Butters

Ladyboys

115 posts in this topic

Never been to thailand but I do find femboys attractive. Planning on going to anime conventions to game and meet some there this year. 

 


Owner of creatives community all around Canada as well as a business & Investing mastermind 

Follow me on Instagram @Kylegfall 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

The finer details

A dick.

Lol


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Leo Gura said:

A dick.

Lol

I walked right into that.

NGL I can't stop laughing xD


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is crazy that they care more about beauty than "standard woman".

Search for "Agatha Lira". She is a trans woman from Brazil. 

Edited by CARDOZZO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually if I remember having a penis it's because I'm dehydrated, someone in this thread's gonna have to pay me 3 dollars for a gallon of water so I can forget about that rope-angle, please and thanks. (it's been 8+ months since i remembered holy fck). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

All women are gay I see the truth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Shermaningeorgia said:

The definnitions Kinsey made decades ago stll stand. And men like women physically for feminine physcial and behavioural characteristics. That's independent of of seeing her genitals, which even when naked are not technically visible always.

Keep coping buddy; genitals are absolutely crucial in this aspect and the moment I'd find out a "woman" has a dick I'd be immediately grossed out; even if prior to possesing that knowledge I was attracted to the outward feminine bodily characteristics and behaviors. See this definition sicko:

Screenshot_20260202_061556_Chrome.jpg

Edited by NewKidOnTheBlock

"A man can do what he wills but cannot will what he wills"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

Fine. That’s your opinion. And just that 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Keep coping buddy; genitals are absolutely crucial in this aspect and the moment I'd find out a "woman" has a dick I'd be immediately grossed out; even if prior to possesing that knowledge I was attracted to the outward feminine bodily characteristics and behaviors. See this definition sicko:

Screenshot_20260202_061556_Chrome.jpg

Make sure you clear out your browser history though, don't want any funny stuff in there..

Edited by Talinn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LordFall said:

Never been to thailand but I do find femboys attractive. Planning on going to anime conventions to game and meet some there this year. 

Don't forget your ladyboy declaration form

619066362_122144040536976741_36454529381

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

No

It clearly seems to be the case with women, at least. And with all the homophobia and concern about whether other men are gay or not that men display across the globe - that reeks of gayness, if you ask me. For us non-homophobes, other people’s sexuality is about the most boring and uninteresting thing there is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

That's pretty stage blue nglxD

Like a good russian would say.

Edited by Eskilon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Winona Ryder of 20 yes ago had a c*ck I’d let her ram me. Even now she still looks pretty great for her age. 

Angelina may secretly have one, all those adopted children right. So I am open minded. 

It’s difficult to say who else, I don’t really follow celebrities just one’s knew growing up. Celebrity culture is clearly becoming an outside kennel now but, slowly. The red carpet has become tacky and awards ceremonies confusion whenever anyone is clapping, but they know they gotta do it to keep getting deals, dollars and their own roots, and not the homely one’s, although I’m sure it makes them proud. Unless you’re like Eminem’s mom; a complex mammalian familial engagement, I think he pushes the rapping not physical limit of saying he fcks her but I could be wrong, it’s just for rapping right?

Transgender is an important subject, never touched another humans boat that hits the docking bay of a female.  That said, for those interested Michael Levin’s work on bioelectriity and it’s overlap with genetic engineering and say softer techs like CRISPR, the idea of transforming to alternate biological genders not only more seamlessly but the ability to advance the selective parameters of those choices both internal and external to a traditional gender itself… I would say without a doubt somewhere, in some crazy lab, there’s a baby somewhere with a penis attached to its head and it’s eyes out of its ass cheeks.

Sci-Fi, is yet to be fully even be spelled out by the movies, in fact it may in the future looking back be just seen as a chick flick compared to the landlines we’re going to have to traverse, just that Angelina’s dick may no longer be one of them unless anti-ageing advances flares up or her sexual appetite more, in which case, she may take over the whole planet with her c#ck swinging. There’s this scene in the film “Dude Where’s My Car?” that I remember with a giant female, reminds me of that. Irrespectively, I simply wouldnt believe a genuine man that would deny Angelina fully if she had a baseball bat swinging for home runs on his balls.

Edited by oOo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

So if you're a bi guy, you're straight? And if you're an impotent old man, you're gay? 

Edited by Butters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 01/02/2026 at 10:57 AM, Leo Gura said:

Dude, what?

If you want a girl with a dick you are gay.

The last thing a straight man wants on his girlfriend is a dick. That is not a little thing, that's a dealbreaker. Lol.

If you negotiating about your gf having a dick, you ain't straight. Do whatever, but don't kid yourself.

🙄

I’m a bit surprised by this. You often emphasize how language and concepts distort reality, yet here you’re treating a culturally loaded label (“penis”) as if it maps cleanly onto biology, identity, and sexual orientation.

Preferences are preferences not ontological truths. Everyone is attracted to a range, not to “women in general” or “men in general.” What people actually respond to is their own internal prototype. A particular configuration of appearance, affect, presence, and embodiment that they label “woman” or “man.” That prototype already excludes vast numbers of biologically female women and includes traits that are not strictly biological at all.

Genital appearance does not define biological sex in a clean binary way. The clitoris and penis are the same dimorphic organ, differentiated by hormonal pathways, enzymes, receptors, and timing. Variations exist on a wide spectrum. There are documented cases where individuals are born with externally female genitalia and develop fully functional male genitalia at puberty due to enzyme differences. These bodies do not fit simplified binary categories, yet they are not pathological.

When an organ’s appearance crosses an arbitrary visual threshold, we rename it “penis” and treat it as ontologically decisive. It isn’t. Individual sexual components that have dimorphic potential are not exclusive. 

Calling attraction “gay” or “straight” based solely on the presence of a single organ is a category error confusing appearance with biology and biology with identity. It is entirely possible and biologically documented for someone to be neurologically female and embodied in a form that does not conform to ‘folk taxonomy’. Labels don’t change that and it also does not follow that a person attracted to them is gay.

I’m not raising this as an exception, but as a concrete example of the principles above. I know this from direct experience. I am someone who has been scanned and tested, neurologically aligned with male-typical neuroendocrine development, carries XX chromosomes, had female looking genitalia, and gonadal dysgenesis, meaning I did not have endogenous hormones for enzyme production to continue development at a biologically critical age.

I embody both male and female biology, but I am in no way a woman, and I have had extensive surgeries to correct that lack of development for the sake of intimacy in a way that feels natural to me. Not everyone in a similar position will feel the same, and there are “nebulous” reasons for that.

My wife is most certainly not gay, and after having had intimate relationships with other men, her experience is that I am no different. Unique, yes but not different from her preference for what she considers a man.

Sexual attraction responds to a whole, integrated system not a single anatomical component and personal bias/preference according one’s own ideal has a lot to do with that. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:D 

Edited by UnbornTao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Adrian colby I am not surprised by Leo's response.

To my opinion awakening does not transcend incentive structures or biology/genetics. I see this across the board with teachers. But this is just my observation 😃

In addition, thank you for your earnest and candid report of your experiences. No shame needed. I see nothing wrong with anything, let alone yourself, to carry any sense of internal 'wrongness'. I enjoy your expression. 

Huge courage and grace - respect 


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now