winterknight

I am enlightened. Sincere seekers: ask me anything

4,430 posts in this topic

13 minutes ago, Bauer1977 said:

If a person believes they are going to get stepped on by a giant in a virtual world, the emotional response is genuine, even though the threat is not. And when that emotional response is owned, that's what matters to that person at that time, illusion or not.

The problem here is that the entire idea of a person who has emotional responses is itself part of the "virtual reality" if we take your example. No one can be said to actually have this emotional response.

Who is this person to whom that response matters? And perhaps it might be worth asking yourself -- to whom does it matter right now, this whole idea of others suffering?

10 minutes ago, sword said:

How long did it take to go from your first glimpse of the realization of union, to permanently grounding yourself in the realization? And, do you still feel like there is more to do?

Has your ego reconstructed itself, even though you are now aware of its nature? If so, how has it changed?

Is everything after enlightenment just play?

What will you do now that you are enlightened? create a life purpose?

Are you going to continue to self-actualize other facets of your life?

I'm not really interested in going into great autobiographical detail about my search, but I'll say that from the seeker's perspective it took 20 years of searching. The reality is that there is no such thing as "realization" -- that is part of the realization. And thus there can be no "more" to do, given that there was nothing ever to do, really. Though the seeker must proceed as if there is something to be done. From the mind's standpoint, the mind can always grow quieter and quieter, and that -- to the mind -- is what seems to be happening. In reality there is no such thing as mind.

These are the paradoxes of talking about this stuff.

There is no enlightenment and no "after." There is no "I" after enlightenment, so no question of life purpose. There really isn't, but if I spoke in that language I'd say -- the only purpose is to be, and all else comes involuntarily and spontaneously, unplanned -- even planning itself.

5 minutes ago, Outer said:

Are akilesh's words true?

How does this relate to your search? I don't think asking or answering these kinds of questions is too helpful.


Website/book/one-on-one spiritual guidance: Sifting to the Truth: A New Map to the Self

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@winterknight  thanks for answering my questions :) definitely not the answers I was expecting. Now I have a lot to think about :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, winterknight said:

Who is this person to whom that response matters? And perhaps it might be worth asking yourself -- to whom does it matter right now, this whole idea of others suffering?

Hmmm.... I see what you are getting at. 

Interesting.... O.o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is starting to get out of hand with these ridiculous questions.

This is why Zen masters do not answer stupid questions. Because the ego-mind will create an infinite supply of them to avoid self-inquiry.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, winterknight said:

Yes, I'm suggesting that your understanding of illusion is missing something. If you're interested in discussing this further to deepen your understanding, I'm willing.

But if you're just interested in telling me how right you are, then I'm happy not to continue this conversation.

Why would you ask if I'm interested in discussing to "deepen understanding" when you also say it can't be understood with the intellect? So which is it? Actually, never mind, I know the answer.

I didn't intend to disturb you in your 'I am enlightened ask me anything' guru thread by pointing out the obvious so pardon me for interrupting your teaching of the incomprehensible using limited words.

Peace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, winterknight said:

Who is this person to whom that response matters? And perhaps it might be worth asking yourself -- to whom does it matter right now, this whole idea of others suffering?

Hmmm.... I see what you are getting at. 

Interesting.... O.o

But if everything is God's will, as it appears to be. Doesn't the idea to help others (which is a positive) qualify? I mean, you don't exist either, so who is responding to me, how does that work? I mean even though everything is an illusion, we still do interact here with a purpose though, don't we? Are you not a person typing here the same as me?

Edited by Bauer1977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

This thread is starting to get out of hand with these ridiculous questions.

This is why Zen masters do not answer stupid questions. Because the ego-mind will create an infinite supply of them to avoid self-inquiry.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I am genuine with my queries. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Leo Gurahe handles it quite well however and it’s been most insightful 

never have I had such a clear understanding of enlightenment approached from different angles 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DrewNows said:

@Leo Gurahe handles it quite well however and it’s been most insightful 

never have I had such a clear understanding of enlightenment approached from different angles 

Same!  Screw Leo we can't help but be idiots this thread has offered so much to me in such a clear way


Comprehensive list of techniques: https://sites.google.com/site/psychospiritualtools/Home/meditation-practices

I appreciate criticism!  Be as critical/nitpicky as you like and don't hold your blows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

This thread is starting to get out of hand with these ridiculous questions.

