Ladyboys

[LordFall]

Never been to thailand but I do find femboys attractive. Planning on going to anime conventions to game and meet some there this year. 

 

[Leo Gura]

5 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

The finer details

A dick.

Lol

[Natasha Tori Maru]

Just now, Leo Gura said:

A dick.

Lol

I walked right into that.

NGL I can't stop laughing 

[CARDOZZO]

It is crazy that they care more about beauty than "standard woman".

Search for "Agatha Lira". She is a trans woman from Brazil. 

Edited 18 hours ago by CARDOZZO

[Talinn]

Usually if I remember having a penis it's because I'm dehydrated, someone in this thread's gonna have to pay me 3 dollars for a gallon of water so I can forget about that rope-angle, please and thanks. (it's been 8+ months since i remembered holy fck). 

[Leo Gura]

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

Edited 18 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Talinn]

5 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

All women are gay I see the truth...

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

6 hours ago, Shermaningeorgia said:

The definnitions Kinsey made decades ago stll stand. And men like women physically for feminine physcial and behavioural characteristics. That's independent of of seeing her genitals, which even when naked are not technically visible always.

Keep coping buddy; genitals are absolutely crucial in this aspect and the moment I'd find out a "woman" has a dick I'd be immediately grossed out; even if prior to possesing that knowledge I was attracted to the outward feminine bodily characteristics and behaviors. See this definition sicko:

Edited 17 hours ago by NewKidOnTheBlock

[Shermaningeorgia]

2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

Fine. That’s your opinion. And just that 

[Talinn]

1 hour ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Keep coping buddy; genitals are absolutely crucial in this aspect and the moment I'd find out a "woman" has a dick I'd be immediately grossed out; even if prior to possesing that knowledge I was attracted to the outward feminine bodily characteristics and behaviors. See this definition sicko:

Make sure you clear out your browser history though, don't want any funny stuff in there..

Edited 16 hours ago by Talinn

[emptiness dancing]

4 hours ago, LordFall said:

Never been to thailand but I do find femboys attractive. Planning on going to anime conventions to game and meet some there this year. 

Don't forget your ladyboy declaration form

[Kid A]

9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

No

It clearly seems to be the case with women, at least. And with all the homophobia and concern about whether other men are gay or not that men display across the globe - that reeks of gayness, if you ask me. For us non-homophobes, other people’s sexuality is about the most boring and uninteresting thing there is.

[Eskilon]

8 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

That's pretty stage blue ngl

Like a good russian would say.

Edited 10 hours ago by Eskilon

[oOo]

If Winona Ryder of 20 yes ago had a c*ck I’d let her ram me. Even now she still looks pretty great for her age. 

Angelina may secretly have one, all those adopted children right. So I am open minded. 

It’s difficult to say who else, I don’t really follow celebrities just one’s knew growing up. Celebrity culture is clearly becoming an outside kennel now but, slowly. The red carpet has become tacky and awards ceremonies confusion whenever anyone is clapping, but they know they gotta do it to keep getting deals, dollars and their own roots, and not the homely one’s, although I’m sure it makes them proud. Unless you’re like Eminem’s mom; a complex mammalian familial engagement, I think he pushes the rapping not physical limit of saying he fcks her but I could be wrong, it’s just for rapping right?

Transgender is an important subject, never touched another humans boat that hits the docking bay of a female.  That said, for those interested Michael Levin’s work on bioelectriity and it’s overlap with genetic engineering and say softer techs like CRISPR, the idea of transforming to alternate biological genders not only more seamlessly but the ability to advance the selective parameters of those choices both internal and external to a traditional gender itself… I would say without a doubt somewhere, in some crazy lab, there’s a baby somewhere with a penis attached to its head and it’s eyes out of its ass cheeks.

Sci-Fi, is yet to be fully even be spelled out by the movies, in fact it may in the future looking back be just seen as a chick flick compared to the landlines we’re going to have to traverse, just that Angelina’s dick may no longer be one of them unless anti-ageing advances flares up or her sexual appetite more, in which case, she may take over the whole planet with her c#ck swinging. There’s this scene in the film “Dude Where’s My Car?” that I remember with a giant female, reminds me of that. Irrespectively, I simply wouldnt believe a genuine man that would deny Angelina fully if she had a baseball bat swinging for home runs on his balls.

Edited 10 hours ago by oOo

[Butters]

9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Here's Leo's definition of being straight:

You don't have a pussy and you crave pussy.

So if you're a bi guy, you're straight? And if you're an impotent old man, you're gay? 

Edited 9 hours ago by Butters

[LoneWonderer]

11 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

 

In 100 years when Leo's disciples are compiling a book of all the great masters teachings...

