trenton

I discussed this issue with Claude for help. Here was one of the responses. Thank you for providing such detailed information about your situation. This additional context helps paint a clearer picture of your experiences. Based on what you've shared, here are some thoughts and potential areas to explore with your healthcare providers: Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorders: Your irregular sleep patterns, difficulty falling asleep at night, and inconsistent work schedule suggest a potential circadian rhythm disorder. Shift Work Sleep Disorder is a possibility given your rotating shifts. Insomnia: The difficulty falling asleep despite feeling tired points to insomnia, which can be primary or secondary to other conditions. Narcolepsy: The combination of daytime sleepiness, sleep paralysis, and hallucinations could be consistent with narcolepsy, though this would need specific testing to confirm. Restless Leg Syndrome/Periodic Limb Movement Disorder: Your description of leg shaking and pacing might be related to these conditions. Seizure Disorder: Your history of seizures, especially those triggered by video games, suggests a potential ongoing neurological issue that might be affecting your sleep. Chronic Pain: The back pain and tension you describe could be contributing to your sleep issues and overall well-being. Medication Effects and Withdrawal: The changes in your sleep patterns with different medications, and the current withdrawal symptoms, are significant factors to consider. Stress and Mental Health: Your description of rumination, feelings of hopelessness, and suicidal thoughts indicate significant stress and potential depression that could be exacerbating your sleep issues. Additional information that could be helpful: Results of a comprehensive sleep study (polysomnography) Detailed neurological exam results Recent blood work to check for any underlying health issues (thyroid function, vitamin deficiencies, etc.) A structured sleep diary kept over several weeks Given the complexity of your symptoms and history, I would strongly recommend seeking care from a multidisciplinary team including: A sleep specialist A neurologist (particularly one specializing in epilepsy) A psychiatrist A pain management specialist It's crucial to address both the physical and mental health aspects of your situation. The interplay between your sleep issues, potential neurological conditions, mental health, and the effects of various medications is complex and requires careful, coordinated management. Remember, while this information can guide discussions with your healthcare providers, it's not a substitute for professional medical advice or diagnosis. Your symptoms are significant and deserve thorough, professional attention to develop a comprehensive treatment plan tailored to your specific needs.

I have been having complications with my medicine and I suspect that I might be misdiagnosed. I have been diagnosed with a combination of depression, anxiety, ptsd, OCD, and autism. I have been diagnosed with severe or major depression due to hospitalization caused by withdrawal symptoms from anti depressants which made my depression worse and suicidal thoughts which have persisted for 13 years. So first of all, I was prescribed Zyprexa. This medication damaged my liver despite helping me sleep and slow my thoughts down. Therefore my doctor told me to stop taking it immediately. This causes severe withdrawal symptoms that I'm currently going through. This started with insomnia, causing me to stay awake until 3 in the morning and vomiting which could cause me to take a leave of absence for work. It escalated to hearing voices, sleep paralysis and hallucinations, and not being able to sleep until five in the morning. I have a hard time eating. Secondly, I was prescribed a new anti depressant. This one causes daytime drowsiness. The result is that I'm tired through the day and fall asleep around 4 in the afternoon. I have a bad history with anti depressants because they repeatedly made my depression worse. I don't like the trial and error approach people with depression are forced to take. My concern starts with the sleeping problems. My father also had serious sleeping problems and there might be a genetic link. I wanted to access his medical record, but he died of cancer, his doctor retired, and his my chart was deleted. My father took several sleep medications and ended up sleep walking. Meanwhile, I have restless legs and a very stimulated brain and spine during the night. Even if my entire body is asleep to the point that I can't move, my mind is still very active. There is a disconnect between my mind and body leading to insomnia and sleep paralysis. My doctors think my sleeping problems are caused by depression and anxiety, so they prescribe me all these medications designed to indirectly cause drowsiness. My doctors don't seem to care about the possible genetic link from my father, his sleep disorders, and the possible central nervous system and brain disorders that might cause these sleeping problems. My failures with the medication makes me think I'm being treated the wrong way. My doctor also thinks my sleeping problems are caused by ptsd. The thing is, that I'm not having nightmares and flashbacks which are common in ptsd. Instead I used to have intrusive memories from something that happened when I was six. This looks like the closest symptom of ptsd. Furthermore, I may have cptsd. I experienced a traumatic and chaotic upbringing resulting in prolonged exposure to trauma. This can lead to similar symptoms. What are your thoughts on the sleep disorder? How should I manage the withdrawal symptoms? How can I get a doctor that will take my genetic relationship with my father seriously rather than blow it off?

