Breakingthewall

Yeah sorry I was generalizing thinking in how we humans are today I think that in any specific case of loss, suffering is inevitable. The key is to accept the situation as soon as possible and restructure your reality based on your new circumstances. If your operating system functions from within, let's say in emitter mode, this is much easier than if it functions by drawing its energy from the outside, in receiver mode, completely dependent on the environment. There is always some level of dependence; the question is which one predominates.

In my opinion, there's no universal formula, since suffering doesn't stem from a conceptual error but from a chronic misalignment between your psyche and external reality. Spirituality will tell you that external reality is illusory, that you are everything, but if for years you've yielded to micro-humiliations, chosen paths that didn't align with your natural values. values you weren't even aware of because you'd adopted others' values, surrendering your sovereignty, driven by your need to be reflected in society as valid. if, ultimately, you've prostituted yourself year after year in exchange for approval, you won't stop suffering without becoming a taliban defender of your own values and waging a small (or perhaps not so small) war to rebalance your life. This is a process parallel to the shift from being sustained by the social psyche to being sustained simply by the absolute fact of being .

Meditation and contemplation, to understand what is exactly his paradigm about suffering and how we are creating it, also a a page would be interesting

Could you put an example?

How did you realize? How are you creating it? Why do you create suffering if your girlfriend have sex with your brother but you don't do if you drink a glass of water?

Really? That's good to know that someone understand my point. In this matter nothing is proved, everything are subjetive impressions. What I see is that absolutely all spirituality is wrong due a couple of concrete mistakes. And of course, according to my vision I'm absolutely right without deviation 😅.

The flow of thought is not the obstacle, but rather the mechanism of psychological equilibrium when the psyche is fully oriented toward the social matrix. This is based on extremely powerful biological mechanisms, such as the absolute need for belonging and acceptance by the collective, which emerges with enormous force in adolescence. It is a mechanism that creates civilizations and allows men to do things like the Battle of the Somme. It is not eliminated by looking at the gaps between thoughts. The process is different, you have to contemplate the absolute void of existence hour by our, day by day. Then meditate in the pure I am, absolutely empty of content. Then in some moment, the absolute opens up. The void is full, it is. It's a total change of phase of being.

Ralston makes a fundamental error, as does Tolle. For him, there is something in your mind called pure, unlimited consciousness, but you don't have access to it because you are constantly generating thoughts. If you learn to let go of those thoughts or stop identifying with them, you can access that state of consciousness. The reality is different. Your mind, your thoughts, everything, is existence being; your mind doesn't contain that, it is that. The act of constantly generating thoughts doesn't close you off; rather, the fact of being closed by default to the absolute being forces the psyche to create a foundation by weaving a structure of constant mental flow, in order not to collapse. The psyche cannot stop doing this; perhaps Ralston's and Tolle's can, due to their peculiarities, because they are open to the nature of being. But if you are not open, you won't achieve this by ceasing to think or identifying; rather, ceasing to need a foundation of mental flow will be a consequence of permanent openness to the nature of being.

Why you suffer less now, where is the difference? If you can explain

But how could be the reality without any form? Anyway, right now the body exist, so the point is getting open to what is now. As I see it there are a lot of preferences uncoded and it's impossible to avoid them, for example physical pain, need of human communication, etc, but under everything it's always the absolute fact of being. if you are open to it life still has pain but it's relative, you can access to your unlimited nature easily and that's fullness. The point is being able to dissolve the self totally for a moment. If you do it it's not wonderful, love, freedom or anything because those are appreciations of the self, it's absolute being, the total fact of existing. Anything else are appreciations that happens in this fact, the absolute being is not thinkable because thoughts are an expression of it. If you manage to totally dissolve the self sometimes, then everything take the quality of the absolute being even you are operating in the self, as it's inevitable

I think that the point is not being aware of the ego, but open yourself to the absolute fact of being, then the ego recalibrates itself and the suffering decreases greatly. Neurosis happens when your only ground is the psyche itself. Then it creates constantly a mental ground to maintain balance, and this constant flow is anxiety by default. Being open to the unlimited is not a ground, its being sustained by the fact of being. It could sounds simple but it isn't because psyche by default is oriented to be grounded by the tribe, collective, religion. By meaning and the idea of something bigger. Humans are hive being, then when the hive is not anymore a solid structure the psyche builds the structure. If its suffering, that's better than nothing.

