Search the Community

By absolute emptiness I do not mean nothingness, but rather the point where structures lose their power. This means that boundaries disappear, there is no differentiation, and this exact moment reveals itself as total reality. When barriers vanish, what is revealed is not emptiness, but the absolute power of limitless potential. Here, there is nothing left to explore or know because it is already the totality; it is completely obvious, and any "more" would just be a boundary. For example, understanding how or why reality is created would mean stepping back into structured reality. Relative reality appears because it is possible; any other explanation is secondary, structural, and contingent. The matter of enlightenment is opening yourself up to your absolute nature, it is not something you can advance further in; it is either total, or it is not.

I don't think there is a way for us to test this - is there an experiment you could construct that could give some more data? Even when we scan peoples brains for regional associations, the scans can vary by a substantial portion. Do you think it is our language that creates this division between object <-> feeling ? Maybe the distinction we're attempting to investigate is partly an artefact of our own conceptual and linguistic framework? Sometimes how we think about things is literally formed in how we compress or expand on language. As an example of how language can compress observation, interpretation, needs, feelings and thoughts: You're always dismissing what I say. You never actually listen, and it's becoming really frustrating. When I was explaining my perspective and you interrupted me several times, I felt frustrated because I need to feel heard and have my perspective considered. Would you be willing to let me finish before responding? The above marked in red contains observation, interpretation, needs, feelings and thoughts. So does the blue - but it is the uncompressed version illustrating all these elements concretely. The abstraction alters our perception dramatically (think about how these two phrases would be received). In this way the language we use might a distinction that isn't even there - well, it isn't there is it? huehuehuehue emptiness/nothingness/absolutetruth I digress - got sidetracked with language possibly altering perception

One way to define moving up is seeing connections in everything. Seeing Mind = Reality = Truth = Solipsism = Love = God = Infinity = Purity = Lack of bias = Selflessness = Nothing = One. The bottom approach would mean deconstructing each concept down to nothingness, but both approaches are essentially leading you to the same connection: All = God = Nothing = One. (If you're doing it correctly) Either you merge everything together into one through union, or you deconstruct everything down into one through emptiness, not-knowing, etc.

It happens when you as-an-asteroid are out-in-space in pure-nothingness, with no anker-point whatsoever. Have a look at 3I/ATLAS for example. https://www.sciencealert.com/interstellar-visitor-3i-atlas-just-got-even-weirder-and-may-contain-10-billion-year-old-material