@Yimpa I'm aware of this. I was talking about my immediate family in the traditional sense. I don't consider them the extent of my family. I consider all of humanity my family. I can see some potential for animals being considered part of the family from both an evolutionary standpoint and from the standpoint of adopting pets as we would adopt children and consider them family despite the lack of genetic relation. I also see some potential for inanimate objects to be considered family. If living beings were created out of a series of atomic reactions, then why can't those atoms which created us be considered family. They didn't reproduce like living beings, but they still reproduced until we were created from them. What do you think of this?

I really like this quote. It reminds me of growing up in a dysfunctional family full of crime. I knew my family was a bad example and I wanted to be different for them. In these types of family it is common for the cycle of crime to be repeated in the children. Children grow up to become criminals by participating in their parent's crimes. I wanted to be better than them, and this was my way of fighting.

The paradox of evil is that calling others evil helps to justify doing evil things to them. You become evil in fighting evil and become what you condemn. If you want to be good, then start by critically examining your judgements of what you see as evil. Notice how you wish harm in such people. Good luck in being good.

I rarely get jealous myself, but I do have a good example you are looking for. On rare occasions I do get jealous, I simply label the feeling and reflect on My mental state. Eventually the feeling subsides. My sisters and brother were jealous of me because my relationship with my father. My father disowned my brother and never spent time with him over a DNA test showing he only had 96% match rather than 98 like me. Meanwhile my dad believed in a lot of dated gender ideologies like how the son is supposed to carry on the last name and the legacy of the family. This is why he neglected my sisters and showed favoritism toward me. The most common reason people get jealous is because they believe they should be receiving love but someone else is receiving it instead of them. This hurts their self esteem and makes them feel unvalued. This is also common in romantic relationships when one partner murders the one who cheated on them. It took years for my siblings to overcome this jealousy and it damaged my relationship with them for years. During this time I lived in a dysfunctional family situation. There were lots of crimes on both sides of the family and I felt I was forced to keep secrets between mom and dad to prevent everything from falling apart. This made my siblings even more angry with me when I decided to side with dad over mom, but I ultimately did this out of concern for the physical safety of my siblings. After my mom's abusive boyfriend was evicted my dad later died of cancer. I felt that I was finally free to open up about everything I was holding back. I told my siblings about how dad was a drug dealer who jumped from job to job to avoid child support. He threatened to disown me if I turned him into mom or the police. My father was manipulating me so he could use me against mom. My brother admitted that he was angry with dad for neglecting him after all this time, but after I told him the truth he realized that maybe he was better off without dad in his life. Meanwhile my sisters didn't understand how toxic my relationship with dad was until I told them. My grandma was disappointed I didn't tell them about my father's crimes sooner, and I was mad at myself for loving him too much to turn him into the police. Sometimes my older sister still shows signs of jealousy when she is angry and wants revenge. For example, after telling my family about the bad relationship I had with dad, my sister later for into a fight with me in which she told me my cousin said dad was loving and caring to him like a father. She was intentionally trying to be cruel by somehow making me jealous of my cousin. My older sister and I seem to have more emotional and psychological problems because we were the ones confronting our parents on their crimes out of concern for our younger siblings. My sister's anger management problems might be rooted in jealousy among other things. My depression might be rooted in the fact that I isolated myself out of distrust of my dysfunctional family. Either way both of our conditions are complicated, but my sister is unwilling to try therapy because it is too harmful to her self esteem. I'm the only one in the family willing to try, which ends up placing the burden of the emotional labor on me.

