Husseinisdoingfine

Breaking News: Major Combat Operations in Iran 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 🇮🇷

92 posts in this topic

18 hours ago, LordFall said:

@zazen Let's be intellectually honest, you can call the US administration demonic pedophiles that seems fairly accurate but to call Ali Khamenei a spiritually revered leader is insane. He was a brutal dictator with 10% approval rating who just massacred tens of thousands of people. I piss on his image and memory and you trying to martyr him is shameful. He's part of the problem of egotistical men ruining this earth for us all with their will to oppress others. 

 

Both things can be true - I was just stating a fact that he is revered amongst Shia Muslims which is why even in Pakistan they stormed the US consulate etc - not that I revere him in any grand sense.

17 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Don't forget that the holy ayatollah, in addition to resisting the evil Jews, also massacred Sunnis in Syria to spread Shiism, and promoted violence in all middle east against sunnis

True as well - but I think its a stretch to say they want to promote violence against Sunni's in the ME even if that was a geopolitical outcome. Iran has a history of trying to be imperially contained by the West going back decades, and with the emergence of Israel in the region that has only complicated matters and required asymmetric proxy warfare as a by product. Iran has good relations with the region and normalized with Saudi etc - they frequently refer to their neighbors as brotherly neighbors including sunni majority Pakistan who they thank for having their back.

It's less sectarian and more geopolitical - not denying sectarian tensions exist at a social or street level, but states behave differently because they have a different level of responsibility and standards to operate on. It used to be that even in London for example a sunni guy once told me ''don't buy from that corner shop, he's shia'' utterly retarded. Now days I'm seeing sunni muslims say that despite differences they are against the downfall of Iran because its destablising to the region and because the West will gets its way ie puppet control and exploitation.

9 hours ago, LordFall said:

Whoever is currently in power has very unclear objectives, hard to say what they're trying to accomplish strategically besides lashing out. If you teleported me in the Iranian HQ I would be going the humanitarian route and getting the UN on my side going down the US and Israel are war criminals angle and getting international support.

UN has no teeth and Iran won't go the humanitarian route of laws when they're literally being struck by US/Israel lol as if laws will stop them. In all these years nothing could be done for Gaza with all the global support then nothing will be done for Iran which has much less support. 

Iran's objectives are clear - maintain internal stability and impose external costs on the US/Israel and it allies who may be able to influence them to pipe down. Hence the strategic hits on ports, radars, bases in the gulf and wider Middle East - blinding US/Israel from early warning, disrupting logistics and stretching the empire. Hence now needing to call in the European countries and UK providing US to operate from its bases - because ME bases have been hit and can't be used properly or at all in some cases.

Iran can't win decisively against the US (as its far away) but more importantly doesn't need to. This is asymmetric warfare where they simply need to make US/Israel operations of regime change (or Iran balkanisation and state collapse) extremely costly. It's like a porcupine (Iran) vs a lion (US) - make it painful.

Spreading the missiles to multiple locations simultaneously means draining the interceptors stock pile faster than if targetting at single location ie Israel. Iran hasn't even got out the big guns yet: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-28/iranian-missile-attacks-set-to-strain-us-interceptor-stockpiles

Like I'v said before and even two months ago - US needs a short campaign of shock and awe and to go in hard to seize the initiative - they clearly didn't do enough - they were hoping it would be as easy as Venezuela or that their initial blitz would rally domestic uprising to take over and regime change themselves. The window is now closing as the optimal time for street protests and storming of institutions would have been when millions were out on the streets - some celebrating Khameini's death and other mourning his death.

Like I said in my post above about Trump wanting and looking for a off ramp, the question is will Iran allow for it or continue up the escalation ladder pulling in an already desperate late stage empire into a quagmire - who are now locked into a war of attrition. Iran may want to take this chance to impose costs and strengthen their bargaining position in any future settlement - rather than stop early and have to face a stronger coalition later. That's the same calculus US/Israel had - contain Iran now before having to face a stronger Iran in the future.

They are shattering the US's halo of invincibility and straining its own relations with its vassal gulf states who are moaning about the US protecting Israel more than them. I just saw a video of 10 itnerceptors in Israel failing to take down a single Iranian missile which dribbled through to it's target like Messi.

The Epstein Regime gambled and are now in FAFO territory.

9 hours ago, LordFall said:

What was his prediction and what was it based on? 

Trump winning and attacking Iran was his claim to fame. His prediction is that Iran wants to lure the US into a ground invasion which they know will be deadly for them and end of the empire. Erik Prince from Blackwater has warned against this - the wider military establishment / Pentagon also warned Trump of engaging Iran which is why the delay and hesitation the past month.

