The problem is he's turned health into an ego-trip and a marketing circus.
True health is the opposite of gimmickry.
Beware of these social media marketer types. They are building brands, not health.

Approach Anxiety.
You must drop thinking, you must relax your body, and you must build state by having fun.
Stop all thinking when you are out. Your overthinking creates the anxiety.

I think relationships are generally very good for your development as a human. They're going to force you to grow and mature.
But it's worth making some distinctions between human development and awakening. Awakening is really trans-human. So there's overlap, but also distinctions.
Personally, I've let go of the idea of needing my partner to be interested in hardcore consciousness. I think it's an unfair expectation and puts you in the bind of looking for a unicorn. 
Really want I need from her is just basic maturity and to be a good mother. As long as she supports me taking time for consciousness work, that's enough. She doesn't need to be Peter Ralston.
Consider that dating a woman who is interested in hardcore consciousness will inevitably come with serious downsides. 

Incels are missing one very important thing:
Leave your man-cave and go talk to girls.
Everything else is bullshit and will not get you laid.

I’ve been thinking about making this post for a while. I just want to alert you guys to the fact that looks are important for dating. Pickup is nice and all and does help, but our looks matter more realistically. If a very attractive guy does pickup, he will have WAY better results than an average person, let alone someone below average. 
Let me clarify that I’m not one of the ideological “blackpilled” looksmaxxing people who have been circulating lately. But I have looked into the looksmaxxing space to extract the juice and leave behind all the resentment, ideology, and noise.
Why are looks important? Simply put, we evaluate people’s attractiveness almost instantly, as a biologically ingrained mechanism. We essentially have a perfect looks-rating device that we use unconsciously, though we ironically can’t give accurate ratings (people are rated 7/10 on average, which is stupid). Looks are an indicator of genetic quality and there are good survival reasons for why we value them. 

Doing the whole Owen Cook pickup thing is ineffective if you look bad. Even granted that it helps you get better with women (and I don’t really care to debate how much it does), it’s silly not to be optimizing the other factor that makes you have success with women— looks.
Now I’ll evaluate Leo’s looks profile. This is just an honest assessment and not a personal attack.

Leo is 6’2. This is a huge advantage in attractiveness, as height is a big factor in addition to facial harmony. The average male height is 5’9, so Leo towers over the average male by 5 inches. Think about this in a club environment—Leo is able to see above other people and actively heightmogs the vast majority of people. 6’2-6’3 is also often considered the ideal height, as beyond that there are diminishing returns and a degree of “freak effect.”
Next, Leo is not attractive but not unattractive either facially. I’d estimate he’s probably slightly above average. But what’s interesting is how he has unknowingly looksmaxxed subtly, which is ironic given the emphasis on pickup. The biggest looksmax by far is having a low body fat percentage, which makes your facial structure more visible. Fat is bad for looks, and the ideal range is considered to be 8-12 percent body fat (depending on your specific genetics). Leo is quite lean, far more so than the average person. Additionally, Leo’s facial hair covers a likely suboptimal lower third (chin and jaw area), which is another effective looksmax.
So what if Leo was 5’9, overweight, and had no facial hair? Would the results be the same?
My point stands. 
The practical upshot of this is that improving your looks is helpful and worth doing. There is a lot of research into this subject you can do, and you have a choice how far to go, from softmaxxes (non-invasive things like hairstyle, clothing, skincare) all the way to hardmaxxes (surgeries). Obviously be safe and don’t buy into the incel ideology BS.

Objections:
Looksmaxxing isn’t spiritual. True, but getting laid isn’t spiritual in general; it is survival. If you’re doing survival, might as well do it effectively
Why change your face? That’s so insecure/feminine/low-consciousness. Look, being attached to how your face looks is classic ego. The stigma against rhinoplasties is a part of this. If someone wants to improve their nose based on objective considerations and they are well-informed, surgery is awesome. There’s also a certain beauty to aesthetics for their own sake.
By looksmaxxing, you are mainly just doing a survival activity, but since you’re focused on the actual truth of attraction, it is a microdose of spiritual embodiment— as it’s closer to truth than “coping”. Spirituality is just seeing the Truth.
 


 

Bro, having a crush is already wrong.
Learn proper game please. You ain't above it.

Psychedelics are underrated. No one understands how powerful psychedelics are.

Understanding women does not require turning gay.
You are still focused on keeping them, using them, rather than understanding. That is very limited.
You have some weird resistance to seeing women for themselves, not for you.
You are seeing them FOR YOU. You are like a wolf who only sees rabbits as food. But rabbits are not food for themselves.