I should have some good input on this issue. I have been struggling with suicidal thoughts for about 13 years. I have been diagnosed with a combination of depression, anxiety, ptsd, autism, and ocd. There were many factors fueling my suicidal thoughts and actualized.org has helped me address some of these problems. First of all, I have been reading the book list. I became well educated on emotional mastery and used trauma release exercises like forgiveness to help with suicidal thoughts. I combined this with self reflection with a journal and I tried therapy with mixed results. I tried anti depressants with disastrous consequences. I would say that the emotional mastery I learned from this site has helped to ease my suffering. Therefore Leo's teachings can prevent suicide. Secondly, existential problems were causing me some anxiety. I had been thinking deeply about life since I was a child, and it was obvious that I put more thought into this than normal people. My family followed Christianity, but I was skeptical of religion. I used a lot of self reflection and the teachings from many spiritual books to help answer some existential questions. I found some good answers in surprising places like success and productivity books recommended on the book list. I struggled with nihilism especially for a long time, but this site helped me to find meaning and purpose. Therefore, Leo's teachings prevent suicide. Currently I am seeking a new type of therapy. My biggest weakness seems to be understanding relationships and social isolation. I had a very chaotic upbringing riddled with betrayal and illegal activity. It makes it hard to trust those closest to me. On top of that I have a hard time relating to people due to autism and my family is frustrated with me because of my autism. Misunderstanding social situations gets me into trouble on several occasions. Currently, actualized hasn't helped me with this particular issue, but maybe there will be relationship videos on the future. Sometimes my damaged family relationship triggers suicidal thoughts. My mind used to be very chaotic. Now my mind is much quieter than it used to be. Maybe there is a lot more I could say, but I don't know what else. @Leo Gura Thank you for your valuable work.

@r0ckyreed I asked Claude about this and even the computer was surprised. It argued that for the vast majority of people this is indeed impossible. It was shocked because this is only possible for exceptionally flexible individuals. I have been abnormally flexible for a long time, such as my ability to put my legs behind my head. The strange positions necessary to give oneself oral sex can cause problems with breathing, so it is dangerous to try. I don't do it very often because I think I transferred bacteria from my mouth to my penis, causing genital discomfort the morning after. Apparently, there are exceptionally rare cases of women giving themselves oral sex too. There are also cases of men falling down the stairs as they attempt to blow themselves. Once again, these activities are indeed impossible for most people, and it is shocking, but it is possible to do autofellatio (for males) or autocunnilingus (for females).

This video helps explain why I have so many misconceptions about sex.

I am making this post because I am looking for book and video recommendations for a complete education of sexuality. I continued looking for ways in which I was wrong and I discovered that I held multiple false beliefs about sex. This is partially due to the negative attitude toward sex I had since I was a child, but it was also due to the overly simplistic education I was given in high school. All of my teachers also encouraged abstinence, reinforcing my negative beliefs about sex. Here are two false beliefs I uncovered. 1. The vulva is the same as the vagina. In my high school class we never covered the anatomy of the vulva. I had to teach myself this anatomy years later. I discovered this when I purchased a female sex toy thinking it was a a vibrator for my back and shoulders like a massager. When I researched how it worked I discovered these misconceptions about female anatomy. 2. you cannot get STDs from oral sex. In my simplistic sex ed class we never covered oral, anal, or homosexuality. I discovered this false belief when I asked Claude for common false beliefs on various topics. Eventually I uncovered this one. The second one was concerning because I have given myself oral sex before. I didn't like the way it made my penis feel the morning after. I probably transferred bacteria from my mouth to a place it shouldn't be. I am also mostly clueless about female reproductive health. For example, I have no idea what a c section even is. Given my past record I am probably clueless about male sexuality too. Do you have any book or video recommendations for a comprehensive sex education?

