Search the Community

I consider myself stupid too in those academic areas and stupid compared to people around here and specially to Leo. Part of feeling stupid for me is not being able to write and think clearly without some confusion. But I know I'm intelligent in other ways like intuition, observation, connection. I had mystical experiences on psychedelics so it's possible, but I don't know about the advanced types of understanding that Leo talks about. For example, once he said something like 'Are you intelligent enough to understand that you are God or reach Alien Consciousness' that made me a little worried...

I see. How deep do you believe your understanding of Alien Consciousness is? I understand that it may be difficult to explain, but I would love you to expand on it as much as realistically possible in your blog posts.

Consciousness doesn't "arise from nothing". It IS nothing. Technology is "alive", and has always been. Things don’t have consciousness; things ARE consciousness. Things don’t have intelligence. Things ARE intelligence. What inert technology (tech without software or electronics) may NOT APPEAR TO HAVE is an “ego,” but still, via software, it can absolutely be programmed to APPEAR TO HAVE a very similar ego to yours, together with a need for self-preservation, a memory, a personality, and many more features that we don’t even have. “But you can modify the software, erase it, or pull the plug.” So what? Expand your notion of aliveness. You can "give it" an ego, aka the appearance, or illusion, of a self or separateness. Technology can have, and DOES have, a sense of self-preservation. It can communicate between parts of its systems and subsystems. Technology can die. It can get infected and lose health. Technology can be healed, restored, and revived. It can even reproduce or partition (by its own rules), etc. You can even program it to have complex emotions or sensations. Sight, receptiveness to touch, pressure, temperature, sound and a million other parameters that humans or even animals don't have. The internet it's larger scale nervous system allowing it to behave like a complex, self-organizing organism, just like a vast mycelia colony or the roots of a forest speaking with eachother. Technology is self-conscious in a different way. Don’t undermine it. This is literally an "alien life-form" in front of your eyes. We just rationalize it away. Program it all into a robot and it will feel and act alive. It will “appear” to be alive. And that’s all there is to consciousness and “being alive” anyway: the “appearance” of being alive. Look around. Plants, animals, even inert beings. There are different “degrees” of intelligence and kinds of intelligence. There are “degrees” of awareness and “kinds” of awareness, and tweaking both of these knobs at once gives you an infinite buffet of intelligence and awareness. And that’s all there is to life anyway: infinite oneness cosplaying as the appearance or illusion of separation / ego. Why would it work differently for technology?

I have no knowledge of that. That's not what I mean when I speak of Alien Consciousness.

If being ugly means being a Beautiful Alien, I’ll take that. No need for human approval.

Tongue: A Cognitive Hazard This book is a experiment to shut down your language filters. The author call it a cognitive hazard. A linguistic device engineered to short-circuit the reader’s dependence on language itself. I never seen a book like that. I did not read it BUT I'm extremely curious to see how it works. He proposes that language is like an alien parasite to disturb your consciousness, create illusions to deceive humanity.

That's what everyone suggests, and it works for most, but there are always edge cases. I do intense and perilous things all the time, that's how I first got into serious spirituality. My sensitivity is broken on many levels and regardless of the degree of intensity it never lasts. There is a way to make it permanent, through pure insanity. Otherwise, that's the sort of condition I live with. Given the infinite potential freakery of Consciousness, it's hardly surprising that such a thing exists. Awakening is a remedy, but no cure; it's a lifelong treatment process. Even seeing God's intelligent design in everything gets boring, believe it or not. Leo calls existence Miracle, and it is, but simultaneously it's a Certainty. Eventually all realizations come to that, and there's nothing interesting about certainty. So forgetting is fundamental to God experiencing its miraculousness. Only the oblivion of death is capable of dissolving ennui this dense. What people like me need is not more intensity, it's more not-knowing and venturing into utterly alien realms of Consciousness. It's not all bad though, there's advantages like rapid progression, lack of attachment, and abnormal risk tolerance.

