Danioover9000

Member P3
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    12,494

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Danioover9000

  1. Posted

    @Devin

    9 minutes ago, Devin said:

    If masturbators, for example a male performing manual stimulation to his penis, is not attracted to that act similar to sex with a woman, then why do they do it?

    Obviously many men "attracted" to sex with women are only attracted to the act of sex and nothing more from the relationship, this is no different than his attraction to manual sex with his own penis. Do you see a difference between those two primal attractions?

       Because in male sex biology the penis head has many nerve endings that when physically stimulated results in an erection, which then from further stimulation sends signals to the brain that this is pleasure, which then reinforces further stimulation of erect penis, until eventually leading to ejaculation of seminal fluids and sperm and orgasm and climax, followed by other bio chemical triggers afterwards for relaxation. Because of the nerve endings and stimulation, and the brain remembering that orgasm and rewarding it, is why masturbation occurs in males and in females. Also P-M-O, an acronym for pornography, masturbation and orgasm, which mostly means that masturbators masturbate to porn material, porn vids, porn mags, erotica, or other erotic images/words, even the sexual fantasy in their minds of what they're sexually attracted to, from homosexual to heterosexual fantasies.

       I see a difference between the two primary attractions of many men 'attracted' to sex with women primarily and secondly to relationships although this generalization need clarifying from you, and I see this could be no different to his attraction to manual stroking of his penis, but I think you deeply misunderstand these two primary differences yourself. Again you are conflating and making a category error, now between sexual attraction to opposite sex and sexual intercourse between a male and female, and confusing that with masturbation. Again, as I stated, masturbators can pleasure themselves, and be pleasured by their sex partners. 

  2. Posted

    @Nivsch

    12 hours ago, Nivsch said:

    Wow a great video!

    I listened to it ALL.

    And the most interesting thing is that the pro Israel side is a palestinian 😵

    He was so reasonable in his claims.

    But the interviewer (the podcast owner) was impulsive, cutted him all the time in the middle and cutted him off the interview at the end and his claims were utterly childish, and if I remove his wrong terminology (genocide? 😂 ) his claims are rooted in 10-20% of truth because Israel has responsibility to not trigger their initial tendencies and to be more just in the settlements issue.

       Why is it a great video?

       The most interesting thing is a pro Israeli is a Palestinian, and not how he was brainwashed by Zionism to be pro Israeli???

       Now, if you did listened to it ALL, then list ALL the timestamps when he made such reasonable claims, and if you can't list ALL OF THEM, and miss just one, then why claim he's being so reasonable?

       The interviewer BadEmpanada, or the interviewee John Aziz who's the one being impulsive? Also BadEmpanada has this to say about John Aziz:

       'I've been contacted by members of John Aziz's family. He claims to be a Palestinian who represents Palestinians. But he's barely seen them since he was 5 years old. They tried many times to reach out & include him, he was never interested. They are shocked to see that he advocates for Zionism now. While they think everyone has the right to their opinion, they are angry that he claims to be Palestinian while doing so.

       The truth: John has visited the West Bank one time, and visited his father's family in the USA a couple of times. That's it. Far, far from what he claimed in his article for The Atlantic, where he painted himself as fluently bicultural, and lied about visiting the West Bank multiple times and spending every Christmas with his Palestinian family in California. John does not speak Arabic. He does not know anything about Palestinian culture nor is he involved or immersed in it. He does not know any other Palestinians nor interact with any. Here is what one family member had to say about him being "Palestinian": "John does not speak Arabic at all as far as I know. He had very limited contact with his dad. He only visited Palestine for days when he was 4. His formative upbringing did not include any palestinian elements. No language, no songs, do stories, no food, no communication with family, no living experience in Palestine.

       He is totally disconnected from the Palestinian experience, culture, life, communication, history, struggle etc. He has zero Pslestinian immersive experience. He never took any active measure to have such an experience despite the continuous urging and welcoming of his Palestine family. Never actively communicated with his Palestinian side of family. Never called, never participated in major happy or sad social events, was never there. Even though his cousins were always trying to contact him and engage him via social media like Facebook, he was never keen in having a deep humane relationship with them. That all is understood and is his full right. Many people of Palestinian origin or ancestry lose contacts with motherland, as it happens with all nations and ethnicities. That's perfectly normal. But for John to claim suddenly discover his non-existent Polynesian half, and suddenly transforms onto a Palestinian speaking as a Palestinian voice on the Palestinian trauma and struggle from the platform of being a Palestinian is a deceptive thing, to say the least."

