The craziest things happened when I drank ayahusca

[Wilhelm44]

8 hours ago, samijiben said:

Yes, but it has nothing to do with 2000 years. There is SOMETHING VERY VERY REAL HERE! STOP GOING FOR JESUS COPOUTS AND LOON AT THE ACTUAL THING DAMNIT!

this kinda frustrating lol. You seem to be utterly closeminded & unwilling to consider what the kind & thoughtful folk of this community have taken their sweet time to respond to your bs with..

Instead of consideration, youre just responding "But you didnt see Jesus like I did!"

So why you tryna prove it to us? Go dwell in your JesusLand ChristConsciousness lol. If it were really true, you would have no stake in the game. But youre tryna prove it to us. That shows thst you are unconsciously defending beliefs. Thats not what this work is about.

Jesus triggers everyone on this forum. And yet even someone like Adyashanti talks about Jesus quite often. So did Yogananda, so does Tolle, so does Sadhguru etc. Wonder why . . . perhaps he achieved something that hasnt quite been matched again yet.

[MuadDib]

If you meet Jesus on the road, kiss him.

 

[Rigel]

18 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

I think calling on names has an effect, because your mind is not isolated from the other minds that have called on the same name. The contrary is a materialistic notion. If you believe consciousness is fundamental but minds cannot influence each other non-locally, you are a crypto-materialist.

I was tripping a few months ago & it made me remember an old friend I hadn’t seen in years. After the trip I texted her to hang out that week & she told me that she had been thinking of me randomly that day. We didn’t talk for a looong ass time it’s like the psych put my mind into her mind before even calling by imagining her.

[Nemra]

@Leo Gura, to me, the intriguing thing is that psychedelics can reinforce one's beliefs.

It seems it can make what is happening in one's experience so stark, obvious, and ever-present that can make one believe that operating on beliefs has always been superior. So if one is filled with beliefs, they will be more entrenched in it.

What do you say?

Edited yesterday at 11:40 AM by Nemra

[Inliytened1]

On 7/26/2025 at 0:21 AM, Flowerfaeiry said:

Hi. Some of you know me, some don’t. It’s been a wild ride 😅 But anyway, JESUS revealed himself to me like in a really radical way. I abandoned new age and now I’m a Jesus freak.

 

 

Are you sure it wasn't because you already had Jesus in your subconscious as your God?  I have a girlfriend who was raised a Christian and talking to her about Truth and God is very difficult because she believes in Jesus.  So I don't anymore but I do go to Church with her.  And this type of thing only solidifies it more.  Are you sure this wasn't something you hallucinated.   Be careful about that.  Keep an open mind.

Edited yesterday at 11:39 AM by Inliytened1

[Harikrishnan]

59 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Jesus triggers everyone on this forum. And yet even someone like Adyashanti talks about Jesus quite often. So did Yogananda, so does Tolle, so does Sadhguru etc. Wonder why . . . perhaps he achieved something that hasnt quite been matched again yet.

Nah, not as much as you think. I agree Christ is a great state, but that doesn’t mean he lived 1000s of years back. Now thats imaginary. 

[Wilhelm44]

1 minute ago, Harikrishnan said:

Nah, not as much as you think. I agree Christ is a great state, but that doesn’t mean he lived 1000s of years back. Now thats imaginary. 

That's silly. I suppose Buddha and Muhammed never really existed either ?

[Sincerity]

Sorry, couldn't resist. But a point is being made.

[Harikrishnan]

10 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

That's silly. I suppose Buddha and Muhammed never really existed either ?

Haha, I dont think you are like those religious people who does whataboutism. 

Yeah they two are also imaginary. 😌

[Inliytened1]

11 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

That's silly. I suppose Buddha and Muhammed never really existed either ?

Buddhism came the closest with no self.  The buddah was the closest of the three.  The issue is Christians can't be torn away from the idea that Christ is the second coming.  Yeah he existed and was enlightened..but...that's where it all got twisted around.   I love it when a Christain says the Bible is the word of Truth.   

Edited yesterday at 12:01 PM by Inliytened1

[Wilhelm44]

Just now, Harikrishnan said:

Haha, I dont think you are like those religious people who does whataboutism. 

Yeah they two are also imaginary. 😌

You doing the everyone is imaginary thing I get it. But what proof do you have that Jesus was not a character on this plane, or are you just parroting Leo on this one.

[Inliytened1]

5 minutes ago, Harikrishnan said:

Haha, I dont think you are like those religious people who does whataboutism. 

Yeah they two are also imaginary. 😌

Sshh..you might piss some folks off 😀

And besides..maybe they did exist and were enlightened right? And from there everything got twisted because someone wanted to believe in someone to lead them to the promised land?

But sshh..be quiet or you might really anger some people.  They may even come for your head at night. 

[Wilhelm44]

@Harikrishnan  Forget about the imaginary nature of things.

What actual proof made you question the validity of Jesus having been a person ? 

[Wilhelm44]

21 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Buddhism came the closest with no self.  The buddah was the closest of the three.  The issue is Christians can't be torn away from the idea that Christ is the second coming.  Yeah he existed and was enlightened..but...that's where it all got twisted around.   I love it when a Christain says the Bible is the word of Truth.   

I'm not religious, but it just seems silly all these claims that Jesus never existed as a person. 

[James123]

3 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

I'm not religious, but it just seems silly all these claims that Jesus never existed as a person. 

Maybe questioner or answerer was never there 😊 that's why questioning therefore, answering becomes irrelevant 😊 

Much love ❤️ 

[Wilhelm44]

17 minutes ago, James123 said:

Maybe questioner or answerer was never there 😊 that's why questioning therefore, answering becomes irrelevant 😊 

Much love ❤️ 

No, i dont mean the spiritual stuff. People are claiming he never existed as a historical figure.

[Inliytened1]

5 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

No, i dont mean the spiritual stuff. People are claiming he never existed as a historical figure.

Well..i think saying they are imaginary actually doesn't mean they didn't exist..in imagination.  Did you see him walk? No..you didn't.  Nor did i.  So whatever we say about him is imaginary.   So they're not wrong.  

Edited yesterday at 12:55 PM by Inliytened1

[Wilhelm44]

6 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Well..i think saying they are imaginary actually doesn't mean they didn't exist..in imagination.  Did you see him walk? No..you didn't.  Nor did i.  So whatever we say about him is imaginary.   So they're not wrong.  

1 hour ago, Harikrishnan said:

Nah, not as much as you think. I agree Christ is a great state, but that doesn’t mean he lived 1000s of years back. Now thats imaginary. 

Why are you not questioning the validity of Paul, he's also in the bible, and you never saw him with your own eyes either. We cant just use the imagination argument to delete historical figures. You need to actually have some proof when you say that the guy who inspired the biggest religion never walked the earth.

[Inliytened1]

12 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Why are you not questioning the validity of Paul, he's also in the bible, and you never saw him with your own eyes either. We cant just use the imagination argument to delete historical figures. You need to actually have some proof when you say that the guy who inspired the biggest religion never walked the earth.

I'm not saying he didn't walk the earth I'm actually with you.   Unfortunately though, saying he existed is pure speculation.  History is what it is.  I can also say that George Washington never existed.   And there would be a whole lot of resistance to that.  And the argument that our country was shaped by him so he must have existed.   But in truth all we have is the writings.  

Edited yesterday at 01:17 PM by Inliytened1

[UnbornTao]

1 hour ago, Sincerity said:

Sorry, couldn't resist. But a point is being made.

Don't do drugs, kids.