Osaid

I'm not claiming to know the chemistry. I'm saying if the toxin is omitted then there's no problem. You don't need to know the chemistry of the substance to solve the problem or narrow down what's problematic.

It's toxic because it's taking the place of what isn't toxic. If you know for a fact that air high in oxygen is good for energy, then it's as simple as removing anything foreign to oxygen, like carcinogens or other particles. Anything foreign would impede the normal energy conversion process. In this way you don't need to know the specific science and behaviour of each and every substance. It's a more fundamental way of looking at it.

That's the same thing though. It's toxic because the body can't convert it into anything positive, but the body can definitely convert oxygen. Therefore anything which impedes oxygen or energy conversion will be perceived as toxic. I'm just saying that focusing on the oxygen is more fundamental and important than honing in on every little strange chemical or substance. It's not a mystery why filling a room with a foreign substance lowers overall energy, it's because what is essential for energy has simply been lowered. You have to look at how it's interacting with the body as a whole rather than blaming one substance. A substance does nothing until it interacts with the body, then you study that interaction.

I don't believe any of that. BTW, something very simple might be being overlooked. It's not something bad in the air per say, it's just the amount of oxygen. Less oxygen is less conducive to energy production, and more oxygen is more conducive. The proof of this is simply opening a window in a stagnant room and feeling the difference breathing in the "fresh air". As an anecdote, when I'm cleaning a bathroom using a detergent spray or whatever, there is a noticeable energy difference and maybe even headaches. It's because the spray is simply taking over the oxygen ratio. It immediately fixes just by going outside to breathe.

Because you've defined yourself as separate from the chair. Without you there's no chair, as @gettoefl said. Emotion is very obviously not separate, though. You will never find it because it's already wherever you are.

You can't find it because it's what you are

Yep. Peas in a pod. ❤️

"Other POV" begs the question, other than what? Neither is found because both are the same quality.

Lol. The first time I cut my own hair it was better than what any barber gave me. We all have to go no contact with our barbers. I guess there's a difference between haircuts and hairstyles. Haircuts are really easy and you should do it at home. But if you're looking for a hairstyle like a buzz cut or something then go to a barber I guess. Barbers ironically don't do a very good job at simple haircuts cause they always wanna use some fancy technique or product or something.

I get what you're saying. But a proper therapy session wouldn't really involve this stuff, it would be a series of questions about what you believe which is completely open-ended. Not to mention the different types of therapy. You're talking about online videos specifically. IMO the best of Dr.K is his hour long chats that he does with streamers, not really the short videos. That's actually what the OP was referring to as well. Maybe a distinction needs to be made between therapy and psychology/mental health videos in specific. There's definitely a lot of wacky mental health videos and lingo flying around but I wouldn't equate that with someone deciding to go to therapy.

https://www.actualized.org/insights/profound-quotes-090 Someone vandalized the quote

No one is. No separation. Sameness. No one can own or have sameness. The very notion is self-defeating. Too funny.

Neither. It's a false premise, so it has no answer. You can debate and cite studies about what color Santa's hat is, but there isn't Santa or the hat. It's not common knowledge that women are pickier at dating and that men only pursue this or that, yadda yadda. These are your own beliefs which you've injected into the OP and then assumed that everyone believes it too.

But you're engaging in the topic right now. Furthermore, you haven't directly said anything about the topic, and yet continuously slander it. Who's grifting, again?

Front of who?? Me in front of me?