       John Aziz (his real name is not Aziz, I don't know why he calls himself that) saw an opportunity on October 7th to gain fame and fortune by claiming to be a Palestinian while advocating for Israel. Obviously Zionists lapped this up, they are always looking for traitors. But his claims to be Palestinian are spurious and based off nothing but ancestry. That he even mentions that as if he had anything resembling a Palestinian life or experience is laughable. And it's only due to that lack of experience that he can be so callous & selfish. In doing this, John Aziz is even slandering his father. In the Atlanic article, he paints his father negatively, as someone who wanted one state with the expulsion of all Israelis. This is weird, since John Aziz barely knew his father. He basically invented a false history. John's father is dead. He cannot defend himself.

       But one of his family member's who knew him well had this to say about him: "The other minor point that deeply troubles and hurts me is his mentioning that his dad has advicated for the destruction of Israel. This is very untrue. Indeed it is very sad and pathetic too. I have known Adil for so many years and had thousands of hours of discussions with him on all issues of life. On the Palestinian issue he was very passionste and committed to the rights of his people, but he was pragmatic and humane. He never advicated to the destruction of Israel or the Jewish people in Israel/Palestine. His stance was that the Palestinians have right to freedom in their homeland. In particular, Adil was anti Muslim Brotherhood and anti Hamas all the time. He criticized their ideology and tactics, specially targetting civilians. For John to say that about his dad, when his dad is away and can not defend himself, is both very hurtful and injust. It is either he really did not know what his dad's lifelong position was, or he is simply saying things to cast himself as the Palestinian son who rebelled against his dad's genocidal doctrine." All in all, John Aziz is a massive fraud, and his relatives are taking notice. The Atlantic should unpublish his article and issue a formal apology for not fact checking his story. John Aziz's twitter account is @aziz0nomics. It has gained tens of thousands of followers in just the two months since Oct 7, purely off this "I am Palestinian and I support Israel" grift. Disgusting that he lies about himself for self benefit like this.

       In summary: When John's family in Jenin were asked about him, their response was "Who is John?"'

  3. Posted · Edited by Danioover9000

    @Devin

    22 minutes ago, Devin said:

    Homo, in homosexual as compared to heterosexual, means same, homogenous. The same person performing a sex act upon themselves, masturbation, is more homogenous homosexual.

    A man giving a handjob to a penis is categorically homosexual, a female to a clitoris the same, this my friend, can all be contained within masturbation.

       Sure, I partly agree that homo in homosexuality as compared to heterosexuality, means same, homogenous. The same person performing a sex act upon themselves, masturbation, is more homogenous homosexual needs elaboration. Firstly hetero, in heterosexuality as opposed to homosexuality, means attraction to the opposite sex, means diverse in content, heterogenous. This includes the same person performing a sex act upon themselves, but also includes a different person performing a sex act upon themselves, like a couple masturbating each other, to a person masturbating to the opposite sex, not just the same sex.

       If you consider a man giving a hand job to his penis, and a woman giving a hand job to her clitoris, is categorically homosexual, then that category is small in range. You didn't include the object of sexual attraction that triggers one's arousal to initiate masturbation, which isn't limited to same sex but rather can include the opposite sex, hence a heterosexual male/female can masturbate to their opposite sex they're sexually attracted to. You attempting to make masturbation equivalent to homosexuality is a category error and a false equivalency, without knowing that heterosexuality and masturbation are also compatible, as heterogenous means diverse in content, means that you can masturbate to any diverse in content sexual objects, including but not limited to same sex, but also including heterosexuality and attractions to the opposite sex.

  4. Posted

    @Dodo

    On 2023-11-21 at 10:48 AM, Dodo said:

    The thread is old and it advised starting a new one rather than reviving it. 

     

    Leo said that only bitcoin is perhaps worth it and even that is a gamble. He put all other coins under th bus, and that is my main disagreement. 

    Bitcoin with its first mover advantage has obviously eaten up the most marketcap out of all, and is considered the main store of value, resembling digital gold. However, there are so many different types of crypto that are designed to do different things, solve problems that old and slow bitcoin cannot solve. 