[lostingenosmaze]

@Leo Gura You said you experienced an actual female orgasm in one of your Awakenings, does that make you gay? 😁

[ZenSwift]

On 28/01/2026 at 1:15 PM, Butters said:

What has been your experience dating ladyboys? I am talking to one now who I met online. She's nice and all but I can't help but feel that it's a dude, especially after we had a video call.

My only other experience was with this girl I met on tinder and it was amazing. She was extremely good looking, like you couldn't tell her from a woman. 

I will be visiting Thailand, possibly later this year. 

I will make myself vulnerable here and lay myself out bare, for your clarity, so I hope this doesn't go underappreciated. 

 

I have never DATED a ladyboy per se in a relationship sense, but from what I understand, you'll essentially be dating a man, with learned woman/selectivity power dynamics. 

If you know about the typical experience of game with women, it can feel like trying to chase a fly in your room to go into a wine bottle in your hand. So many games have to be played to make it happen. 

Whereas game with a man as a cis woman can feel like shaking a bag of cat treats, only moments later, to see your cat RUNNING to you for a treat.

In general, if a ladyboy is attracted to you, it's much harder to fuck it up as opposed to a woman being attracted to you. 

However... 

Anyone with an abundance of offers and sexual opportunities, will start being harder to attract as they are naturally going to become more choosy. This will be commonplace for any attractive looking female/feminine appearing individual. 

 

Some interesting things to understand about BIOLOGICAL differences... 

Read the book: The Essential Difference: Male and Female Brains and the Truth about Autism by Simon Baron-Cohen

This will clearly lay out a picture for creating fundamental distinctions between individuals that are assigned male at birth and assigned female at birth. You will notice that systematizer brains (typically AMAB) and Empathizer brains (Typically AFAB) will think about reality differently at a fundamental level. Their interests will be different. AMAB will naturally prioritize logical truth over emotion, whereas AFAB will naturally bias themselves towards emotional truth over logical truth. The actual experience of reality relative to emotions are fundamentally dependent on what hormones you've got flowing in your system (such as testosterone and estrogen). So, just wanted to mention this. This is an interesting rabbit hole of distinctions to draw there.

AMAB Males (Ladyboys included) flip like a switch for sex, talking about sex very explicitly is typically very appealing. AFAB Females need to be warmed up slowly like a knob, foreplay, emotional connection, sex is implied, but never explicitly talked about, etc. For AFAB females, it can be far slower to "warm them up" to sex, where Ladyboys will be ready to get into bed with you as quickly as a man. It is possible to skip the date, skip the foreplay, and just have them show up at your place to fuck. This is typically seen as an advantage to Ladyboys.  

 

(To clarify, I'm cis male.) 

Upon reflection of my personal direct experiences... 

I've had sex with men, women, and ladyboys. I had sex with men first because women felt inaccessible to me, shaped by years of introversion, shyness, and limited social development. Lamentably, I’ve never had sex with a woman in the context of a mutual, committed relationship.

 

What I've learned from these experiences... 

What's most interesting is watching how easy or difficult it is for my body to be aroused.

When I'm with a woman, it's the easiest to get aroused. If a girl squeezes my butt, I'm erect in 1 second. A ladyboy with a strong female presentation can arouse me in a similar way.

When I'm on a date with a cis woman, if there's enough physical touch, hand holding, hugging, kissing, hands on hip, hands on their butt, I can get aroused to extreme blue-balling levels. To the point where I wish I ejaculated half way through some dates. 

When it comes to sexual encounters with men, the emotional connection is absent, and my sense of comfort is much lower, which significantly reduces my arousal. It becomes a purely stimulation-based activity.

I discovered I'm not romantically attracted to men AT ALL. I'm not attracted to masculinity at all, even in women. I'm not attracted to masculine form at all. I’m not attracted to penises. They don’t arouse me.

I’m aroused by feminine bodies, feminine butts, feminine hips and curves, feminine form, etc. Which is where Ladyboys exist on my playing field. I don’t enjoy giving oral sex to individuals with penises. I did it for their sake, for me it was a purely mechanical activity. Even though I didn’t enjoy it, I liked feeling useful or appreciated in that distorted way, but that feeling was fleeting. Although my initial aversion has decreased, I still don’t like it. Admitting to these activities feels tied to shame about my identity, and I feel ashamed when I think about other people knowing, as it represents the deeper theme of being unable to attract women. Upon reflection from these experiences, what I discovered is that what I really wanted was to feel appreciated.