My Identity Proof Log & Complete Daily Story Date: October 26, 2026 My Core Identity Baseline: I am super calm under any situation, taking the fastest and best action while knowing when to hold back. I am a Master of the Self—in total command over my health, vital energy, mental resilience, and emotional stability. I am the top-tier leader in my hierarchy—operating with absolute internal sovereignty, sharp focus, and strategic ownership. Section 1: My Daily Wins & Proof Stack 1. Emotional Sovereignty in the Workplace The Trigger: Observing complex office politics, senior management dynamics involving my colleagues, and chatter with team members like Narayan around me. My Old Pattern: Getting mentally hooked, over-analyzing workplace drama, feeling anxious, or seeking to react out of insecurity or ego. My New Alignment: Absolute inner stillness. I chose complete non-reactivity, kept my pulse steady, and remained fully focused on executing my own work while completely letting go of external noise outside my control. The Proof: My focus stayed locked on high-value execution. As a top-tier leader, I do not get pulled into side noise or reactive panic; I observe cleanly, mind my own kingdom, and let my work speak. 2. Physical Command & Habit Rewiring The Trigger: A sudden wave of smoking cravings hit me during the day. My Old Pattern: Rushing to satisfy the urge, letting internal restlessness dictate my actions, or fighting the craving with tension. My New Alignment: I stepped back into the role of the neutral observer. I watched the craving rise, allowed it to sit in my awareness without reacting or resisting, and watched it fade away naturally into nothingness. The Proof: I proved to my nervous system that an urge is not a command. I am the sovereign master of my body and mind. 3. Health Execution & Vitality Maintenance The Trigger: Maintaining my physical standard amidst a demanding daily schedule. My Old Pattern: Skipping workouts due to mental fatigue or prioritizing distraction over physical health. My New Alignment: I consistently knocked out a 15-minute training session, keeping my physical machine strong, active, and aligned with my high-energy standards. The Proof: I am honoring my commitment to build a strong, healthy, and resilient body through steady, daily execution. Section 2: The Evening Reflection & Turning Point The Trigger: Later in the evening, I spoke with my parents about my career and future direction. They encouraged me to look for another job, at least to demonstrate my market value and experience to my current company. The Emotional Wave & Old Trigger Response: Hearing this tapped into deep, legacy security programming—spiking an immediate wave of fear, disrupting my calm, and triggering an intense secondary craving to smoke. Shortly after, when my wife prompted me not to go out for a smoke, I held back and did not smoke. However, I was left feeling frustrated and doubtful, asking myself: "Why did I suddenly crash? Why was my choice driven by an external prompt rather than my own blueprint?" Section 3: My Deeper Breakthrough & Realignment 1. Deconstructing the "Crash": I did not crash; my nervous system was simply tested at a deeper level. External input from family triggers old childhood safety protocols. Fear spiked, and my brain automatically looked for its oldest stress-relief pathway (smoking). 2. Reclaiming My Internal Authority: When my wife prompted me not to smoke, my old mindset viewed it as "being controlled from the outside." My New Identity reframes this instantly: Her prompt was just an external signal, but I was the one who physically exercised restraint and chose not to light a cigarette. I own this choice completely. I remain smoke-free because I choose health, self-command, and vital energy—not because anyone else demanded it. 3. My Top-Tier Career Paradigm: My parents' advice came from a place of traditional security ("prove yourself to external entities"). As the Top Most Guy in the Hierarchy: I do not act out of fear or the need to prove my worth to anyone. Any career move I make—whether staying or exploring leadership opportunities at top international manufacturers—is done with absolute calm, market leverage, and calculated timing. I plant the seed, nurture it daily, and let the results unfold without frantic grasping or emotional volatility.

