Search the Community

A type of alien curiosity relative and more, that aliens are fascinated with machines, humans, spirits and themselves and alternates and humans with aliens, machines, spirits, themselves and alternates also and so vice-versa for each other and in mathematics and imagination this trend continues with the exploration of self, other, beyond and abstraction like x to its own power continuous, or imagine polygon interconnected in its polygram as a polyract in polyspace irregular and regular using iridescent phosphorescent translucence to play and explore itself in simultaneous multi projected abstraction and exploration as aetheric feeling, sensing, intuiting, living, being.

You transformed into an alien mice at least.

The way I do it is just be detached. Not to say that you don't care about anything...but that is ultimately the best way to go about it in a way. You could also then do some social freedom exercises which start easy and work up to more challenging. For starters you could walk up to random people in a part of town you never go to and just ask people for the time or directions. Then after a lot of that you can start to actively embrace the awkward and socially alien: you can ask people "what time is it in Roman numerals" or after they give you directions just walk the opposite direction lol. Then slowly ramp it up to where you just walk up to a random girl and propose to her with a jelly ring on the spot. Gradually your social >freedom< will become better. Also generally becoming a badass is a good tool, but don't go towards Tate style badassery, you can be a calibrated badass. You could even start with wearing pink and walk down the street or whatever is mildly uncomfortable 4u

my POV: Any low-vibrational aliens or demons or entities that you're in contact with, are using the power of your will from some point of your life where you felt like a victim and this contract is what allows them to fuck with you. You should review your life and close any gaps in your integrity through which you receive external energy. Ultimately all the defects are in front of you right now. my experience: im currently dealing with similar issues. I randomly wake up in the middle of the night combat-rolling to the floor and jabbing the air. Recently I had at least 1 alien entity removed from my consciousness, which was partially controlling my lower chakras. I've immediately felt healthier and bloodflow to my lower body was restored. Any contact without your permission is against the alien cosmic rules and there are repercussions for breaking this law for any entity. You should also consider trying defensive chants or prayers against demons This has helped me and i hope it will help you

Day 14 I slept well today 🫨 I will have more energy to manifest a delicious viking foid and 100,000€ cash. Yum I'm not going to go into details today, I really don't have time, I'm really making this post for the sake of regularity But what I really miss the most, jokes aside, is vitality; Not so much in the sense of physical energy but really vibrational. I don't feel bad, not depressed, in fact I've never really had suicidal or dark thoughts in general even in cases of extreme stress, but it seems that I still live overall, most of the time, in a fairly dry and poor frequency to my taste This is the conclusion that I can have here and there when I enter a particularly deep and unusual state of satisfaction, in fact in these states I even happen to feel what seems to be a rise of Kundalini: I can feel a sensation of pleasant heat in the body and more particularly in the lower spine. Not the anus or the sex, not an erogenous zone, but at the level of the coccyx, maybe a little above. Ideally I would be physically overpowered, very courageous, rational, with a lot of libido; And at the same time hyperintuitive, supercreative, with a lot of visions, creativity, and a natural inclination to be .high" I want to become an alien bodybuilder with 300 qi, master of manifestation lol. Maybe in the near future we will see 👺, nevermind.

You can operate the law of attraction in an orthodox way by following Neville's advice, the law works the same way whether you understand, are aware of its operation or not. I think that an average but intelligent and healthy person could master and accept this new paradigm with the implications, I also think that a spiritual person could completely fail to obtain a greater creative power because it would threaten one's ego, in particular those who come from the blue stage spirituality (typically Abrahamic religions) or even worse (shamanism). These people will never really accept living in a simulation and this will block awareness. I have no problem with hopium ahah, the goal is of course still selfish even if paradoxically it requires a higher degree of detachment because you have to understand that you don't have something because you pretend to want it, and have something because it's what you really want at some point. I see it everywhere and in everyone now, it's blatant, even if I'm not yet conscious enough to observe the phenomenon from a less superficial level. I see it as an evolution of the basic human game that we (me and most of my mirrors) play. Now we play (are conscious) essentially the game of Newtonian physics, of distance, of having or not having, and by extension of the downstream minigames, in fractal models, like the big psycho-social minigame of the hero and the victim; I see the human experience as a fractal of play (= selfish experiences). We will switch to a game of greater oppulence, which btw corresponds with the arrival of technological singularity ; That of quantum physics, the goal will be awakening. The goal will be more to have or not 100,000€ or a girlfriend with flowers in hairs and a big buttocks👺 , but to understand that it is a projection in a game of self-discovery. This is also what Bashar Daryl says about alien civilizations, even if I don't have an opinion on this character it seems logical to me. Hoping that I did not answer beside eheh.

