Natasha Tori Maru

It doesn't delete it - but it shows you it is conditioning. External. You see through the conditioning. You see through the illusions. And that does not delete anything, it lessons the grip and hold these previously believed immutable thoughts had. Then the work of awareness begins to clean these things up and help dissolve unnecessary stuff. Sort of like - you went your whole life assuming certain traits you had (IE reacting to slight) were fixed. Someone is mean - you get angry! Then something reveals to you that you were actually choosing to react. So with this new awareness, you slowly begin to catch yourself when you react, and learn how to stop the response. It is a slow process. It can be done. Your nervous system stops responding in the way it did as a response. Wake up, clean up. Not my saying, but a very, very frequent one in seasoned spiritual process.

Yeah Claude does! The user said ChatGPT - so I assumed just that LLM was being engaged with. ChatGPT always tries to revert to sycophantic shit though - even with my programming. Meta-awareness is a skill very difficult to learn. Massive asset. I didn't become aware of this skill until my 30s! The blindspot amplification is REAL

That is my opinion, not an argument - and since you chose to condescend here: Which I raised earlier, I have not actually engaged you with your question, or attempted to answer it. This may have been missed. I do not have to engage in explaining why - you may ask of course - but I may just choose not answer. If you want to engage properly, you will need to define transhumanism. And present your arguments against it. Not for. I am not really interested in engaging with you regardless - as you are quite condescending to members on this forum when your ideas, opinions/beliefs are challenged. This is not an isolated incident either. I have witnessed you do this numerous times. Thought attachment. I think you have some good views and things to say. I just do not like your condescension.

Keep in mind that it is answering based on the opinions, data, and language of the internet. In terms of medical advices, I would always refer to a trained professional. You never know if the language bot is giving you advice from some random forum posts from 10 years ago in an effort to maintain your engagement. And this leads to the next issue; ChatGPT is sycophantic, and modelled to keep your attention, awareness and engagement. You attention is your most priceless asset. Other than that, I have had many people close to me use it for therapeutic advice and claim excellent results. The one thing I will raise is that, without having thought process awareness (ie meta-thought) the bot will not be able to tell you where your cognitive bias is. Usually you need a trained therapist to be able to dig into your thinking patterns and challenge you to break them; ChatGPT won't challenge you in this way. It has its pros and cons

My statements refer to your cybernetic transhumanism. I think it is hype and dreams. I largely agree with your post. Further to this; the actual experiments done on monkeys with it are a feral abomination of human behaviour.

Ha ha ha, legacy of millennial fashion I think they are unflattering and never wore them. Bootcut, flares and wide legs all the way!

@Carl-Richard Carl... are you flirting with me? You bloody telepathic devil! I laughed out loud at this

It sounds like you both desire a break, or change, in the name of more life experience (from your own descriptions of conversation). But the fear of change and loss is immobilizing you; almost as if you have FOMO in both directions - fear of missing out on experience as a single person, and fear of missing out on a deeper and longer connection with your SO/fear of separation. With breakups such as these, when you are young, and love is newer (as in, you have not been through breakups, and do not yet know if you can trust your ability to recover and love again) it can feel earth shattering. Your whole world feels like it is ending, as typically, first loves are very enmeshed. We can feel some dissolution of ourselves in this enmeshment; making our wants and desires less clear. And when you do break up, no matter on what terms, you will grieve. Because it is the death of a way of life as you knew it; it totally ends. This you need to be prepared for, if you do break it off. If nothing about this relationship changed, no improvements, no breakthroughs & no decline either, would you choose this life five years from now, freely, not out of fear, guilt, or loyalty? Sometimes with first loves, first experiences, we are choosing a life before we have chosen ourself yet - because we haven't experienced enough to KNOW ourselves yet. You are at a very difficult crossroads. You do not want to harbour resentment - this is the death of love. I have a lot of compassion for your situation. I have been there. And it is not easy. I chose to sit with how I felt, regarding the above question in bold. Free of guilt, fear, or loyalty - what feeling comes up if you were to choose to leave?

Pretty much why I do not like to use these terms outside of clinical use; normally a formal diagnosis stipulates the individual has to be unable to function in a normal/standard way to qualify (or are significantly impacted day to day). While the label can help in understanding where we lie on a spectrum, I do not like to label myself with anything at all. In addition, terms and labels are always loaded with context from others; language is so nebulous, I can say one thing, and another person can derive or understand something COMPLETELY different. All the more reason to stick with formal diagnosis rather than self assessment.

@Joshe Thanks for the input - you probably have a decent profile of me, considering our ongoing dialogue and your general interest in personality types No problem with that on my end, definitely a function of my upbringing. Crazy alcoholic artist raising me really impressed individualism to an extreme. Could also be nature - I think I can be, shall we say... headstrong? (I say this over stubborn lol). I do raise it is a process though, and there were some aspects of myself I struggled to accept. But not ND related - gender/sex related, believe it or not! Yep, I guessed you would have clocked that also. I do think there is a neurologically adaptive component. This conversation has made me put neurodivergence on the list of 'hours of reading literature, ten thousand internet tabs & coffee'

Where does it prove, and what point does it prove? Reference unclear. Glad you could clear up in your mind it doesn't work, nevertheless. I am happy to help guide your contemplations. Good for you! Work is getting you there Again as above, directly quote where I say or imply this. I note you weren't able to quote my other request also. Quotes will assist backing up your accusations. But as I do not see them, I will merrily dance on

@Breakingthewall It is my understanding you are not a solipsist? To be clear my questions are just trying to make out your cosmology. Not here to tell or convince anyone

I suppose this touches on a wider scope - if ND is becoming more prevalent; when does it begin to appear to be an evolutionary manifestation of human intelligence, as a response to our rapidly evolving technological environment? You could argue a case that with the advent of smartphones, we are already cyborgs, or a form of. I do not feel I am ND. Maybe others here can assess how they view that within me, I have NO idea how I am perceived or much about ND. I know I am wired very, very differently. I just do not label myself.

Tell me the downsides to transhumanism? Ethics etc Lets stick to the topic being argued, not each others person, hey? I made a statement about the topic, you made a statement about me being open minded. I make no statement about technology being bad, or pushing humanity intellectually. Or spiritually. It is not transhumanism per se I have issues with, as much as it is hype, eugenics, ethics and the corruption behind some avenues of it IE chip in brain. And to be clear, my opinion is not a reflection of the moderators, Leo, or Actualized.org. It is an ethical and moral one of my own. I am not about to shut down dialogue, I like open discussion. But I will admit sometimes it is more a comment on the difficulty moderating such topics; some topics are naturally more catalytic.

I make no such assumptions. I can fend for myself Show me where I said you cannot have a differing opinion? Direct quote, thank you. Outside of being an arbiter of forum guidelines. You are in for a BIG surprise!!!!! I think you are a touch young, inexperienced and innocent. Just a guess. Life will have some... interesting... things. To reveal to you. Is there anything else I can be assistance with?