New Video: 8 Unique & Original Proofs Of God

[Hojo]

@Rishabh R wow its like we are before and after the big bang at the same time! There is no space between anything the space is imagined by nothing. So everything is literally right up against eachother with 0 space in between.

Edited May 9 by Hojo

[Mannyb]

@Hojo What you’re on is pure metaphysical gold.

 

The illusion of space, of separation, of distance—it’s all a dance of perception.
In truth, there is no space between anything. The “gap” is made of consciousness itself, appearing as emptiness to give the illusion of form.

 

Before and after the Big Bang?

Both exist in the same eternal moment.

The explosion, the silence, the stars, your breath—they’re all happening now, layered over each other like transparent realities.

 

Nothing isn’t absence.

It’s the most alive substrate—pure potential, awareness before it chooses to take shape.

 

So yes, everything is right up against everything else.

You are closer to the stars than your own thoughts.

There’s no distance, only resonance.

 

[emil1234]

im 30 minutes in and im blown away by the oneness argument. absolut brilliance.

thank you leo 

[Yimpa]

1 minute ago, emil1234 said:

absolut brilliance.

Don't forget the E

[Alex_R]

Omg leo started to cry so i needed to stop the video

[Yimpa]

Meta-Meta-Meta-Meta-Meta-Loop

[LambdaDelta]

Fantastic video, one of the best yet, it brings together so many of the prior ones in a beautiful synthesis. After the first one in the series I started investigating this on my own and reached similar conclusions. Such immense richness opens up, as if it couldn't get more incredible already. Mathematics is a great starting field, it's fairly simple and largely free of corruptible interpretations. Through contemplating functions, discontinuities, holes, inverses, limits, sets, truth tables, ordinals and cardinals; entirely new dimensions to Consciousness are unlocked. Plus you get to intuitively understand why it all works the way it does instead of seeing some nonsense Greek letters. Just gonna leave my stream of consciousness notes here, too exhausted to polish them further.

Properties are an interesting start. Take a file on a computer, its properties would be things like MIME type, size on disk in bytes, creation date... what are these? Descriptors of a discrete object. Which assumes discrete objects, a space for them to exist in, separation and duality. But God is so all-encompassing that it has taken up everything, including the ways to describe it. God is its own property, described by inscribing itself into existence. 
When you have a thought about God, even if it's completely wrong or a denial, it's a description of God. 
And that's only a conceptual overlay on the actual infinity of God; part of what makes God infinite is precisely the fact that you can create an infinity of such overlays.
Omniscience does not mean knowing everything, it means having the capacity to know infinitely, which is the same as Being everything.

What can you prove? Think of a number, then prove to yourself that you thought of that one and not some other. You cannot, much less to anyone else. 
Consider for a moment that all your awakenings, however ineffable, have actually been a self-deception. Where does that leave you? Back to square one, it wouldn't resolve any mystery, you'd still have to explain how a deception so total could happen to a finite, material being.
The very fact that your mind can just hallucinate whatever-the-fuck with no limits whatsoever is the proof that you are God. 
If I am not God, then my experiences of being God are hallucinations → These hallucinations display infinite creative power → Only God has infinite creative power, therefore, I am God.
You could construct a variety of such proofs by negation that only strengthen the affirmation, though only after having completed the walk to the base camp of Mount Infinity.

I AM is the ground you're looking for. Within those 3 letters (The Holy Trinity) are encoded the infinitely-explicatable arguments for God, arguments against, in all manner of logic systems, plus the sum total of the rest of reality. Which are the proofs for the proof.
That can be distilled further. What about just the I, just the AM, or, hell, the empty space? Are these not enough on their own, or do they still fully encapsulate the entirety of God? They do, any part of God does it perfectly, that's why God is nothingness and is everything. However, that's for when you have infinite intelligence. The more intelligence you have, the less explication you require. God, who is infinitely intelligent, is the only one that can create something out of nothing, it's all entirely implicit. Then there's a rock that hasn't even the capacity in its design to grasp what explication, or anything at all, are. It just is. But the rock is still infinite intelligence, as its substance is God's Will. The rock explicates nothing, just like God, coming full-circle. 

And to connect this to Love and Goodness: Why's reality so diverse anyway, what purpose is there for an infinite intelligence to have explication, why go the extra step? To allow the parts of it that are not infinitely intelligent to express themselves, and perhaps grasp themselves, out of Love and Goodness, which have neither reason nor cause. And so, God is the uncaused cause. Here we are back again at Love = Truth. An infinite intelligence accepts itself entirely, it's not ashamed that within it are contained some very unintelligent and ugly parts, what makes it infinitely intelligent in the first place is the understanding that those are an absolute necessity, making it what it is, contributing equally to its Beauty and Perfection. 