I feel like writing; something. How does materialism fit in with idealism? At first sight it would seem that the two are at opposites to each other. Materialism posits a world out there of spiritless hard tangible stuff. It's the default mode for most us, I mean it's very difficult to get away from the often harsh reality of the material world. But maybe it's also blatantly obvious that the world has its own rules and ways of being and most of it has nothing to do with you or how you choose to see it. For example no matter how hard I try I cannot turn a house brick into a brick of gold, that's materialism's ultimate triumph: the world is rulebound and transformation only happens very specifically, and there is no room for anything else not even a god. Materialism's other triumph is that we all share in it, the brick I hold in my hand is experienced by anyone who cares to look at it. What about idealism? On the face of it subjective idealism seems alien to most. When it says that the world is encompassed only as subjective sensations and perceptions, this seems absurd at first. What about that experience we all share in called "the world"? How is it I can say that only my first-hand experience of that world is prime and that the ideas of materialism are secondary, it seems to be untrue; what about when someone else's report of their experience, tallies with mine? After a while of stewing in idealism however it starts to make much more sense. I really can't escape myself, in the sense that the experiences I seem to have appear to be unique to me. Even if the world is a shared experience I still have my own special viewpoint and everything is funnelled through that nexus. That realisation makes it difficult to explain anything at all without reference to that special viewpoint. In other words it is exactly as idealism says: subjective experience is prime. One subtlety of idealism is that it really is about unity. Since subjective experience is everything, it implies that "subjective experience" is in fact a monolithic thing. It lumps all the phenomena of perception together and says that those things are the only things in the world. But in that respect it is no different from materialism which posits a "world out there", in fact a monolith of a world out there with its types of matter and light and rules of interaction. The thing with all being just subjective experience is that there is a kind of passive flattening happening. Stuff is just "experienced". However much this lines up with what reality might be - that reality is just a screen to which is projected experiences for us to perceive - there is that nagging materialist doubt: but what about the stuff behind the scenes that isn't experienced but still seems to affect what is experienced? How is it the world seems to be composed of stuff that doesn't care about our experience of it? Why does the world appear to carry on even if we're not looking? I'd say that problem is acute for idealism. Yes, we can have experience of going on holiday to a foreign country, but idealism would say that when we return home in some real sense that foreign country ceases to exist: because we stop experiencing it in the now. Idealism says nothing about the consistency and permanency of the world, it doesn't even acknowledge a world as such, just an ever unfolding ongoing subjective experience. If you were to blink and suddenly find yourself in Italy (say), idealism wouldn't care, materialism would care very much. A middle ground. We can de-compose our subjective experience into nuggets called qualia. These are the units of perception so to speak, there are qualia for sight and qualia for sound, qualia for touch and so on. The fact that bits of our experience can be put in categories at all is interesting in itself. There's a real sense in which the perceptions of sight are somehow all linked together, there is a kinship between red and green, light and dark that persists all over our visual field and temporally. I would say all those gross qualia with which we're familiar seem obvious to us and that they are our lived in subjective experience. The idea of qualia can be extended to include more subtle experiences. There are qualia for "things" in the world. For example there would be a quale for chairs and people and bridges. Isn't it the case that when we see the car we own there is an instant recognition of it, we don't need to mentally calculate to experience it, it is very much like hearing a sound or smelling a rose, it is "just there". That's interesting because a car is a composite thing. It can be decomposed by our subjective eye into other parts such as wheels and metal and leather - all themselves qualia. But aren't qualia both gross and subtle just appearances to be passively recognised? Aren't they fundamentally ethereal and substanceless (in direct opposition to materialism), coming and going at their own whim? The quale of our car may appear to us once a day, but that appearance and disappearance seem nearly out of our control: we would have to stand in front of it indefinitely to constantly experience the quale. There's very much a staccato constantly disconnected sense to idealism. Could it be that qualia are actually deeper than they seem, in function? Maybe qualia conspire with each other to keep the world in check. Whereas materialism says that matter and light rules the world, and gives it substance and permanence, maybe qualia does the same for subjective idealism. Rather than being a passive function of awareness, qualia have a life of their own. Their comings and goings already give motion and time to the world, aliveness, but if they were to interact with each other they would also give it that missing ingredient: structure. What is this structure of qualia? Primarily it is a network of interrelatedness. Just as the quale of a car is composed of other qualia, the car is also connected to the other qualia in its environment, qualia are never solitary. A large part of our subjective experience is composed of interlocking contrasts; red is not blue, loud is not soft, fast is not slow. This interlocking network of qualia gives it a structure, not just the gross qualia of vision and sound and touch, but the more subtle qualia of objects, ideas and a sense of self. There is also a kind of stickiness to qualia, they have a pace to their comings and goings, everything is not happening at once. This stickiness is the ultimate cause of structure, for if it takes times for one quale to affect another to affect another, then structure can be maintained over time - all that's needed is a loop of interaction. This is what makes the world permanent. Even if we don't experience being in Italy right here an right now, it continues to exist precisely because there is this near infinite network of qualia communicating with each other in time, and it's this which scaffolds reality. Not all qualia are so obvious. Some are exceptionally subtle and nuanced, and barely in awareness, they are like near invisible strings holding reality together. In some sense we're aware of the universe all at once, and that is what keeps it around.