    In any of those new types of cryptos there are first movers as well. Ethereum is the first mover of smart chain blockchain solutions and it is quickly catching up to bitcoin as the two of them are by far the biggest by marketcap. You can build dapps and smart contracts on the ethereum network which you can't do on bitcoin. 

    There are other types of blockchain such as Oracles, the first mover there is Link and it is seeing some intense gains recently. I am investing currently in Cardano, which is a smart chain like Ethereum and plans to build their own oracle, rather than using others. 

    There are payment blockchains, the ones that are best used for money transfers - they are quick and cheap to transfer, unlike Bitcoin, that would be a horrible idea for money transfers. XRP is the main leader there.

    There are other types but lets keep it shorter. My point is, bitcoin is bitcoin, but the rest of the market is very intriguing and in my opinion worth the research and eventual investment in the long term. 

     

    The other point Leo said was not to mix art with investing, but as a guy who has been learning technical analysis for a long time, I can see the chart and patterns within it as art, a mathematical kind of art. The numbers are dancing and if you have an eye for what painting to look at and know how the patterns created behave, you can enjoy some really high reward-low risk setups which someone who doesnt look at chart will miss. 

    Another common similarty between art and charts is that charts are using fibonacci, the golden ratio, which is the same ratio used in the Mona Lisa itself, used by many famous artists, as it makes things more beautiful. The golden ratio is found everywhere in nature too, so by seeing the charts following the golden ratio is to see they are perhaps a natural phenomenon rather than a man made scam manipulated and controlled by scheming individuals who want your money. 

     

    In conclusion, cryptocurrency is not a scam, it behaves very technically accurate on the charts. It is there to solve a miriad of problems and there are more options than the one Bitcoin to research and invest in. Altcoins are all forms of different vehicles designed for different purpose and without them, crypto is just not useful at all. 

       It's an old thread, and you didn't want to revive the thread even when you had an interest in talking about it, why wait for this long?

       Leo says bitcoin is worth it even if it's a gamble, and puts other coins away. Why is another man's money and how he invests it your main disagreement when it's their money, not yours?

       First movers? Crypto? Blockchains? Ethereum? Bitcoin is bitcoin, but rest of market is intriguing is enough justification to invest, even when there's little security between the payer and the receiver of those bitcoins?

       What do you disagree with @Leo Gura's second point of not mixing art with investing? Is it because of cryptocurrencies around NFT(non-fungible tokens)? If it's about NFTs and crypto, well that field is highly susceptible to scams, swindles, grifts, cons and frauds, meanwhile NFTs have very little value outside of cryptocurrency.

       Why do you conclude that cryptocurrency is not riddled with scams, behaves technical, to solve a myriad of problems, more options than bitcoin? 

     

  6. Posted

    @Devin

    1 hour ago, Devin said:

    Masturbation seems categorically more homosexual than homosexuality even, and more people have masturbated more than had hetero sex, therefore homosexuality is more normal actually. There are more Asexual organisms in existence and throughout history, including Adam if you're an Abrahamic follower, therefore heterosexuality is more a deviance.

       How is masturbation categorically more homosexual than homosexuality? How is more people masturbated than hetero sex makes homosexuality normal? Okay, there are a lot of Asexual organisms like plants and bacteria that can self replicate, not history but throughout evolution, but why include Adam from the bible, which out of nowhere and is irrelevant to this thread? How does all of that make heterosexuality a deviance?

       Firstly, masturbation is the act of pleasuring oneself via hands stroking the pleasure spots of your sex organ, for males it's penis head and shaft, and for female bodies it's the clitoris, the lips and breasts. Obviously both male and female bodies will have different to similar erogenous zones for pleasuring oneself. I don't think masturbation is categorically homosexuality, I think it's a category error you just did, conflating same sexual acts with self sexual pleasure acts. Opposite sex partners can also masturbate each other as well, not just same sex.

  7. Posted

    @UnbornTao

    2 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

    What's natural is the drive to have sex. Heterosexuality is the norm but I think both sexual predispositions have occurred throughout history.

       Sure, what is natural is sex drive, sexual attraction, and sex biology and dimorphism between male and female bodies. Yes, heterosexuality is the norm and average throughout current times to history, and that homosexuality, same sex, asexuality, and other kinks/fetishes are fringes to the norm and average, the exceptions. Main problem is most people think exceptions make the rule, but most cases exceptions don't make the rule.