This is why Zen masters do not answer stupid questions. Because the ego-mind will create an infinite supply of them to avoid self-inquiry.

:D This is true, and there are some questions here that are less than meritorious, but there are a lot of genuine ones as well. I partly feel committed to "pay it forward" since I've had people patiently answer my questions as a seeker, and have learned so much from various Q&A dialogues with, e.g. Ramana Maharshi.

13 minutes ago, Bauer1977 said:

Hmmm.... I see what you are getting at. 

Interesting.... O.o

But if everything is God's will, as it appears to be. Doesn't the idea to help others (which is a positive) qualify? I mean, you don't exist either, so who is responding to me. How does that work? I mean even though everything is an illusion, we still do interact here with a purpose though, don't we?

Great choice of emoji. Yes, the idea to help others qualifies. But dig down deeper into the "I" and you might find that the very idea of a "purpose" doesn't really represent reality accurately... that in fact things happen "without a purpose."


Website/book/one-on-one spiritual guidance: Sifting to the Truth: A New Map to the Self

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, winterknight said:

Great choice of emoji. Yes, the idea to help others qualifies. But dig down deeper into the "I" and you might find that the very idea of a "purpose" doesn't really represent reality accurately... that in fact things happen "without a purpose."

So if I ask you, who responds to people's questions here everyday as Winterknight?.... what is your response?

I feel I am to the point where I can brush away anything in awareness as the smaller "i" or the illusion whenever I choose to. When I am doing self inquiry, its so still, it's just being. If that's the perspective to be held always, and if that's the goal, why would the body ever need to move again. What makes your body move? Is it just happening on its own accord, with you as an almost disinterested detached witness?

Edited by Bauer1977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ramana Marharshi talked about the true self residing in 'the heart on the right,' and that thoughts travel from the heart up to the head to become the 'I' thought. But if we're not our bodies, how can we say the true self resides in the heart? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Bauer1977 said:

So if I ask you, who responds to people's questions here everyday as Winterknight?.... what is your response?

I feel I am to the point where I can brush away anything in awareness as the smaller "i" or the illusion whenever I choose to. When I am doing self inquiry, its so still, it's just being. If that's the perspective to be held always, and if that's the goal, why would the body ever need to move again. What makes your body move? Is it just happening on its own accord, with you as an almost disinterested detached witness?

Who says the body is moving? It is only when the mind leaves that place which is “so still, it’s just being” that someone says the body moves... 

So what is happening, then? Well, it is only when the mind leaves that place that THAT question is asked...

The same is true of the questions about who is responding to questions here. 

3 hours ago, Yog said:

How/why did perception came into being ?

Follow the path of self-inquiry and you’ll find out that it cannot be said ever to have come into being.

2 hours ago, Wisebaxter said:

Ramana Marharshi talked about the true self residing in 'the heart on the right,' and that thoughts travel from the heart up to the head to become the 'I' thought. But if we're not our bodies, how can we say the true self resides in the heart? 

Yes, this is an unfortunately common misunderstanding. The Heart simply means the Self. All the right side of the body stuff is only meant for those who currently identify themselves other the body, as a way of helping them go beyond it, as a bridge to a better understanding.

Edited by winterknight

Website/book/one-on-one spiritual guidance: Sifting to the Truth: A New Map to the Self

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, winterknight said:

Who says the body is moving? It is only when the mind leaves that place which is “so still, it’s just being” that someone says the body moves... 

So what is happening, then? Well, it is only when the mind leaves that place that THAT question is asked...

The same is true of the questions about who is responding to questions here. 

OK, I get what your saying. If there is never a who, there is never an experience. So is the goal of Self-Inquiry then for the mind to never completely leave that place? I feel I already know the answer, but I want to see if I am on the right track or not

Edited by Bauer1977

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.