Heaven

Islam = the biggest cult in the world

80 posts in this topic

2 hours ago, Twentyfirst said:

How many people did they kill? How many of other nations did they destroy? 

The people I mentioned killed people from there own country. Go read about these people and history before boasting about islamic rulers being less abusive than western. 


I will be waiting here, For your silence to break, For your soul to shake,              For your love to wake! Rumi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29/04/2024 at 9:20 AM, Leo Gura said:

@Ayham All that is a function of geography, as is Islam.

That sounds very reductionistic.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many Muslim countries have dropped bombs on European countries?   How many Muslim countries have militarily occupied European lands (including the US)?  Iran is anti US because Iran was dominated for years by the US backed tyrant the Shah of Iran.   If Islam wasn’t so peaceful we would be in real trouble.


Vincit omnia Veritas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Nivsch said:

But how life will be interesting without conflicts? I think non violent conflicts will ever be, and religion too just in higher versions.

Lol, atleast nations should work towards avoiding conflicts which affect the basic needs of people and keep them in constant survival mode.

9 hours ago, Jodistrict said:

How many Muslim countries have dropped bombs on European countries?   How many Muslim countries have militarily occupied European lands (including the US)?  Iran is anti US because Iran was dominated for years by the US backed tyrant the Shah of Iran.   If Islam wasn’t so peaceful we would be in real trouble.

One reason might be the rapid development of western nations, both in terms of science and military. If Islamic countries were as developed as, say US, we might have a different situation in the world right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Haribo said:

That sounds very reductionistic.

Geography is to nations what genetics is to living organisms.

It's more reductionistic to blame underdevelopment on a single religion.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/4/2024 at 5:28 PM, Ayham said:

of course nowadays Arabs are much less developed, because they are clinging to Islam so hard as a dogma, Islam by it's very nature refuses to change, if you change Islam, or try to make it more "modern", you are basically a disbeliever by traditional Islam, most people here are extremely brainwashed, for example, they think doing philosophy or thinking is wrong because it might make you doubt Islam.

That's the big problem of islam, that makes it a trap, something extremely toxic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Geography is to nations what genetics is to living organisms.

It's more reductionistic to blame underdevelopment on a single religion.

In the Philippines there is a low level of development. The majority are Christians and are quite tolerant of sexuality, gays, lesbians and transsexuals. In the Muslim part they are extremely intolerant and violent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Demographics is destiny, geography is opportunity, genetics is potential. 
 

Analogous to hardware / software = software operates within the constraints of the hardware it runs on.

Similarly it’s the conciousness (software) that maximises but is limited to the constraints of the hardware (geography, genetics) it is housed within. Reminds me of the Sadhguru thread where everyone was debating a yogi can or should over come a physical illness = elevating software to think it can transcend hardware.
 

The opposite end is the geopolitical analyst Peter Zeihan who elevates hardware and has been calling China’s collapse due to its poor geography -  but has high hopes for Argentina becoming a power due to its geography, or America staying top dog due to its superior geography. He overlooks the human element - the human conciousness (software) at work with the material it has (hardware).

Edited by zazen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2024-04-29 at 2:11 AM, Leo Gura said:

If you did a quantitative analysis it is actually the opposite, but the news amplifies the negative stuff.

Im interested in adapting my view on it, because my news consumption mostly shows the bad sides. I know the good stuff like prohibition on alcohol, emphasise on family and discipline etc.

Is there any good sources that supports this view which are freely available? which isn’t a cleric that self-congratulates his collective ego.

Edited by ArcticGong
Grammar and added a some information

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/4/2024 at 6:38 PM, Danioover9000 said:

@tvaeli

   True, so generally Islam is the youngest orthodox religion, next is Christianity, next is Judaism, then Buddhism is next although Confucianism/Taoism maybe earlier, Hinduism technically being the oldest, but actually Zoroastrianism is THE OLDEST RELIGION BY FAR, with some paganist religions in between Zoroastrianism and Hinduism.

   Yes, Christianity had the crusades but for good reasons why the Pope and Catholics wanted it to happen:

  

 

 

One question is, whether your war is justified - completely another, whether you can avoid it. When you are younger, your battles might be justified - but when you are older, you are able to avoid them (in similar situations).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an Abrahamic religion that is explicitly political, resists reform by rejecting reinterpretations of the Qoran and which worships a warlord. You couldn't construct a better tool for resisting cultural progress. Sadly Europe will only learn that it's its antithesis through hindsight. 