       And it's a fact that most cases of STD and HIV are more correlated to homosexuality when partners had sexual relations with each other, or when there's an open relationship with other same sex partners. So if heterosexuality is natural, and it also is natural for an increase in STDs and HIV in same sex, does that make any feelings of fear natural of those that could spread HIV or STDs? 

  8. Posted

    @Merkabah Star

    32 minutes ago, Merkabah Star said:

    Saying it’s a deviance kind of implies it’s bad. 😀
     

    i4Oszqt.jpg

       Is it really the case that deviance implies bad? Why is deviance bad? It's similar to deviation, and deviations exists in many things in nature and even in man made objects, in history and in evolution many types of mutations would be considered deviations which end up being good.

       P.S, you are adorable.

  9. Posted

    @bebotalk

    7 minutes ago, bebotalk said:

    Musk left South Africa for the USA, and whilst South Africa wasn't or isn't overly rich, he would have been born in Apartheid times and thus being white would have been privileged. The USA was pretty well-developed and without much wildernesses, in the time Musk's family arrived in the USA. He himself said that he came from a lower-middle class family looking for work as they migrated from SA to the USA. I'd say economic pioneers as the post mentioned don't exist, and their view of migration is very romanticised and inaccurate. I disagree with you strongly about feminism's effect on birth rates. Feminism hasn't been enacted in all countries, and falling birth rates are global in form. Countries that are still heavily patriarchal are still experiencing them. PUA was a largely Internet-based dating fad/scam about ten years ago. I doubt it had much penetration in the Middle East, Africa, or Asia, where patriarchy is still entrenched culturally and legally. Your points are relevant somewhat in the USA or Europe, but not in much of Asia, Africa, etc. Even in the US, Internet culture is moot. Not everybody is in open relationships or has an onlyfans, or even subscribes to it. It's mainly because content creators congregate around liberal and open spaces in the USA like California or Florida and thus demonstrate this lifestyle. It doesn't mean it's common. As for feminism cottoning off civil rights, well so did Dr. King cotton off Gandhi and other anti-colonialists. I don't see the issue there. Birth rates are falling in India, yet in many parts of India, it's not ethical to show off skin or for women to wear revealing clothing. Even in the USA, this differs. There are naked parades in Seattle. This woul;dn't be allowed in the south. It wou;ldn't be right in the UK or France or other European countries. 

    Your points are based on conservative ideology, and you're using strawmen. Rape is illegal. it's the fault of governments if they don't implement their own laws, or allow migrants to flagrantly violate them. Migrants aren't inherent sociopaths, nor is it intrinsic to migrants to think "Yes, I must sexually assault women as soon as I set foot in my desired country!!" The fact some countries don't manage immigration properly doesn't make migrants valid. The person with his/her post mentioned ghettos or isolated communities. Yes, this is problematic, but then what is his/her solution? If groups of people wish to congregate, this isn't a problem in any other area or for any other people. If a group of migrants congregate in a part of a city but aren't committing crime, then yes it may look bad, but then that is their right. Curbing their right to do this is problematic. It's up to Sweden to sort out these problems, and tbh I'm not Swedish so I don't care. But if it were my country, I'd make it a point to call out the government for this seeming oversight in punishing those who commit serious crimes. And I also won't condemn ALL migrants or essentialise a group based on what some migrants do. 

    I say yes, the post is based largely on cliches, misconceptions, anachronisms, and biased ideological groundings. The issue of migration in the West is nuanced. Yes, there are problems associated with it, in specific countries. But there are also success stories, and it's generally racists or bigots who decry ALL immigration or think migrants generally don't integrate to any extent. That's why I asked if this person actually knows any migrants. I'm not accusing them of being racist or bigoted - I do not know them. But by using fallacies and anachronisms, they are not viewing the issue with the complexity that it deserves and warrants. And bias, whether personal or ideological. should also be accounted for in this case. It skews perception and understanding, and often away from the general picture or factual picture. 

    To use streamers/content creators as an example, as Leo is such, many of the top content creators in the world are migrants or are the children of such. Pewdiepie, KSI, xQC, Hasan, etc. all are such. From what they've said of their families, they all integrated relatively well. That's the norm, generally, for migrants in Western countries. Pewpiedie for one is a double migrant, as it were, as he's Swedish by birth but moved to the UK and now lives in Japan. Pokimane is another example, as is Destiny as his mother is Cuban. Some of my family are migrants, and have had little issues in adapting and integrating. It's more amusing than annoying to see analyses as presented from that X post, since it shows their limited perspective and often ideological underpinnings of their viewpoints. 