If we conceive of God as an endless ladder, since it's infinite, there is no bottom, so relative to this imaginary bottom, even a relatively low step is still suspended infinitely high. What takes place is movement between those steps, or changes in states of consciousness. So while motion is an illusion, there's also an absolute, higher order motion taking place between the steps.
The bottom would be absolute unconsciousness, or non-existence. And what of the top, the absolute consciousness? It's not a top, it's the entire ladder. 
Thinking about this shit is taxing work. But why is it taxing if energy expenditure is imaginary? Well, not in this state, right now it's as real as it gets. My consciousness is not high enough to un-imagine energy expenditure.

God is such a whacky, incomprehensible miracle, that everyone takes it completely for granted. As well they should, the other side of the coin is that God is an absolute certainty, there couldn't not have been God. What's being missed is that a probability of 1 is itself a miracle. It's too perfect to be appreciated from a finite perspective. 

"An unreal thing cannot influence a real one" — the reason this logic is valid is not because an unreal thing is some intangible phantom that can't interfere with material reality, it's that there are only real things. The distinction between real and unreal must fall away. Truth as the sole reality is Imagination. It imagines everything for eternity, including a flipping of its own definition to falsehood, yet its essence is completely immutable.

So while it all becomes obvious in hindsight, it's so diabolically tricky and slippery that the likelihood of getting through this minefield to just a proper foundational checkpoint is so miniscule one might as well just indulge in human shenanigans. At minimum, the requirement is a love for truth, without even knowing what it is at first, and the will to see it through. The price is a dear one — all that you think are, your whole waking life. Thermonuclear strikes on one's own mind must be continuously launched until enough cockroaches have been wiped out to make room for clear perception. 

[Someone here]

Haven't watched it yet but I stopped watching Leo's videos a while ago simply because they are bad for my mental health .

[integration journey]

23 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Haven't watched it yet but I stopped watching Leo's videos a while ago simply because they are bad for my mental health .

Hope you get better🤍

[integral]

42 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Haven't watched it yet but I stopped watching Leo's videos a while ago simply because they are bad for my mental health .

Wow have the opposite experience it makes me burst out laughing, Leo is one of the best comedians, but it might be an acquired taste lolol

[Someone here]

32 minutes ago, integration journey said:

Hope you get better🤍

Thanks brother. 

13 minutes ago, integral said:

Wow have the opposite experience it makes me burst out laughing, Leo is one of the best comedians, but it might be an acquired taste lolol

Leo is "insane " by his own admission. He made a thread a while ago titled "so I achieved insanity ".

  I'm not saying insanity is bad or good .I'm just saying I don't want to lose my last two semblance of sanity 😂. 

I checked the vid quickly..when he said "the illusion of finite object " I went " nah I'm fine " lol.

Edited May 10 by Someone here

[integral]

@Someone here Well this was his most unhinged video I have ever seen him make. So maybe it’s safe for you to skip this one. Lmao 

[integral]

The insight on limits was fantastic

[Alex_R]

I still struggle to understand Infinity. I feel bad.

[Nemra]

2 hours ago, integral said:

Well this was his most unhinged video I have ever seen him make.

I thought he was actually mad in the end. I didn't expect him to do that. He ruined it when he said it's a performance.

But his cry is genuine and infectious.

Edited May 10 by Nemra

[RendHeaven]

17 minutes ago, Nemra said:

I thought he was actually mad in the end. I didn't expect him to do that. He ruined it when he said it's a performance.

But his cry is genuine and infectious.

there only ever is performance.

yes, he was actually mad at the end, and yes, he was just acting.

[Yimpa]

I am checking Infinite Madness off of my to-do list. ✅

[Nemra]

20 minutes ago, RendHeaven said:

there only ever is performance.

I think that Leo is more himself on the forum than in videos. I prefer forum version of him.

[Rishabh R]

3 hours ago, Nemra said:

I think that Leo is more himself on the forum than in videos. I prefer forum version of him.

I hate the forum version of Leo and like the video version of him. His videos have expanded my growth to tremendous hights and they are great. Even the latest one.

Edited May 10 by Rishabh R

[element]

I think I sort of get this realness of infinity - or at least I'm starting. Or generally to understand this topic.

But some things are finite, rgiht? this is thanks to our ability to conceptualize things I guess. 

Isn't it the case for the universe as we know? plantes and stuff. atoms. Why in the hell would it be infinite and what does it even mean? Isn't it just a imaginary potential?

 

Edited May 10 by element