No1Here2c

Yes, I claim it is possible to hold this. Not necessarily as explicit, but as inuitive, implicit. All simultaneously. The 'highest potential' definition or understanding is not a rigid holding & maintaining of each and every understanding individually, but rather a full integration & superimposition of each, fully grasped together, such that the word can be placed into any context and Intuitively known from each possible definition & perspective simultaneously. I am not claiming that this operates in a fixed way or as a rigid system of definitional replacement, where you must logically know, switch out, & fit each definition and context to a word until you find a working match. Not how I claim this works. It is as precisely a fluid and shifting understanding of definition that makes this possible. If the mind were so rigid it could not see the term from each & every possible perspective and context. It would remain caught within its own, or the first basic few. This is not easily possible, or even very plausible, from the ordinary human state of consciousness. This requires a hyperaware, hyperfluid state, in which awareness itself may utilize a 'vision beyond' the basic human being's very narrow, rigid, limited perspective. This is a fluid 'system'.

It is not even that the lemur must somehow grasp this consciousness, as it is known that the consciousness is what grasps the lemur and its perceptual world. There is nothing really that the lemur 'must do' to have this 'click in its mind', as the doing, and anything which could 'click into place' for it, is already what consciousness will hold within it. It is this intrinsic grasping nature of consciousness that must itself be understood. That regardless of the lemurs understanding, consciousness will be there experiencing it. That is itself the understanding. At the same time that the lemur need not do anything, the only way for the lemur to have a snowballs chance through hell of getting this is for him to work very hard to understand it. This work goes deeper than words, linguistics, & logic. It requires utilization of imagination, and direct conscious awareness. It requires the ability to navigate conscious state through various means. This is all only a model, a tool for communication, & a surface level one at that. Words will only ever 'capture' the very surface. Hence the difficulties in communication here. No human model will ever touch the full depth of consciousness. Or effectively convey the scope of Truth

The context within the frame can be expanded through various means. Context is held within the eyes of the character, a sort of imagined frame, which does not have distinct defined basis in the image itself, but is rather a filter through which all shape/color must be passed before any content reaches the observer 'inside' of the lemur. All of this is held within the true frame. The scope of the character's context can be expanded, but the frame always remains. When the character thinks to have broken out of the frame, is actually a breaking out of context that was imaginarily held as the frame itself. Context can never be Truth, it can never be the entire frame. Context itself is as function of the lemur which is an aspect of the scenery held within the true frame. The frame is Truth. The frame is pure Consciousness. The true frame is the 'actual container' for all of the activities within it. The world/character, & the actual experience of the characters perception, of which is Illusorily held within the character's imagined/presented context, is all within the true frame of consciousness itself. 'The frame', or consciousness itself, has no distinct qualities to it. It cannot be grasped in the same way as any aspect of the image. It is of a different sort of nature. The consciousness is the true observer. It is not held within the lemur. But rather the entire wholistic process is grasped by consciousness all at once, and presented as 'the lemurs existence from within its own eyes' It can almost be thought of as if there is no frame. The black border does not exist, as that too is an artifact of the lemur looking out. Rather everything spills seamlessly into the white void, which has no end, has no limit, or divisive quality, so it cannot be grasped through the traditional means that the lemur understands. Lemur himself only understands division and distinct aspects; Things with quality(color, forms, texture, etc...etc...)

Even the deepest linguistic understanding, utilizing the 'highest potential' definitions, is an infinitesimal fraction of what can truly be witnessed.

They are one of the best tools we have to communicate here. If you seek higher understanding, it will never be transcribed or communicated. It must be consciously grasped. Drop the play toys and go for the absolute. This is all ultimately dependent upon conscious state.

Ultimately, Linguistics are a child's toy in comparison to the highest understanding.

You demonstrate a mild form of this ability here It goes deeper than this.

Again, this is very difficult to communicate, but it can be understood, and consciously grasped in direct awareness.

Highest potential definition attempts to take into account all possible contexts in which a word may be positioned, and all contexts a word may be understood from.

This 'highest potential' definition must take into account all possible usages and variations of a word. This at some point transcends abilities to transcribe or communicate, but it can be grasped & understood.

Context being an inherent part of existing as human. You could not be human without context. You could not utilize words without context. And therefor any words which are utilized, must have a 'highest' potential definition given any particular conscious state.

Is what a moderator as part of a cult would claim.

Leo himself could be blind to the chance that he is operating a cult. *If he is or somehow were* I personally have seen no evidence for this.

I don't give a fuck about mine

Yes words have no intrinsic meaning of their own. If a fox saw these words it would just shrug and continue after the rabbit. we are bound to instinctual drives, much like the fox, but we also have a higher order intelligence, which gives rise to cognition and meaning. Humans attribute meaning under ordinary conscious states. This is a fact of our experience. Its not until you reach relatively high states of transcendence that meaning falls away again, but we are not in that current state.