     

     

        Okay then, we'll agree to disagree and leave this post as that. Have a nice day.

  14. Posted

    @bebotalk

    5 hours ago, bebotalk said:

    Whoever wrote this is pretty unschooled in terms of contemporary geopolitics and trends. 

    S/he is stuck in 19th-century thinking. 

    Most migrants in the West at least since WW2 have been the "bad" economic migrants they mention. Economic pioneers as they put it don't exist - at least in the sense of German immigrants moving to the Midwest of the USA in the mid-19th century to create hamburgers, or people off the Netflix show Outlander. There aren't as many "wildernesses" out there left to conquer and tame, as there were back then. It has been governments in Europe and North America that have actively encouraged immigration, due to labour shortages amongst other reasons. This pattern has been true of Britain, France, Germany, the USA, Canada, etc. for decades. 

    Many economic migrants have and do integrate - they learn the language and follow the general culture of the host country. Whilst there is some ghettoisation, this often comes from states that have poor integration policies. Moreover, people are free to live as they choose, generally, in liberal democracies. So if people wish to live in isolated communities, then that's their right. It's a black-and-white thing to say they are "bad" for doing so. Who can stop them, without violating the rights that are central to such countries' existence and morals? Economic migrants have contributed positively to various countries. This includes national cuisines - why is pizza big in the USA? Because Italians moved to big US cities such as NYC and settled. Curry is big in the UK for the same reason. 

    Moreover, people within countries migrate to richer regions. Are they just as "bad"? If an ambitious person from rural Alabama moves to Atlanta, or NYC, or LA, is s/he "bad" since there are more opportunities in said cities? I'm sure such a thing, such as moving from the South to the West or New England, is common. The person admits this is a human thing - so then what's the issue? why deny people greater opportunities in other regions? 

    Raising birth rates is possible, but the effects of such will take years or even decades to accomplish. We don't even know why birth rates are falling, and it's a global phenomenon. Blaming "feminism" or it is an easy and ideologically-driven way out. I suggest with this person, it's more of the latter. This person fails to recognise that birth rates and fertility rates are falling in countries that hardly are adherents of feminist values. Iran and Saudi Arabia are prominent examples. A country that legally mandates women to wear hijabs is hardly a bastion of gender equality, is it? 

    The same is true of education levels or skills shortages. It takes time to train doctors or other highly-qualified professionals. If there are dire economic conditions, then this time taken for training to be conducted and training to take effect leads to further negative macroeconomic states. 

    This "post" is based on a very black-and-white and frankly antiquated rationale. It labels all immigrants as "bad" and lacks critical nuance, and is a view from an ivory tower. I get the suspicion that some American conservative wrote this - they often tend to be anachronistic and hold hard refusals to see real details or the bigger picture. 

    I wonder if the person who wrote this piece knows economic migrants. If so, then they might note the nuances involved. I get the feeling that s/he is probably some white, middle-aged, American from the South or Mid-West who lives in a very white community and is outraged from a very conservative/GOP angle. 

     

       Why would you assume the person writing this post, or the tweet, is unschooled in terms of contemporary geopolitical trends?

       What do you mean 19-century thinking?

       What do you mean economic pioneers don't exist, across the countries you listed? Is Elon Musk, Jeff Bazos, the Sackler family, are not examples of economic pioneers? What about Bruce Lee, who studied Wing Chun partly in China, migrated to the USA, to then study many different martial arts with some philosophy, then created JKD, which now the USA military and Navy Seals use for hand to hand combat, and the UFC took that MMA concept as a business modal, is this not an example? Labor shortages and other reasons, including the death toll of WW1 and WW2 of such countries that needed to replenish their population?

       People are free to live as they choose, generally, in liberal democracies, which means migrants are free to assault and rape it's nation's citizens with little legal ramification, theft, gang violence, for example Sweden, as they choose?