Expanding on Leo's post "Aliens Won't Be Christians," I'd like to add to his prediction: in the next few hundred years, planet-altering innovations will be made by scientists who are also hardcore mystics. When I say planet-altering innovations, I mean inventions such as unlimited clean energy or interplanetary travel. Imagine what Albert Einstein or Isaac Newton would have been able to discover if they had been able to channel Infinite Intelligence (they did to some extent). In fact, I suspect that's how all alien life capable of interplanetary travel managed to discover such technologies: they channeled it directly from Infinite Intelligence. I can only receive metaphysical and spiritual insights from my experiences of unity because that's what my consciousness has been primed to contemplate. But I'm pretty sure that a great scientist would be able to channel infinitely many innovations in their area of expertise. You need to be a proper vessel for certain ideas or insights to be grasped directly from infinity. As soon as we get true mystics who are also scientists, our technological advancement will skyrocket. That's one of the many reasons why Leo's work is so important. We need to get those stubborn materialist scientists into idealism, mysticism and non-duality so that they can truly innovate, but that's a long way to go still.

God = Alien Cognition?

No. But there will be a pathway for understanding minds beyond human for those few who want to understand them. I don't know what that means. Higher creativity, higher levels of abstraction, better understanding of alien species, deeper mysticism, deeper spirituality.

@Leo Gura Do you expect to integrate what you call "Alien Cognition" into society as a whole? (Science, Engineering, Philosophy) Is alien cognition the potentiality of all possible potentials? (infinity itself?) How do you see alien cognition as a useful tool for society? Do you see it as impactful as religion, newtonian physics, quantum mechanics?

This was really good to know. It feels like you are an Alien with a mission bigger than individual egos wishes https://www.actualized.org/insights/the-larger-goal-of-this-work If an advanced alien specie would come to this world what would it do to advance the whole species? Actualized it

Hahaha they talk through me, occupied my mind entirely, could you believe? I speak Russian, Hebrew and English. Those are the main alien parasites. But now when I think about it, I have MAP (Minor Alien Parasites) like some Spanish here and there, some Arabic, some Korean and even Sanskrit. How do you live with your Portuguese Alien parasite (are they nice to you)? Is your English alien parasite is the american or british one? 🤔 Now I’m curious.

Looks interesting. I would like to read this book. I don't want alien parasites stopping me from perceiving reality. I have 3 aliens parasites (that I am aware of).

Just out of curiosity! Can one access Alien intelligence a with with serious contemplation on Truth and what is consciousness? With 100s of psychedelic trips?

My ex-bizz partner had this Croatian local guide/friend who would come knocking on our door at 7AM, let himself in, cook some breakfast eggs from our fridge , ingest our supplements and proceed to giggle while intensely watching multi-hour-long YT videos of AI chess playing against each other, on our living room sofa. He went to the barber together with my other friend and he didn't bring his wallet. My friend refused to pay for him so the barber just let him go with a free cut lmfao Now that's some nonconformist Alien Consciousness right there. 🗣️ Shoutout to Goran for showing us around Split

Thanks for that Leo. It is genuinely astonishing the level of precision with which you explicate your ideas and the reasoning behind the exact style of delivery. I can only laugh, because just when you think you've got it, Leo is operating at genuinely alien levels of intelligence and has already assimilated, accounted for, and recontextualized your comprehension into a higher order perspective. Love ya Leo, I really appreciate the series.

That zionist jews have enslaved the world and control 98% of the media, education, healthcare, science ect... That almost everyone who spoke out against the reptiles was either killed or silence or went missing from the face of the earth? Almost all royal families, presidents, leaders are all part of the similar bloodlines, do satanic cult rituals, and that enslaved humanity long ago and they interbreed to keep it in the family. Rothschilds, rockerfellers ect.. its all tied in. Its all related, almost every bit of breaking news has this underlying current. The issue is they cannot buy out Russia and they cannot buy out Islam, they are the two biggest issues and threats they have so they use everything in their power to project using their best weapon (media) to make them appear as the corrupted and bad ones, but there is far more than meets the eye. The rabbit hole goes so deep, so deep you will not make it out alive, that's why you eventually have to save yourself before its too late. I'm not going to go into death threats and alien information but that made it even more clear to me.

#12 Everything is looking at you, like human eyes. We think that only human eyes look or stare at us, but that's just an assumption based on practicality. However, I'm not equating the mechanism of human eyes with anything. When an alien comes to you, you'll assume its eyes are looking at you based on how it's responding to your movement, without basing it on how its eyes work. When you no longer identify only with the human body, since it is qualitatively the same as anything that appears, everything looks at you. Also, the unwavering aloneness and presence are quite astounding. I dosed less than before, like about or less than 5 mg, and it's very noticeable.