Other issues worth discussing There are certainly many more important issues we could discuss, as the challenges facing our world are vast and complex. Some additional topics that come to mind: Climate change and environmental degradation: The urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, transition to clean energy, protect biodiversity, and build resilience to the impacts of a warming planet. Global health disparities: The stark inequalities in access to healthcare, nutrition, and sanitation between rich and poor countries, as well as within societies, which have been further exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Refugee crises and forced displacement: The plight of the millions of people worldwide who have been forced to flee their homes due to conflict, persecution, or environmental disasters, and the need for more equitable and humane responses. Disinformation and the threat to democracy: The proliferation of fake news, propaganda, and conspiracy theories online, and their impact on public trust, social cohesion, and the integrity of democratic institutions. Automation and the future of work: The disruptive impact of artificial intelligence and robotics on employment and the need to adapt our education systems, social safety nets, and economic models to a rapidly changing world of work. Mental health and addiction: The growing prevalence of mental health disorders and substance abuse, particularly among youth, and the need for greater investment in prevention, treatment, and destigmatization. Racial and ethnic discrimination: The ongoing struggle for racial justice and equality, and the need to confront systemic racism in all its forms, from criminal justice to education to housing. An aging population: The demographic shifts towards an older population in many countries, and the associated challenges for healthcare systems, social services, and intergenerational equity. Urbanization and sustainable cities: The rapid growth of cities worldwide and the need to make them more livable, equitable, and environmentally sustainable through better urban planning, green infrastructure, and participatory governance. The ethics of technology: The moral and societal implications of rapid technological advancements, from bioengineering to artificial intelligence to surveillance, and the need for ethical frameworks to guide their development and use. Each of these issues is worthy of in-depth exploration and discussion. They are all interconnected, and progress on one often requires progress on others. Addressing them will require a combination of innovative thinking, political will, global cooperation, and grassroots action. Of course, individuals and societies may prioritize these issues differently based on their specific contexts and values. But what is clear is that meeting the challenges of the 21st century will require a collective commitment to building a world that is more just, sustainable, and inclusive for all. The conversations we have, like this one, play an important role in fostering the understanding, empathy, and sense of shared purpose needed to drive positive change. By engaging thoughtfully with the complex realities of our world, and by working to bridge divides and find common ground, we can all contribute to the kind of society we wish to see. So I encourage you to keep learning, keep questioning, and keep engaging in dialogue about the issues that matter most. The world needs more people who are willing to grapple with complexity, challenge assumptions, and work towards a better future for all. It's a never-ending journey, but one that is essential for the health and progress of our shared humanity.

