Making The Podcast Rounds -- Need Your Suggestions

[Himanshu]

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvW2U2-szAK2lBzUYOw0DwA

An interview with@Emerald / The Diamond Net would be great!

Both of you are pursuing enlightenment and sharing wisdom from opposing sides of the Masculine-Feminine polarity. 

The meeting point would be illuminating. 

[BipolarGrowth]

Aaron Abke

Frank Yang

Joe Rogan

 

[Grateful Dead]

Duncan Trussell Family Hour (Not on Youtube)

Aaron Abke

Your Mate Tom

The Stoa

[Enlightenment]

Bernardo Kastrup

Joe Rogan

Martin Ball

Sam Harris (probably too close minded for you but I would still love to see that conversation)

Daniel Ingram

[CultivateLove]

Been waiting for this moment for YEARS! 

[Girzo]

I saw the title and wanted to say go to Charlie, haha. Turns out he is the first you choose, hah.

[Phyllis Wagner]

Man I said this as a Joke in the other thread, but it would be really cool to see you have conversation with Bashar.

Others:

- Aaron Abke

- Rupert Spira

- Buddha at the Gas Pump

Edited April 27, 2021 by Phyllis Wagner

[Nightwise]

1 hour ago, XYZ said:

Quote

- BuddhaAtTheGasPump

Second This.

Oh totally

[Nightwise]

1 hour ago, mmKay said:

"Owen Cook"

Oh that would be super interesting. I know Leo has some years of experience with doing Pick-up so there's almost no way he doesn't know RSD and Owen.

I know Leo has critiques again the mainstream PUA community, but Owen himself has also evolved a lot over the years and has actually steered away from Pick-up for the most part, but what he does still teach about pick-up is usually a whole lot more holistic and compassion-based, with an emphasis on win-win situations.

Later edit: actually looking at Owen's video's again it does indeed seem like he's talking about game and pick-up a whole lot more now again, but I don't think that's a bad thing. I don't have a critique against Pick-up itself I just have a critique of people who do it out of pure selfishness with some kind of win-lose attitude (but even this could be a necessary stage to go though to evolve, so I don't even judge it too much)

Edited April 27, 2021 by Nightwise

[bazera]

I would love to see your conversation with Lex Fridman

[Shin]

6 minutes ago, Michael569 said:

I love that you're willing to do this! COC is such an awesome channel. 

Would love to watch face to face with Jordan Peterson or Sam Harris  

Read the op, this isn't gonna happen ?

[martins name]

Russel Brand, his audience doesn't overlap too much with the idw folks. Would be great reach.

Also the Weinstein brothers.

Someone needs to straighten out JPs believes, you are perfect for his audience too.

You could also create your own podcasts with authors like Ken Wilber, SantataGamana, Om Swami, what have you. Call it Cutting Edge Conversations. 

[tatsumaru]

Great news! Good luck.
My suggestions:
- The Portal with Eric Weinstein
- Hotboxin’ with Mike Tyson

Also please consider doing certain podcasts which are lower on the spiral dynamics model just to help the lower tiers move up a notch as well.
Thank you for your efforts.

[BipolarGrowth]

5 minutes ago, martins name said:

Russel Brand, his audience doesn't overlap too much with the idw folks. Would be great reach.

Also the Weinstein brothers.

Someone needs to straighten out JPs believes, you are perfect for his audience too.

You could also create your own podcasts with authors like Ken Wilber, SantataGamana, Om Swami, what have you. Call it Cutting Edge Conversations. 

Russell Brand would be great. 

[SolarWarden]

BuddhaAtTheGaspump.

Aaron Abke.

Timothy Feriss.

You could help Tim to make a book about Enlightment by the principles of 80/20 Principle, Minimum Effective Dose and "Everything popular is wrong.”  

 

Edited April 27, 2021 by SolarWarden

[Brivido]

Tim Ferris, he has a massive audience and seems to be way more serious than Joe Rogan about the usage of psychedelics.

Alex Grey & Allyson Grey.

I would love to see a talk of yours with Ken Wilber, even though he doesn't have a podcast per se.  

[Eren Eeager]

17 minutes ago, BipolarGrowth said:

Russell Brand would be great. 

+1

[Waves]

Love it!

I'm sure that you and Aubrey Marcus would have a Tier 2 mind-blowing conversation

[Space]

41 minutes ago, bazera said:

I would love to see your conversation with Lex Fridman

I also had this thought. I do believe Lex to be quite openminded. I don't think i've ever seen him dogmatically defend a particular position. He's always quite curious and open to others perspective. However, he is certainly leaning on the side of atheistic materialism. I don't quite know how openminded he will be when it starts going all metaphysical. 

Most of my other ideas have already been mentioned in the thread I think.

Rebel Wisdom - Certainly a higher/integral level channel. Would be interesting to see you and them take it to the next level into more metaphysical topics.

Daniel Ingram - He's doing copious talks and podcasts at the moment. He's very openminded about psychedelics and not dogmatic towards the meditative path. I think a discussion on the overlap between psychedelics and meditation with him would be very interesting and productive.

Aaron Abke - Doesn't really need much explanation as to why it would be a good discussion.

Can't think of any more at the moment.

[Leo Gura]

I would talk to JP or Sam Harris or the Weinstein's -- the problem is I very much doubt they would be open to it. And I don't know how far the conversations could go. We would get hung up very quickly.

My conversation with Charlie was smooth and we went deep. But that's only because he's got the right kind of mind for this work, which is rare. People like JP, Sam Harris, Weinstein's, etc tend to have a lot of personal agenda clouding their minds. Which makes going deep rather hard. I'd be curious just to see how far it would go. There would be a lot of defense mechanisms triggered very quickly because they have a certain worldview to defend on behalf of their loyal audiences. Then it becomes more like a debate, which isn't good.

What's needed is hosts who don't have a worldview that they are defending/promoting -- because of course their worldview cannot be ultimately true. Because all worldviews are biased and partial.