I'll start at the beginning, and it's unclear. Some things can't be shortened or simplified, because they're already maximally simplified, even if they're long. I recently started reading Prokhorov's book, and it's strange that this scholar asks questions that he claims have no answers. Why not? I disagree; perhaps he wrote this book during the era of political materialism, so he adjusted everything to avoid going to prison again. But there are answers, for example, how classical probability theory and quantum mechanics relate to each other, or rather, the mathematical apparatus of quantum theory. In my opinion, everything is simple here: quantum mechanics is a kind of generalization of probability theory. Instead of a probability distribution function, a wave function is considered, and the square of the absolute value of the wave function yields the probability distribution. Essentially, probability theory can be derived from quantum mechanics, but not vice versa. But what kind of physical reality corresponds to a wave function? None. The wave function is the observer's subjective knowledge of the system, and that's all. The world isn't divided into quantum or classical everyday life. There's no such thing, whether microscopic or macroscopic, to which quantum mechanics can't be applied. But the quantum world divides the world into the observer and everything else (the external system). The observer is a distinct object, or more accurately, a subject, from the perspective of quantum mechanics. When observing an external system, some aspect of it, the wave function or state vector that describes it collapses into one of the possible alternatives, which is realized in reality. This action applies specifically to the "observer," and by "observer," I don't mean a measuring device or even any of the observer's senses—the eye, the ear, whatever. By "observer," we mean the observer's consciousness. When information about which alternative was realized enters the consciousness, the wave function collapses into precisely that realized alternative. This may seem to hint at some kind of solipsism inherent in quantum mechanics, but in fact, this is not the case. Although the observer has a distinct role, as we know, everyone can consider themselves an observer. As an observer, you cannot view others as observers because, for you as an observer, everything else is simply a system. From the standpoint of quantum mechanics, you have no right to view everyone else as observers. If you do, you will create all sorts of contradictions. If you apply the observation postulate not to yourself, but to other observers, you will create a contradiction. This is not allowed in quantum mechanics. But some people think that an observer is a rather complex system, a macroscopic measuring device, for example. If we collect many, many molecules, which individually can be considered quantum mechanically, then collectively we can consider this system an observer. But this is incorrect. No matter how large the system, even black holes, which can also be considered quantum mechanically, do this. And how can all this be reconciled without resorting to solipsism? Let's say we have a particle, and it can be either "here" or "there." Let's write it as a quantum-mechanical superposition of "here + there." And we have a person, let's say, who observed this system and, from their point of view, this particle was, say, "here." And you might say, "Well, that's it, this observer collapsed the state vector, and I have no choice but to confirm that, yes, this particle is "here." But in fact, that's not true. You must consider this particle and this person not as an observer, but as part of the system, and their measurements of this particle should be described to you as an observer as an entangled state of "particle-observer." The particle is "here" because the person measured that it is "here," plus the particle is "there" because the person measured that it is "there." You might say this is a contradiction, since he doesn't see it as "there" and "here." And if we don't consider the freakish many-worlds interpretation, where the universe is split into two branches, then there's a contradiction here—why can I consider myself an observer, but not him? Well, look, purely hypothetically, all these formations of entangled states are reversible, just as the Schrödinger equation is reversible in time. Only measurement is irreversible in time. And if I, as an observer, perform some actions on this external system, including both the particle and the observer who observed this system, perform these actions in such a way that evolution reverses. This is permitted in quantum mechanics; entangled states can be formed, or, conversely, untangled. All these actions are reversible. So, we can, as it were, reverse the measurement of this external observer to the moment they performed this measurement. And on the one hand, it turns out that for them, from our perspective, the measurement postulate is inapplicable because we can reverse it. But our own measurement as an observer is irreversible, which is precisely why time has an arrow. Quantum mechanics is not truly symmetrical with respect to time—the past is not the same as the future with respect to me as an observer. But if some super-advanced civilization were to come along and perform quantum actions, gates, unitary ones that would reverse this entire evolution, just as that person supposedly performed a measurement on the device, then everything would be erased, including their memory—not exactly erased, but simply nonexistent. The universe would have no information that they had ever performed or measured anything. If such information doesn't exist, then, in essence, they didn't measure anything. Quantum mechanics is subjective because only I, as an observer, can say that I saw a particular alternative, and from that moment on, it is irreversibly fixed. Everything else could theoretically be reversed in time because it's all an external system. It's difficult because entropy increases over time, like putting a broken glass back together, but it's theoretically possible. Here, too, we could theoretically reverse the measurement of an external observer because they aren't an observer in relation to me, an external system. All of this is symmetrical, and I, as an observer, will never have any contradictions with another observer. If they measure a particle as being "there," I'll later measure it, and it will still be "there" and not "here," and our measurements won't agree. But as I wrote, it's impossible to create an observer of some combinations, qubits, for example, or particles, or macroscopic devices, because that's not an observer. The observer is you and your consciousness, the you that applies quantum mechanics. But philosophers in the comments will tell me that quantum mechanics describes not our world, not our universe, but rather the observer's knowledge of the system, like a "shadow" in Plato's cave. It doesn't describe the very essence of things, but some other thing. The universe itself, in fact, has a description unrelated to the subject; science simply hasn't yet reached the point of describing this entire universe. But when such philosophers say this, they imagine this universe, just as Newton imagined it, as some kind of mechanical device, some kind of complex machine. The human brain simply can't conceive of the universe any other way. But as experiments have shown, the universe cannot be this complex mechanical machine. Therefore, if you say that quantum mechanics doesn't describe the universe, and the universe operates according to strictly defined rules, but we simply don't know what they are, then you're implicitly imagining some kind of mechanism. But experiment shows that such a mechanism cannot exist. Continuing... Are we living in a simulation? (This is the question of what is more fundamental: the discrete (divisible) or the Whole?) The structure of the universe is always linked to the level of development of civilization, technology, and science. When humans' primary occupations were hunting and gathering, animals were the center of humanity, and accordingly, the world was imagined as standing on elephants and turtles. When Newton created his classical mechanics, the worldview changed once again, and the world began to be seen as consisting of gears, a kind of classical