Supposedly, what 5-MeO aims to achieve is the dissolution of all your psychological structures, leaving you with the life you are without structure. This is perceived as total glory, an absolute power that explodes and is your true nature. It's simply the act of existing without all the intricate valorative systems that are inevitable as a human being. The idea is to understand how and why you disconnect from that essential reality. 5-MeO helps with this. True, total openness is achieved without 5-MeO; it's sober because 5-MeO always introduces a hallucinogenic component, a "high," confusion. It's violent; it demolishes structures through brute force. What I mean is In meditation, you reach a point where there is only the fact of "I am." You forget about the body and everything else; it becomes deactivated. There is only the raw "I am," without anything else. Then comes the difficult step. Let's see, you reach that point by will; you still know you are meditating, but in the background. Then, from that background, you focus on the feeling of centeredness, of the "I" that receives the "am." The "I" that is the receiver of the experience. Then sometimes, if you manage to hold that state for a while and your psychological structure allows it, the center disappears. For a few moments, perhaps 10 seconds, reality opens up completely. Here there is no "I am," there is no structure, you are not aware of anything, well you are but you don't feel that you are aware, it's total, unlimited reality is, period. The first time this happens, it feels like your brain is being fried with electricity. Reality is dazzling white.(This is just by the stress of the change of frequency id say, nothing like "mystical"). Your heart and mind open completely; you are one with the absolute; you are the absolute. A fluctuation then occurs, and you return to your normal state, but what has been revealed remains partially perceptible. A few seconds like this, even a single second, change your operating system. It's as if you've been fueled by dead energy and are now in contact with what lives (it's a metaphor, what happens is that you was closed in the mental loop that creates a ground full time because you needed it). What lives is indescribable; it is living reality, the totality of being. It is not someone, an entity that wants something, but it is still everything, and your operating system automatically creates the imperative to align yourself completely with that totality. You are no longer an individual in need seeking things to satisfy you; you are a manifestation of the totality trying to align itself to the fullest extent. more like a soldier with a mission than a seeker of satisfaction (too epic, better a mind re calibrating itself). Total satisfaction lies in being what you are. If this happens but time pass, you start forgetting, it blurs. In some point you are closed to what is. You have to do again and again, and it's not easy, there are many barriers, your psyche is the barrier, it has to change, and changes are slow. In some moment you reach a point where the closure is low, easy to open. Then you don't try anymore to achieve total openess, it's enough with the life that transparents in everything, you don't need more mystical stuff, reality is mystical enough, this is the real thing, the absolute is exactly here and now.

Maybe that's real, nobody know the structure of reality, maybe it's much deeper that it seems.

Human reality is existence expressing itself, it can't be separate, but human mind gets very focused in belonging, in the social matrix, because that's the way that life found to grow in complexity, its just the flow of reality. The absolute is the fact of being, it's impossible being separate of it, what's possible is not perceiving it because our sight is totally oriented to the structure due our genetical emotional structure But the relative is the absolute happening. It's very obvious, they are not different, are exactly the same. The point is making a change let say phase of being. You are not anymore part of the society you are an expression of the reality. Not as an idea but totally direct perception full time. You see yourself all time as the existence happening, then you also see anything else as the reality happening, there is no form vs absolute, it's the absolute in its flow always

Alive and direct, open, full and beautiful, fluid, in comparison with a mental state of lack where you are pointing to yourself full time what is lack, what shouldn't happen, how should be everything. If you are closed to your nature it's inevitable doing it because the mind needs a ground because it's isolated, disconnected, then it creates that ground pointing all time what is lack. It's an strategy to get balanced. Spirituality will tell you: stop doing it, it's a mistake, ego, reality is perfect, accept it. That's impossible. The self needs to be open to it's source to stop it, if not it will do this activity because it needs it.

Not exactly that . Suffering is a reality being human, it's a kind of energetic impulse that life uses to point in an evolutionary direction. It is the same as anything else in the sense that it is existence existing. If you place yourself in the dimension where existence simply is and there is no difference, everything is the same, but it is almost impossible to do this for more than a few moments, since the dynamics of form absorb you. Furthermore, in my opinion, trying to deactivate form like a renunciant ascetic is violence. They prefer the dimension of absolute being because there is no suffering there, so they try to divorce themselves from their human nature, that the consider impure. For me being able to do this sometimes is enough. Being able to really do it 1 time it's an absolute difference. It's the openess to the nature of existence. I don't know, probably or almost sure that there isn't continuity in the sense of you knowing that you died and now you continue, but any movement creates effect. At the end there is no separation between you and reality, and reality will exist. Id say that this, now, is that manifestation. There is not "real you" that is holy and this one that is illusion, this is the reality happening, the point is aligning ourselves to stop veiling our perception

You could do that but to me it seems oo waste the potential of this form is to disregard it and remain in the openness of being total. The perfect move is to achieve that openness at will and then perceive yourself as form, but always with a density low enough so that the absolute is perceived in every moment. Then the absolute and form are a synergy, not two opposites.