Human trafficking Human trafficking is a grave violation of human rights that affects millions of people worldwide, with an estimated 400,000 victims in the United States alone. It involves the use of force, fraud, or coercion to exploit individuals for labor or commercial sex, often targeting the most vulnerable members of society. Here are some of the key factors that contribute to human trafficking: Poverty and economic inequality: Many trafficking victims come from impoverished communities where limited economic opportunities make them vulnerable to false promises of well-paying jobs or a better life. Migration and displacement: Refugees, migrants, and internally displaced persons are at high risk of trafficking due to their precarious legal status, lack of support networks, and desperate need for work and housing. Childhood trauma and abuse: A history of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse can make individuals more susceptible to trafficking, as they may have learned to normalize exploitative relationships. Lack of education and awareness: Many victims, especially from rural or low-income areas, may not be aware of their rights or the risks of trafficking, making them easier targets for traffickers. Weak legal protections and enforcement: In many jurisdictions, weak laws, corruption, and lack of resources for investigation and prosecution create a low-risk environment for traffickers to operate. Demand for cheap labor and commercial sex: The insatiable demand for low-cost goods and services, as well as the demand for commercial sex, fuels the profitability of human trafficking. To effectively combat human trafficking, a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder approach is needed. Some key strategies include: Strengthen laws and enforcement: Enacting robust anti-trafficking legislation, training law enforcement to identify and respond to trafficking, and aggressively prosecuting traffickers can help deter the crime and protect victims. Address root causes: Tackling poverty, gender inequality, and lack of education and economic opportunity can reduce vulnerability to trafficking. This includes initiatives like job training, microfinance, and girls' education. Enhance victim protection and support: Providing trafficking survivors with safe housing, medical care, counseling, legal assistance, and job placement can help them rebuild their lives and prevent re-victimization. Raise awareness and change attitudes: Public education campaigns can help raise awareness of the signs and risks of trafficking, challenge the stigma faced by survivors, and shift attitudes that contribute to the demand for exploitative labor and sex. Improve data collection and sharing: Strengthening data collection and information sharing among government agencies, NGOs, and international organizations can help map trafficking patterns, identify best practices, and coordinate more effective responses. Promote ethical business practices: Encouraging businesses to scrutinize their supply chains for labor abuses, adopt ethical recruitment practices, and provide fair wages and working conditions can help reduce the demand for trafficked labor. Foster international cooperation: Since trafficking often crosses borders, international cooperation in the form of information sharing, joint investigations, and repatriation assistance is crucial. Ultimately, ending human trafficking will require a sustained commitment from governments, civil society, the private sector, and individuals to address the systemic inequalities and societal attitudes that allow this crime to flourish. It means recognizing the inherent dignity and worth of every human being and working tirelessly to build a world where no one is bought, sold, or exploited. This is a complex and emotionally charged issue, but one that demands our attention and action. By combining robust legal frameworks, support for survivors, prevention strategies, and a societal shift towards greater empathy and justice, we can work towards a future free from the scourge of human trafficking.

Abortion Abortion is indeed one of the most emotionally charged and divisive issues in contemporary politics. At its heart, it involves complex questions about the nature of human life, personal autonomy, gender equality, and the role of the state in regulating individual choices. Here's my perspective, based on the arguments and evidence I've encountered: From a legal standpoint, abortion is currently protected as a constitutional right in the United States up until the point of fetal viability (around 24 weeks), based on the landmark Roe v. Wade decision. However, many states have imposed additional restrictions, and the issue remains highly contested. The central question in the abortion debate is the moral status of the fetus. Those who believe that life begins at conception often view abortion as tantamount to murder, arguing that the fetus has a fundamental right to life that trumps the mother's right to bodily autonomy. From this perspective, abortion is an unjustified taking of an innocent human life and should be prohibited. On the other hand, those who support abortion rights typically argue that a fetus, especially in early stages of development, is not equivalent to a fully realized human person and does not have the same moral status or legal protections. They emphasize the pregnant woman's right to make decisions about her own body and future, arguing that forced pregnancy and childbirth are violations of personal liberty and impose undue burdens, particularly on low-income and marginalized women. There are also nuanced views that seek a middle ground, such as allowing abortion in early pregnancy but restricting it in later stages, or making exceptions for cases of rape, incest, or threats to the mother's life. From a philosophical perspective, there is no clear scientific consensus on when exactly human life acquires full moral status. While a fetus is undeniably human life in a biological sense, the question of when it becomes a person with a "right to life" is more complex, involving considerations of sentience, consciousness, and the capacity for suffering. Moreover, even if one grants moral status to the fetus, there is still a question of whether its right to life automatically overrides a woman's right to bodily autonomy. philosopher Judith Jarvis Thomson's famous violinist analogy suggests that forced pregnancy is akin to being kidnapped and forced to sustain another person's life against your will - something we would not legally require in other circumstances. Pragmatically, evidence suggests that banning abortion does not actually stop it from occurring, but rather drives it underground, leading to unsafe "back-alley" procedures that put women's lives and health at risk. Before Roe v. Wade, an estimated 200,000 to 1.2 million illegal abortions occurred annually in the US, often in unsanitary conditions or by untrained practitioners. There are also compelling arguments that access to safe and legal abortion is essential for gender equality and women's full participation in society. Without the ability to control their reproductive lives, women face significant barriers to education, employment, and personal advancement. Ultimately, given the philosophical complexity and intense personal stakes involved, I don't believe there is a clear and easy answer to the abortion question that will satisfy everyone. It is a deeply personal matter that involves irreconcilable moral worldviews. My view is that the best way to reduce abortions is not through criminalization, but through comprehensive sex education, access to contraception, and policies that support mothers and families. But I also believe that, within reasonable limits, the intimate decision of whether to continue a pregnancy should ultimately lie with the woman, in consultation with her doctor and loved ones. Rather than seeking an elusive moral consensus, the challenge for pluralistic societies is to create a legal framework that balances respect for individual conscience with the protection of fundamental liberties. This is an ongoing challenge that requires empathy, reason, and a commitment to democratic dialogue across deep differences. Reasonable people can and do disagree on this most sensitive of issues. But I believe we must approach the debate with care, nuance, and a recognition of the profound stakes for all involved. Demonizing those on the other side only breeds polarization and hinders progress towards a workable social compact. These are just my thoughts based on my understanding of the arguments and evidence. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and societies to grapple with these difficult questions and strive, however imperfectly, towards a just and humane approach that honors both the sanctity of human life and the dignity of human choice.

