have a body that can be damaged and a social position that will affect your reality. You don't want people to run away from you, nor do you want to live in misery, but that's not your essence; it's your circumstance. You've detached it from your system. As you've said many times, the problem is that the normal thing is to replace it with another identity: God, soul, whatever. This happens because your psyche needs that identity to avoid collapsing; it's not something you can choose at will. That's why when you say that identity is an illusion, I say no, it's a structural reality of the psyche created by evolution, and to be free of it requires a profound change on several levels. When the self is detached it's seen as not essential. you still exist but essentially you are not a or b, essentialy you are, what you are is the fact of being, and circumstancially you are a person, etc. but this is not something that you see and that's it, it's something that happens when that detachment happens, then the self is seen as circumstancial. This is a fundamental difference, you can't tell someone: look, the self is illusion, when you see it, you are free. No, because the attachment are real when they are operating in his system.

Yeah im not in your religion, that's why it's not nice for you sharing point of views with someone who doesn't know your dogmas. I understand, I'm sorry if I offended your beliefs. Thanks for the offering, im not interested for now in your religion, still preferring direct view

What means that? The exposure of your level? . Boring. So boring.

For example this: If the void is not contained or bounded, it is impossible for it to remain in a stable, flat state eternally, because then it would be limited to a flat state without fluctuation. Fluctuation occurs because it is a possibility; it is a breaking of symmetry that unfolds in a coherent equation that ultimately results in zero, a cycle that begins at zero and ends at zero and starts again and unfolds In infinite possibilities.

Existence didn't spawn, just is. It's not paradoxical at all, it's absolutely inevitable and logical How do you know that?

Science don't ask why reality exist but how it operates

Yes, I already did. Reality is because there are not limits. No limits are not the cause or reality, are what reality is. Then reality never started, it hasn't a source because it would be a limit, it is and that's everything. There is zero paradox, absolutely logical.

Nothing doesn't exist except as an idea. There is not nothing, then there is not paradox

Because existence doesn't came from, it is because nothing limits it. It is not caused, just is. Absolutely inevitable