PolyPeter

may the lord hear you and might this time come soon because i'm tired of telling claude what to do. Better to just pay for his sub and let it cook, fully agentic, no asking me questions, only updating me and making money. Imagine that scenario but for everyone

@trenton Everything on your list got subsumed the same way. Not refuted from inside, but turned into an object by a wider frame. What was working as the horizon you saw through becomes a thing you see, from somewhere that has its own horizon you can't see. And the new frame isn't a bigger box with the old one sitting inside it. The old commitments get carried across as structure, not as contents on a shelf. Which is why it only runs one direction. Once a horizon has been objectified you can't go back to living inside it as horizon. That's why there's no final one, and it has nothing to do with the list being short. A frame can objectify its previous presentation. It can never objectify the one currently doing the work, because that's what's making the objectifying possible. So the thing you're chasing is always one step behind where you're standing, and the gap doesn't close with better theories. Which changes what you're actually looking for. The pointer isn't aimed outward at a further object, at some last frame you'd recognize by its features. It's aimed the other way, at what any frame presupposes in order to count as one. And that isn't another item in the sequence. It isn't the limit of the sequence either. It's what the sequence shows up from.

scam altman is a paid actor

we are not even close to actual intelligence

Heyy thank you! 🫶🏻 I will def be uploading soon It is counter-intuitive, for sure. I'm working on the same thing too, not an easy cake 100% yes 👽

it shows that you don't know

hahahaha being less than 100%, is belief, almost by definition being sure means you know directly

This sounds like you are afraid of going insane, but also at the same time knowing that you must experience it yourself to know Don't push it But the intuition is right there

100% agree on this and also notice how even though a human can have glimpses and know directly what God is, it doesn't override an entire way of being, habits require new behavior in order for other habits to take place, and it is "orthogonal" work to Consciousness work in a certain way

of course we are all contingent and that's for certain but that doesn't imply that there are no better ways to live than others thats why i feel is important to -change the world- as somebody said in the post earlier ♾️

white boy nah, i'm god as a white boy

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH WHAT? not in my country I've gotten a lot of bully myself just because saying that printing money to "help the poor" generates inflation which fucks up the entire economy Leftists would go all the way, no matter what, to "protect the minorities", EVEN if this minorities, on their own countries, would behead this same liberals

what if this is just a low-concurrency moment for the niche as a whole, and not for the forum itself? I think in the future this place will have waay more visitors and overall activity. But something must happen to people, at scale, which makes them realize that spending ALL the time on stupid youtube shit is nonsense.

This is not something you can project onto me this is a very weird example, it does not apply here because i'm not claiming nonsense. the human me is still contingent, it still has things to learn. in the same way as if you had a lucid dream, you are still gonna play by the rules of your dream, for it to be playable at all. and it does not undermine the fact that you know that you are dreaming Humans can only maintain a fully absolute consciousness state for so long, the material domain has its own inertia to it. and also there is nothing making the absolute stay only in the absolute state for ever, and this is difficult to understand if your ontology is wrong

Ok then What is the I am?