Schizophonia

You’ll gain value in the eyes of girls who like being homeless (yes that’s a thing I’ve actually seen one lol) but lose it with those who have a different survival strategy, who are in an opposed egregor. But you aren’t actually attractive if you’re lukewarm, try to please everyone more or less; you basically end up simping lol. So you might as well be polarizing.

It is difficult to understand the topic because the signified is hidden under ramblings. As I see it, it is easier to become neurotic in this day and age. Social media instills and perpetuates new ego-driven loops. Jobs and means of livelihood are less natural, and it is easier to become self-absorbed as a way to avoid radicality. The answer to alienation is radicality—anything powerful enough to wrest attention away from the objects with which the ego identifies and suffers. Sports, high-quality food, and art in general represent radicality.

You should like Guy Debord

What most strongly generates vibes of social dominance (and thus charisma) is authenticity. If one is prepared to be polarizing—because one is rejected by people with different survival strategies... Indeed, women's moods vary significantly depending on the time and their hormonal fluctuations. The other day I was talking to a colleague whose best friend decided on a whim to stop speaking to her, simply because she was frustrated with her romantic relationship. Lol women. takes a sip of beer

I meant there are notions of value that tend to recur like money or beauty but high value depends a lot on the girl and her persona. You might be boring to one woman and too intense for another and so on.

Thinking that the "logical and mature" guy is better is begging the question. It's a coping mechanism because you identify with that profile; instead of admitting that you're putting the wrong shape into the wrong hole, you tell yourself the toy is stupid anyway. And conversely since you’ve internalized the same values regarding women you once declared that your dick generally didn't go for the "good girls," but for the crazy ones. But it makes sense that you're drawn to crazy women; your persona is built for it. Who else but a crazy woman would have any use for a tedious guru with a bald spot and rolled-up shirt sleeves. The libidinal machine precedes value judgments.

High value according to her values *

Surrendering to your emotional reality is precisely what will make you masculine.The impression of stoicism comes precisely from being absorbed by one's emotional world. If it is in fact emotional crushing, it may superficially resemble masculinity from a certain point of view, but it is actually feminizing since the source is unconsciously castration anxiety. We can talk about neurodivergence, obsessive neurosis…

The women I feel most drawn to are those who are emotionally similar to me.

Humm burgerking

“I want the business plan that ask me the least amount of effort possible”

It doesn't seem viable; it's simpler and safer to start a simpler business. I know someone who started beekeeping for example. He bought or built a hive and plans to accumulate more to sell the honey and make a living.

That doesn’t contradict what I said

The “lack of empathy” is relative; for a Jain it's wrong even to crush a fly. I remember a guy here (maybe it was you? I can't remember) told me that hunting was bad. Personally I think I don't give a fu** and whoever says that is just a wimp. But what intellectual point is there in calling each other bad or conversely fragile? The closest thing to something objective with possible sociological value/use is the link between mental structures and social conditions; history in general.

Al Jazeera is an anti-western qatari agent of influence

The British Empire came about because it was in the interest of enough people. Including among the colonized populations: the United Kingdom brought technology, infrastructure, and peace or unity. The unification of India, for example, was made possible by the British.

Individuality is an illusion; individuals are the instruments of collective subjects and of history in general. The British Empire came about as the automatic, logical result of material conditions and by extension of the mental structures those conditions engender in people. You view it as ""bad"" because your mental structures and thus your superego are the product of modern living conditions within your social position; it therefore has nothing to do with the British Empire. The dichotomies of good vs evil, selfish vs altruistic etc are delusional, childish, and narcisstistic because it's always lowkey about placing oneself above another. It can manifest via affirmer domination/sadism (generally the right-wing perspective; the nationalism by exemple) or conversely via a masochistic/guilt inducing stance (generally the left-wing perspective); yet in both cases the underlying aim is to signal one's superiority over others.

No otherwise a lot of people if not most would be expert in thos fields lol Those are differents things. If you don't stress anough you die Stress is bad if it's abnormally high relative to metabolic needs as in the case of Cushing's disease or chronic psychological stress. In the case of ejaculation it works by slowing down your reward/motivation system just like neuroleptic so it's bad. Going out is a form of productivity. What I mean is that it boosts your energy; if someone wants to break free from depression or learned helplessness they can use this as a lever. People with favorable neurology will act smug, telling themselves they "have discipline," but in reality outside any abstraction what determines in fine whether someone improves their life or conversely lets themselves wither away on the couch is the state of their neurology.

Tony huge has lost his closest friends, he is also on an twisted frequency; Is he next on the list

A "culture" he actually doesn't like

Maybe it wouldn't be "perfect" but it doesn't matter Because i'm lazy; i'm used to be single and don't have that much pressure to find a girlfriend. I talk to a great girl these days, i also have access to several girls i could flirt with eventually; we will see. Yes but here's the thing you place sex in the center of your life I want children asap; if tommorow i get a girlfriend who wants children and i have enough money i would impregnate her with pleasure. Ok I find it cool to have sex but still insignifiant relatively to wearing my child in my arms, or the others goals i enumerated (sports career, gardening, ride a motorcycle, fishing/hunting, brewing my own beer or wine rice lol etcetc; anything).

Highly qualified women are not particularly beautiful; there is no correlation. And people are more complex than such a divide; you find a bit of everything everywhere.

There are also more ugly women in big cities but you don't see it because you have a cognitive bias in favor of pretty girls. In facts there are just more people in general. It’s like competence: there are more competent people in big cities but also more destitute degenerates, drug addicts, and so on; it's both ways. I am currently in a town of 30,000 inhabitants including the outskirts and I constantly see pretty nice girls. But you will always find young people at work, in leisure activities, or possibly on dating sites. I don't know why you're being so ruthless lol for me it's closer to 20 or even 30%; that’s just my take but to me if you’re too rigid you finally end up infertile; my goal is simply to find someone nice to share my life with and have children. My main disappointment with some people who claim to be spiritual and consume loads of psychedelics is that ultimately most of the time they turn out to be "Orange-stage" degenerates. They talk about love but don't build a family or even sports/hobbies careers, they talk about masculinity while being normal if not cowards in real life... There are sus things I don't like about this egregore. I should start a YouTube channel where I talk about hunting, fishing, sports, beer, etc lol Well there are young "Chads" in small towns too. Once again the only real difference aside from cognitive biases is the number or concentration of people. And above all what I’m saying is that for me it’s not worth choosing a city for the sake of women especially if it comes at the expense of your own preferences and the general implications of settling in that city. Yes and so there are 50 other guys "competing" eheh That's true; I have a rather conservative/reserved attitude towards women. It's my pov

That's nonsense even in a small town of 10,000 inhabitants there are hundreds to thousands of women between let's say 18 and 35; inevitably there are tons if not most of them that will appeal to you. From my point of view it's not a significant criterion unless you're really looking to be a pickup artist or something like that idk.

Their passions, what they do regularly