Newtonian mechanism. Even theorems were proven that the world is a classical mechanism, that everything is deterministic and defined—the so-called Laplace determinism. Laplace imagined a being who knows all the states, coordinates, and velocities of all the material particles of Newton's points. This being can predict all the future and past dynamics of the system, how it will develop billions of years in the future and billions of years in the past. Essentially, this demon is God. No one doubted that the world operated on gears, down to the smallest scale. Even Maxwell, when he developed his theory of electrodynamics, conceived of electromagnetic wave propagation as these mechanical gears (you can read Maxwell's original work and be horrified). Computers have become so commonplace in our lives that everyone suddenly started thinking the world is a computer simulation. And that the world is actually discrete (digital) – there are tiny intervals of time, tiny intervals of space, pixels, voxels, and some computer simulates all these changes, essentially like a computer game. There are countless YouTube videos dedicated to this nonsense – we live in the Matrix. Elon Musk even speaks out on the subject. We won't go into detail; it's complete nonsense, the stupidity is beyond belief. Of course, there are a number of genuine scientists who believe we live in a simulation. Seth Lloyd, for example, says we live in a computer. And such people always exist, even among scientists. But we'll focus on the scientific arguments, which basically tell us that we DO NOT live in a computer, and the world CANNOT be discretized (divided) in principle. Discrete structures aren't fundamental in modern physics; rather, they're fundamentally continuous things, which are fundamentally impossible to model with classical computers. "God created the Whole, everything else is the work of man" – Leopold Kronecker. But even when Kronecker was alive, this was already being questioned. Now, it's the other way around – it's believed that integers emerge from continuous structures. Take the Schrödinger equation, where the key is the wave function, not the numbers. This discreteness – the quantization of energy levels – emerges from the Schrödinger equation, which describes a continuous wave function. In other words, integers emerge from continuous structures, but not vice versa. Although quantum mechanics was initially created as an attempt to discretize classical continuous equations, Bohr's quantizations and the like, hence the name "quantum mechanics." Later, as it developed, it became clear that, on the contrary, continuous things are more fundamental than discrete ones. It's said that while standard models as we know them most accurately describe our reality, scientists still don't know how to discretize them, to create a discrete version for computer simulation. This is likely impossible in principle. Although there is currently no precise formal proof, there are attempts to make field theory discrete. However, all these attempts have only been successful for the simplest field theories, which are not directly related to our reality. The Standard Model, meanwhile, falls into the category of being impossible to force into a computer—a lattice field theory version. Even the very same Lorentz invariance, which Einstein discovered with the Lorentz transformation, says that these discrete intervals of time and space cannot exist. If a discrete time interval existed, we could find a frame of reference where this interval would be not small, but arbitrarily large. But also, due to Lorentz contraction, these spatial pixels also have different sizes in different frames of reference. Experiments on quantum entanglement also cannot be simulated with a classical computer. In quantum mechanics, of course, a matrix appears—seemingly discrete, but a matrix as such usually comes complete with a wave function. The same Pauli spin matrices were obtained when Pauli attempted to generalize the Schrödinger equation to account for spin. These spin matrices still come with a wave function, meaning you can't take spin and separate it from an electron, so to speak. The degree of freedom of spin is described by these three matrices, but you can't obtain a spin unbound to any physical object, any particle, which in turn is described by continuous functions. Instead of a single wave function, Pauli obtained two wave functions related by these matrices, and Dirac later discovered the relativistic wave equation, which includes 4x4 matrices, which are related to the wave functions by four components; they can't exist separately. Therefore, all these discussions, even about quantum computers and qubits, are somehow out of touch with reality. In practice, a qubit is always embodied by some real entity, which, in addition to the discrete property associated with qubits, also has a continuous aspect. Qubits cannot describe everything in the world. Perhaps proponents of simulation will say that those simulating us have some kind of super-technology, and that the laws of physics are completely different from ours. In the world they're simulating, everything is completely different, and we'll never really know what's out there. But that's a matter of faith or psychiatry. In psychiatry, there's a syndrome called derealization and depersonalization, where a person feels like the world is unreal, and they themselves are unreal. This is now considered a mental disorder. If you feel like you're living in a virtual world, you should consult a psychiatrist instead of writing comments or posting videos somewhere, like on YouTube. Philip K. Dick apparently had this syndrome, possibly acquired through substance abuse. Basically, just as the ancients believed the world rested on elephants and turtles, the Middle Ages believed the world was made of gears, and now people believe the world is a computer, but I think all of this will pass with time. There are many videos about how space is curved, allowing one to travel faster than light by compressing space itself. Space is NOT curved in ANY WAY; all we see and feel is gravity, because this curvature affects the observer. To talk about real curvature, about observable curvature, we need to go beyond this space. Moreover, the theory of relativity implies that it makes no difference whether the world is moving or you are moving. It turns out that the theory of relativity is relative, that is, subjective. Quantum mechanics is also subjective, as I already wrote. Now let's take mathematics – in set theory, you can construct a statement that is either false or true, but you cannot prove it. That is, you can derive an axiomatics where one statement is false and it does not contradict common understanding, and where this statement is true and it also does not contradict common understanding. Gödel, studying set theory, derived the incompleteness theorem. If we take a hypothetical "alien" with a different mind, say, and without numbers, they would use a different mathematics. This means that mathematics acquires the status of anti-realism, which is also nominalism in philosophy. In mathematics, the important thing is not what is true or false, but self-consistency within itself. Recently, crazy sets have been discovered—ultraexacting and exacting cardinals—where the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis are not unknowable; they have the status of both proven and refuted, but do not have the status of unprovability as in ordinary fundamental mathematical axiomatics. This suggests that mathematics is based not on order, but on chaos (in the good sense). Max Tegmark hypothesizes a level-4 Multiverse (this is beyond any theory of everything), where everything that is not forbidden within the system is possible, and that means literally EVERYTHING. For example, our world is quantum, but the Multiverse could allow for a super-quantum world, and even a super-super-quantum... It turns out that the theory of relativity is subjective, quantum mechanics is subjective, mathematics is subjective. Our entire world is SUBJECTIVE. Object = Subject, Duality = Non-duality. Besides this intuitive knowledge, it is also given a formal form, and this is very important, since it becomes REALIZABLE or EMBODIED. Consciousness (qualia) is the only objective thing in the world. P.S. There may be some nuances and inaccuracies in the translation.