Good thing about Jiang is he always says ''this is just my speculation'' but he sounds way too confident in his assumptions. In this scenario for example I wouldn't say its Iran's intention to lure US into invasion - but if it happens they are prepared. Some geopolitical anlysts overweight intent and grand design / control and underweight miscalculation. War is never that neat.

@Nivsch Stay safe man

 

Edited by zazen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, zazen said:

because the West will gets its way ie puppet control and exploitation.

If a Muslim government collaborates with the West, as Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Morocco do, it's not so dramatic, is it? What is the need for people like Saddam, the ayatollahs, or Gaddafi to constantly challenge power?

Perhaps they seek the freedom of their people against the evil aggressor? Or could it be that they can't sleep thinking about the Palestinians they are expelling from their lands?

Perhaps, but it seems more like something else. Since they are dictators who have seized power by force and subjugate their people by carrying out massacres at the slightest sign of political opposition, anti-American rhetoric makes them appear as noble Davids facing the avaricious, hook-nosed Goliath, and thus their people, who have the mental development of an 11-year-old, love them and see them as legitimate. 

Sure, Gaddafi was in his right trying do displace the us dollar creating the dirham gold. And maybe Saddam was right launching scuds to Israel and invading Kuwait, but the point is that you frontally challenge the power, then what do you expect? Hugs? Or maybe that they say: oh well, it's their right, we are evil Jews and we should let them displace the dollar, because it's fair and our hearts are pure and noble, so justice is first, or interest is second, we are the Knights of the Round Table defending orphans.

Well, it seems the world doesn't work that way. Knowing it, declaring that Israel must disappear of the map and burning American flags every day seems good to fool fools, but bad for feed your people 

Edited by Breakingthewall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Massive news. This is much bigger than when Assad was ousted by rebels. But also let the dust settle. Everyone wants to make their prediction but the truth is no one knows what will happen. As I understand Iran has a pretty nuanced line of succession (up to 4 backup plans) and their government has been designed and prepared for decades specifically for if this were to happen. Boots on the ground I think would be the only way to actually topple Iran's revolutionary guard and supreme leader. They're going to elect another one and continue their nuclear program. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Trump and Hegseth apparently don’t even agree on whether they want regime change in Iran or not... To everyone affected by this: Relax. Clearly, we’re dealing with a higher form of competent leadership that knows exactly what it’s doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Husseinisdoingfine said:

From a Spiral Dynamics POV, this is an attempt by America to forcefully remove the BLUE government and force it into ORANGE.

You cant quite apply Spiral Dynamics to this, because the USA ultimately wants to install a puppet who serves them oil and Israel wants a failed state that wont be an effective opponent to their imperialist aspirations.

What happens to the iranian people does not concern them the least. They want to get a grip on their government and thats it.

Edited by Sandroew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiery interview with Scot Ritter:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Sandroew said:

You cant quite apply Spiral Dynamics to this, because the USA ultimately wants to install a puppet who serves them oil and Israel wants a failed state that wont be an effective opponent to their imperialist aspirations.

What happens to the iranian people does not concern them the least. They want to get a grip on their government and thats it.

That's exactly what stage orange is, it's not a utopia but it's predictable rules of engagement. Stage blue and stage red states don't play by those rules. They fund theorist organizations and have non rational religious goals instead of standardized(capitalistic) win-win rules for everyone. 

 


Owner of creatives community all around Canada as well as a business & Investing mastermind 

Follow me on Instagram @Kylegfall 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This guy is apparently going to consult the White House in a few weeks. He’s persuasively arguing the risks of further entanglements. So I don’t think it’ll continue long.

 

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I oppose comparisons such that he did here ("Nazis" etc) but still, his post seems quite important to me, if we take into account the details.

The post:

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DfXcgBdwa/

" Why did Iran almost become the Third Reich of the 21st century? 👇🏿
Iran is not just another third-world country.


" Iran is the most lethal combination modern history has known: the production capacity of an industrial-technological power fused with the ideology of a murderous cult.


That is exactly what turned Nazi Germany into the monster that devastated Europe and destroyed half the world: not only fanaticism, but the ability of diligent engineers and scientists to harness technology to the Reich’s endless appetite for death.


The numbers don’t lie 👇🏿


#1 Iran ranks among the top ten countries in the world in annual STEM graduates (engineering, science, technology, mathematics), surpassing powers like Japan and South Korea (World Economic Forum).


#2 Nearly 35% of students in Iran study technological fields. That’s how they managed to produce centrifuges and ballistic missiles (CSET report).


#3 Over 2,700 Iranian researchers are ranked in the top 2% of the most cited scientists worldwide (Stanford/Elsevier database).


#4 Iran reached a production capacity of roughly 100 to 300 ballistic missiles per month. That means that had we not attacked them, they would have been producing thousands of missiles per year. Every year.


