Are you kidding?
Of course there are.
You gotta be seriously deluded to even want the job.
If you actually valued truth you would never apply for that job.

I explain this difference as the difference between Blue and Orange.
Nazi Germany was Blue-Red and current America is Orange-Blue. Blue is a collectivist stage and Orange is an individualist/libertarian stage. This is why capitalism will manifest differently at these stages.
I see no risk of America actually becoming a Christian nationalist state. That would be too unpopular and too low in development. America is not going back to solid Blue. But America can go hyper toxic Orange. Which is where we are headed now.
The real danger is not a Christian theocracy but a hyper-capitalist oligarchic technocratic dystopia.

The government is incapable of handling the levels of truth and consciousness that the most conscious people would bring.
What the government needs is not the most conscious people, but people who are slightly more conscious than average. That's what Bernie is.
Government doesn't need ideas which are 300 years ahead of their time. It needs ideas which are 10-20 years ahead.
As you can see with recent developments, people are nowhere ready for serious progressive ideas. They need something much less developed.
The best quantum physics profressor is lost on middle school children. It's not what they need.
My work is not what most people need.

Not true at all.
Twitter/X is an unprofitable shitshow, bleeding people to Threads and Bluesky.
Entrusting AI to Musk is foolish. He cannot even run Twitter without injecting it with his silly biases.
Twitter is less truthful than before he took it over. Because he has no understanding of what truth requires. His notion of truth is just whatever serves his power.

In a healthy, developed society corporations would place the betterment of mankind as their highest priority and profit as secondary. Until that happens society will be sick and corrupt.

They will change it for optics, and then a year later they will change it back and charge you even more when no one is looking.
Again, you're dealing with a system and a stage of development, not an evil person or company.

Although I´m not black pill, I kind of understand it. I never got girls laugh at me, ridicule me, or do nasty stuff. But probably if I was a weaker looking man or more ugly, I would get the same treatment. I know a lot of below average guys just giving it up. Too many guys. And nobody is talking about it, especially women not caring about this group of men while they care about everything else and especially caring about their own interests.
I have fair share of success because I, kind of, go for 6´s and 7´s because those are easy to wrap up. But if I would aim for my own league I kind of agree that dating is more difficult than ever. I have an American friend in Europe and he says it is more difficult in EU than in the US. I´m not going into the specifics but he was very clear about it.
Personally I just do dating for myself, not for the girl. Because I think most women are not worth it. Too entitled for more than they give and too big of a body count to make sacrifices for. And if you have this attitude of doing things for yourself from a POV of already being complete, and her just being a NPC, it actually works out.
It is important to not have resentment for female nature and accept them as they are. And from that acceptance, muster some love you are willing to give. Just having huge resentment and expecting women to behave and think like men is just a recipe for unhappiness. Just look at the sadness of Alexander´s face. It is a pity.

A fascist fantasy.

It's much deeper and more nuanced than that.
I've had profound insights into the workings of mankind, society, civilization, culture, politics, social hierarchies, etc. I understand the fantasies and illusions that govern all of mankind's ignorance and behavior. That's no light thing to stomach.
I want to make some videos about it but I'm also careful not to blackpill you guys. I haven't even released videos on this topic yet and you guys already saying I'm too negative and cynical. If I actually laid it all out, you guys would get super bummed out.

One time I was in bed with a girl and I told her:
I wanna go to a Chinese supermarket, buy a chicken foot, tie some dental floss around it, and hang it around your neck.

Congrats!
The reality is that most one nights stands are pretty lame. The sex isn't good because it feels awkward with a stranger and it can be hard to relax and enjoy it. Plus condoms.
But the biggest problem is when you pull a girl you're not attracted to. The lesson for you here is: pull hotter girls who actually turn you on. And then have sex with her multiple times. Sex starts shallow and get deeper with time.
But also, next to proper jerking off, sex isn't actually as good in most cases. It's hard for a girl to please you better than you can please yourself. The best part isn't the sex itself, it's the human connection before and afterwards.
Sex is sorta overrated. The anticipation of it is better than the act itself.
Don't get bummed out. Find hotter girls and keep trying. You'll have some amazing experiences at some point. Also, some girls are way better at sex than others. Many girls aren't good at it.

Several reasons which are quite personal to me:
1) Health problems made it very difficult to do it consistently.
2) It just pales in comparison to psychedelics.
3) It doesn't suit my type of mind and philosophical interests.

Have you met average people who don't do psychedelics? Most of them are complete dipshits.
70 million Americans voted to reelect Trump.
Yeah, dipshits are our situation. Don't blame that on psychedelics.