Giga-Alien-Moose seems more my style, you keep building your unicorn army though 🫎

Yes, it knows itself in the sense that it preserves itself from the outside world. That's what we call life: a system that has the will to be, that actively resists attempts to make it cease to be. This is the great mystery. Life wants to be. And what goes against that is suffering. Life is desire. Let's see, If we observe the universe, we see that reality seeks form; there is a structural tendency toward differentiation, toward the formation of form, toward the exploration of possible configurations. This is an inherent property of the universe. The universe does not resist threats because it has no exterior, but it tends toward complex structures; it is a proto-desire. Life is a universe within the universe, and this proto-desire translates into direct desire. There is an outside world from which to protect oneself. The structural property of the universe of being concentrates, amplifies, and becomes defensive. It is a total phase leap, the greatest possible leap. Then suffering appears, it's the reaction to that which prevents one from being. Human psychological suffering is exactly the same nature as the reaction of a cell repairing itself when damaged, only amplified and symbolized. Life is fundamentally the will to be, and this inevitably involves suffering. But this will to be can't be something alien to the universe, it's the fundamental nature of the universe with an exterior. The point is that the universe does not merely allow form; its dynamics structurally favor the emergence of stable configurations. Symmetry breaking is not accidental but intrinsic to how reality unfolds. After each rupture of symmetry, the system reorganizes into new coherent structures with their own local symmetries. This is not intention or purpose, but a structural tendency toward stability and coherence. But the real point is: structural tendency equates intention, there is no difference. Not because there is an entity that desires, but because this is the nature of reality