#5 The Iranian regime has now slaughtered 30,000 of its own citizens without batting an eye.


#6 For 47 years, this regime has tried to harm, exhaust, eliminate, destroy, and murder Israeli and American civilians. Since 1979, the Iranian regime and its proxies have killed at least 3,000 Israelis in Israel and abroad, and over 1,000 Americans over the years.


#7 The regime’s annual budget for building and strengthening proxies across the Middle East stands at $2 billion (before the war). Hezbollah alone receives about $700 million per year.
This is a regime that starves its own citizens in order to feed the monsters surrounding us.


This is the main cause of instability in the Middle East.


And I haven’t even started talking about the nuclear program — that’s already been discussed enough.


The era is different, but in my view, there is a strong resemblance between the Iranian regime and the Nazi regime:
Both were a deadly combination of an educated, industrious population (one that produces engineers and scientists in large numbers) and a murderous fanatic ideology. In short, the ultimate dream of any bloodthirsty dictator who wants to spread his ideology.


If Hitler had risen to power in Brazil, no one would have cared (except perhaps the Argentinians).


If the ayatollahs had taken power in Zimbabwe or Papua New Guinea, Israel’s defense budget would remain the same.
But when ideologically driven dictators seize power in countries with exceptional human capital, advanced industry, and strong engineering capability — like Germany or Iran — it enables them to devastate half the world.


If Sinwar had not attacked, and Iran had continued on the same trajectory, Iran would have been capable of 👇🏿


#1 Developing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of traveling 10,000 km — a direct threat to the eastern coast of the United States. By 2035 (source: U.S. Congress, 2025).


#2 Possessing dozens of nuclear warheads mounted on precision missiles aimed directly at Tel Aviv, Haifa, Riyadh, and Dubai.


A nuclear umbrella would have given Iran nearly unlimited military freedom of action, along with the ability to intimidate and harm Israel and the Gulf states. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis would leave the country out of existential fear alone. Don’t believe me? Look at how North Korea holds South Korea in a chokehold.


#3 Iran would have become the largest exporter of cheap, smart weapons for the modern axis of evil. Today, the drones destroying infrastructure in Ukraine are Iranian. Tomorrow? Every terrorist organization in Africa or South America.
Just as the Russians turned the Kalashnikov into the standard weapon of global terror, the Iranians would have turned the “Shahed” into the aerial standard of modern warfare.


And we haven’t even discussed control of the Strait of Hormuz, which would allow Iran to spike global fuel prices by 200% at the push of a button.


Hitler, with German industrial capacity, was the nightmare of the 20th century.
Khamenei, with Iran’s remarkable human capital, was on track to become the nightmare of the 21st century.


By 2035, Iran could have transformed from a state sponsor of terror into a technological-fanatical-brutal terror empire capable of destroying entire countries, striking American cities, paralyzing the global oil pipeline, and crashing stock markets at the push of a button.


All under nuclear immunity.
Imagine waking up one morning to a barrage of 5,000 ballistic missiles raining down on us from Iran — a massive blitz overwhelming air defense systems and killing tens of thousands of Israelis in the time it took Hamas terrorists to massacre border communities.


This is a threat Israel cannot tolerate.
This is a threat the free world cannot tolerate under any circumstances.
And Trump and Netanyahu, unlike the Europeans and the foolish Democrats in New York — understand this very well.
Israel and the United States are eliminating one of the greatest threats to world peace.


If you had the opportunity to bomb Nazi Germany in 1936, with reasonable risk to human life — wouldn’t you do it? I would.
Be proud to be Israeli. And if you are American — be proud that you chose Trump over the other idiot. Hundreds of millions of Europeans envy you greatly.


P.S. If you liked the content, like, comment, and share 🙏
We must understand the magnitude of the threat we are removing. "

Edited by Nivsch

🏔 Spiral dynamics can be limited, or it can be unlimited if one's development is constantly reflected in its interpretation.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A video not exactly about the attacks but about Iran Itself and how it became what it is. 

there is so much we dont know about a country. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Nivsch said:

I oppose comparisons such that he did here ("Nazis" etc) but still, his post seems quite important to me, if we take into account the details.

The post:

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DfXcgBdwa/

" Why did Iran almost become the Third Reich of the 21st century? 👇🏿
Iran is not just another third-world country.


" Iran is the most lethal combination modern history has known: the production capacity of an industrial-technological power fused with the ideology of a murderous cult.


That is exactly what turned Nazi Germany into the monster that devastated Europe and destroyed half the world: not only fanaticism, but the ability of diligent engineers and scientists to harness technology to the Reich’s endless appetite for death.


The numbers don’t lie 👇🏿


#1 Iran ranks among the top ten countries in the world in annual STEM graduates (engineering, science, technology, mathematics), surpassing powers like Japan and South Korea (World Economic Forum).