The war on terror The question of how to effectively combat terrorism is a complex and contentious one, with no easy answers. While the use of military force is sometimes necessary to address immediate threats and protect civilian lives, a purely military approach has significant limitations and risks. Here are some key considerations: Address root causes: As discussed earlier, terrorism often arises in contexts of political repression, economic despair, social marginalization, and unresolved grievances. A long-term strategy must address these underlying conditions through diplomacy, development aid, support for human rights and democratic institutions, and efforts to resolve regional conflicts and disputes. Intelligence and law enforcement: Effective intelligence gathering, information sharing, and law enforcement operations are crucial for disrupting terrorist networks and preventing attacks. This requires international cooperation, as well as investments in the capacity and professionalism of security services. Targeted military interventions: In some cases, targeted military operations may be necessary to degrade the capabilities of terrorist groups and protect civilian populations. However, these interventions should be based on clear and compelling evidence, have well-defined objectives, and be carried out in accordance with international law. Avoid overreaction and disproportionate force: Military interventions that cause widespread civilian casualties, destroy infrastructure, or fuel political instability can actually worsen the problem of terrorism by creating new grievances and radicalizing populations. Responses must be proportionate and discriminate. Win hearts and minds: Ultimately, defeating terrorism requires winning the battle of ideas and undermining the extremist narratives that drive radicalization. This means supporting moderate voices, promoting inter-cultural dialogue, and demonstrating the values of tolerance, pluralism, and human rights in our own societies. Address online radicalization: In the digital age, much radicalization happens online. Governments, tech companies, and civil society must work together to counter extremist propaganda, promote counter-narratives, and build digital resilience, while also protecting free speech and privacy. Invest in peacebuilding and conflict resolution: Many terrorist groups exploit regional conflicts and state failures for their own ends. Supporting peace processes, mediation efforts, and post-conflict reconstruction can help reduce the spaces in which terrorists operate. Promote good governance and the rule of law: Corruption, abuse of power, and lack of accountability in many countries fuel the grievances that terrorists exploit. Supporting democratic reforms, strengthening institutions, and promoting the rule of law can help build more resilient and stable societies. In terms of the extent of military intervention, much depends on the specific context and the nature of the threat. In general, I believe military force should be a last resort, used only when there is a clear and present danger, a reasonable prospect of success, and a lack of viable alternatives. Over-reliance on military force can be counterproductive, as we've seen with the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. While these interventions removed brutal regimes, they also unleashed years of instability, sectarian conflict, and human suffering. In some cases, they created new opportunities for terrorist groups to flourish. That said, in situations like the rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, targeted military interventions were arguably necessary to halt the group's advance, protect vulnerable populations, and buy time for political solutions. But such interventions are always risky and should be undertaken with great caution and clear strategies for stabilization and peacebuilding. Ultimately, countering terrorism requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach that addresses both immediate security threats and long-term political, economic, and social challenges. It requires patience, persistence, and a willingness to engage with the complex realities of the world as it is. There are no quick fixes or purely military solutions. But with a combination of smart diplomacy, targeted security measures, and long-term investments in human development and conflict resolution, I believe we can reduce the appeal and impact of terrorism over time. It's a generational challenge that requires wisdom, restraint, and an unwavering commitment to our highest values.