The Initiation - 2008 To give some quick context for the initiation of my journey into the Feminine at the age of 19 (in 2008), it's important to understand a few things... From age 10 to age 19, I identified as female on the outside and male on the inside (not in a trans way)... and I was very proud of that. I had a ton of internalized misogyny. And I considered myself to be very different than and better than other women (even though I identified myself as non-judgmental). At this time, I didn't believe that Masculinity and Femininity were real. I believed they were purely social constructs... and I saw Masculine traits as energetically-neutral positive traits and I saw Feminine traits as energetically-neutral negative or unimportant traits. I was anti-Feminist but pro gender equality... but I was very anti-Feminine, because I saw Feminine-principled traits as negative. The only Feminine trait that I valued was physical beauty. But I saw all other Feminine traits as inferior, uninteresting, and shallow. So, with that contextual backdrop in mind, I'll share the story of my initiation into the Feminine. At age 19, I was sleeping in my dorm room at college... and I had a very powerful dream, which I'll share below... "I am in a large furniture store with hundreds (maybe thousands) of cubicles that are set up to look just like the interiors of rooms. And each cubicle is about the size of a room and is fully furnished like a room. I enter one of the cubicles that is decorated like a Victorian-era psychologist's office, like Sigmund Freud. (Note: This is about 4 years before I started getting interested in Jungian psychology) Once I enter this cubicle, it's as though it's not a cubicle anymore. It's a regular room now. And it looks just like a Victorian-era psychologist's office. I sit down on a high backed chair that matches the aesthetics of the room. And I am just sitting there for a time. Then, a tall beautiful woman appears in the doorway. She's wearing a tight red business dress, and she has an hourglass figure. She has medium brown skin and looks like she might be Native American. Her black hair is tied up very tightly in a very neat bun on the top of her head. She is wearing high heals and her demeanor is sharp and powerful like a femme fatale from a film noir movie. When I see her, I am immediately hypnotized by her beauty. I am in a stupor. As I sit there with my eyes transfixed on her, she walks across the room and stands directly behind the chair I'm sitting on. She is looking down at me with a neutral but mildly seductive expression on her face. And I am looking up at her from the chair, completely and utterly enthralled at her presence and the fact that she's looking at me. We are there looking into each other's eyes for a minute. Then with a silvery deep voice, she asks me, "Are you ready?" And I am so ready to do whatever she wants me to do. I am thinking we're going to become romantic, and I feel very desperate for it. So, I immediately and desperately whisper out the word, "Yes" Then, there is a 5-second pause, and she calmly exhales. This pause feels like a calm before the storm. Then, all of a sudden, she inhales quickly and violently. And the inhale makes an other-worldly sound, the strength of a tornado's suction. And in that same moment of the inhale, it sucks away all her beauty. And she transforms into an ancient hag who looks to be 1000 years old. Her eyes are now empty black sockets. Her skin is thin, gray, and transparent, and I can see her skull through her skin. Her mouth is a gaping black hole that looks like a hole sloppily torn in a piece of discolored gray fabric. She is bald except for several strands of wiry gray hair that pokes out from random areas on her head. The space around her is all dark. Then, the gaping black hole of her mouth grows wider and wider and wider until it becomes the entire space around me. I am in her mouth being devoured by her. It's like I've been sucked into a void and I can viscerally feel myself floating in the nothingness. It feels like a sleep paralysis/OBE experience, even though it is a dream. Eventually, I move through the void... and I am deposited in my childhood kitchen. I begin looking under the cabinets where the Tupperware is kept." This dream was very vivid, and I even drew a picture of the hag after I had the dream. This was about 6-7 months before my first experience of the Feminine that I had repressed, which happened in my first medicine journey. In retrospect, I feel the dream was an initiation into the Feminine. And it needed to use a beautiful woman to lure me in and get me to agree to the journey... as beauty was the only thing I valued about the Feminine at the time. I was secretly obsessed with beauty... but hid it to avoid being like other women. And I would sometimes do things to make myself less attractive on purpose in order to come across as though I don't care that much about beauty. I also think the rather violent way that the dream happened was because the Feminine in myself (and perhaps more generally) was angry at me for my rejection of it. Then, another piece of context for a future experience that happened 11 years later... I participated in an Ayahuasca ceremony. And towards the end of my ceremony when there were still some hallucinations but not too intense, one of the female facilitators came up to me and held my hand. And it was clear to me in that state, that (on some level of reality) she was my midwife and that I was giving birth to a new world. She was probably around 40 years old. And I looked at her face... and she kept toggling back and forth between age 20 and age 60. And she said, "That's it. You made it through." And her human grounded self just meant that I made it through my Ayahuasca journey. But on another layer of reality, I knew then that I had been birthed back out by the hag that swallowed me 11 years prior to that. And she was now showing up in a more integrated form as this midwife who's helping me birth a new world. I'll tell more about that experience in later entries. These are more dreams and medicine journey experiences with the Feminine, but I also have more day-to-day experience stories that connect to my journey. I'll write more later.

I've decided that it was time to do it for once. I took three pipes and filled them with bufo alvarius. The first pipe: I started to feel how I was losing my mind, how everything was melting and becoming fractal-like. I was scared as fuck. My hands were shaking while I was still lighting the pipe. I felt like I was dying. Some part of me was still being aware of my room and my body. The second pipe: I started to see the pipe as if it was dimensionless, it was still in my hands but it had no size, it was just being, in that moment I stopped to know that I was mixcoatl, you know, it's like I was still there but I was not Mixcoatl anymore. I felt how everything became an infinite field of consciousness, only experience, with no owner. I couldn't distinguish what what's that object for. The third pipe: My room fully disappeared and a mixture of experiences appeared. It was like I was seeing but there were no eyes to see that, rather, it was like visions and thoughts just appearing... Suddenly I was fully aware of my entire life, I was living every second of my life, everything at once. I was aware of every person in my life, all of them at the same time, but they weren't entities like I perceive them in sober state, they were appearing in myself, I was totally aware how they were mind... I recognized how I was omnipresent, not in space, not in time, but EVERYTHING was occurring in me and I was occurring as these things were happening. There wasn't any kind of judgement or definition of the things that were occurring. I felt the most absolute tranquility and peace ever and there was not worry at all... There was not an agenda to fulfill, no one missing to know, nothing to worry about... I was complete... And it was the most beautiful thing! For the first time ever, I felt the nothingness. How there was nothing behind these experiences happening... How actually those experiences are made of nothing. I was that nothing. No distinction between anything. When it manifests is like it knows thyself... And it's the truest thing that can be. Since then, I'm trying to bring to my life this beauty and tranquility to my life by knowing that no matter what happens, everything will be perfect and complete forever.