Also apparently the transition from being alive to death as a ghost from NDE reports is sort of instant and like popping out of the body into the timeless state to which you visit realms that aren't of Earth and are difficult to describe which sounds different than say different alien realm planets or Psychadelic realms ... Though apparently idk sounds like there are loving angels on the other side and you get wrapped in unconditional love which to an extent sounds better than being a human, and many suicide attempts wanted to stay on the other side but were told their time wasn't to die yet so they had to return ... so

No, not the kind of Alien Mind (Mouse) Leo talks about. Rather a less advanced version of it, more practical than spiritual, a liminal space between human cognition and something otherworldly. Still, it's majorly distinct from regular states of consciousness. Over the past 2 years, I tried 60+ psychoactive substances. For the most part, they're different flavors of the same thing, but a few really stand out. I'll discuss one such chemical here, its effects are so unique I couldn't replicate them with anything else. It is O-PCE, a dissociative, a class that isn't discussed much if at all here, and that's unfortunate, since they can be as powerful, if not more so in some aspects, than classic tryptamine/lysergamide psychedelics. I don't expect many people to follow up on this or even be able to find it (it's very rare outside the EU), but that's okay. First I'll list some of the main effects I got, and then describe the technicalities. Crossing games like sudoku, chess, and others, and coming up with the best moves for each within the combined board/grid. Entering a black void where there's no sensory input/output, concepts arise directly in the mind. Paradoxically, this is where true visualization can happen, Tesla-level. A twisted multimodal way of thinking wherein asking a question like "What would Jesus do in a given situation?" shows the number 4 arising out of the darkness, and an octahedron forming from it. The answer is decoded as "something that a human can't conceive of". Multifold amplification of recall ability. Being able to retrace paths I hiked perfectly, along with what thoughts I was thinking or what I was listening to at the time. Same with car routes and the like. Enhanced mapping where I can bring to mind customs regulations of multiple EU countries, create a map with nodes, find similarities, connections, and ultimately business opportunities within those. Something like this. Multi-window perception of time (past, present, future), as well as of various avatars/parallel realities. This has ripple effects such as fractured causality - events lose their before/after relationship. A conclusion appears in the mind before the premise is formulated. A good visual example of how this feels like: Stepping out of own's identity and introspecting objectively, as if you were reading a book, largely solving the ego entanglement issues. Dimensional folding - existing between two spaces, as a flat plane with no third dimension. A bit like Funny Valentine. Similarly, spatial inversion, I 'look' within myself to 'see' the world, it's kind of like headspace, but more warped, akin to a Klein bottle. Naturally, neither language nor my use of it are capable of faithfully describing such things, but that's what we have to work with. Now for the other information. The optimal ROA for this chemical, the only one to produce such effects, is vaping. All the others are nothing like it, mostly similar to your regular dissos. I use an e-mesh to vape it, that is the best way, but people also have success with simple oil burners (meth pipes). I'll only be talking about the e-mesh here. User maxpechura has left very comprehensive instructions regarding the mesh in this thread, big props for that. You can also see this video. The optimal mode I found is power, with the wattage range of 13-17W. If you've crushed the crystals into fine powder well, you won't really need to go above 15. I typically do 14. Set an setting matter very much, it is a fickle chemical. It almost demands you being in complete darkness and silence. Also a clean mesh is crucial, I change mine basically after every session, the difference in intensity is major. Do a deep inhale, keep the vapor inside for ~20s, exhale, wait a little and repeat if you want to go deeper. Close your eyes. For someone without a tolerance (which can build quickly), even 15mg might be enough to dissolve into hyperspace, so start cautiously. The dosages for insufflated ROA on PsychonautWiki map quite accurately to vaping. Final miscellaneous notes, it's not a physically addictive substance, but can be psychologically so, so make sure to take sufficient breaks. Similar to MDMA, over time some of the 'magic' can be lost if you abuse it. Plus, being a salt form (though one that vapes really well), you don't want a lot of it in your lungs, it leaves a nasty residue. Haven't tried freebasing it, could be something to consider. That about does it. I have some exciting things to share regarding psychedelics, when the time is right - if I live to tell the tale.

