Girzo

They are mostly not Green to begin with. A lot of Purple/Red magical thinking and thirst for power in some New Age populations. It's your misuse of the model that causes this problem. I am not saying SD is perfect, but this is a weak argument against it.

Reliability is not an issue when parts cost $50. Old Citroen user here, you put $1000 into maintenance and repairs every 3 years and it rides well.

But AI tags it, and can give you any output, so you can integrate its output on your own terms. Everything on a computer is coding, you can even script mouse movements and keystrokes so the process goes quicker. You can do it however you want, and I won't believe the task can be anyhow done faster without AI than with it. Even if you want to tag everything by hand, you have to somehow then add that data to posts, and you can script that process = coding. There's always coding.

@Leo Gura Yeah, it's images, not text. They are text-machines, LLMs, and ChatGPT is the worst thing ever, Claude does this type of job flawlessly with academic rigour.

No way anyone tagging it by hand would be faster than AI. There's so many posts to swift through. It excels at such jobs. I think an average human would be the one to make mistakes and omissions, as they would get bored and stopped tagging posts diligently halfway through, but AI won't get bored.

The type of issue AI is designed for, would be very easy for it to tag all the posts in one afternoon, create an excel table with all the data, and then you would just have to somehow import it to database and add them to UI, can't say how, because who know how the blog posts are designed on the backend.

When there were upvotes, there were always some "stage Coral" megaminds bragging about their upvote per post ratio.

Regardless of this case, Jared Leto is 100% guilty of cringe by being a cringy cult leader. That he innocent is, one can say not.

Hahaha, hahaha. Aaahh... You have never been teaching anyone, have you? As a math teacher, I can guarantee you, you way overestimate thinking capabilities of someone around 80. The more abstract the topic is, the harder it gets to teach such person. But at this level people struggle with even using a calculator. They struggle to create a strategy to solve basic arithmetics with a help of the calculator. Not to mention algebra. Such people struggle even with everyday tasks like putting together an IKEA wardrobe with instructions. Not to mention "advanced scientific shit" like calculating the number of cans of paint they need to buy to paint a wall -- impossible challange. I have also once naively believed it's only a matter of effort and time, a need for a quality teacher. But, being a personal tutor for below average-individuals who have parents with deep pockets, when I was putting in all my effort, I am no longer allowed to hold that illusion.

Because the outcome is not the same. That you say it is, doesn't mean it is.

It's precisely not. It's a coping mechanism to deal with the lack of evolution and intelligence.

All this AI stuff just shows how over-dignified programmers are in today's economy, if most of them up to this moment have been doing stuff that can be done by a mindless machine. What do you get the money for? Almost as bad as MDs.

My man, I am not a native English speaker, but, uh... Insufficient examples means exactly there are no examples in its training data. And it struggles a lot because it can't think, it defaults to repeating patterns reinforced during the learning phase. That you put it into its context, you need some special curated version of the rules, while a human can read the documentation version every other human reads and process it, learn it. Then if you get for example Fable and give it those snippets, it WON'T perform at the level it does in other languages. Because it doesn't have that many solved examples of problems to pattern-match. There's no thinking. Even if you do social science, it can't come up with a good idea every paragraph when writing long-form texts, because it doesn't think. It can give a good idea if you ask it for ideas, then you have to trim 6 or 7 bad ones using your own intelligence. The only time it produces a good essay Is when I basically create the whole outline and then put the insights, all the important info into the paragraphs, and just ask the AI to process it into a fully finished, flowing prose. But still, I am the one doing the thinking, AI is like a stupid assistant who happens to know English and various formatting standards (or coding languages) really well, who can organise your thoughts. If you give it too much of its own agency it defaults to boring, useless slop, the longer it processes something.

It's also dependent on the lifestyle, I think. If one were to party all the time and spend time around pretty girls, they would be hornier than just sitting at home. It's hard to get horny reading Ralston's books, way easier when you are out. So it's a kind of self-perpetuating pattern of behaviour, I feel.

@PenguinPablo If you have a very high intelligence and talent to begin with, then maybe. I also know two bipolar people and both are very foolish and hard to deal with during an episode. Not genius at all, normal people, who suffer the condition and need to medicate it.