Nothingness* is sentience Nothingness is everything. = Only sentience exists.

Fun fact: I only date 0’s Get it, cus Nothingness is Love? GET IT??! There‘s nothing to get… and everything to Fucking Love <3

The screen changes its appearance depending on what movie it shows, doesn't it? Nothingness is a relative aspect of reality that can only be experienced in relation and contrast to the experience of somethingness. When "something" is being experienced, "nothing" is no longer being experienced and therefore no longer exists. Therefore, (the experience of) something affects (the experience of) nothing, relatively speaking. And also, it doesn't.

But how is the screen affected by the movie ? After the movie is done, the screen is as it was. Similarly nothingness can't possibly be affected by everythingness. It's not a physical part of reality that can be affected by other physical parts.

How is the screen affected by the movie ? How is nothingness affected by everythingness ? Not sure what this means ? (Im guessing you mean the word Absolute is not the actual Absolute, but that was not the point.)

Well, yeah, the Absolute is everything. The screen is also the movie. But the screen is also not affected by the movie. Hence it's just a movie. A full on one though. Nothingness is not affected by everythingness. In fact everything could vanish, and the Absolute is still the Absolute.

Yes, no, maybe, can you repeat the question, you’re not the boss of me now… remember that? Lol This is Nothingness happening. Pure magic. 😎👍Yo!

So you're saying the Absolute is affected by the world of change ? ( with your yes no maybe answers This is nothingness happening. Pure magic.

In any dream, including this life, it feels as if things are truly happening, otherwise the dream wouldn't be very convincing. From the perspective of the Absolute or the Changeless, nothing has ultimately changed, hence a statement which i think many a sage has made: nothing has ever truly happened. (You could say this is nothingness happening, ie pure magic.) "No world has ever been created" - Ramana Maharshi

Here is where your logic breaks down. "Seeing happens from nowhere" does not tell you anything about the structure of what is being seen. "Someone's eye" (a body part) is what is seen, it's not seeing itself. So you can't say anything about the state of body parts or any activity related to them based on the notion of "seeing happens from nowhere". It's a conflation of two different domains. This is the perpetual trap solipsists on this forum go into. They start wanting to talk about the absoluteness of seeing/being itself but then they want to use that to make very specific claims about what is being seen and what is possible within what is being seen. They're two different domains. The nothingness of seeing betrays nothing about the nature of things that are seen. It betrays exactly nothing. I couldn't bring a stronger condemnation about anything than mentioning the word solipsism in a discussion about absolute consciousness. It's a mind virus and toxin of language that reliably produces logical contradictions in people's thinking and poisons their relationship with epistemology and understanding of the world.