@Leo Gura A Critique of your Critique of Post-Modernism, as a polite gesture. Mate, I applaud your tenacity in dissecting postmodernism as you dissect every nuance, from relativism to epistemic blind spots. Yet in your eagerness here, you neglect the fundamental truth that human beings, for better or worse, embody morality before they theorize it. You map out how cognition can spiral through modern, postmodern, and even “transhuman” stages, but you miss the primal force that propels any moral stance that has any merit beyond any potentially manipulative shadow its cloaked in, namely, empathy. Not shallow, sentimental “niceness,” but the stuff that springs from the acknowledgement of the very 'sovereignty' of an individual that you yourself expressed, something I shared as follows not long before you shared the video actually " This shift redefines heroism as an ongoing process of becoming, returning to the outlining of the limits to synchronization noted in part 3. It is not about reaching a fixed state of virtue, that's just a reflection of philosophical absurdity at its present state of pseudo-intellectualism that reflects a caricature of the human condition, instead its about continually evolving toward greater synchronization of mind, heart, and spirit with their respective higher integrated universal truths inclusive then of our greater nervous system and connection between each other towards higher and higher, more and more powerful states of being. It's all about the harmony between individuality, universe and respectful acknowledgement of their meeting ground of sovereignty and finding peace in the transformations asked of us in the process of shifting from evolving to 'being' back into 'becoming'... a "Universal". " You’re right that postmodernism uncovers hidden biases and unravels absolutist claims, the trouble is mate, you treat that unraveling as if it solves or even addresses the emotional impetus behind why people cling to certain worldviews. You note that societies weaponize science or rationality, but you ignore the raw, empathic fuel that either fosters or warps these constructs. Without acknowledging that core affect, no intellectual “meta” stance can fulfill its promise. Moralities aren’t just chess moves of power as you say; they’re also expressions of whether we’re aligned with genuine love or consumed by fear, rage, or apathy say, again, as I encapsulate in 'From Heroism to Universalism'. In this sense mate, you state 'you can't unsee construct awareness' while being oblivious to the fact that 'construct awareness' is its own 'construct' referring to the inherent confirmation bias then that would limit an individual to move beyond the bias of their own meta-understanding of the value of religions themselves, of which, all spring from the acknowledgement of the sovereignty that I am talking about. Moreover, while it’s commendable that you highlight how easily postmodernism slips into dogmatic activism or shallow identity politics, you seem to want a purely conceptual remedy, or at the very least, your critique falls short by the very fact that its limited to critique rather than a solution at the nervous system level as I have shared, which isn't to be hero's or even 'universals' but first and foremost, to align with our highest energies, not out of 'iron will' but a slow maturity analogous to the slow growing of a bone after a breakage, the fracturing of morality in the way I have described is a direct parallel. You’re championing an ever-expanding rational lens, but that lens, no matter how meta you want to go forgets the willingness to feel deeply for another being’s wellbeing, to experience the visceral cost of suffering. By treating moral systems like abstract puzzles, you sidestep the human reality that our moral sense is intimately tied to the body, to relationships, and to forms of devotion that transcend mere logical coherence. Yes, societies need frameworks; yes, geopolitics and survival matter. Yet there’s a difference between grudgingly admitting we “need” hierarchical structures and embracing a deeper impetus to care for each other. If you only fixate on intellectual mastery, you limit your own maturity and growth by those very limits because you haven't understood the very limits that constrain every perception beyond the intellect. If you change the heart, you will change your perception is the direct implication of what I have stated and shared in that piece of writing pertaining to the Star Wars analogy. Constructing truths, parrying dogmas, then the underlying empathic current, which truly animates moral life, becomes secondary to the internal alignment, the only solution, that is needed not getting lost in the 'survival need' that can blur the real compass of morality and therefore mislead observers and future critiquers like yourself. That’s precisely how an otherwise incisive critique of