Firstly, on a strictly practical level, the war on drugs has been an abysmal racist failure. Countries which decriminalize drugs, even the worst drugs like meth and heroin, end up doing better, having less death, violence, and addiction. This has been scientifically measured.
Secondly, very very very few people will ever be able to develop the intoxication factory that Sadhguru is talking about. Less than 1% of the population will do it. Less than 1% of the population will awaken. For the other 99%, psychedelics are now scientifically proven to provide many benefits such a reducing depression, PTSD, social anxiety, fear of death, addiction recovery, anger reduction, healing childhood trauma, etc. This very important stuff strictly from a medical, social, and political perspective.
Thirdly, psychedelics open the doorway to mystical experience. Most people don't even believe mysticism is real. So they will never discover it through Sadhguru's methods. Psychedelics offer a way to access what Sadhguru is teaching in a more direct, scientific way.
Fourthly, you will never naturally reach the level of consciousness possible via psychedelics using Sadhguru's methods. Never.
Fifthly, of course coke and meth should be distinguished from psychedelics. To talk about these in the same conversation is absurd. We should treat coke and meth differently in that we should help people get off them and onto psychedelics instead. But total decriminalization is the way to go for all drugs. We have tried 50 years of prohibition and it's failed spectacularly.
Sixthly, once you get your hands on the right psychedelics, you will never need to listen to Sadhguru or any guru again. Psychedelics are a far better guru than a human could ever be. The only reason human gurus exist is because the psychedelic guru has been criminalized and demonized. Psychedelics serve an important function in deconstructing the spiritual and religion cults which inevitably arise around gurus. Once Sadhguru is dead, his organization will turn into just another cult religion. And his followers will become devils. Psychedelics are an antidote to that.
Sadhguru sounds wise here, but he's actually being dumb, impractical, and misleading his followers.

Women are passive. They are not gonna do work to sleep with you. You gotta do the work.

Of course! He's a Trump wannabe and makes his way through life by bullshitting. Pure toxic Orange.

A man needs to achieve a material result. A woman wants to relate to others instead.
Because men and women have different responsibilities. A woman usually doesn't have a gun to her head to deliver a material result, but a man does. So for a man sharing feelings is irrelevant. When you are on a battlefield your feelings do not matter.

@Hardkill As I've told you, you gotta put all this stuff into perspective.
Be careful getting too wrapped up in political battles. That too becomes self-deception when not properly contextualized.
You're gonna have political loses. That's just how society is. You don't win every campaign and things don't go your way half the time. Your worldview needs to account for that.
Society develops at a certain rate that you cannot dictate. Just as kids do stupid things. It's like being a parent of immature kids. You can't force maturity on them. And then this becomes a test of your own maturity. How will you behave when others around you act like children or lose their minds? That's the real test.
Things are just getting real.

How far you wish to transcend all that is really up to you.
You have to decide what you want out of life and how you want to live. No one can tell you. If you want to be wrapped up in political battles that's your choice.

@Thought Art I cook eggs in stainless steel all the time. Easy to make an omelet.
I haven't used a nonstick pan in like 10 years.

I remember Leo shared on his blog an autistic teenager who is currently teaching quantum physics in university. This is proof nature is more than capable of creating a human brain and mind that is orders of magnitude better at understanding and learning, even before finishing puberty. We have seen similarly gifted individuals when it comes to spirituality and self actualization, Peter Ralston for example.
But my question is why does nature seemingly limit our spiritual and psychological capacities? Why is Ralston and this teenager the exception and not the rule? And why doesn’t society acknowledge this as even being a problem? America spends more money on alcohol than genetic research every year, this alone highlights our idiocy.

I remember Leo shared on his blog an autistic teenager who is currently teaching quantum physics in university. This is proof nature is more than capable of creating a human brain and mind that is orders of magnitude better at understanding and learning, even before finishing puberty. We have seen similarly gifted individuals when it comes to spirituality and self actualization, Peter Ralston for example.
But my question is why does nature seemingly limit our spiritual and psychological capacities? Why is Ralston and this teenager the exception and not the rule? And why doesn’t society acknowledge this as even being a problem? America spends more money on alcohol than genetic research every year, this alone highlights our idiocy.

It's exactly the opposite.
These paths are accessible to almost nobody. A gold-plated Rolls Royce is more accessible to people than higher stages of development.

If you wanna see how they bullshit each other, watch the All In Podcast.
It's 5 TechBros blowing smoke up each others asses. There's no mystery here.

That is the bottom line, after all the stories and excuses.
Development is what drives everything. Even the so-called corrupt elites are just products of their society and culture. A neoliberal culture breeds people like Trump, Musk, Theil, Zuckerberg, Tate, lobbists, crypto grifters, and Wall Street wolves.