Danioover9000

Member P3
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    12,494

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Danioover9000

  1. Posted

    @Stovo

    14 hours ago, Stovo said:

    There's a certain appeal to the military for those on the right because they're more likely to have a strong sense of nationalism and be willing to die for that cause. 

    If you're in a war you'd be grateful to have the far right in your military, they're some of the toughest fighters.

       Of course, it all depends on the stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality type and psychological development, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development. Typically, most extremists' groups are attracted to SD red/blue values and groups more so than SD orange/green/yellow/turquoise, 

  4. Posted

    @Florian

    5 hours ago, Florian said:

    Maybe imagine this: A man born in a womans body that has a conservative mind (he wants to keep order intact to keep society alive) feels like having a influence on society is his life purpose and decides to become a politican. His situation is really tricky since one side of him is pulling him to the conservatives who hate transgender people cause of his purpose and another side of him pulls him to the progressive transgender community who hates conservatives, cause he wants to survive and thats where he feels save. Now a person who wasnt consious of both those side inside him/herself would propably be ripped apart internally by this inner conflict, but lets say this man is a very consious human and is aware of these two contradicting aspects in himself. He consiously contemplates what he values more and how he should act. He comes to the conclusion that it is more imporant to him to keep the society alive and become a conservative politician even though that means he will have to sacrifice love for the part of him that is transgender that will have to suffer from this decision, since the core of this society isnt developed enough to fully integrate transgenders. He doesnt resent society for denying him the love he feels like he deserves as a transgender person but accepts the fact that society just isnt developed enough yet and is grateful for the fact that society even gives him the chance to have had a rather save life with enough food, shelter, order, education, entertainment and a lot of other things that he wouldnt have otherwise. Life is mercilessly brutal and humankind had to go through a lot of shit to make things better for future generations. 

    Edit: How would you think/feel about such a person?

    @DrugsBunny @Heart of Space @Danioover9000 @BeHereNow

       It's likely to be that such a person has multiple personality disorder and needs to seek professional help first, get this person sorted out first, before pursuing leadership roles.

  5. Posted

    @something_else

    3 hours ago, something_else said:

    You keep ignoring it when this particular point is made in this thread:

    Being cautious about fucking with gender/identity is not an unwise position.

    There could be unforeseen consequences of promoting trans ideas so heavily to young people. It could seriously fuck up their identity. Transitioning to a new gender should not be something that is considered so lightly because it causes radical and irreversible changes to a person, physically and mentally. And it may have unforeseen consequences for those kids who are not even trans in the first place but essentially get indoctrinated into that worldview.

    ^This is the conservative position for non-bigoted conservatives. Some are just bigoted, sure, but not all. The conservative position is based around being cautious of changing the status quo because rapid change can be dangerous, and cause more damage than it fixes.

       Good take, most progressives and socialists and tankies don't appreciate how humanity has a deep fear of rapid change.

  6. Posted

    @Carl-Richard

    2 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

    Destiny's veganism position is a peak case of intellect without wisdom. You don't need a deep discussion to figure out why killing an animal might be wrong.

       I am willing to bet, that Destiny himself hasn't been to those slaughterhouses, and saw, in his perception and experiences of how those animals are handled and killed. Largely why Daniel Schmachtenberger is who he is, is because one of those factors is his earlier exposer to how they handled animals.

       Vegan Gains is a very questionable person to be the spokesperson for Veganism though. So, ultimately, both these narcissistic dead-beat online game junkies mental masturbating to pixels in a screen, are just playing games at this point.

  7. Posted

       I think on the moderation, Destiny might be right, as Mr. Girl's 700 comments were stirring anti fans against his community. In real life, that's like a big company that hires a new guy, and that new not only sets up a union worker's rights team, up front, but behind the scenes tries to orchestrate events to increase desertion, splinters and tries to make the company look bad.

  8. Posted

    @Thought Art

    1 hour ago, Thought Art said:

     

       My first impressions: It's VICE, a biased alternative media source, that doesn't care for age restricting, censoring graphic content, and doesn't care to leave a warning or disclaimer when a subject matter contains graphic content of violence, physical attacks, drugs, even sexual imagery. If you don't believe me, check some of their videos.

       It's also biased towards socialistic and progressive thinking, so while it shares content that shares values with SD orange to green, it definitely has blind spots towards the lower tiers and higher tiers. 

  9. Posted

    @NoSelfSelf

    On 2022-11-02 at 6:19 PM, NoSelfSelf said:

    @Danioover9000 Haha i fixed my grammer...

    There are millions of them for growth its crazy

    If you dont see it then thats okay,im not going to convince you its pointless....

       Good you fixed your grammar, although I still see 4 red underlines in some of your words, and one blue in the last sentence.

       Not like I've spent 10 years straight in solitary confinement in my house, I do go outside and try to be a person in shops, stores, cafes, mostly small talk. If there are millions of them benefits, could you list maybe 10 or 5, or even just 3? For example, one benefit of dating, is for the 'fun' of dating a woman, and to get talk to a female in a certain other than a general social setting.