postmodernism can remain ungrounded, it can’t explain why love, or compassion, or mutual care might truly guide us beyond these ideological swirling's. So you've critiqued with solid justice, granted but overall you've shrugged at the emotional substrate that makes us care about any of this to begin with, why our hearts want to move all the way to the end of the video isn't to just solve some 'survival game' internally. No matter how expertly we decode biases or reframe “absolute truth,” we cannot claim any holistic meta-view while ignoring the felt dimension of moral concern. We don’t simply need a “higher vantage point”; we need to feel where moral impetus arises Leo, at that junction of heart, body, and consciousness. Without that, even the best post-rational synthesis you do collapses into a new brand of cerebral play, ironically mirroring the same shallowness that you critique. Ironically, you've fallen into the same (moral) materialistic paradigm you've claim to critique, the limitation of concept without understanding its energetic and in our case, moral underpinnings. As a thought experiment, I recommend you imagine yourself as 'a moral being' then understanding all the ways energetically, this can become distorted relative to the functionality of your being as a full nervous system apparatus, now you will understand why and how society has fallen by those particular degrees themselves and thus by the same measure, where we have balance versus going above and beyond accordingly. And by the way, Unity, predicates "Universalism", something that will never be achieved solely through the mind. This is going to take you thousands of hours to really grasp, not to mention the hundreds of hours more I feel its going to take you until you actually grasp the magnitude of what you've really missed and realign yourself accordingly, by that same measure though, I look forward to embracing my own unique psychedelic route next year, one that is only likely to more align where I already am in light of the reports I have so far heard as my morality is not 'social' it is empathic. You don't 'unleash the self' when you lose the small 's' of social and make it a big 'S' as you say, you turn it into a child Leo, and when you add an 'e' for where emotion meets empathy into a big 'E', that's when that 'free child' learns to truly become mature. I feel you've only broken into the meta, and that's fine, you're still at the beginning level. I think its fantastic you're encouraging people to explore themselves in all these wonderful ways, however right now I feel like because you're still at that beginner level, you're not sure how to wear clothes in a field in which you presently kinda look a bit naked. No offense man. Still, great job, you'll get there eventually. As for your idea that you need to be 'very awake' to understand the absolute vs relative, its also not very tricky, really, and we need to humble ourselves as humans in this regard, to me its analogous to a pigeon learning to mimic a monkey, on the absolute scale, its not a high achievement on a relative scale though, its an incredible achievement. I feel that if you learned to bring more balance between your self-referential dopaminergic 'insight loop' that feeds into your sense of 'self-validation' and personal grandiosity, you'd be able to become more level headed and appraise your progress with a more esteemed level of personal development. At the same time, to the contrary by merely having gratitude and appreciation for our own progress, its simultaneously a healthy way to self-appraise while also not being taken away by the blunder of over-aggrandising one's own progress that in return, distorts the fundamental role, purpose and connection we must maintain with the rest of our environment, group, society, country, world to act in a continued level headed way, which to come full circle, ends in 'the social game' regardless as to how much you wish to critique it or think you've successfully done so, because the social, always ends in its end full absolute scale as a mere fact of all of us being human here, as per your false notion of 'psuedo universal values', which is of course, an oxymoron predicated by a lack of understanding the biological energy that predicates one 'evil' side versus a 'good' side. Regardless as to any mental gymnastics you try Leo, eventually you're going to have to concede defeat mate, aliens or non-alien thought experiment there too there's still our own inherent self-understanding of positive versus negative, dark versus light. We need the conceptual, its the carving of our mental worlds that create the final product of our morality, but its all driven by those underpinnings mate, that in our ignorance, reduces our development by the largest possible measure as a consequence of their position relative to our consciousness of consciousness itself. Best Light.