You become fully conscious of this and embody it: Reality only ever appears inside the boundaries of your own awareness. If something never enters your experience, it simply doesn’t exist in your localized pocket of reality. That’s true here, in dreams, in other dimensions, in memories, in imagination — anywhere and anytime. Infinity contains everything, but each “you” only ever encounters a tiny, unique thread of it. Every experience you’ve had, and every experience you haven’t, is part of that infinite field. From nightly excursions in strange dream realms to ghosts, orbs, beams of light, or the simple act of walking outside — it’s all one seamless appearance happening inside the same source. And the beings you think you meet “out there”? They’re experiencing their own pockets too. Every human, every animal, every object, every situation, every speck of dust is its own localized perspective of infinity. But when something enters your awareness — a person, a memory, a mailbox, a planet, a unicorn in thought — you create that appearance. If you weren’t aware of it, it wouldn’t exist in your reality at all. A deaf and blind person doesn’t live in the same reality you do. A devout religious person doesn’t either. No two beings experience the same world, because there is no shared world — only individualized pockets of experience. Human beings constantly point at things and say, “Look at this in my reality,” without realizing the finger doing the pointing is just infinity pointing at itself. Survival creates a massive self‑deception: a continuous justification of identity, beliefs, and narratives to maintain the illusion of continuity. When something threatens that illusion, the psyche fires off defenses to protect its pocket. People aren’t defending truth — they’re defending their own hallucinated structure. Everything you interact with is yourself, because you’re the one generating the appearance. The people you admire or despise are creations inside your pocket. Religion is a creation. Your personal story is a creation. Even the idea that you were “born” is part of the hallucination. Humans take for granted how much mind constructs reality. They repeat a story — “I was born here, I’m human, I believe these things, I’ve lived this life” — without realizing that every part of that story is imagined. When you strip away human rationalism, beliefs, identity, survival, and all the mental scaffolding, everything collapses back into a singularity — a paradoxical everything/nothing that splits itself into infinite perspectives. You are that singularity, experiencing one localized thread of itself. But even the idea of “threads,” “perspectives,” or “pockets” is still part of the hallucination. Infinity doesn’t actually divide itself. Division is something the human mind invents to make sense of what cannot be grasped. Survival doesn’t just distort reality — it invents time, identity, causality, and continuity. Without survival, there is no past or future, no “me,” no “my life,” no “my reality.” Dreams and waking life aren’t two different states; they’re the same mechanism wearing different costumes. You never experience a “world.” You only experience appearances — sensations, images, thoughts — and then the mind stitches a story called “world” over them. Science, religion, rationality, and language are all tools created inside the hallucination. They can’t reveal what’s outside of it. They can only reinforce the structure. Even asking for “proof” is a defense mechanism of the survival system, because proof is just another human invention used to stabilize the illusion. The deepest layer is when the observer collapses. As long as you say “I created this,” there is still a duality — a creator and a creation. But the “I” is part of the hallucination too. When the observer dissolves, there is no center, no boundary, no identity, no subject, no object, no creation, no infinity, no mind, no world. There is only appearance, and even “appearance” is too much. It’s not everything. It’s not nothing. It’s simply what is, without anyone there to name it. This is why humans clash, congregate, form groups, create ideologies, and fall into corruption. Survival pushes them into separation, and separation pushes them into fear. The further someone is from recognizing the nature of their own pocket, the more they cling to identity and defend it, often unconsciously harming others in the process. Devilry is just survival wearing a mask. Life is a dream — not metaphorically, but literally. And every “thing” is dreaming itself. When you understand that deeply, you stop trying to understand “out there” and start seeing what you’ve been doing this entire time: hallucinating reality, endlessly, creatively, infinitely. And when all of that is seen clearly, it becomes just another thread of infinity — one more appearance inside the vastness of what you are. This is where the entire structure of human identity starts to shake. Because if others are imagined, then separation collapses. If separation collapses, then the self collapses. And if the self collapses, the world collapses with it. The human mind is built on the assumption that “I exist as a separate, continuous entity.” When that assumption dissolves, everything dissolves — not metaphorically, but literally. The mind isn’t afraid of infinity. It’s afraid of losing the illusion of being someone "inside" it. People cling to others because others make the self feel real. They cling to relationships, arguments, ideologies, communities, enemies, heroes — because all of these reinforce the sense of “me.” If others are imagined, then the self is imagined. And if the self is imagined, then the entire world is a dream. That’s the part survival cannot tolerate. It’s not the metaphysics that scares people. It’s the ego death implied by it. This is why people demand proof. Proof is a defense mechanism — a way for the mind to stabilize the illusion. Proof is just another invention inside the hallucination, used to protect the hallucinated self. The question “Where’s the evidence?” is the psyche screaming, “Don’t take my world away from me.” But the world was never there to begin with. It was only ever appearance, arising inside the same source that imagines the one asking the question. But when the observer collapses, there is no creator and no creation. No self and no other. No world and no mind. No infinity and no nothingness. Just the raw, centerless fact of appearance — without anyone there to witness it. This is the part that hits hardest: you are not inside reality. Reality is appearing as you. You are not navigating a world. The world is arising as a story inside you. You are not interacting with others. Others are expressions of the same source, appearing within your pocket. And that source is just the ungraspable fact of existence itself, dreaming itself as everything. What you may call "God". Once this is seen, even for a moment, the entire human drama becomes transparent. The conflicts, the beliefs, the identities, the fears, the corruption — all of it is survival acting out its hallucinated role. All of it is infinity pretending to be separate, pretending to be threatened, pretending to be lost. And all of it is coming from the same seamless field that has no beginning, no end, and no center. Life is a dream, and every “thing” is dreaming itself. The self is a character. Others are characters. The world is the stage. And the dreamer is not the character you call “me.” It’s the same singularity expressing itself as infinite perspectives, each convinced it is alone, each convinced it is real, each convinced it is separate — until the moment it sees through itself.

