Nivsch

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,144

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nivsch

  1. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    23 minutes ago, Lento said:

    Taliban leaders know how to manage and manipulate systems. They know how to manipulate Trump and to make him make stupid mistakes. Are they good or evil? I don't know, and I don't care. All I know (assume) is that they're at tier two level of thinking and sophistication, and that Trump isn't.

    That cannot be right in any universe.

    Taliban in their barbaric ideology are RED-blue. They know how to manipulate trump because they have overlap with trump in red.

    0% yellow.

  2. Posted

    @Serotoninluv @Lento @Aquarius @Nak Khid@Key Elements @Nickyy  @remember thanks all 

    On 9.11.2019 at 5:43 PM, Lento said:

    I think tier two is higher than tier one as long as you're still in tier one. But when you become at tier two, things start becoming clearer to you, and the hierarchy breaks down. Stage Purple would not be viewed lower than Green anymore. I think it's only at tier two that consciousness starts practically working in a mindful real-time mode. So, it becomes more of a 'case by case' than an 'absolute solution or view for all cases'.

    Of course, this quality still can be misused and can be really dangerous. That's where the unhealthy manifestations of Yellow start to appear, it's when you use the wisdom you have for selfish reasons, so that's returning back to beige only with a lot more tools for manipulating reality.

    1. Why yellow won't see purple as lower than green? 

    2. What manipulations he can do? As i know, yellow won't manipulate the system

  5. Posted

    @Leo Gura I want to show at least an intuition of why it is limited. I said that math is like a machine we input it and gets outputs and again input and this creates a closed loop which makes us overlook intuition, senses etc and dont think for ourselves. And that it like thinking in a closed pipe streams without see outside of these streams. And then I gave them first technique - observing thoughts and emotions (havent publish yet).

  9. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    1 hour ago, ajasatya said:

    @Nivsch The scientific method is a well-defined closure. If you want to debate with people that really understand Science, good luck! Such people are very rare.

    Most people who go to universities and get their bachelors, masters or PhDs are just repeating old cycles without going meta and realizing what they're really doing.

    Do you think you know enough to understand what Science is about in the first place in order to investigate its fundamental barriers? This is very tricky.

    Actually my goal in the video is not proffessionaled and detailed analyze science, but more in the bottom line general line of that thing, to rise the consciousness of my facebook friends and my youtube chennel (small, yet ?) audience. And im doing ir through introducing the SD stages. Right now i thinking about stage green part B video, and want to show them the problem with materialistic logic thinking and why this thinking cannot solve our root personal problems, and therefore have to go beyond language (what new age's center of gravity wants to teach us).

    But the problem is that people can write me that "Language is enough and we dont need meditation and self inquiry because there are psychologists and with them you can go deep enough to core issues. So our culture right now is good enough! So you dont have to go beyond language at all."

  10. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    I want to show that science tries to communicate us the truth with external language that itself creates a closed loop.

    I want to show that its never gonna solve our root inner problems - depression, anxiety and more mental problems, because to solve this we have to turn inwards and learn ourselves independently without any language.

    The problem is, that people can comment me and write:

    "But there are already psychological therapies. We can go to a psychologist and he will help us to go to our root problems in a direct manner trough conversation. So science is not supposed to solve our root problems, because for that you have the psychologists. So in conclusion, our culture is good enough in solving your root issues, we already do that. And psychology is even can be seen as a part of science. Because the therapies today are part of investigations, learning from mistakes and improving all the time. So you dont really have to go beyond language, as long as you have the right therapist. Language can be enough!"

     

  11. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    @wk197 No.

    I'm 32 and i'm attracted to 18-30 year old boys.

    And yes sometimes to 17 and 16 but its illegal so i dont try (and also its too much mentally different). 

    I try only 20-30 ages.

    So what, i'm a phedophille? No.

    Dont get triggered by stupid toxic definitions and judgments.

    Is it legal? You love each other and develop each other? Thats it.

    All the other stuff are nonsense.

  14. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    @Nickyy yes but about the TRUTH itself, (politically and socialy speaking) green is far above the others.

    I agree the forcing and pushing is wrong in most cases, but in the other hand if we won't push the orthodox sector to accept gays more (campaigns, social pressure...) many ultra orthodox children will suffer because of boycotting by their family. For example.

