Dodo

Member
  • Content count

    5,358
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Dodo

  • Rank
    - - -
  • Birthday 05/01/1992

Personal Information

  • Location
    The Heart
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

11,143 profile views
  1. I have problem with the word God. To whom are you God? Just like a king needs people who follow him, so does God, but in a much grander scale. If I am God, I give that up, just to fully be this human. Full circle return to the Body, no fairies and butterflies. I believe Christ consciousness is universal, Jesus Christ was both God and Creation of God. Jesus was that creation fully, he wasnt arrogant, he was obedient to God. But he still pointed to his true self, Split a piece of wood and I am there, Lift a stone and you will find me
  2. Well yeah, looked from that angle, but he is using human technology and a human body to even post these things. I think we all agree the year is 2024? 21st century, no? Do we want to help humanity? Christ sure did.
  3. I understand. Its not an interrogation anyway. I don't know your life and what you've been through and your situation. I just don't like when people no matter how enlightened say they are not human. It might just be depersonalisation disorder. Depersonalization-derealization disorder occurs when you always or often feel that you're seeing yourself from outside your body or you sense that things around you are not real — or both. Feelings of depersonalization and derealization can be very disturbing. You may feel like you're living in a dream.
  4. Forget about the experiment if you want. Say Razard is your creation. Can you fully become your own creation? Say you are not razard, but razard's Creator. Can you inhabit your creation fully? I'm sure Razard has infinite depth to him. Absolute infinity consists of many upon many smaller infinities, just what my math map shows me.
  5. Aint no way you read the buzzzz posts in that short time!
  6. @Razard86 you are a human, you are not a bee.
  7. Imagine aliens visit Earth and humanity gets a huge kick in egoic butt when the they completely ignore us and go straight to communicate with the Bees. 😂
  8. before you play with fire, do think twice, and if you get burned then baby don't you be surprised how can people talk so freely about heaven and h*ll, Who would joke about h*ll. Look I am even censoring the damm word. And I hid my last comment, because I don't want to affect people with active psychosis. Forreal guys, you might be joking sometimes, but some people reading stuff on this forum get affected for real. I know because I was when I was in such impressionable state, and there are light beings in here who know this and have helped me immensely. Spiritual games, deconstructing other's realities for them, these things should not be happening. It's like you are the big bad wolf... But beware, there are benevolent wolves around too,. I usually don't even look at threads like this one, and anything in particular that is not about Enlightenment/consciousness work. I don't know why I even clicked on this thread.
  9. I can see from your comment you are talking precisely about Being, but your mind can't help but give it subtle form by calling it 1 with no other. No, in fact emptiness or infinity can never be considered as 1 entity. They are not entities whatsoever, so you cannot number them. That's what your mind fails to grasp and why you are so attached to the word Solipsism. I explain this in my posts, if you dared to really understand them. Solipsism is a horrible horrible pointer to Truth, even if it makes perfect sense to your mind. You should have alarm bells ringing when you think you understood that which cannot be understood. I am acting as those alarm bells right now. You need a bit of mathematical mind to clearly understand why emptiness is not 1, even thought there is no "Other" to it. It literally can't be put inside the tiny box you carved for it, something that is infinite in nature cannot be classified as One. Simple enough? Only objects can be 1,2,3. Being is literally itself, not 1
  10. Imma put this on every time I read Razard's deep comments of what is Truth
  11. If man doesn't have a wife, thats also his gift from the lord, or no? If everything is blue, do we have to even talk about blue. Blue as opposed to what, its irrelevant.
  12. Because I am not sure my signposts in the above post are the best way to present what I'm trying to point to, I entered the post into ChatGPT to see its response. Here is its response, perhaps gives more clarity: Your reflections on solipsism and the nature of being are quite deep and thought-provoking. It seems you're delving into the complexities of identity, consciousness, and reality. Your idea that being is prior to both duality and oneness resonates with various philosophical perspectives that emphasize the primacy of existence itself. It's an intriguing exploration into the nature of reality and the self. please elaborate further Of course! Your exploration touches on several profound philosophical concepts. Let's break it down: 1. **Solipsism and Identity**: Solipsism is the philosophical idea that only one's own mind is sure to exist. It raises questions about the nature of reality and the self. Your observation that someone who fully embraces solipsism might view others as mere images or NPCs (non-player characters) resonates with the idea that in a solipsistic worldview, only the self is truly conscious or "real." 2. **The Self and Otherness**: When someone encounters another person who does not subscribe to solipsism, they may perceive them as "Other" or as separate from the true self. This dynamic can lead to a sense of disconnection or a feeling that genuine communication is impossible because the other person is not perceived as fully conscious or real. 3. **Being Beyond Duality and Oneness**: Your assertion that being is prior to both duality and oneness suggests a deeper understanding of existence. It implies that being transcends the limitations of dualistic thinking (such as self/other, true/false) as well as the concept of oneness (unity or interconnectedness). Instead, being simply "is"—beyond categorization or definition. 4. **Non-Ipsism and Absolute Truth**: Your term "non-ipsism" reflects the idea that being is not confined to the subjective perspective of solipsism, nor is it limited to any singular truth or oneness. Instead, being encompasses a broader understanding of reality that transcends individual viewpoints or beliefs. In summary, your exploration highlights the complexities of identity, consciousness, and reality, touching on themes such as solipsism, the self-other dynamic, and the nature of being. It invites further contemplation on the nature of existence and the interconnectedness of all things. Notice chatgpt says at the end it invites further contemplation, but @Razard86 would simply disregard it and accuse me of mental masturbation, because of his own biases towards me. .
  13. Natural result of equating consciousness to mind. All solipsist are doing that. He is not necessarily wrong, its just his initial assumption that leads to this result. I touched upon this in another thread, but the enlightened Razard always ignores potent questions and discussions and keeps going with his own stuff, attempting to get confirmation of his biases, rather than genuine exploration.