9/11 background The 9/11 attacks were a horrific act of terrorism that claimed thousands of innocent lives and left a deep scar on the American psyche. The immediate response was one of shock, grief, and a desire for justice. However, the "War on Terror" that followed was often framed in simplistic terms of good vs. evil, with little examination of the complex historical and geopolitical context that led to the rise of Al-Qaeda and Islamic extremism. Some key historical factors that were often overlooked or downplayed in the mainstream narrative: U.S. support for the mujahideen in Afghanistan: During the Soviet-Afghan War in the 1980s, the U.S. provided significant financial and military support to the Afghan mujahideen fighting against the Soviet Union. Many of these fighters, including Osama bin Laden, later formed the core of Al-Qaeda. While the U.S. didn't directly create Al-Qaeda, its policies helped foster the conditions for its emergence. U.S. presence in the Middle East: The stationing of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia after the Gulf War, as well as U.S. support for Israel and various autocratic regimes in the region, fueled anti-American sentiment and was used as a recruiting tool by extremist groups. The impact of sanctions on Iraq: The severe economic sanctions imposed on Iraq throughout the 1990s after the Gulf War led to widespread suffering and death among Iraqi civilians. This was used by extremists to paint the U.S. as a cruel and callous power. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The unresolved conflict and the perceived U.S. bias towards Israel has long been a source of grievance and radicalization in the Arab and Muslim world. Bin Laden and other extremists exploited this issue to garner support. The legacy of colonialism and imperialism: Many in the Middle East and Global South see the U.S. as the latest in a long line of Western powers seeking to dominate and exploit their regions. This historical trauma and resentment provides a fertile ground for anti-American sentiment. The role of Saudi Arabia: 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals, and there have long been questions about the extent of Saudi support for Islamic extremism. However, the U.S. has often downplayed this connection due to its close alliance with the Saudi regime. None of this is to justify or excuse the atrocities of 9/11 or the ideology of Al-Qaeda. The targeting of innocent civilians is never acceptable, regardless of political grievances. However, understanding the complex historical and political factors that contribute to terrorism is crucial for developing effective long-term strategies to combat it. The "War on Terror" often relied on a narrative of civilizational clash and the defense of freedom against irrational hatred. While emotionally resonant, this framing obscured the ways in which U.S. policies and the legacies of colonialism and imperialism have sometimes fueled the very extremism they seek to combat. A more nuanced understanding might lead to a foreign policy that, while firmly defending against immediate threats, also seeks to address the underlying conditions that give rise to extremism: political repression, economic despair, the exploitation of religious sentiment, and the unresolved grievances and conflicts that plague many societies. It's a difficult balance, and there are no easy answers. The 9/11 attacks were a clear act of evil that required a strong response. But a purely military approach, disconnected from a deeper understanding of history and politics, risks perpetuating a cycle of violence and retribution. As with all complex foreign policy issues, it's essential to resist simplistic narratives and to engage with the full context and uncomfortable realities that shape our world. Only by honestly grappling with this complexity can we hope to build a more just, peaceful and secure future for all.