Trump's just a classic narccist and con artist.
Most people don't have personal experiences with such people. But once you've hung around a person like this you learn how they work and they become very predictable. Their whole life revolves around shameless manipulation and opportunism. Eventually it leads to their downfall and hurts everyone close to them.

It's funny how a giant ego looks like mental illness.
All egos behave like Trump. It's just a question of degree.

That's a hallmark of conservative ideology. Its always got a romanticized view of history. The past is always mythologized and whitewashed in grossly unrealistic and ahistorical ways. Conservatism is inherently ahistorical.
As if 1980's, or 1970's, or 1960's, or 1950's America was ever so great. It never was. There were riots and protests and murders and wars in all those eras. And all the laws were far inferior to what they are today. But conservatives love to tell themselves that those were the good ol' days -- when lynching a blackie for looking at a white woman wasn't even considered a crime by the local sheriff.

Well, you are in a dream where you dream a society. This society is evil, it has always been evil, but your whole life depends on it. You were born from evil-doers and you are entangled with the evil-doing of your imagined society.
Just remember that everyone is lost in survival, just like you.
Certainly not. It fact it will probably devolve in many ways.
Hard to say.
You can change some things if you really apply yourself.
Getting old sucks and then you die a miserable death.
Sure, of course.
I don't know cause I have never been asked.
I notice you have a lot of questios which you expect some easy pat answers to, when the right thing is to do the work to have your own insights. My verbal answer do not give you genuine understanding. You have to earn the answers through years of contemplation and experience. I can't just give them to you like a basket of apples.
When you realize Truth it is self-validating and completely obvious. That's what Awakening is and it cannot be wrong. You could misunderstand it though or build a fantasy around it, but that's another matter.
Anti-5-MeO is what you've been puffing your whole life.

It is tricky to approach a table of girls during the day. Takes a lot of skill to pull that off. I don't recommend it for newbies.
Although when I first got into game my wingman would go around popular evening restaurants in town which had sort of outdoorish seating and he would walk up and charm up entire tables of girls. So that is possible, but again, I am not good at that sort of thing so I can't really teach you how to do it.
The key to learning game is to find locations where you can get in a lot of practice with little consequence because you will be failing a lot in the beginning. You need to find a sort of training ground.

I don't have that level of consciousness most of the time. That was my point. So in that sense I am a limited human.
But beyond my humanness I am what you are: INFINITY.

1) By recognizing that your resentment is just an egoic reaction to having been rejected. But no one woman owes you a date. Women are picky just like you are picky about women. Women are not horrible nor unfair to you, they just don't find you as attractive as you would like. And that's life.
2) By recognizing that you must treat each woman as an individual. If other women rejected you that has zero relation to the woman who likes you. Take the win.
3) By being more social and developing some sexual abundance. You are bitter because you are not having sex. If you were having sex you wouls stop being bitter. So the ultimate solution is to increase your dating life.
4) Many women who rejected you might have loved you if you learned proper game and how to communicate properly with them. So learn game.

Both physically and mentally. Lots of potential for accidental abuse, misuse, overuse.
You can really sour yourself on life and blackpill yourself psychologically if you go too deep. Humans are not meant to be that conscious.
And you will not be able to hold on to that level of consciousness. So you will have to live knowning how much you're missing.
The beauty of nondualists is that they just have no idea how little they understand Consciousness. So they can live in bliss.

Make whatever excuses you want, but in the end women will flee from you and flock to guys who go out and develop their game.

@CoolDreamThanks Excellent! Now you're starting to grasp the depth of the problem.
However, it gets even trickier because you are still entangled with the game of survival. You are not free to sit out on the sidelines because life must go on and choices must be made. And no matter how enlightened you get or whatever, you will still be using your mind to make choices and to manipulate reality around you. You will still be thinking, and probably not be thinking well, since that is the default unless you train yourself how to think properly.
So you're damned if you do and danmned if you don't.
And then there is stuff you can know. You can know you're God. And many other things.
Be careful just parroting some platitude of "I don't know". In fact you know many things. If no knowing was possible, that would be too easy. Our situation is more difficult than that. God gives you just enough knowing to hang yourself with

Transcending judgment is really fucking difficult. Because it's so fundamental to our survival.