From my perspective there is a kind of mistake or maybe a contradiction there, maybe you will agree or not The nature of reality, what reality is, is absolute being, that is, the fact of being that has no opposite in non-being, since non-being is not. So, if you open yourself to your total nature, you realize that you are that, you are the fact of being. This is not something neutral; it is positive and alive, full, plenitude, everything, as you know. But it's ' positive" in the sense that it is affirmative, that it is, and alive in the sense that it exists, and this existence manifest inevitably in relational flow. This "positive" has zero relation to positive according to a local perspective programmed to prefer A over B. The suffering derived from this is also positive, because it is. From the perspective of total being, there is no difference between being a homeless guy with five cancers being eaten by rats while their parents laugh at him and a cyborg sentient being who dominates the universe. Both are, both exist, period. The difference is local, not essential. But the reality is that from the local perspective, form exists, relational flow occurs, and it creates patterns of brutal complexity and enormous beauty. This pattern that we are can be understood and aligned in a huge level. Maybe there is a kind of continuity after death, it's impossible to know, but seems that this cycle that is happening has a drive, points in a direction. From an absolute perspective maybe it's irrelevant, but from a local perspective it's absolutely relevant, every movement has consequence, cause and effect that unfolds beyond our understanding. So what I mean is that even the nature of everything is immutable and absolute, it's manifestation is cause effect relationship and always it's going to be, because existing implies manifestation. There is no being without happening, it's not a possibility.

I think that usually people get interested in spirituality because they suffer, they can't adapt, they can't find their place in the world, or a tragedy has befallen them that they can't cope with, so they turn to spirituality. The problem is that spirituality is a mess and is explained terribly. Current spirituality is a kind of dissociative anesthetic in which the person identifies with something larger, consciousness, which doesn't suffer but rather suffering happens within it, parallel to Tolle's ideas that tell you that suffering over the past or the future is a mistake because right now there is no problem. So you can escape the mental error that is the ego simply by becoming aware of it. This is false, it doesn't work. It's a scam.

They suffer more because their spirituality is false, they are in a mental mess thinking that the power of now is the truth and that you shouldn't suffer because a zebra doesn't suffer thinking about the future, while they are totally closed to the reality that they are. If you are open to the actual reality that is, every moment feels alive and full, there are no regrets because you act straight by default, relationship are clean without friction because freedom and truth are natural for you, and lie and submission are impossible, and death is seen as the open heart of reality where you are going to dissolve to be one with it. The point is not avoiding suffering, it's being worthy. You are not a bitch that want confort and anesthesia, you are the living reality manifested in a form full of potential and what you want is developing it as much as it's possible, give your best, be one with what is.

Don't go to those camps if you don't want to find there bentinho massaro or similar telling you that for enlightenment you have to suck his magic dick. all this area is plenty of scammers and psychopaths.

It's not about versions but about an action that can be done.

The seer and what's seen are the same thing then the seer can see itself easily. Or not so easily but possible. Step one, removing everything except the fact of I am. The self knowing that is , nothing else. This I am is empty of content but has still structure, then it's closed. Step two. Dissolution of this structure. There is no more I am, no self being conscious of itself. "Consciousness" become meaningless. There is what is, no subject and object. Of course there is still consciousness because we are conscious beings but what disappear is the awareness of being aware. Zero structure, then absolute being reveals itself. The seer sees itself totally.

Imo Ideas are like anything else, something that happens. Spirituality seems to say: ideas are false, sensations are true, when both are in the same dimension, that of processes, causality, what happens. Perhaps you could say that sensations are more vivid and ideas more subdued, and that they distance you further from the dimension of absolute being. I would say that's true, but at the same time, they are the key to opening up to total absolute being. Without the mental representation that your life is a trap and that you have to make a change in frequency, the necessary action wouldn't occur. The issue isn't that sensations or ideas are maya, or false, or whatever, but that they are the dimension of form. There's no problem with this dimension except that in the human configuration, it leads to an almost total closure to the perception of "substance". Substance is not something, is the fact of being and this fact of being recognizes itself through the self as absolute and immortal (veganawake would think now: another identity of grandiosity) . You are not immortal as form, but as the fact of being, and from this perspective, form is perceived as secondary, not as false or illusory, because the perceiver of the form is the form. There is not a witness out of the experience, the experience implies the witness, and It is perceived as what it is: form. But the form is the substance in a form. There are not two, are one, but the form usually gets blind to it's nature, closes itself to it putting the form as essential veiling the essential reality of being. As much as you adapt to the inevitable rules of society, to the need of adaptation, you get more and more veiled, enclosed in a barrier that blinds you totally from what you are. That feels very bad, anxiety and sadness by default The better way (imo)for us, civilized humans trapped in the gray, dull, lifeless ego, is total openness to substance, the complete transcendence of the ego for a few moments as often as you can. This completely changes the frequency of the ego. It gives it life, and by giving it life, it gives it purpose. Its purpose is the same as that of anything else: to exist. The ego, enlightened by the full light of the unlimited fact of being, changes frequency; it ceases to be a line that moves forward and becomes an actual reality that is. The difference is total.

What is the essential truth? What identities are false?