So medicaid portals are down equals Medicaid has been canceled in IL? What a slander and a farse by the left LOL Between you and Leo's fear mongering I don't know what's worse other than his pathetic attempt at saying God was an alien.

Sofa is good. Alien Mouse™ is better

It makes total sense that you would be afraid. You never know what Donald Trump is actually going to do. I would stay put until there's real movement and not just talk. Donald Trump loves to talk about things and not do them. So, I wouldn't leave right now. But if I were in your position, I would create an escape plan, just in case. And I'd get my passports ready as soon as I can as well as any other necessary travel documents. And in the worst case scenario I would plan to go South to a Central American country. My pick would probably be Costa Rica. But I had a friend visit Guatemala, and he said it was really nice. I'd also look up what the naturalization process is if things become sustainably less safe. The important thing is to map out a route to safety in the worst case scenario... but continue to live as though the worst case scenario isn't going to happen. My family and I have a bug out plan in case he starts doing some crazy anti-immigrant stuff like genuinely invoking the Alien Enemies Act and not just talking about it. My husband is an immigrant, so we have to be vigilant. There's an 90% chance that it's just talk to fire up his base. But that's still a nonzero chance. Plan A for us is to drive to Toronto. Plan B is Costa Rica.

That's alien attention right there.

Roses are red Violets are blue Alien Salad Makes martian go “Woo!”

They do, their phones are cameras and ppl share tons of weird stuff online, but it could be faked or just a misrepresentation.. The thing is this, whether you have a 4k video of an alien ship landing on the Whitehouse lawn or someone levitating or someone pushing someone with the "Force", or not, it doesn't matter, don't believe what You see or hear, but don't disbelieve it either, if Your interested in knowing truth look within, and if You don't know how to do that find someone that can teach you methods that allow you to look within, then You will know for Yourself, which is the most important aspect...

A concrete example of this was when I first heard Jacob Collier's Moon River 5 years ago, I struggled to enjoy it. It felt like too much, especially at 3:48 and onwards. I wished he would've just kept it more unembellished because the unconventional musical decisions were just too difficult for me to follow. I remember my gf at the time straight up said she hated it, despite knowing that Jacob is a certified genius. That "genius" label didn't mean anything to her because her ears intuitively rejected what it heard. But in hindsight our judgement was like a child learning algebra deciding that Einstein must be full of shit because we "intuitively" didn't see any potential in the conclusions of his general relativity (of course, without having spent any time mulling over his equations) Now I recognize that this work is a blinding ray of genius that staggers my mind to even attempt to comprehend. The part at 3:48 to the end which I so disliked is now my favorite part. This change in opinion came from my own maturity in musical understanding coupled with a detailed study of the following logic breakdown video. This example is a watered-down microcosm of Human mind interacting with Alien/MIND. When a human finds something aesthetically distasteful, it can be genuine (from above) or ignorant (from below). The difference is tricky to tell apart, since the ignorant judge loves to see himself as genuine. The answer is in lots of study and experience + having the flexibility to pinpoint the beauty in absolutely anything. The latter bulletproofs you against ignorantly declaring something you don't understand as ugly.

