@Xonas Pitfall I think you're making this way too complicated. First off, the idea that attraction has changed throughout history is nonsense. It's not even reasonable to compare how mating worked 100 years ago with how it works now.
Now is actually the best time to analyze female psychology and how women select mates, simply because this is the first time ever in human history where dating is a market, where men and women are basically shopping around. The qualities and traits that women find attractive are the same, regardless of culture or the time we're living in.
We've kind of moved from socialism to capitalism in dating. In the 1950s, it was much more regulated, with stronger social norms and family involvement limiting people's choices. Today, dating is far more open and market-driven. In many ways, the 1950s were more comparable to how dating works in countries like India or Pakistan today.
It's only been in the last 40 years or so that men have started to discover what truly attracts women.
Postmodernist and pluralistic views aren't going to work when it comes to mating, simply because it's so essential to our survival. I'm not saying there's no value in those perspectives, but if we want to solve the current dating challenges we men are facing, pragmatism is absolutely necessary.
 

In the context of this thread, men are the providers, which is why women are judged on their beauty and not on their ability to provide.
No man rejects a woman because she can't provide materially.
Women are not called to be "providers", men are. If a man fails to do it, "something is wrong with him". If a woman fails to do it, nothing is wrong with her.
Let's not act like this standard doesn't exist.
This explains why women date up. It screens out those who can't provide. It is easier to provide when one is near the social top. That's why women are attracted to men near the top.

Men can also be attractive on their own merits.
But, since women need men for survival, they want a man who is better at survival, and survival for humans usually involves higher social standing.
Men don't depend on women for survival aa much (excluding reproduction).
So yeah, it is asymmetrical.

LOL.
It DOES if you have a pussy. 
A pussy cannot afford to not care about social standards. Social standards are life and death, not a silly game.

And men get horny for a vacuum cleaner. So what?
All else being equal woman will choose the high status guy if she can get him. Women LOVE to chase guys with status.

We are never talking about ALL women in such discussions. We are talking about a bell curve. We seek to understand the curve.

Any hot girl gets lots of male attention unless she lives in a basement.
Pure physical appearance.

What?
Of course it is genuine.
I have gotten girlfriends from my fame alone. In fact, those girlfriends are better than random club girls.
When you have fame, not only do you get more sex, you attract higher quality girls who really appreciate you because they understand your full value.
Nothing is as effective at getting girls than fame. I barely have fame and it still works. Not that I use it much.
When you have fame, girls will just throw themselves at you. Girls will bend over backwards to be with you.

If a girl is hot to me, she is hot to basically everyone.
That's called having good taste.
Being hot is not as subjective as people want to believe. Everyone sees the hottest girl in the room. Don't kid yourself.

Does not matter. They are all hot.
I don't know. I have not been with many hot girls. And some I ruined by lack of experience and skill.
No.
You guys are being too nuanced for your own good, which ends in misleading false equivalencies.
We all understand who the model in the room is. Don't act naive. Hot people are objectively good-looking. That's what models and actors are.
I can walk into any room and point out to you the objectively hottest 5 people in that room. And those people themselves will know it because they know how much attention they get for doing zero.
You can objectively measure this just by counting how many unsolicited sexual offers they get.
A hot girl is getting swarmed with dicks.
I've had a hot girl complain to me about how spammed she gets by guys at the club. It is exhausting. She is rejecting 30 guys a night.

The "art" that Hollywood makes these days is so poor that I get more enjoyment from watching criticism of it than I do from watching the art.
We have entered full late-stage capitalist post-modernity, where the reviews are more interesting than the art

There is too much Hollywood trash these days not to consider reviews.
I am not saying I know it is bad. I am saying the evidence points to it being not so good.

Nosejob is only worth it if you have an especially big or problematic nose. Not a regular nose.
Girls don't care about this as much as fools like Clav think.
You will get way more results from learning game than looksmaxxing. Pickup is way healtheir than looksmaxxing. Even caring about your looks is already terrible inner game.

I don't doubt he believes his own BS.
That's hard to quantify. I don't have a number for you.
Depends on the costs.
Minor stuff is worth it like hair transplant.

Prostitutes are low consciousness people and hang around other low consciousness people. So they can scam you, drug you, and worse. You are engaging in business with criminals, which is always dicey.

Well, every atom is pulling on every other atoms in the universe so of course all causality is grossly simplified down. However, the simplification does work. You understand that if you step on a dog that you caused it pain, not some random atom on the other side of the universe.

The absurdity of this is that Clav has exceptional genetics. You will never look as good as he naturally looks with him doing zero lookmaxxing.
His looksmaxxing is NOT what makes him look good.
It would be like if I was born with a footlong dick and made a channel about how to grow your dick with dickmaxxing. But that's not how I got my dick.
Clav is lucky to have great genetics and his looksmaxxing is just performative online antics for purposes of clickbait. I promise you his looksmaxxing got him zero extra sex. Other than through the fame of his channel. No girl is sleeping with Clav because he looksmaxxed himself. This idea is laughable.

Age is a terrible way to measure attractiveness.
George Clooney is still attractive at 65.
Some people age much worse than others.
40s is no problem if you got other things going for you.
Girls will date way older as long as the guy has value.

It's not all you need to know, but it's a solid skeleton.
Look for quality paid pickup courses. This is not an area to be cheap. You want the best training. Your time is worth more than a few hundred bucks.
Buy a few pickup courses, study, and apply.

I had that and it got me no girls.
You can't get girls if you don't learn to socialize. Pickup is just the skill of socializing.
Many guys get rich only to realize they still can't get girls because they sacrificed social skills for success.
Girls don't sleep with the rich guy, they sleep with the fun social guy.
Good looks are great, but if you don't have them you still need a way of getting girls.

What you are afraid of is selflessness. Death is selflessness. Love is selflessness.
Love is challenging because it has no I.

She wasn't even dark tetrad or close. She just has lots of trauma and abusive past.
She couldn't control her emotions but she was a sweet caring person underneath that.
Dark tetrad will fuck you up.
How can the rampaging elephant in the room be ignored?

Enlightenment is simply independent of development.
A chimpanzee could have an enlightenment.
Awakening and development simply need to be treated as independent variables, orthogonal axes.

Because every developed nation needs them for slave labor, but they don't like the cultural and ethnic changes this brings.
Americans want it both ways: They want the cheap labor of Mexicans, but not their culture, skin color, and language.
It is like hiring an immigrant lawnmower because you are too lazy to mow your own lawn, but also hating him at the same time because he isn't your kind.

Bryan's aim is not to live longer, it's to create the feeling of being significant.
He's not doing this for health, he's doing it for significance. The ego wants to feel significant.