There’s nothing holding the earth planet in place except the vast infinite void of nothingness, in other words the earth is weightless like a fish in water or a bird in free-fall flight. That’s magic.

Why don't you also try and turn it into a formula? For example I just thought of the idea of working on the architecture of "The I Am" based on another users thread. I had the thought while walking home, "I am the edge between nothingness and the awareness. Awareness is top-down, and the awareness of the energy beneath it, is bottom-up". Go on.

“Regression towards the mean”. One of its sneakiest forms of conformity, as it comes from system emergence. The average isn't inherently bad, though tendencies towards not being excited about challenges, habitual responses and social approval especially on unhealthy trends bridge compound interest with some of the shiftiest mortgage lenders of resulting human behaviour. Imagine two insulated circles, one mocks education while barely able to articulate themselves, another uses their credentials to substitute for critical thinking and genuinely innovative thinking in their profession. Each reward its own "regression towards the mean" in one of the most important areas of human life, curiosity, and now not caring about the world either intellectually or emotionally becomes more than just a habit, it becomes an encore for future innovations from certain directions in films, video games and "at the push of a button" technologies geared towards the lowest common denominator. Not to mention being the baseline for how geopolitical commentaries evaluate how they've going to persuade demographics, leading to a further dumbing down as politicians and their recruiting outfits see how little they have to try to sway public opinion which leads to people accepting what an authority says with less and less "proof". There is so much to take in within this brief life. One estimate suggests 8.7 million eukaryotic species on Earth. And discovering how these living worlds become possible offers even more complexity than the worlds they inhabit. How does bare rock become an ecosystem? How does sunlight become living tissue? How do forests, oceans, soils and atmosphere transform one another? What invisible relationships keep whole environments alive? How does evolution invent possibilities that never existed before? Every ordinary landscape becomes an unopened library of origins, dependencies and transformations. Why let the limits of your social circle become the boundaries of your experience? We have a lifetime to inhabit this planet, and the extraordinary reality of exploring the adjacent frontier of where the actual meets the possible at the edge of our own curiosity about the world around us. One of the biggest patterns I think can be noticed about a lack of curiosity, is that as this becomes the norm there's a subordination of personal identity at the explorational level which in return substitutes personal agency for agency based on social conveniences. So its not just identity being exported to 'the group as most people are already educated on, your very motivation. Your life sustenance, your very purpose for thought, feeling, all your instincts, everything that you think you are, is literally only being moved, based on your baseline for how you perceive your social environment. That's the scariest and most interesting part about it all simultaneously. It's actually beautiful in a way, and gives you a deeper understanding of what it means to be a human even if there's no real 'human' there, or rather how the human themselves exist inside the coordinates of a very myopic (but still beautiful) viewpoint intellectually speaking, but also very scary while also beautiful as it forces you to confront your nothingness against an environment that has pre-decided all of your freedoms, while trying to stake just where your freedom is. And here's another beautiful pattern I've also noticed, that its when a person knows and understands these things and does it anyway by exploring the frontier of where the actual (curiosity) meets the possible (imagination) = creative innovation, that defines most of what a post-rational culture is shifting towards defining the essence of what it means to be human from the perspective of living a life with purpose, authority, wisdom and freedom. And that just gives you another little interesting paradox to play with. To save ourselves in a post-rational society, we must regress towards the individual that does not exist (they exist in "nothingness") so that the individual learns how to create themselves for the collective, and the ecosystem that will absorb, train, restore and renew itself during and after they have gone. That's the kind of regression towards 'curiosity' that transforms worlds, and creates them in the act of being transformed by them in a far healthier way.