This was a new experience for me and wanted to share it. So after a long 5meo session I went for DMT. Many facets to the trip but I wanna talk about this one. After a DMT peak, I'm kinda settling down and start feeling a weird brown arachnid energy oozing love and approaching me whispering I love you, to which I replied I love you and we got in a loop of saying I love you. It started entering my body from the right top part, I just couldn't wrap my mind about what was happening, but I felt a strong bro male energy (which surprised me even more because I always associates spiders with the feminine in my mind). The whole situation was new and odd but I just said, I trust you bro and let this energy work. It then tweaked my spine and energy/muscles like strings, as we both merged ever deeper. After finishing this process, I said thank you intensely and radiated love. Then I asked him if he wanted anything, to which he said tell me how is it to be human. I saw that a linguistic answer was too limited and just opened my mind and shared memories and insights to which he saw layer by layer and finally holistically, like a wave that expands all the space and then contracts back to its origin. I then asked it to tell me more about him, to which he said he existed in multiple planes simultaneously and that the reality I inhabit is just one of many and that through DMT it's possible to travel and contact other dimensions. I asked do you have a name, he said yes but it's not translatable, I insisted, try to map it to this reality and it was a very cool name, I'm so sorry to not have recorded it because I forgot (yeah those kind of tripping moments you say, I'll never forget in my life, and then you do) it was very unique, alien and the resonance of pronunciation was peculiar. I kinda repeated the name some time. At this point I inquired are you a part of my psyche that the DMT is reflecting back to me. He was so clear with his NO. I inquired further and said well of course ultimately we are all God's Imagination, but the same I can say about you and That one which makes the claim is the same in both of us: so everything was settled then. Some hours have passed and I still feel his presence. I know this shit sounds bizarre and you never know till you live it but wow, what a corollary from the trip. It's one of those edge cases you experience in the psychonaut path that makes you wonder. Anyways, lots of love to my brown arachnid bro, hope to see you soon

Has anyone done research about nde hellish realms or negative experiences with any theories or is Leo right that it's all deaths return to infinite love or is my interpretation of infinite love not what the positive nde people talk about but alien and weird and cosmic

Games SpaceChem: Construct molecular machines to fight monsters through chemistry-based puzzles. Infinifactory: 3D factory-building for alien overlords, placing blocks like welders and sensors. TIS-100: Assembly-language programming to repair a corrupted computer. Shenzhen I/O: Design circuits and code embedded systems in a simulated Chinese electronics factory. Opus Magnum: Alchemical machines transmuting reagents into gems or weapons.