You're not going wrong per se. You just lack state of consciousness. So then the work becomes about just raising your state of consciousness through hardcore practice.
What gurus don't explain well enough is just how hardcore the practice needs to be for state of consciousness to change significantly.
Your practice is too weak, too distracted.

Well, if you take a psychedelic and contemplate your field, you will see how little you really know about it.

Living on purpose is much harder than not. That's why so few do it.
But it is more fulfulling.

You don't even know how little you understand women without psychedelics.
Your perspective is too self-centered.

The 5 Love Langauges

She will feel whatever you feel.
Quality over quantity. 1 great approach is worth 10 crappy ones.
Speak slower. You are speaking too fast.

Rather than trying "pick up girls", just sit next to girls you like and start talking normal with them. Ask them some shit like why they are taking that class and what her dreams are.
Don't try to use pickup lines on them. Just be curious about them, ask questions, and grab a number at the end.

I hate social circle.

Technology Strategy Consulting 
You'd be surprised to see me in person with a suit and in working mode

Yes you can, I do that.
In my work breaks, I watch through the window and contemplate the imaginary nature of Reality and its raw beauty. I love watching the leaves moving and the trees breathing.
If anything I've learnt in life is that human development and Awakening are the best combo. If you put all your points there, it gives the greatest returns and synergies. 

The modern psychiatry business is one of the worst crimes done against humanity

But what if that were the truth?
That some truths are unfindable because you're a human and not an alien or a spider or a fifth dimensional being or who knows what.
Contemplate you'll never know how it feels like to be a woman, have breasts, pussy, the period, being pregnant, giving birth, giving milk to your child... You'll absolutely never know the inner truths of that, unless maybe you die from this form and somehow be in another form with other limitations.

@theleelajoker Prove me that everyone can reach the States of Consciousness I'm talking about.
I just don't buy it, I've seen people doing everything right and they haven't reached. I've seen people just getting there by virtue of being born. It's simply denial to not see this truth.
All the teachers and mystics you follow are extremely gifted, that's the reason why so few of their students reach even close to their spiritual heights. If what you say where to be true, then everyone would reach and we know this is not the case. You've been sold a fantasy and in case you're a genetic freak, which could probably be, then you seriously seriously underestimate how much you owe to the starting position you were given.

(AI transcribed post from an audio contemplation)
 
There is a truth about spiritual development that very few are willing to articulate plainly.
 
Many people enter the spiritual path with an implicit assumption: that if they do everything correctly — meditate diligently, attend long retreats, practice yoga rigorously, explore psychedelics responsibly, dedicate years to contemplation and inquiry, become a full time monk — they will eventually reach the highest states of consciousness. They assume the path is meritocratic and universally attainable at its summit.
 
But after years of observation and dialogue with serious practitioners, a difficult conclusion emerges:
 
It is extraordinarily rare to reach the highest states of consciousness — whether as stable baseline realizations or as insane peak states — unless one possesses exceptional, perhaps extreme, innate endowment.
 
In blunt terms: unless one is, in that domain, a genetic outlier.
 
The Spiritual Domain Is Not Exempt
 
We accept biological inequality in nearly every other domain without protest.
 
Consider athletics.
 
No matter how disciplined you are, no matter how optimized your training, nutrition, recovery, or psychology, you will not outrun Usain Bolt. The gap is not merely effort-based; it is structural. It is encoded in muscle fiber composition, tendon elasticity, neural firing rates, biomechanics — variables largely determined before conscious striving begins.
 
The same applies in mathematics, music, physics, or art. When one studies the true geniuses — those who revolutionize a field — one finds not merely diligence but profound structural asymmetry: cognitive architecture, perceptual sensitivity, creative intuition, memory bandwidth, abstraction capacity...
 
Why, then, should spirituality and mysticism be exempt?
 
 
---
 
The Myth of Equal Attainability
 
Many practitioners believe they can reach the level of Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, or Muhammad if only they practice hard and intelligently enough.
 
But consider what is being claimed.
 
To reach (definition of terms excluded):
 
Serious baseline Awareness 
 
Peak Awakenings into a facet of Awakening 
 
Peak Awakenings into many facets and in conjunction
 
Holistic Awakenings across all facets.
 
Infinity Consciousness 
 
Realization of infinities for Infinity
 
Breakthrough into God-consciousness and God-Mode
 
And from there, further God Facet and Infinity Awakenings 
 
Even a single authentic awakening of those is already a huge blessing.
A few partial awakenings on limited facets are already extremely rare.
Totalized realization across all axes? That is vanishingly rare. Imagine to realise Infinity and God...
 
And yet many assume it is simply a matter of human mechanical effort.
 
