Leo Gura

Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

3,974 posts in this topic

28 minutes ago, Nemra said:

I didn't say that.

Well, then it's settled. I'm an INTP. 😁

Or maybe the test should have better questions. 😌

You're an INFP bro 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Joshe said:

What happened to open mindedness?

What happened to using your mind?


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Joshe said:

You're an INFP bro 😆

Maybe I’m Schrödinger’s cat — INTP and INFP until observed.

I’m unstructured by design. Good luck, INTJ!

cat-no.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

What happened to using your mind?

I can see how this information would be detrimental to you. You'd have a lot to refactor if the evidence I've presented cannot be refuted. It's laid out. Do with it what you will. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Nemra said:

Maybe I’m Schrödinger’s cat — INTP and INFP until observed.

I’m unstructured by design. Good luck, INTJ!

cat-no.gif

😂😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

4 minutes ago, Joshe said:

I can see how this information would be detrimental to you.

It is irrelevant to me.

Anyhow... if you wish to discuss in-depth issues of Myers-Briggs, please start a dedicated thread. You guys can argue over this stuff forever.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Miguel1 said:

Osho also most likely ENFP.

Rupert is something completely else to INFJ?

Osho ENTP, Rupert Spira INTP.


"Not believing your own thoughts, you’re free from the primal desire: the thought that reality should be different than it is. You realise the wordless, the unthinkable. You understand that any mystery is only what you yourself have created. In fact, there’s no mystery. Everything is as clear as day. It’s simple, because there really isn’t anything. There’s only the story appearing now. And not even that.” — Byron Katie

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for sharing your insights Leo. You the man/ infinite consciousness ;)


There is no failure, only feedback

One small step at a time. No one climbs a mountain in one go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Actualized quotes #209.

The legend has it that, that old German man, was in fact Austrian! An Austrian man which used to be a painter! 

Edited by Daniel Balan

https://x.com/DanyBalan7 - Please follow me on twitter! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recently I've listened to AI translated speeches of the Austrian painter! It scared me to realize that he was speaking exactly like today's right wingers! The us vs them mentality, the external enemy that threatens to destroy the nation( back then it was the jew, now the enemy is the migrant and the stage green globalists) a stark remark is the hatred which both the painter and today's right wingers have towards democracy! When the painter meant that it is time to destroy the Jewish state he meant the democratic Weimar republic, not the Ussr. He believed that democracies are the work of the jews! Much like how todays right wingers hate democracies because of the "degenerate west".


https://x.com/DanyBalan7 - Please follow me on twitter! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

General question @Leo Gura relating to your posts about others writings and podcasts ect.: 

Whats your general intention while reading and listening to the theories of others? Since your own theory of everything is so robustly equipped with logic and empiricism, whats the point?

Isn't it like watching bodybuilding shows from the pre-steroid era?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

7 minutes ago, Vynce said:

Whats your general intention while reading and listening to the theories of others?

I learn from everyone. I learn from Nazis. I learn from terrorists. I learn from AI doomers. I learn from silly scientists. I learn from Christians. I learn from Zionists.

It's all grist to deepen my own models of mankind.

There's always more insight to be had.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

16 hours ago, Nemra said:

Or maybe the test should have better questions. 😌

why would an external source tell you who you are? This is lazy epistemology

15 hours ago, Nemra said:

Maybe I’m Schrödinger’s cat — INTP and INFP until observed.

I’m unstructured by design. Good luck, INTJ!

cat-no.gif

lmao ya observe yourself... The INFP and the INTP are two completely completely completely completely completely completely completely different types of people.

its like not being able to see the difference between red and blue... color blind, thats your curent level of development for this model.

This isn't a fun identity game where you just masturbate to your own identity and decide to be to be whoever you want like some fairy tale, you have to do hard work to develop large scale pattern recognition and develop your own internal mental model so you could see the world with clarity. And to see the limits of models which none of you guys are at that level yet.

It's like you wanna find limits when you can't even see the difference between 2 colours

Edited by integral

StopWork.ai - Voice Everything Browser Extension

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@integral, dude, you are taking the discussion too seriously. It's not worth it.

I haven't really cared about what I was by the test from the beginning.

I was also being humorous.

If you go back a little bit, you would see that I said the questions were too simple.

13 minutes ago, integral said:

why would an external source tell you who you are? This is lazy epistemology

How did you come to that conclusion? 😮‍💨

Edited by Nemra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

3 minutes ago, Nemra said:

@integral, dude, you are taking the discussion too seriously. It's not worth it.

I haven't really cared about what I was from the beginning

I was also being humorous.

If you go back a little bit, you would see that I said the questions were too simple.

How did you come to that conclusion? 😮‍💨

😅 the statement you made is one that is the most common statements made about any model so I was yelling down the collective hellhole lol

Edited by integral

StopWork.ai - Voice Everything Browser Extension

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

30 minutes ago, integral said:

This isn't a fun identity game where you just masturbate to your own identity and decide to be to be whoever you want like some fairy tale, you have to do hard work to develop large scale pattern recognition and develop your own internal mental model so you could see the world with clarity. And to see the limits of models which none of you guys are at that level yet.

It's like you wanna find limits when you can't even see the difference between 2 colours

To take ANY model that seriously is not to be developed as you are saying. 

Edited by Eskilon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

40 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

To take ANY model that seriously is not to be developed as you are saying. 

I'm not saying the model is true and we have to respect it, you're misunderstanding.

What im saying is what's the point of having a model if you're not gonna apply it in the most conscious way possible? That includes understanding its limitations, I do not say this model has no limitations.

I'm criticizing things being half assed.

Edited by integral

StopWork.ai - Voice Everything Browser Extension

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@Leo Gura

Leo, if all scientists became philosophers or mystics who would build your pc and smartphone? Who would solve global warming? They would just sit and talk all day about how well they understand God, and how stupid everyone is for not understanding it. Where does that lead us? What's the value?

God as a firefly is already caught within the confines of the brain, it is simply the nature of consciousness as it becomes self aware in a high state. A high state is not a natural phenomenon, but a distortion which is not supposed to happen naturally. Only a mild high state from a long meditation, that I'll grant.

Sorry to ruin the party, I'm afraid you won't like my new hypothesis. I think that psychedelics disturb the module in the brain that is responsible for perception of limits and so you get an illusion of infinity, and since you are inside the illusion there's no way to disprove it as there is no apparent reference point anymore - that was the belief in an external finite world.

Edited by Anton Rogachevski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm here to comment on Leo's post about the German soldier ranting about Jews. The two German soldiers told him they were Jewish, but they were not believed. This is the no true Scotsman fallacy. If you understand logic it seems simple, but the consequences of this self-deception were actually severe. What starts off as a minor intellectual error spiraled into something unimaginably terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now