The road to God is paved with bliss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29.4.2024 at 3:20 PM, Leo Gura said:

@Ayham All that is a function of geography, as is Islam.

@Leo Gura Could you please clarify this? What do you mean by "all that is function of geograpy"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, StaraX said:

@Leo Gura Could you please clarify this? What do you mean by "all that is function of geograpy"?

A phrase I've heard before is that we are prisoners of geography. I think what this means is that geography (just like genetics) has a certain constraint and influence on what humans can do. Analogous to hardware / software = software operates within the constraints of the hardware it runs on.

The structure / hardware dictates to a extent what software / state of mind is possible. It’s the conciousness (software) that maximizes but is limited to the constraints of the hardware (geography, genetics) it is housed within. 

As a example Middle East is at a cross roads between continents and civilizations which meant there was a flow of trade and ideas compared to say Australia at the edge of the world and only accessible once naval technology took off. Similarly from a military perspective countries with mountains around it or the sea become much less likely to be invaded due to their difficulty - nature provides a moat.

India for example has the himalayas to its north and is surrounded by sea - obviously these were overcome with technological advancements. But compare this to more flat land regions where invasions are much more easier and likely where tribes/clans/groups clash like Europe or the flats Middle East.

The span and scope of Islam and its geographic location allowing it to become a hub between regions counters the OP's claim of Islam being a cult - although I can understand where they come from. But in general, a cult isolates itself and its followers from the world whilst religions insulate/integrate themselves in the world  - this is a spectrum where some integrate less than others. A cult is usually small and centralized around a specific leader so is the wrong term to apply to a major world religion with over a billion followers with different sects etc.  

Edited by zazen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@StaraX

10 hours ago, StaraX said:

@Leo Gura Could you please clarify this? What do you mean by "all that is function of geograpy"?

   For example, MMA fighters like Khabib and others that come from Dagestan or Kazakhstan regions, which are mostly mountainous with lots of declines and inclines, lower oxygen, and a cultural practice of Sambo, tend to produce more athletic fighters. Islam has a minor factor in this, as the larger factor was genetics, environment and culture for the most part. Swap it with other religions that have discipline or abstinence practices, like Buddhism, Taoism, Christianity, Judaism, Confucianism, Paganism, and you'd relatively still be producing greater and more athletic fighters from that region.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jodistrict

On 01/05/2024 at 1:10 AM, Jodistrict said:

How many Muslim countries have dropped bombs on European countries?   How many Muslim countries have militarily occupied European lands (including the US)?  Iran is anti US because Iran was dominated for years by the US backed tyrant the Shah of Iran.   If Islam wasn’t so peaceful we would be in real trouble.

   What was the one country that ended the slave trade for the Muslims?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@tvaeli

On 02/05/2024 at 9:59 AM, tvaeli said:

One question is, whether your war is justified - completely another, whether you can avoid it. When you are younger, your battles might be justified - but when you are older, you are able to avoid them (in similar situations).

   Of course, as GOD any and all wars are justified, every side has their just justifications for why they're oh so good and why the other side is oh they so evil!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Twentyfirst

On 30/04/2024 at 6:35 PM, Twentyfirst said:

Let's not forget that you guys have a huge dating and mating problem. Along with a birth rate problem. Why are the people who don't even have the basic natural functions trying to judge others? Maybe you guys should figure out step ONE before moving onto other steps. I know every ancestor before me some of ya'll don't even know your OWN DADS!!!! But you can keep your iPhones and fast food technologies and hold onto them as tightly as you can hahaha. Truth hurts!

   It's quite simple, under the Islam caliphate rule, under Islam theocracy, women and wives had little say back against their husband. If husband wants to impregnate his wife, she cannot say no in most cases just because it's too inconvenient or other reasons. Also under Islam Caliphate multiple wives are allowed and encouraged culturally, not monogamy, so birth rate tends to increase a bit more. Also under Islam caliphate rule, you can also own slaves, male and mostly female and they cannot refuse their master's desire for having sex with them, and your ancestors likely did all the above, did you know that? Did you also know that your ancestors have black slave markets and slave trade across Africa, and did own black slaves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now