Warning To Members Here

[Leo Gura]

If I see you referring to Actualized.org as a cult, you will be banned.

I've had enough of entertaining such disrespect towards my work and this community.

If you disagree with the core values of Actualized.org, it's very simple: leave.

Don't forget that being here is a privilege. No one is forcing you to learn any of this.

Edited 4 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Harikrishnan]

Yes, finally. It was really demotivating to see people nitpicking everything you've said in the past under a microscope and then jumping to accusations of cult-like behavior. Constructive criticism is one thing, but constantly interpreting everything through that lens doesn't lead to productive discussion.

[Someone here]

Mad respect !

[Opulence]

Ignorance is the highest devilry.

[meta_male]

@Leo Gura As someone who grew up in a cult, I don't think this helps your case. I understand you want respectful discussion but banning the label is going to make people who are undecided more suspicious. It would be healthier to address the concerns people raise and discuss the nuances of why Actualized could or could not be considered cult-like.

[Sincerity]

Unfortunate, but reasonable I think. Some have really gone overboard with shitting on you and this place. It’s like they suffer through you and your teachings because they just want the benefits of this community. It’s leeching in a way.

I understand you having enough of it. It’s not fun to be slandered and engaged in bad faith all the time.

This won’t alleviate the cult allegations, but oh well. They were stupid to begin with. The people who this work will most deeply affect should see through them anyway.

2 hours ago, Harikrishnan said:

Constructive criticism is one thing, but constantly interpreting everything through that lens doesn't lead to productive discussion.

Agree.

[Jirh]

Quote

If you disagree with the core values of Actualized.org

The disagreement is not with Actualized.org's core values.

It's precisely for those values, actually.

Edited 1 hour ago by Jirh

[Monster Energy]

They only say that because you don’t know whether solipsism is true or not.

Is there logic in that? No.

But if you look deeper, you can see the root.

 

 

[Inliytened1]

2 hours ago, meta_male said:

@Leo Gura As someone who grew up in a cult, I don't think this helps your case. I understand you want respectful discussion but banning the label is going to make people who are undecided more suspicious. It would be healthier to address the concerns people raise and discuss the nuances of why Actualized could or could not be considered cult-like.

@Leo Gura i kinda agree with this...I mean..a lot of this is going to come off as like a fear tactic.  Its better to just admit that you exhibited some odd God complex like behavior - or that is what it appears in that if we dont follow you we will never reach the states of consciousness "promised" by you and that no one has already.   Can you clarify where I have gone wrong here?  I'm never stated this is a cult but I do find some of your behavior disturbing.  If you just kick people out that want to question you then that would be kinda cult like wouldn't it?  Your overall tone can be at times come off condensending and this would just solidy things.  You have to realize you are dammed if you do here and damned if you don't.   I understand you have to stick with your convictions but there isnt a way you can judge how awake someone else is.  If you showed a bit more humility and explained your teachings in a way that didnt come off as so grandiose and exalting yourself above everyone else I think it would go along way.  If someone doesn't speak up they then appear to be a "blind" follower.  I understand these people may not follow you on to some of your highest teachings anyway but your highest teachings involve psychedelics anyway and some people can't do them anyway due to genetics.