Schizophonia

I'm waiting for the promethean techno-communist utopia with AI and robots everywhere but for the moment there's a RAM shortage.

👺

No pb It requires surrender. These days I'm making an effort to block out my negative/self-referential thoughts; I'll make a topic about this mixing the epistemology/languages elements of Deleuze and Guattari (🤓) It generates a narcissistic rage; you have this ego-driven desire to play the victim, to impose limits on yourself, to "block the flow", reterritorialize but if I don't give in to my mood my ambition and masculinity skyrocket. I've just signed up to try horseback riding and karate lessons and I'm planning at least one more thing to try, this wouldn't happen if I let myself go more like I used to; I think I'll post some stuff on Instagram, either in stories or posts. eheh I'm knäpp

I'm going horse riding soon; it's a cool activity and there's plenty of women too.

I've been trying to explain this for a while now, but you don't understand anything and you're being rude, and/or trolling. You're annoying.

It's fine for the one for whom it's in their interest. Once again, you're basing your opinion on random videos; that makes you extremely manipulable. Already answered Yes but the Nazis' interests are probably not yours for many reasons; you're probably not in favor of killing Jews, killing minorities in general, in capitalism... Actually the Nazis did what vegans do today; they used various media outlets to portray Jews as evil simply because a particular Jew was in a particular institution. My message is that instead of resorting to aggression and dogmatism because you've seen a few videos among all the events that occur daily on a planet of 8 billion inhabitants, you should calm down a bit and try to be more rational. You can very well say, "I wish farm animals had a certain level of comfort; it pisses me off that farming conditions are so poor, and I'd rather not eat meat, or even agree to eat less of it rather than meat raised in poor conditions; there are also environmental and hygiene arguments; blablabla"; saying that is highly rational. My thesis is that veganism, that is when you start to embrace the idea that life isn't worth living in a situation of interdependence with humans (many vegans for example if not most are against pets), becomes delusional and even masks bourgeois morality; that is it stems from mental structures that overshadow the importance of material conditions.

It's normal to want to kill enemies in a war. Now you don't necessarily want there to be a war; because well you don't necessarily want to kill other human beings, for people you love to be killed, or for yourself to be killed. We come back to my book on Lenin ; what is the nature of the process driving large-scale conflicts, brings belligerent ideologies to power; and this nature is economical You might tell me again that the USSR also had to be belligerent for geopolitical reasons. But it was Germany that put these lunatic extermination in power, and these people were able to seize power thanks to the support of big German business; because Nazism was more favorable to their interests than growing socialists. .

If Mario's best friend wants to put a bullet in my head for whatever reason there's nothing I can do, but he might end up in prison. This is completely detrimental from my point of view and that of the collective because he's taking my life; I was brought into the world and my existence was fostered to contribute to collective subjetcs which doesn't include cannibalis lol. The sine qua non condition for the existence of a farm pig is that it will in fine be killed to be eaten. A better question would be "If I were in a cannibal tribe, would I accept living to be killed say at 30 years old to be eaten, if my life is considered decent?"; and my answer would be ofc yes.

You base your opinion on a video of a rotten old farmhouse in the Balkans ? And again, what's the problem; t's a poor man's method but with a big blow from a sledgehammer the pig is unconscious. Being a sensitive little girl and letting herself insult others on a forum is indeed very intelligent. That's what I was saying to Emerald; your bias is negative because you only watch vegan propaganda. It's like me giving you a video of a guy getting his heart ripped out by a Mexican cartel to justify the need to atomize Mexico. If you want to form your own opinion go and do internships on a farm, in a slaughterhouse, practice hunting, or make yourself a chicken coop. Humans are not protected by "ethics"; that's an extremely idealistic framework. A person can't put a bullet in your head because Intra-species empathy is stronger, people don't practice cannibalism and because you're protected by a social contract so if you kill someone people in uniform with "police" written on them will come to your house to put you in prison; and that's annoying.

It's an extremely rapid death what's the problem

I'll reply to the @Lila9's post here at the same time. When I talk about powerlessness; I am not talking about motor and emotional strength, in which case girls are indeed as powerful as men if they are in good physical and mental health. There are women who are crushed, who keep their mouths shut and are beaten by their husbands, but of course that is an anomaly and it's agender; there are also men who are beaten/crushed by their wives or other men even if the other way is certainly more probable; and ofc to want to harm your girlfriend you must be a sociopath. What I'm simply saying is that women tend to be more obedient, to go with the flow; it's in their anatomy, in their appreciation of humor, in their way of loving. That doesn't mean women aren't creative or don't like discovering and sharing things; it's just a preference, an inclination. The heart of the genre is the relationship to the phallus that I described in my previous topic (I plan to make a larger and more refined V2 soon) What I mean by powerlessness is identification with limits, with negativity (not even in the perorative sense, but in the raw/mathematical sense of the term). Women start from the imaginary and descend back into reality, what Lacan would call the symbolic order, while men do the opposite; symbolism prevails. To illustrate imagine you want to buy a coffee table. If you say, "Okay, my current coffee table is already fine (the current coffee table), but the other one looks cool, so I'll work, go to IKEA, and buy it," you're simply shifting your attention to your current table before changing it and then shifting your attention to the new one once it's physically there. This way of approaching desire is masculinizing. However from the moment you shift your attention to the new table before you even have it (you ruminate on the fact that you should have a new table before you actually have it, you constantly look at the IKEA catalog (obsessive-compulsive disorder/Asperger's syndrome can lead to feminizing tendencies because of this pattern) etc.), then you're no longer in the realm of the symbolic but in the realm of the imaginary, which is feminizing. This is something you can experience for yourself. For 48 hours, try to inhibit negative beliefs when they arise; suspend this imaginary of what should be there but isn't (the phallus) and simply do what you want to do or should do; even when you're walking down the street ask yourself, "How does Sincerity like to move his member, because it's comfortable/fun?" You will: -Become sexually dominant, see much more; immediately eliminate all fetishes that go against this. -Become naturally more sociable, do more activities; strive to be a physical leader. -To be more physically powerful. -To stop wanting to listen to girly music (If the concept of self lacks lack, then you will no longer reason with this kind of music; the same goes for all the sad stuff or phonk music; it's ultimately more like music for submissive people from what i feel).

Femininity is lack/powerlessness. The female genitalia are literally a void to be filled; men are also taller and much more muscular. You speak of patriarchy but that's simply the basic social organization among most great apes; the great ape that Homo sapiens most closely resembles is the chimpanzee and it too is broadly a patriarchy. Men like submissive women; there are men who like the opposite but they tend to be less androgenic phenotypes. No, unless they're homosexual men don't like obeying other men. In the military men don't obey out of submission to a strongman; they do it because successfully obeying military orders makes them feel tough and effective.

Not being sociable enough and being too anxious

Obedience is not gendered. Men like to obey to feel that they are strong; women like to obey out of submission.

Everything