 
---
 
The Uncomfortable Implication
 
This conclusion is discouraging.
 
It suggests that many sincere practitioners — even those dedicating thousands of hours to meditation, retreats, yoga, inquiry, psychedelics — may never reach the highest conceivable states in comparison with other gifted individuals.
 
Not because they failed.
 
But because the organism/manifestation has limits.
 
Genetic limits. Neurological limits. Structural limits.
 
The same way no amount of training will turn a very good runner into an Olympic record holder, the gap is quantum, no amount of practice may turn an average nervous system into a vehicle for absolute consciousness, an avatar.
 
Let me ground this in something concrete.
Recently, I spoke with someone who, by any reasonable metric, could be called a spiritual prodigy — what I've been calling a “genetic freak.” He described having solipsistic awakenings at the age of two. At two! Before doctrine. Before philosophy. Before influence. Before language was fully formed.
Throughout childhood and adolescence, he did not need to be introduced to spirituality. He did not “discover” it. He was already living it. He would wake up in the middle of the night to meditate. To pray. To contemplate God. Not because a teacher instructed him. Not because a book inspired him. Not because a forum persuaded him.
Because it was intrinsic.
That difference matters.
 
The Metric of Origin
One of the simplest diagnostics you propose is this:
If spirituality came to you from the outside — from a teacher, from religion, from philosophy, from a figure like Leo Gura, from a book, from psychedelics — then by definition, it was not native to your earliest structure of consciousness.
If, from the very first moment of self-awareness, your primary orientation was toward truth, God, metaphysics, infinity — then something structurally unusual was present from the beginning.
This is not about superiority. It is about origin and understanding the truth.
Some people discover the path.
Others are the path from the moment awareness crystallizes.
That distinction is not trivial...
 
---
 
The Deeper Paradox
 
And yet, paradoxically, this truth does not invalidate practice.
 
It reframes it.
 
Spiritual work may not be about reaching the maximal conceivable state. It may not be about becoming a once-in-history outlier of consciousness. It may instead be about:
Doing your absolute best and bending as much as possible all limitations in the way for higher and more complete consciousness (or whatever your spiritual goals or approach may be)
 
In fact, one might argue that the mature stage of spiritual development includes accepting limits — including the limits of genetics, embodiment, and this particular manifestation.
 
There may be states of consciousness that are simply inaccessible to this organism.
 
And that, too, is part of the truth.
 
 
---
 
End
Don't fall into false equivalence. Some are born already touching the sky — their first breath a question about God, their childhood a meditation, their nervous system intrinsically tuned to infinity. Others must carve their way upward through discipline, study, psychedelics, years of relentless refinement — and still may not reach Holistic Awakenings, Infinite Consciousness or God.
This is the structure of reality. Consciousness, like every domain of existence, expresses itself through gradients of capacity. There are prodigies of spirit just as there are prodigies of mind and body. To deny this is sentimentality. To resent it is immaturity.
 
Your task was never to become the best but to be your best — completely, honestly, without self-deception — whether it rises ten feet or touches the infinite sky.
And that, too as for all Infinity, is God.
I'll leave with this quote: "Even when you struggle to realise God, you're God"

Life is too short for not doing what you love

Hey Leo, congratulations for bringing this into reality.
 
I've been leading underground psychedelic retreat for years. If you want some expert advisory I'm here to offer tangible value.
Consider it seriously, I can assure you there's some blind spots in how you are conducting the psychedelic retreat that can only come from seasoned experience in the field. Leading 20 people as a first psychedelic retreat is no joke, hopefully you're aware of the magnitude coming ahead. 

Only stage Yellow is guilty of that as the whole psyche, worldview and mind is being restructured. It finds itself in epistemic humility and a perspectival integrative approach. Such a recognition must happen for equating the exterior perspective game field as well as ones assumptions and biases. It is only in yellow that one considers seriously the perspective of fascists, rapists, murderers, terrorist, political extremist. All perspective are incorporated like lenses in the yellow mind, yet no proper cleansing, synthesis and merging has happened. Clarity hasn't still been found yet its in the cocoon process. This is impractical on the collective level but as we know in this stage the pendulum has oscillated towards the individual and proper sense making in the jungle of human thoughts and systems.
It is in turquoise when one becomes collectively responsible and keen bullshiter caller. Now the mind can shift into many lens and also into an spherical 360° holistical lense. Different human systems have been integrated and the psyche is built in ever higher holons of complexity and evolution. Now one is what understands, now one has a voice, one is whole towards uniting more wholes to make a more encompassing whole. In this, cancer is called out clearly and stages are seen with their lights and shadows, from a truth-based and loving standpoint.