Nivsch

But did you see the frames when the other side said (I assume this was probably the case) those things too? By the way who stands behind the escalation between the sides in 1920s and 1930s? Or maybe this is actually a chicken and an egg?

I won't argue with you on the fact that this is indeed a hugely difficult reality to Gazans and quite traumatizing to tens of thousands of them.

From top to down: - The numbers shows that (38-15)/15 is a killed ratio of 1.5:1 which is better (not good absolutly of course but my claim is relative) than any other urban war done by western military. - There was one incident when hamas weapon caused Israeli attack to indirectly harm civilians. If you know about more events please add here maybe I miss some but that is what I heard. - Israel accept gays like Europeen countries do when in Gaza they would be executed. You can go to the thread about the support of gay marriage in Israel and read all the detailed there. You make far reaching claims from emotions and unfamiliarity with Israel. Please try to answer with rational evidence.

@zazen Any claim about "genocide in Gaza" has to, at the same time, be addressed to Mosoul and some other cities in Iraq and ask the exact same questions regarding US and Europeen countries that participated in the coalition, because otherwise the critisism isn't fair and hypocrite.

Maybe Ben Gvir and Smotrich wanted that, but I can't see an evidence in reality of acting of the government upon that. Lucky those two have limited power. I agree with you though careful attitude is needed when in such a heated conflict. No desire to argue or to do a competition here just to let you know this isn't what I want. Everyone can think whatever they want. Soon I have time to concentrate I will reply.

How is there a genocide in the current case? Comparing those cases is unjust to my view because the profound differences in the severity between them, despite the psychological mechanism and potential dangers similarity.

To an existential threat? I just don't fully knowledged in ww1 apart that I know they were attacked from all directions and humiliated. but why to compare so different cases, value systems and motivations? When Israelis though to do or done even 0.1% of the severity of the killing, the restriction of freedom to the individual and suffering creating methods the Nazi regime did?

What bothers be here in an additional psychological layer is that when there is one time we can eventually say what we have on our heart after been demonized non stop for 9 months (again I am not justifying Bibi's way in this war, far from that, but I am talking over this now) so you (Rashida) can't for a moment just listen? To show minimal respect to the other side when talks? You must even now to keep with it even in the congress? This is sad and inhumane.

Does richness help to protect against 5 Arab armies when you barely have one?

What was the reason in your opinion? I ask seriously no cynisizm.

Ask yourself why Israel had to become strong?

She only strengthen hamas and preserve the problem with her narrow view and actions. She demonize an entire side just like Ben Gvir do with the Palestinians. How she can expect my side will want to even listen to her when my side's survival concerns and worries aren't interesting her at all? In that sense in what she is different? Is she an honest or fair protestor? I dont think so. In an indirect way she plays into the genocidal desire of the Iranian regime when totally ignoring one half of the equation.

A lof of this is done out of fear and unfamiliarity. Their side has also reponsibility to the way Israelis see them. This is a tango.

She is the Ben Gvir of the opposite edge. Just as poisonous as him.

Lies are used when a person knows he cannot harness truth to his claims.