OBEler

But didnt you have the realization that god has a limitation in creation, god aims always for maximizing love?

@Cubbage can you recommend some places in Japan where you went to heal yourself from these?

By the way the docu moment of contact is free now on YouTube :

These black triangles ufos hovering in silence is a real phenomenon. I read countless reports, its definitely real. It's huge total black triangle, with lingts on every edge. Around 100 m long. Hovering in one position for some second and then vanishes completely in silence. Do you have some more Infos about them. It's the only Ufo which makes me believe in alien technology.

@Leo Gura I hate that there is no ultimate knowing. That's how reality supposed to be. Going back to ufo topic: I want to know what these black triangles are which are appearing in silence and disappear very fast. It hurts to probably never know what these are. It's obvious that here is some new technology in place. If these are from USA, why do they appear in Japan too? Alien spacecraft makes more sense. No massive vehicle can stand still in total silence in the air and disappear in seconds.

But your Infinity of Gods awakening itself seems to leave open the possibility of other sovereign perspectives. You may only ever experience them within your own Infinite Mind, but that still doesn’t tell you whether they have an existence you can never access.

But Bashar doesn’t necessarily require consciousnesses outside God. His model could be that there is only one fundamental Consciousness expressing itself as many genuine perspectives within itself. So realizing that nothing exists outside God does not necessarily prove that only one perspective is real.

@Leo Gura Just because everything appears within your consciousness does not prove that only your consciousness exists. Your conclusion is an assumption but Bashar’s claims about other consciousnesses and conscious agreements are assumptions too.

@Leo Gura Do you agree with bashars overall worldview? chatgpt:"Bashar does not say that only one individual consciousness exists. Instead, he says that each conscious being experiences its own version of reality, including its own version of other people. So if you meet another person, you are not directly experiencing that person’s private reality. You are experiencing a version of them within your own reality. At the same time, that person is experiencing their own version of you within theirs. The important part is the idea of conscious agreement. According to Bashar, these individual realities are not created in total isolation. Different consciousnesses agree, at a deeper level, to participate in compatible experiences. This agreement allows your reality and another person’s reality to line up closely enough that you can appear to interact in a shared world. So the model is something like this: you and the other person are both real consciousnesses, but each of you experiences a personal reality. The apparent shared world exists because your consciousnesses are connected through deeper agreements about what kind of interaction and circumstances you will experience together. In that sense, Bashar’s view is: many real consciousnesses, each creating their own experienced reality, coordinated through deeper conscious agreements. So it is not “only I exist.” It is more like “I only ever experience my own version of reality, but other consciousnesses genuinely exist and our experiences are synchronized through conscious agreement.” In Bashar’s model, you never literally become the whole underlying Consciousness in the sense that your individual perspective replaces or absorbs every other perspective. Rather, your individual consciousness can become aware that its deeper nature is the same underlying Consciousness that also expresses itself through everyone else. So the shift would be: Before: “I am this individual person, separate from everyone else.” After: “At the deepest level, I am the same fundamental Consciousness appearing as this person — and also as every other conscious being.” But the individual perspectives do not therefore disappear. You could think of it as one light shining through many windows. If one window somehow realizes, “I am actually the light,” the other windows do not vanish. They are still other expressions of that same light. So in this model, awakening to the underlying Consciousness is not: “Now only my perspective exists.” It is closer to: “The distinction between ‘my consciousness’ and the consciousness underlying everyone else was never absolute.” And even after that realization, the many perspectives can continue to exist. That is the key distinction between oneness and solipsism. Oneness says: many perspectives, one underlying source. Solipsism says: only one actual perspective exists.

Best opener: Hey, whats your name?

What do you think about her? Shirley Jean Wright was a scientist and college professor, specializing in chemistry and physical science. She later taught chemistry at Miami-Dade College in Florida. She was not Einstein’s secretary. She claimed to have been a student of Albert Einstein in Princeton. Why should she lie`?

I followed numerous body language specialists on youtube and they all came to the same conclusion that what he said, he believed in it. He was not a liar.

@Jacob Morres Good point. Like china you can always find the most underdeveloped people doing crazy stuff. And of course that gets viral.

What do you think which from these siddhis are probably real? Do you have siddhis?

What about levitation, do you think its possible that some yogis can levitate? Or is this just a feeling they have (like out of body experience)