       Who can stop them, without violating the rights that are central to such countries' existence and morals? The police? Armed citizens protecting their body? Harsher sentencing? The main problem is not whether economic migrants contribute to a society, it's not making the distinctions between economic migrants that really want to integrate to the country/nation's identity and culture, be nationalists, from immigrants with stage red values, that are egotistical and want money and benefits at the cost of other citizen's well being and happiness, form gang cultures and cartels and mafias, at the cost of harming the native citizens of a country, such as Sweden. How can Sweden distinguish economic migrants with stage blue and orange values, with higher cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, and 9 stages of ego development of conformist stage, other lines of development and ideological beliefs, from migrants with stage red/purple values, with lower cognitive and lower moral development, at ego stage impulsive to opportunist, with more negative personality types/traits manifested negatively, and consciousness lower such that they feel little moral qualms with harming others for their gain?

       Birthrates are falling from a number of combinatory issues, from females increasingly getting more hyper individualistic, more goal and careers orientated, from getting indoctrinated to have a male centric worldview, to being trained to demonize and dehumanize males from Feminists. Feminism as an ideology cannot stand in it's own merits, but has to also borrow from civil rights movements and parasite off of those movements and communism. Feminism indoctrinates some of the women to think like that, and to value less femininity, motherhood, family raising and the traditional female gender roles. As a result of neoliberalism and capitalism ideology, women are trending to take careers over being wives and raising children, and due to stage orange PUA culture and sexual liberation movements, they feel less shame, less restraint, and less human decency in exposing more and more of their skin, and feeling they can just short term date many men, which makes them have increase in committment to a long term partner, and being indoctrinated with unrealistic expectations of their male partners due to them being so careers orientated that they cannot settle down. Plus, no fault divorce is contributing to the higher divorce rates, and broken homes of the nuclear family, separating children and making them experience the fallout of a divorce and custody battles between husband and wife, having to visit each one, and giving them a bad impression of family relationship dynamics which effects them later on in their adult life. Egalitarianism and Feminism have contributed to the birthrate decline, just look at South Korea and Japan, westernized and secular countries from America. I also will add that nutritional deficiency from industrialized farming of agriculture, farming of say potatoes, tomatoes, other vegetables that are GMO and have sprayed pesticides because at mass scale companies cannot afford using more organic and natural means to pest control crops and those contaminate the soil removing trace minerals and vitamins for further plant growth, as well as industrial animal farms like raising cows, pigs, sheep, chickens, turkeys, some horses, even goats and lambs for consumption or for other production of products, they are given many chemical injections, to bad conditions which makes them produce cortisol too much which leads to illnesses and weakened bodies, which then get slaughtered and consumed at mass scale.

       I really don't see why you're misrepresenting, straw manning, and bad faith tactics this person's writing:

    'This "post" is based on a very black-and-white and frankly antiquated rationale. It labels all immigrants as "bad" and lacks critical nuance, and is a view from an ivory tower. I get the suspicion that some American conservative wrote this - they often tend to be anachronistic and hold hard refusals to see real details or the bigger picture.'

    'I wonder if the person who wrote this piece knows economic migrants. If so, then they might note the nuances involved. I get the feeling that s/he is probably some white, middle-aged, American from the South or Mid-West who lives in a very white community and is outraged from a very conservative/GOP angle.'

       As him/her having a certain self bias and preference, a certain political and religious worldview, some ideological beliefs which makes them have a simplistic notion of immigrants, when said person already established 3 types of immigrants in his post? 

  18. Posted

    Absolutely? Absent absolute ambassador, Amish sent by Yahweh's ain't the path we take, so yah persuaded yourself in this sick way, time for me to dissuade this male maid. 

    I Segway to your abs, flabby, I gasp. No wonder man, Ask burgers why, cuz Burger King likes Aspergers to buy, so much they gas and can't grasp grass jointed.  you needed abs, heaven sent free, no pennies and cents, makes sense when you went absolute denial.

    I freestyle reals, you dream film reels, great careers to choose from, like managing a scam call center. I call BS, like a man aging clams for pearls, since his hurdle is his attraction, can't elope cantaloupe goody breasted fine lasses to drink from his glass, so he got Out Last!

    Let's dance and toast! You come be the charlatan, I came to be spirit Charlemagne drinking Champaign made from your deceased remains! Like you said, it's your dream come true, so keep it, in the real you think you live like a king in kingdom? More like you king of the hill, grilled, killed, and berried in the hill with eyes to keep you occupied in your I casket, lost in the tombs, lost in Exiled Kingdoms.