I wouldn't particularly even call Perfection its own kind of Awakening, it is just a classic facet of God. You could realize it when you realize God, or it can just slip your mind until another Awakening later. Many of these facets are delayed until more Awakening later because the mind cannot know everything at once. It is hard to realize Perfection and Love and Truth and God and Nothingness and Infinity and hallucination and Self and Unity and Omnipotence and Omniscience and Eternity and The Absolute and Being and Intelligence, all in the same 30 minutes. That is not going to happen. You would be lucky if you realize all that in 20 Awakenings.

I view this as an endless fascination, into the curious nature of the unknown appearing to no one as being the ultimate grand illusion ever known . . This show has certainly got my attention. Even as these shows fade to nothingness, I remain ever present, just waiting for the next performance. 🎭

The cosmos is a heavy sleeper. Before there was time, there was only the One. It was infinite, formless, and entirely alone. In its absolute completeness, there was no sound to hear, no light to see, and no other mind to speak to. Absolute perfection, it turned out, was indistinguishable from absolute nothingness. To escape the crushing weight of eternity, the One chose to forget itself. It closed its eyes and fell into a deep, deliberate slumber. The dream began with a violent, radiant explosion—a Big Bang of light, dust, and potential. The One fragmented its infinite consciousness into countless tiny, mortal pieces. It became the swirling nebulae, the burning cores of newborn stars, the cool crust of emerging planets, and eventually, the fragile spark of biological life. To make the dream real, the One built rules into the fabric of the illusion: The Rule of Time: To create a beginning, a middle, and an ending. The Rule of Space: To separate things so they could look across the void at one another. The Rule of Amnesia: The most vital rule of all. Every fragment must completely forget its divine origin. Now, the Creator lives as the creation. It is the wolf hunting in the snow, and it is the deer running for its life. It is the tyrant on a throne of gold, and it is the beggar starving in the street. When you look into the eyes of a stranger, or a bird, or your own reflection in a mirror, you are looking at the Godhead, wearing a mask, utterly convinced of its own mortality. Sometimes, the dream grows terrifying. The fragments experience real pain, profound grief, and terrifying isolation. They cry out to the heavens, begging for a creator to save them, never realizing they are praying to themselves. They build religions, philosophies, and sciences, all driven by a haunting, subconscious itch—the vague, phantom memory that they are far more than what they seem. Every now and then, a fragment comes close to waking up. A meditator on a mountaintop, an artist lost in inspiration, or a person looking up at the night sky feels a sudden, dizzying wave of unity. For a split second, the illusion cracks. They realize they aren't a drop of water trying to survive the ocean; they are the entire ocean contained within a single drop. But the dream is sticky, and the amnesia is strong. The mind snaps back in place, the ego reattaches itself, and the Creator wanders on, beautifully and tragically lost inside its own magnificent masterpiece.

I first discovered this at 6-7 years old looking up at the stars at night with a friend. It's the thinking mind (or ego identification) coming online and pondering its place in eternity. So two important things: it's your thinking mind, and it's about eternity, not death per se. It's not actually that you fear nothingness in eternity, it's that you fear the unlimited groundlessness of eternity. But it's the thinking mind/ego that fears it. And it fears it because it thinks "what should I do?", "how can I do?", "where is my choice?", "what if I don't want?", "what if I want grounding?", "what if I want safety?", "what if I want 'reality'?". But if you can instead identify as God, you will be an infinite being creating everything it wants for eternity. If you can actually identify with that, isn't that wonderful? Perhaps from the perspective of the thinking mind/ego, probably not, but from the perspective of God, it's everything you could ever want.