       

  10. Posted

    @Panteranegra

    5 hours ago, Panteranegra said:

    Hello! I am a Holistic Fitness and Health coach.

    What books do you recommend me for creating a "tribe"?

    I have red Conversation with God book 4. It's inspiring, but I would like to get deeper into creating a community or conscious movement.

    I can see Leo's recommendation in his library: "Tribe" by Seth Godin ( I haven't red it yet)

    Could you share with me some ideas, examples, books, videos, content and so on?

    Thanks!

       'How To Make Friends and Influence People', 'The 48 Laws of Power', and Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. Robert Green's 'Mastery' is another good one. Also, biographies of presidents and others who were leaders in the past goes without saying important to learn from.

        How did you get the purple Taoism emoji?

  11. Posted

    @BeHereNow

    8 hours ago, BeHereNow said:

    @Danioover9000 @Danioover9000

     

    (Sorry about the gore above not sure how to get rid of it.)

    Some interesting stuff in this thread to consider, a few new angles to look. I don't think JP is evil by any means if that was the impression I gave, I have a very strong bias against conservatism and I just think most of the ideology is repugnant (while other parts of it I find admirable). I'll admit there is some resistance for me to fully understand it, although I probably should for my own sake.

       That's fine, that just means there's more work to do to integrate that view into you. Just be vigilant that it doesn't make you blindly hate JP, or other people with a differing opinion of transgender or transexuality.

  14. Posted

    @BeHereNow    Probably someone for you to study and emulate, in terms of being open minded and willing to learn stuff, not only is it Leo Gura or Daniel Schmachtenberger, but also Contra points, who not only is a YouTuber and streamer, but also a transgender person herself. Contra Points isn't a perfect person herself, but for studying and emulating her style, pick what works and what doesn't from her character.

  15. Posted

    @Carl-Richard

    5 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

    @Danioover9000 This is very tangential and a bit out there and also a little personal, so please don't take offense, but I remember you once called some streamer who got triggered by Mr. Girl's talking style "autistic AND schizophrenic" in that they prefer to use highly literal language. That is more commonly know to be true for autism, but I was surprised why you would mention schizophrenia, but indeed, it does seem to be true for schizophrenia as well: "[...] several studies confirm that schizophrenia patients often choose concrete interpretations when asked to interpret figurative language." (Brune & Bodenstein 2005; Chapman 1960; Kiang et al. 2007).

    Now, you're a pretty literal guy, and you also say you see things that other people don't see (your long-term contact with a spiritual entity), so I'm just curious, do you also experience other symptoms commonly associated with schizophrenia? Note: I'm not trying to infer that you would qualify for a diagnosis (as that requires many more criteria than just a few symptoms), and it's not like I would care anyway, but nevertheless, I'm curious.

       You got me. Although I don't recall calling a streamer 'autistic AND schizophrenic'. Was it in the spiritual sub-forum? That user was conflating Leo's advanced spiritual insights like GOD realization and awakening, but then mentioned that he was in a psych ward for 3 months roughly taking medication and how he had hundreds of voices in his mind about angels and demons, so I was triggered to post in that thread and make clear distinctions between the advanced spiritual stuff with the basic life stuff because I felt that he was conflating.

       Yes, I am a literal guy, and I might have mild schizophrenia. Apart from my paranormal and supernatural experiences with Crysty and my childhood haunting, and a few mystical and meditative experiences recently, and a few psychedelic experiences from holo tropic breathwork, I'm mostly a normal person, that has traversed to several countries, and played many types of video games. These combinations of life experiences have made my view a bit bigger slightly above average. 

  16. Posted

    @Carl-Richard

    14 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

    They were always a public group or at least intended to be, they became famous decades before 2016, and it was not due to a controversial political opinion (that is what I really meant by "controversial position"; sorry, I should've clarified that, you being overly literal and stuff -_-).

     

    It's an explanation, not an excuse.

     

    Calling surgeons butchers and calling women on Twitter ugly is not civil.

       Actually, the precise point of what got them the most hate from the internet, is a negative opinion of a comedian in some interview saying Nickle back songs suck. That's it. That really is what it took to spark the mass negative memes of Nickle Back, their songs sucks. Mind boggling!

       I think JP's behavior in Twitter was a bit rough but considering his fast raise to fame and worldly political attention, that also increased the number of left leaning young people to hate him much more, it may also have something to do with the lobster interview as well. It can be harder to imagine being on JP'S position, having to deal with increasing hate from the left and from SJW's/hippies in Canada and in America. 

  17. Posted · Edited by Danioover9000

    @BeHereNow

    31 minutes ago, BeHereNow said:

    I don't see how his sudden jump into the spotlight excuses him of being a hateful grifter. Also it's not like his points can be presented in a more civil way, his points are why people find him repugnant.

    Maybe it's a little hard for a non-trans person to understand because there's a few of us to relate too, but when you have someone call Elliott's Paige's surgeon a butcher for simply performing top surgery on a consenting adult, it sets off so many red flags and alarm bells that what ever else that person says that can be considered a "good point", it's irrelevant. It just comes off as Nazi-esque to me.