Being coerced many times as a ~10 year old boy to do sexual acts with other boys has definitely left an imprint on me. (Boys at around age 8-12 years old are vulnerable to sexual fetish imprinting. Have a girl sit on your face as a kid; Congratulations: you now have a face-sitting fetish. Was the girl Asain? Now you've got an Asain face-sitting fetish.) Additionally, a HEAVY pornography addiction later on in my teens led to exploration of 2D pornography art of traps, ladyboys and such; strengthening neutral circuits to diminish strong aversion towards penises. Imagine how some male doctors just inspect hundreds of males' genitalia. You'll eventually just be indifferent to it.

To whatever degree, I've got my brain rewired towards finding the whole premise of a trap highly sexually arousing. For me, the wiring is purely sexual circuitry. When I oragasm, the circuits shut off. So when I oragasm with a ladyboy, I have ZERO interest in the Ladyboy or even experience aversion post-orgasm. When I oragasm with a man, it's a mind fuck how quickly it turns from sexual gratification to disgust and regret. 

 

In terms of getting to the truth of the matter... 

So when you talk about whether or not you're gay or straight, these labels start to not accurately represent the picture. To call me gay, or even bisexual doesn't paint the picture properly. There is so much additional, culturally projected meaning on the labels of 'straight', 'gay', 'bisexual' from our social Matrix that leads to an oversimplification; leaving individuals like me feeling outside the bounds of current socially understood definitions. To call myself gay, or bisexual would be grossly inaccurate. 99.9% of the time I'll tell people that I'm straight, if it makes sense and seems appropriate for social likability, (such as being in an LGBT environment), I'll just tell people I'm Pan. In my current state of mind, 'straight' feels most accurate. Male homosexuality is defined as sexual or romantic attraction to men; I don't experience either. My sexual attraction is oriented toward femininity, not maleness. My romantic attraction is towards cis females. So definitions of homosexuality start to lose precision here. 

At most I am pansexual with exclusive attraction to feminine forms and romantically straight. 

Unless you experience reality in this way for yourself, it can be hard for an individual to REALLY understand this level of distinction, and why one may feel this level of distinction to be necessary. 

 

 

Let me know your thoughts. 

Edited 5 hours ago by ZenSwift

[Adrian colby]

On 01/02/2026 at 10:57 AM, Leo Gura said:

Dude, what?

If you want a girl with a dick you are gay.

The last thing a straight man wants on his girlfriend is a dick. That is not a little thing, that's a dealbreaker. Lol.

If you negotiating about your gf having a dick, you ain't straight. Do whatever, but don't kid yourself.

🙄

I’m a bit surprised by this. You often emphasize how language and concepts distort reality, yet here you’re treating a culturally loaded label (“penis”) as if it maps cleanly onto biology, identity, and sexual orientation.

Preferences are preferences not ontological truths. Everyone is attracted to a range, not to “women in general” or “men in general.” What people actually respond to is their own internal prototype. A particular configuration of appearance, affect, presence, and embodiment that they label “woman” or “man.” That prototype already excludes vast numbers of biologically female women and includes traits that are not strictly biological at all.

Genital appearance does not define biological sex in a clean binary way. The clitoris and penis are the same dimorphic organ, differentiated by hormonal pathways, enzymes, receptors, and timing. Variations exist on a wide spectrum. There are documented cases where individuals are born with externally female genitalia and develop fully functional male genitalia at puberty due to enzyme differences. These bodies do not fit simplified binary categories, yet they are not pathological.

When an organ’s appearance crosses an arbitrary visual threshold, we rename it “penis” and treat it as ontologically decisive. It isn’t. Individual sexual components that have dimorphic potential are not exclusive. 

Calling attraction “gay” or “straight” based solely on the presence of a single organ is a category error confusing appearance with biology and biology with identity. It is entirely possible and biologically documented for someone to be neurologically female and embodied in a form that does not conform to ‘folk taxonomy’. Labels don’t change that and it also does not follow that a person attracted to them is gay.

I’m not raising this as an exception, but as a concrete example of the principles above. I know this from direct experience. I am someone who has been scanned and tested, neurologically aligned with male-typical neuroendocrine development, carries XX chromosomes, had female looking genitalia, and gonadal dysgenesis, meaning I did not have endogenous hormones for enzyme production to continue development at a biologically critical age.

I embody both male and female biology, but I am in no way a woman, and I have had extensive surgeries to correct that lack of development for the sake of intimacy in a way that feels natural to me. Not everyone in a similar position will feel the same, and there are “nebulous” reasons for that.

My wife is most certainly not gay, and after having had intimate relationships with other men, her experience is that I am no different. Unique, yes but not different from her preference for what she considers a man.

Sexual attraction responds to a whole, integrated system not a single anatomical component and personal bias/preference according one’s own ideal has a lot to do with that. 

 

[UnbornTao]

 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by UnbornTao