      

  19. Posted

    @PenguinPablo

    7 hours ago, PenguinPablo said:

    absolutely!

    there's plenty of great careers to choose from like...

    managing a scam call center

    or

    becoming a spiritual charlatan

    then I get to live like a King

    Absolutely? Absent absolute ambassador, Amish sent by Yahweh's ain't the path we take, so yah persuaded yourself in this sick way, time for me to dissuade this male maid. 

    I Segway to your abs, flabby, I gasp. No wonder man, Ask burgers why, cuz Burger King likes Aspergers to buy, so much they gas and can't grasp grass jointed.  you needed abs, heaven sent free, no pennies and cents, makes sense when you went absolute denial.

    I freestyle reals, you dream film reels, great careers to choose from, like managing a scam call center. I call BS, like a man aging clams for pearls, since his hurdle is his attraction, can't elope cantaloupe goody breasted fine lasses to drink from his glass, so he got Out Last!

    Let's dance and toast! You come be the charlatan, I came to be spirit Charlemagne drinking Champaign made from your deceased remains! Like you said, it's your dream come true, so keep it, in the real you think you live like a king in kingdom? More like you king of the hill, grilled, killed, and berried in the hill with eyes to keep you occupied in your I casket, lost in the tombs, lost in Exiled Kingdoms.

      

  20. Posted

       When Destiny is confronted by his clip of calling for and being pro genocide against Palestinians, he kicks off the guy he's debating in his stream. Again, Destiny, you are the one that caused this situation to happen, and you're the one stirring up and drama farming for content, views, clicks and bait outraged people to visit YOUR STREAM. You are fucking evil as hell!

       And yes, this journalist guy isn't a saint either, but he exposed Destiny's hypocrisy live, so good on him.

  21. Posted

    @Thought Art

    7 hours ago, Thought Art said:

    @Danioover9000 Yeah, but it’s also contextual. I can’t remember who made the video. But, it showed very well how in the context of that election Trumps techniques were more effective. They stirred the emotions more powerfully than Hilary’s more intellectual approach.

       Sure, for the speech and presentation not sure if Hitler lost in that aspect, I think Hitler lost the war more because of many tactical and military blunders, plus keep in mind he's fighting against the western powers like the UK, America, maybe Spain, at the same time Russia to the east. Literally a war on two fronts which is and always will historically be strategically challenging because you need at least one front's border secured and the defenses strong so that army could pivot to the other front and expand offensively, but he miscalculated invading Russia in the winter which is just horrible for supplying and an invading army unless you have good winter equipment one(doesn't necessarily mean winter wars are impossible, they can happen even if poor supplies and equipment).

  22. Posted

    @Bazooka Jesus

    On 2023-11-30 at 6:57 AM, Bazooka Jesus said:

    F*** yes. Analogous to what @Danioover9000 wrote, I'll say that I don't really have a problem with cold weather per se, but cold and rainy weather is the absolute WORST. Which is why I've made a solemn vow a couple of years ago to never spend another winter in Berlin ever again, lol.

    Man, I love the food here. And it's super cheap too!

       Yes, also analogous to me that I'm well built to handle cold environments, but even then cold and raining sucks cuz it triggers hypothermia, especially when it's windy, the breeze makes it far more chilling. Don't mind winters and snows though, probably best winter I had was in Canada, best snow, some are like powder. UK winters sucks because yes snowflakes are a bit bigger, but they don't last long and melt to sludge. There's so much snow in Canada you can go to one of those resorts, and go tubbing, which basically is sitting on a tire and sliding down.

       Yes, Indian curry is pretty good. Although Indian takeaways are mixed for me, sometimes too much peppers or onions in some of the curries, but sometimes they're great.

  23. Posted

    @An young being

    On 2023-11-30 at 5:50 AM, An young being said:

    I have a weather question, if the temperature is low, does high humidity still make us feel unpleasant or unhealthy?

       If I stick with my personal life, then yes high humidity, from high temperature from sunshine, to mid temperature and even low temperature, that high humidity still makes me feel more lazy, more tired and even a bit sick, and high humidity just makes me want to lie down on cold surfaces, or take more showers.

       Can't speak on the objectivity of if in low temperatures and high humidity makes most feel unpleasant and unhealthy, there might be some people who are fine in high humidity, I assume because they grew up in humid environments.