#2 Nearly 35% of students in Iran study technological fields. That’s how they managed to produce centrifuges and ballistic missiles (CSET report).


#3 Over 2,700 Iranian researchers are ranked in the top 2% of the most cited scientists worldwide (Stanford/Elsevier database).


#4 Iran reached a production capacity of roughly 100 to 300 ballistic missiles per month. That means that had we not attacked them, they would have been producing thousands of missiles per year. Every year.


#5 The Iranian regime has now slaughtered 30,000 of its own citizens without batting an eye.


#6 For 47 years, this regime has tried to harm, exhaust, eliminate, destroy, and murder Israeli and American civilians. Since 1979, the Iranian regime and its proxies have killed at least 3,000 Israelis in Israel and abroad, and over 1,000 Americans over the years.


#7 The regime’s annual budget for building and strengthening proxies across the Middle East stands at $2 billion (before the war). Hezbollah alone receives about $700 million per year.
This is a regime that starves its own citizens in order to feed the monsters surrounding us.


This is the main cause of instability in the Middle East.


And I haven’t even started talking about the nuclear program — that’s already been discussed enough.


The era is different, but in my view, there is a strong resemblance between the Iranian regime and the Nazi regime:
Both were a deadly combination of an educated, industrious population (one that produces engineers and scientists in large numbers) and a murderous fanatic ideology. In short, the ultimate dream of any bloodthirsty dictator who wants to spread his ideology.


If Hitler had risen to power in Brazil, no one would have cared (except perhaps the Argentinians).


If the ayatollahs had taken power in Zimbabwe or Papua New Guinea, Israel’s defense budget would remain the same.
But when ideologically driven dictators seize power in countries with exceptional human capital, advanced industry, and strong engineering capability — like Germany or Iran — it enables them to devastate half the world.


If Sinwar had not attacked, and Iran had continued on the same trajectory, Iran would have been capable of 👇🏿


#1 Developing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of traveling 10,000 km — a direct threat to the eastern coast of the United States. By 2035 (source: U.S. Congress, 2025).


#2 Possessing dozens of nuclear warheads mounted on precision missiles aimed directly at Tel Aviv, Haifa, Riyadh, and Dubai.


A nuclear umbrella would have given Iran nearly unlimited military freedom of action, along with the ability to intimidate and harm Israel and the Gulf states. Hundreds of thousands of Israelis would leave the country out of existential fear alone. Don’t believe me? Look at how North Korea holds South Korea in a chokehold.


#3 Iran would have become the largest exporter of cheap, smart weapons for the modern axis of evil. Today, the drones destroying infrastructure in Ukraine are Iranian. Tomorrow? Every terrorist organization in Africa or South America.
Just as the Russians turned the Kalashnikov into the standard weapon of global terror, the Iranians would have turned the “Shahed” into the aerial standard of modern warfare.


And we haven’t even discussed control of the Strait of Hormuz, which would allow Iran to spike global fuel prices by 200% at the push of a button.


Hitler, with German industrial capacity, was the nightmare of the 20th century.
Khamenei, with Iran’s remarkable human capital, was on track to become the nightmare of the 21st century.


By 2035, Iran could have transformed from a state sponsor of terror into a technological-fanatical-brutal terror empire capable of destroying entire countries, striking American cities, paralyzing the global oil pipeline, and crashing stock markets at the push of a button.


All under nuclear immunity.
Imagine waking up one morning to a barrage of 5,000 ballistic missiles raining down on us from Iran — a massive blitz overwhelming air defense systems and killing tens of thousands of Israelis in the time it took Hamas terrorists to massacre border communities.


This is a threat Israel cannot tolerate.
This is a threat the free world cannot tolerate under any circumstances.
And Trump and Netanyahu, unlike the Europeans and the foolish Democrats in New York — understand this very well.
Israel and the United States are eliminating one of the greatest threats to world peace.


If you had the opportunity to bomb Nazi Germany in 1936, with reasonable risk to human life — wouldn’t you do it? I would.
Be proud to be Israeli. And if you are American — be proud that you chose Trump over the other idiot. Hundreds of millions of Europeans envy you greatly.


P.S. If you liked the content, like, comment, and share 🙏
We must understand the magnitude of the threat we are removing. "

I agree and I support what the US is doing.  It basically comes down to survival.   Trump may have his faults but his military campaigns have been very precise and on point and his relationship with Israel has been key.  This would not have happened with Biden or Obama.   If we just let these guys do whatever they wanted to they would see Israel gone and the US gone. So the US or Israel cannot afford to sit idly by.  Which is exactly what would have been happening if the left was in power.   

Stay safe in the shelter.

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now