       Is this the video? I do agree that's a bit nasty. For context, he came at Elliot Pager, and Twitter, because Elliot Pager and/or other left leaning extremists were mass reporting him on Twitter, which got his account banned:

       Also, not only does he have traditional/conservative values, but does have some religious leanings to Christianity, and Leo's take on his intellectual honesty and merit is on his psychology rather than on his politics.

       However, the question still remains: Can you put aside your bias, and assume his, and understand and empathize with where he's coming from? Otherwise, why are you here in this forum, in Actualized.org? To be close minded and dogmatic, or to be more openminded and willing to learn from perspectives not your own?

  22. Posted

    @BeHereNow

    1 hour ago, BeHereNow said:

    Leo says JP has a lot of honesty and integrity for a rightwinger. That's probably true, he's definitely smarter than the average person I would suspect. I've seen a few videos where he's charitable to differing ideologies like Islam but when it comes to transgender people and transgenderism, suddenly it's an evil ideology and we're all evil people. Just took a look to see if he's ever had a conversation with a trans person and to my knowledge he hasn't, he's spoken to plenty of people who have an interest on pushing anti-trans agendas to wide audience though, funnily enough.

    I'm not buying this crap that the left misunderstands Mr. Peterson, I think they understand him perfectly fine for what he is. Now if people wanna listen to whatever he has to say on anything, I think people should and he should have the right to say anything he on his mind, no matter how hateful. I think he's a shameless grifter using peusdo-intellectualism as a cloak for his bigotry.

    I don't want to listen to people who think I'm apart of some ideology to destroy the west just because I'm transgender. Perhaps you should compromise with people who don't quite understand and maybe feel a little resistant, sure, but when you have JP saying Elliot Page's surgeon is a butcher and keeps constantly fighting this anti trans culture war for years now on big platforms, are you really that surprised when many trans activists and people on the left want nothing to do with him?

       It'll depend on many factors, such as stage of development, cognitive and moral development, psychology and personality type, ego development, states of being, life experiences and other lines of development, and worldviews and bias. Right now, you a transgender person, likely a socialist/progressive, that's your bias, judging and labelling JP, who's more a traditionalist and conservative, which is his bias. The man problem is that both you and his biases are different and conflict in several points, at tier 1 cognition. If you want to go higher development, you have to be more open minded and willing to learn from his POV, and be willing to seriously take on his worldview, and bias correct rather than bias conflict. Otherwise, if you're not that willing, then you'll forever get triggered by these culture wars between the right and left and triggered by him while your mind makes all kinds of distortions and generalizations to maintain its selfish bias.

       Try to imagine how you look, in the eyes of most normies, and some right leaning people, when someone comes up like they don't like their own sex biology and in denial of being born with male/female sex parts. How do you think a normal person is gonna think and feel when hearing a person say they don't like their penis or vagina? now imagine J.K Rowling's experience of getting attacked in a bathroom with one of these males that call themselves transgender, and how that's a legit fear in the minds of these normal people? Not just getting sneak attacks, but the idea of seeing their children and early adolescent boys/girls being encouraged/entertaining the idea of early sex surgery, imagine the horror and fear of those parents?

       The degree to which you can't or won't imagine the scenarios above, is the degree to which you need more inner work and growth to understand and empathize with those biases different from you. 

    @Carl-Richard

    40 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

    He certainly could make his points in a less inflammatory and culture war-like way, but you also have to be a bit understanding that he has been involved in nothing but controversy since 2016, and it was a big change from his usual life, so it's not a surprise that his approach has become a little less virtuous. Imagine if you yourself became famous over night and half of the political world starts being on your ass for 6 years straight. You might say "ah, but many people are involved in controversy", but I would say not in that way. Does there even exist an analogous example in the age of social media of a non-public person suddenly becoming world famous over night because of some controversial position and then gradually becoming more hot for half a decade?

       Easy, the Nickle Back rock group, still is the most hated and negatively mimed group in the internet.

  23. Posted

    @UpperMaster

    6 hours ago, UpperMaster said:

    I'm familiar with the advice, "don't rush things" and "build a good base", but recently I've tried doing the opposite. I approach everything very much in the mindset of how fast can I do this.  

    I can't even say if I produce work with decreased quality, in fact I think I create the same if not better quality work because I skip all the extra bullshit I used to do when completing a task.

     

    Intelligent people are rewarded because they learn things and achieve things faster.

     

    To what extent can I take this mindset? Are there any huge limitations?

    How important is it to approach things with speed and urgency?

     

     

       Another saying is 'haste makes waste' from an American president, and 'the slowest always wins the race' referring to the rabbit and tortoise.

       Depends on the series of actions and whether your survival is on the line. Should I draw quickly many gestures and loose sketches of a dynamic scene? Should I take my time to detail the forms? Should I become faster in my waitress/waiter job because it's rush hour and there's a que forming? So many factors in the context to consider.

       So, what conext is SPEED and URGENCY an important factor to YOU?