  15. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    9 minutes ago, Nickyy said:

    Sounds like you were identified with green? That's not really living in the present moment, it's identification with thought. 

    No? 

    In the individual domain i think that tier2 approach is critical to solve personal problems like emotional, and quality of life as a whole.

    But in the political and social domain I see green as the hegemonic as the truth holder. Like it has 70-80%.

    And 20-30% to all the rest povs altogether (orange and below).

     

  16. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    28 minutes ago, Nickyy said:

    Stop thinking about it. When you stop trying to live from the intellect you will see how all of these perspectives are right and that you can access them all fairly easily in the present moment when you need to.

    At the moment you're just fixated on an ideology of trying to be super developed, which is a false position (as it's causing you obvious problems in relating to others)

    You're already whole. 

    I did. I lived from spontaneosely, not intelected, very clear political position for couple of years (equality, gay rights, anti orthodox, sensitivity to the weak, animal liberation etc) with arguing with people and all that before i knew about SD and this forum. But thats hasn't made me agree with the conservative/over-capitalist ideas at all. I was very strongly in the green pov and I think it just much more developed than the other views. Therefore i cannot see myself really agree and "integrate" the other opinions because it is not symmetric! Yes we have to balance this with other povs and life condition but its not symmetric at all.

    Maybe the political issue itself it very limited and perspectives are much more wide thing. But in the political-social domain its clear to me who is much more right and who is much more wrong. Quite clear.

     

  17. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    On 4.11.2019 at 10:59 PM, Serotoninluv said:

    Transcend the desire to objectively analyze different POVs. Objective analysis is stage Orange. Yellow is about integrative, systemic, relativistic modes of being. For example, Yellow can comfortably hold two opposing POVs without grasping. Yellow understands paradox and is fluid.

    Perhaps read more about what Yellow is like. My favorite book in this are is "How to think like Leonardo Da Vinci". Imo, Da Vinci is a great example of Yellow. 

    This week I bought the two System Thinking books Leo recommended + a third book of system thinking that had good comments in Amazone (76% gave five stars). I heard twice the colors videos of Leo and read about them from multiple of sites. The book "how to think like Da Vinci" changed your view and behaviour in life significantly?

  20. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    On 4.11.2019 at 7:41 PM, NoSelfSelf said:

    Because you should know that any perspective how ridiculous it is it has truth in it and point is to combine as many perspectives to make a big picture...most uneducated people speak truth but its low value or it could be a big value to incomporate into your big picture understanding of a thing...every perspetctive=half truth

    More half truth=better big picture understanding...

    Do you have example of what we can do better in political?

    Because a left-centrists party already exists and it already includs moderate left thinking but with security emphasizes etc.

     

  22. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    On 5.11.2019 at 10:20 PM, Average Investor said:

    Your name is fine if that is what you want. Singing, meteorology, and  personal development are very different. I would suggest trying one topic or category and you could branch it out or alter it later.  It's going to be really hard for you to gain traction with so many different things going on. A person will come to look at your other content and not really even be sure what the channel is about. 

    Its interesting because in MY subjective feeling the all 3 topics are foundamently the same "thing" in their essense. It feels to me connected enough. Of course that from outside it will be seen differently, but again i cant choose one or two above the others.

    Actually SynOptic is a brand name that covers greatly both meteorology (Synoptic maps - the pressure systems) and personal development and consciousness.

     

  25. Posted · Edited by Nivsch

    Is it good enough that the name of the channel will be my own name (Niv Schleifer), or another name?

    Because there are a lot of singers (I learn singing for 5 years so far) that their channel = their name and they are very popular.

    I want to mention that I dont want that my channel will include only singing videos of me, but also videos in which i talk about my insights and what helped me the most in personal development, and introduce my opinions about things and make my own voice and my personality being heard and give value and help others.

    Also I am highly interested, and I am very good at (because I have been learning it for years) Meteorology and I want to introduce it to people because almost nobody really knows this subject and it highly interesting and magical when you know it.

    In summary, I have at least 3 topics which are equaly reflect my deepest interesting topics (not to say I cant discover more in the future) but It feels quite clear to me that at least these 3 topic i want to introduce in my youtube channel. there is not one topic which is above the others and i just can't choose one. The all three are significant.

    So i want to incorporate the all three in my channel.

    Having said that, is it enough, if i want popularity, that the name will stay my own name or that it will be a new brand name which covers and connecting the all 3 topic?