RendHeaven

Member
  • Content count

    2,997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RendHeaven

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

14,333 profile views
  1. a "frequency" describes the behavior of a soundwave any sound whatsoever has a "frequency," since it is a wave so yes, all music, as a subcategory of sound, is made up of frequencies a "high frequency" just means rapid oscillation of a soundwave, producing a "higher" pitch a "low frequency" means a relatively slower oscillation producing a "lower" pitch a baby shrieking is a higher frequency the fire 808s on your favorite beat are lower frequency Yes, human music is deeply structured and often has high-level abstract integrity eh. yes and no. this is a very layered question. listen to what you like, and don't try to justify it throw away all ideas of specific hertz values being better or worse. saying 432hz is better than 440hz is like saying 432 meters is better than 440 meters
  2. Unequivocally yes. Totally, utter, horseshit. I am dying on this hill. I have infinite stamina to debate this matter. I will leave any new ager reeling in terror as I drag them by the hair to come face to face with the abyss of their own inadequacies, forcing them to confront the endless ignorance of their firmly held position on "ViBrAtIoNaL fReQuEnCiEs" the 432hz brainrot conformity makes me want to behead new agers and display their mangled corpses on spikes on my front porch
  3. lie flat on your back, breathe through your belly, and deliberately slow your exhales. exhale REALLY slow. like, 10+ seconds of air leaving your nostrils don't "try" to fall asleep. Just slow tf down and let it come to you
  4. Perfect example of blindly trusting the experts, and MAHA's negative image only doing a disservice to the truth
  5. So it's a shame that people will continue to slam seed oils (or god forbid defend them as good for you) without considering that it might actually be harmful. There's already a stigma going around academic circles branding seed oil skeptics as "conspiratorial," and RFK's image is not helping. I agree. seed oils will never go away. the genie is out of the bottle, so to speak. if we waved a magic wand and erased all seed oils, the entire food supply chain would collapse over night and 99% of restaurants will go out of business. so our entire society is codependent on and built atop a foundation of seed oils now. And yet, it may be the case that seed oils are harmful nonetheless. In which case, I would hope that individuals are given the choice of making an informed decision about what they put in their bodies But academia and nutritionist circles still defend seed oils and go out of their way to smear seed oil skeptics, lumping them in with anti-vaxxers and such. Indulge me for a second and let's just assume that seed oils are actually harmful for humans. If that's the case, then our current information climate gives rise to a shitty epistemic cesspool where if you listen to the experts, you will get vaccinated (good) and chug seed oils (bad), but if you listen to the conspiracy theorists, you will avoid vaccines (bad) and avoid seed oils (good). In either case, the mind is corrupted and the outcomes are sub-optimal. of course, this is a wider issue than just one ingredient. As you know, companies do everything to take shortcuts and obscure externalities. If there is a "serious political issue" here, it would be the lack of transparency driving profit which gives rise to the cesspool of an information climate that forces individuals to figure it out for themselves (but often they won't figure it out, and just follow a popular talking point, which is almost always partial or flawed) If food companies came clean with everything they put in our foods and its full transparent ramifications, there would be outrage and blood. and so that will never happen :]
  6. these are actually genuine risk factors yeah this is dumb also dumb this is good this is garbage app = wasted effort; takes 3 seconds to read the label and notice red40. generally a good habit overall you make a good point my stance is to stack the small meaningful habits (avoiding red40 is actually a conscious move. Of course, that by itself wont "cure" you of anything. It's just good fundamentals) and don't fall for the overblown miracle products (no single product will save you)
  7. RFK is wrong about vaccines but right about seed oils. Which is a shame because his wrongness discredits him polarizes people into full-blown conspiratorial RFK fans or mainstream shills that denounce everything RFK says, and neither camp has accurate discernment
  8. 😈
  9. the normies will... but AIGHE am different and unique! (inb4 emerald clocks me for repressing ordinariness and trying to distinguish myself as extraordinary)
  10. No, he clearly loves solitude more than the majority of humans. Yes, but some rare humans actually love solitude more than the rest of us Don't strawman Leo by conflating his highest value with your teenage inexperience
  11. Yes that's me as well I do think Leo's actually different though Leo is a GIGA-nerd about independence of mind. It's one of his highest values. Given that the foundation of relationship is group-think (literally), it would be a natural roadblock towards Leo's entire MO. Obviously the forum supplements some sort of socialization need for him. but that doesn't contradict his desire to mostly be alone in contemplation
  12. @Natasha Tori Maru Yes, my current way of eating is the nexus of time-efficiency, mental-energy-efficiency, cost-efficiency, tastemaxxing, moodmaxxing, gymmaxxing, and sustainability. I plan to eat this way for the rest of my life, unless something goes wrong and an issue arises (in which case I will admit "I was wrong" and make appropriate adjustments) or otherwise an even better way of eating is discovered and I will jump on that (doubt it. I've already personally experimented with most other ways of eating, and decided they're not for me) I am a strong believer in different needs for different people. If someone just tried to copy my cronometer diet from that screenshot, they will probably have a bad time, because it's so hyper-tailored to me. Still - some principles are universal nonetheless. Generally speaking, if you eat whole-foods single-ingredient meats and plants, you will thrive in comparison to the default paradigm which is buying premade meals and snacks in boxes and bags + eating out or ordering from restaurants (God knows what shit they put in there)
  13. @aurum My bad, you're right Switching to white rice (in my unique case) preserves Calcium, Magnesium, and Zinc specifically