To tie this into the rest of the conversation, I think the punchline would be that if a normal human managed to hear this "alien music" using his dualistic biases and biological ears, he would struggle to make any sense of it. It would feel like ugly gibberish since it directly threatens his preferred human musical sensemaking. That is, unless the human were clever enough to understand his own limits. If the human were able to question his own ideas of beauty, he may be open to levels of beauty/truth/resonance/cognition beyond his current grasp.

Enormous group-think. Ungodly amounts of group-think haha. I'm going to give this a sincere shot off the cuff But i'll need thousands more hours of solitude + 5meo to have a definitive answer (lol) --- An alien consciousness would not differentiate between sound and other sense perceptions. An alien consciousness would not arbitrarily find some tones more beautiful than others, unless it decreed so for the sake of more interesting holistic interplay. An alien consciousness would spawn and discover aesthetics of music beyond all recognition - novel aesthetics spun out of thin air - and yet this new aesthetic will not be random. It would have an immaculate meta-balance that only the alien can appreciate. It strikes balance outside of the box which cannot be appreciated from within the box. An alien consciousness does not need ears nor a body. Therefore an alien consciousness "listening to music" = MIND reconfiguring itself to please itself spontaneously using original, never-before-woven aesthetics born of sonic frequencies that bleed into the rest of MIND in an incestuous, ouroboros-like manner. Striking an intelligent balance too majestic for a mere human to comprehend, being totally alone in its appreciation, it marvels at its magnitude and whimsy. The whole thing is more beautiful than anything it has ever witnessed, and yet it's a joke. Just another day for MIND.

What i mean is that LSD is more stimulating; Not only are there more unpleasant side effects (tight jaw, vasoconstriction, walking and acting like a Fallout robot at x3 speed...) but the trips are particularly manic and strange. Lots of aggressive sexual energy with magenta, chrome visuals, and succession of white and black lines. Crazy ideas, completely alien experiences (best point of LSD for me).

I have watched it. Loved it. I had two major encounters with extraterrestrials in my dreams. The first dream was about 2 or 3 years ago, and the second was a few months ago. Both dreams felt externally real, my senses were super sharp, and I was very awake and conscious in those dreams compared to other dreams. Those were more like spontaneous astral projections rather than regular dreams. In both dreams, I was very frightened by the encounters. In the first dream, a round-shaped UFO came directly to my window and communicated with me through telepathy. The voices inside the UFO were radiating so much love toward me, but I was so afraid of the UFO and its energy that I immediately closed the window and woke up. In the second dream, I saw UFOs hovering in the sky with green lights and felt a strong alien presence, as if something was standing very close to me and I could feel its breath. I caught a glimpse of the shadow of a hominid for a split second, and I was so terrified that I couldn’t bear it. I thought I was about to go mad because it felt so real. My monkey mind couldn’t handle it, it was so difficult to tolerate. Their energy was completely different, something out of this world. Those dreams left me completely restless, especially the first one. Before the first dream, I had never thought about extraterrestrials seriously. But since then, I feel like I have so many unanswered questions and so much curiosity that I can’t satisfy because there isn’t much tangible information about them.

I thought her advice was useful. Most people need very basic advice. Not alien fucking God consciousness.

Only if an alien race comes down and starts farming humans for meat and milking them.

I'm not stuck, i just take pleasure simping talking to you and you are difficult to replace. There are plenty of normies i could easily win over but there would be no point in doing so outside of sex. If you would push me away i would just shrug and give Willy another direction, for now he cares enough about his slavic alien so I'm taking advantage of it to have fun. Ahah, no that's the hot part Sometimes i start discussions and I'm actually too lazy to continue, because the goal was mainly to show off my ideas, because I had a burst of interest or something like that.

Well..you want to say that the absolute or the true nature of existence is not a "he"(or she )? Meaning it is not a sentient being like a human or animal or alien etc ? Well look at your own self . Aren't you a sentient being ? Why is it so far fetched to think the source of you as a conscious person is also a conscious person? In the end ..The duality between personal and impersonal must collapse at the absolute level because like I said its ineffable and beyond words . You can call it absence of limits..you can call it god ..you can call it "42"..etc these are just words . The thing which the words point to can only be accessed by the spiritual seeker himself. That's why different religions and spiritual traditions describe the absolute in slightly different ways..it's impersonal In Hinduism but personal in Abrahamic religions. Etc