@Jordan wang If you haven't noticed, all professional athletes, even the very very best, retire by 30 or 40 and move on to doing something else. It's not just because their bodies age. It's largely because competition like that is unsustainable. It's a real grindy way to live.

I would not trust those judges to moderate this forum fairly.

The problem with this theory is that then Donald Trump should be the most tired man on the planet. Yet seems to have boundless energy.

sounds like you need a big reset, like going to live on a farm and just enjoying simple things in life.  22 is nothing. I was suicidal at 32 and now I'm 35 and can't imagine why or how I felt that way. yes of course it gets better, but you have to be in a receptive state to understand and take that advice.  
 

But then you're NOT a loser because you never even set that goal for yourself.
It's like if I called myself a loser for not being a doctor, even thought I never even tried it.
You have a new goal now, so go for it.

Yes, this is the fundamental problem with capitalism, it actually rewards some of the easy and less important jobs while underpaying the most important ones like school teachers and other kinds of helper roles.
It's twisted that a Hollywood actor makes $50 million of 3 months work while the teachers of their children earn $60k/yr.

A Purple caveman can be enlightened or awake.
Spiral level is independent of enlightenment or awakening.

You came to the wrong place for this.
You should know by now that this is antithetical to everything I teach.
And I do not hate Alex Jones. He's just a very self-deceived and mentally ill individual.

I didn't say you have an obligation to reduce suffering for others. I said to reduce the suffering your selfishness causes others. That's an important difference. Otherwise you will feel obligated to hunt down every asshole in the world. Hunting down bad guys is a selfish-motivated activity.

Yes, that's doable, but frankly my work at this point is at a level where most human ideas are a waste of my time.
My focus is deep into my own direct experience and insight into things.
I have spent decades reading stuff and that way just pales in comparison to what I do now.

Actually all things are equally beautiful in the mind of God. In a finite mind beauty is biased according to one's survival needs and other such factors. So, absolutely, a goat's pussy is beautiful, you're just way too biased to recognize its infinite beauty.
You can construct relative notions of beauty based on majority opinion. That's fine. But you must never forget that this is a purely relative notion. It doesn't actually equate to real beauty.
It's true to say that most men would find Megan Fox more beautiful than a fat girl. This is relatively true. But only relatively! You cannot then go around saying that fat girls are not really beautiful. That is the error.
In the end, majority opinion doesn't mean shit. Nor is your dick the arbiter of truth.
The whole issue here is majority rule which excludes minority perspectives. 100 years ago the majority of Americans would say that black girls are not as beautiful as white girls. That doesn't make it true. Although personally I prefer white girls, the difference is I acknowledge that as my bias. I don't try to make it normative or absolutely true. Whereas someone like JP tries to make it normative and absolute, and this is the mistake.
This is where the topic of self-bias comes in very handy, and why I teach about bias a lot. You need to become conscious of your own mental biases. It's okay to have biases, but it's problematic when you deny they are biases.

Because women are judged so much more harshly on their appearance than men. A significant chunk of a woman's survival hinges on her appearance. And women struggle with fat more than men.
1) Do you really think it's good that many young girls and women have crippling self-esteem problems because they cannot live up to the beauty standards found in magazines?
2) Fat is never gonna become the new hot. That's not something to worry about. Fit and normal girls will always be hot.
3) This cover is just throwing a dog a bone. To get so riled up about it and turn it into a political hill to die on is silly. It reeks of insecurity. A secure human would not be bothered by one or two covers of a fat girl. But an insecure conservative will frame this as the beginning of the end of Western civilization.

If you actually discovered an inconsistency in basic arithmetic you would win a Fields Medal, which is harder to win than a Nobel Prize.
The crazy stuff I say cannot be formally proven, which is why I can get away with it. But if you say crazy things about formal systems like arithmetic, you're in trouble without proof because all of math hinges on formal proofs.
In order to criticize math, logic, and science effectively you gotta call meta aspects of their work into question, the psychology of their paradigms, not their content. Because the content of math is quite solid.
For example, you can criticize math for being too reductionistic and too formal, or too narrow to capture reality.

What is it you expect?
What kind of happiness was sex supposed to provide you other than to mollify your horniness?