Shermaningeorgia

They would follow this basic algorithm: - Recognise a human, without reference to race, religion, appearance, attire, etc. - They would be programmed to judge all things by the DSM and the proper interpretation of such. - if they fail, they're terminated and then reprogrammed. This is done in public viewing to improve transparency

I am nastier to pretty ladies than to others. I believe fully in being civil to all, but I admit I fail in this regard mainly since hotties tend to be scum. I make a point to yell if they get too close in public. As in, I often commute to work/uni. And part of the commute involves traversing a big international rail terminal - this means a near UN of hotties literally. I even swear at some in their own language - if I note they are Spanish-speaking, I'll do it. They often walk so fast with their heavy luggage, and they catch me, and I have no room or time to manoeuvre, so I yell at them. i don't like being hit, thus it's my right. And they have no right to hit me. nothing says their looks give them that "right". It's satisfying to hit them. In restaurants, I enjoy yelling at them. especially as on some occasions they would blindside me if I'm waiting in a busy entrance foyer with other patrons. I don't go to establishments to be manhandled or disrespected. SO will they ban me for shouting at their employees, when they're the ones who are aggressors? Good. There are so many other places to go to. Not skin off my nose. i don't respect looks. why must I? we're all there on the rock in space. So i call them out harshly when needed. Or can some hot bitch try and persuade me why she has a "right" to do what she wants? over all others ? odd logic

A mental disorder is a condition of the mind or behaviour that causes either distress or social malfunctioning.

I do not do this. You're massively projecting.

social skills. More like the social OPINIONS of some scammer PUA.

Did your church growing up tell you these "norms" of regulating others? Apparently, I didn't attend your church or have the critical thinking to question what your pastor told you. Funny how you gripe when people are irreverent. Sorry, sir, but that's part of life. Stop projecting your inner goofy "norms" onto the world. and stop assuming all must look on you kindly. it's baseless and weird and cringe. It belies you're a supposed "man" with no real insight and just bigged up in your youth/church. Any mofo who dares assue I "must" look up to them is a fool and cannot navigatge basic shit in life.

Do indians in temples get taught broken English, thus designed to try and "mess" with people? Or do they hav this "ordained" angle to try and fuck with others? And thus betray the "kind" personas they attempt to push into the world?

Any flesh and blood human being IS BANNED from therapy. They can only form the DSM but NEVER, EVER execute it. This is enforced by a global treaty. Anybody caught is imprisoned for a decade or faces a MASSIVE fine. as in $USD 30m equivalent. We develop androids to act as therapists programmed with the DSM. They are then reviewed after a year to enusre they are performing per cited programming. this will be a transparent process, with the results of every android therapist posted publicly. Thus, there would be no to fewer petty biases. And only objective care. Those who oppose this in spirit had issues or morality by-passes.

Take Taylor Swift, Venus Williams, Pokimane and Jake Paul. They get seen objectively and clinically due to these reasons: - how they look - their race - their countenance And that overshadows all other considerations. So if they are told they are depressed by these "therapists", they will have their concerns taken objectively. If they want a partner or to shag around, they'd be seen holistically as humans. But not others? OH yes...of course. coz of their looks, race, and countenance. No room for basic medical ethics. or diligence. No training, often spanning years, of how to engage with patients, oh no! It's all forgotten as soon as one leaves the training centre. Just like how a person passes their driving test and all they learn exits thei brain as soon as they receive their driving licence. So AI fits. SO ALL can get proper treatment. Those who disagree are evil nazis. yes, NAZIs. A core plank of Nazi ideology was to denigrate and limit. So in spirit one who disagrees is a NAZI in heart. Yes, I said it. NAZI - SIEG! HEIL! SIEG! HEIL!! SIEG! HEIL!!! DER FUHRER would be proud.

Therapists are partial asf and hypocritical. They are pretty much selective. It’s all based on race and looks. And people who deny it are evil and hypocrites.

Name a law stating one has a negative look up to pretties. Seems your only comeback is a childish desire to chase after pussy. so a hot bitch at random kills your dog. Is that acceptable? Cos she’s hot?

He’s been in high end political life for many years. And people are shocked by his conduct ? Lol

Yes therapists are scum. You might come a shoddy country that wishes to keep people down. Don’t project that elsewhere.

It’s a fact that they’re partial. And fail to uphold ethics. Is that good then? Or you’ve been spoilt by looks not to care? Well I do. I’m glad it’s good to say otherwise or stand up for good.

The issue is to ban them all. They’re scum. Ai is the answer. Like data from st tng.