Jodistrict

You are kind of proving my point. How effective it is to use legitimate movements to steer the conversation away from the corruption of big money in politics.

Sure, they may be genuine. Opposing wealth inequality is also genuine but its not allowed. But the identity politics IS allowed. It wouldnt be in politics if it wasn't useful to the Epstein class.

No. It’s slight-of-hand. The real issue for the left is class conflict. But big money supports things like feminism and men vs women because now you have men and women fighting each other instead of fighting the rich. The same for all the other identity politics concerns. The democrats focus on these issues because if they addressed the real economic issues their donations would dry up. The money in politics is a huge issue.

The word “left” should be reserved to economic issues only. That is, directly confronting a society rigged to make a few people rich while everyone else gets the leftovers, even though those few people are rent seekers who produce nothing useful. This isn’t discussed in America because all the politicians are corrupt and serve big money. That is why the American people are continuously frustrated that nothing changes when they vote. The Iran war is highly unpopular, but the congress is all bought out by big donors who support foreign interests. It’s their money that counts. The trends of “gender” and “identity politics” are favored by big money because it creates a distraction and pits the workers against each other so they never focus attention on the real issue – massive wealth injustice.

The nightmare scenario is taking too much psychedelics, calling 911, and having the police be your facilitators.

I wonder how this will affect the Ibogaine clinics in Mexico.

This video features a discussion with Douglas Macgregor regarding the current escalation between the United States and Iran. Macgregor argues that the conflict is driven by an 'Israel-first' agenda and that the U.S. administration is misled by advisors who believe air power alone can secure a decisive victory (21:37, 24:33). According to Douglas Macgregor, the rest of the Islamic world and much of the global community increasingly view Israel as a "menace" or "virus" that threatens their survival. This opposition stems from several factors: Expansionist Concerns: Macgregor points to the map of "Greater Israel," which allegedly includes significant portions of neighboring nations such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. He argues that this geopolitical vision is viewed as an existential threat by populations in the region. (6:42 - 7:42) Alienation: Macgregor claims that Israel is increasingly perceived as a "foreign" or "alien" entity within the region. He suggests that any previous opportunities for accommodation have vanished, exacerbated by rhetoric from figures like Ben-Gvir and Netanyahu. (26:53 - 27:46) Global Sentiment: Macgregor asserts that the entire region, and indeed most of the world, is turning decisively against both the U.S. and Israel, partly because the U.S. is perceived as trying to solve Israel's strategic problems through military force, which he argues is ineffective and damaging to international stability. (16:48 - 17:05)

In this video, economist Jeffrey Sachs provides a sharp critique of US foreign policy, specifically regarding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. He characterizes the war as a "joint venture" driven by the megalomania and incompetence of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu rather than legitimate strategic necessity (1:02 - 1:32). Key takeaways from the discussion: Collapse of US Institutions: Sachs argues that the US government lacks functional systematic processes and that Congress is effectively non-existent in its oversight of the executive branch, leading to one-man rule and erratic decision-making (3:42 - 4:04). The Iran Conflict: He places current tensions in a historical context, linking them to the 1953 US-backed coup in Iran. He asserts that the US views the region through a lens of control and views Iran’s independence as a challenge to American imperial dominance (10:06 - 11:44). Israeli Actions: Sachs describes the current Israeli government's approach as "fascistic" and offensive, alleging a systematic attempt to expropriate land and harm the Palestinian population, actions he claims are carried out under the watchful eye of the US (6:57 - 8:24). Critique of NATO and Europe: He suggests that the US is essentially "occupying" Europe through its military bases and that NATO is a tool of American power that has outlived its purpose. He claims European leaders have been conditioned to exhibit "rousophobia" and are currently out of touch with their own publics (13:12 - 15:43). Outlook: Sachs predicts that the war will not result in a decisive victory but will instead lead to prolonged instability and mutual destruction, noting that Iran is a resilient ancient civilization that will not simply disappear due to external pressure (16:06 - 16:46).

The other thing to keep in mind is that if you need some healing, why do you believe that licensed psychotherapists are the only option? They don’t have a monopoly. It’s a billion dollar business and you are a consumer. Ask yourself if you are paying a lot of money – are you receiving anything of value? Are their “skills” worth paying for? I personally have a spiritual teacher. She is much better than any psychotherapist I have ever known.

Easier said than done.

As a practical matter, finding a competent human therapist is like looking for a needle in a haystack. The AI does a pretty good job. It’s readily available and free.

In this episode of Judging Freedom, host Judge Andrew Napolitano and guest Scott Ritter discuss the current geopolitical situation in the Middle East, focusing on the U.S.-led conflict with Iran, the concept of a blockade at the Strait of Hormuz, and the political state of the Trump administration. Key takeaways from the discussion: Military Realities in Hormuz: Ritter argues that the U.S. does not control the Strait of Hormuz and cannot effectively block it without significant consequences. He suggests that a blockade would be an act of war, highly porous, and would likely lead to severe global economic instability, potentially causing energy prices to soar (7:54-12:35). Critique of the U.S. Strategy: Ritter characterizes the ongoing conflict as a "war of choice" fought on behalf of Israel rather than for American national security interests. He claims the administration's goals of regime change and neutralizing Iranian capabilities have failed, noting that Iranian resilience has rendered current U.S. military tactics ineffective (3:54-8:28). The Trump Brand and Politics: Much of the conversation shifts to a critique of Donald Trump, whom Ritter describes as a "malignant narcissist" prioritizing his own "brand" and ego over coherent foreign or defense policy. Ritter alleges that Vice President JD Vance was set up to fail in negotiations to preserve Trump's political standing (4:57-7:14, 14:31-16:46). Faith and Morality: Ritter expresses strong disapproval of recent social media imagery posted by Trump, which depicts him in a Christ-like manner. He argues that this behavior mocks faith, violates the principle of separation of church and state, and highlights a lack of genuine moral or religious grounding (18:47-21:32, 29:55-30:23). The Need for Peace: Emphasizing the message that "blessed are the peacemakers," Ritter reflects on the human cost of war. He advocates for a diplomatic approach, asserting that real strength lies in peace rather than the destructive cycle of violence that the current administration is pursuing (25:40-29:20).

He gave a lucid description of cult dynamics. But Bakti yoga is a legitimate path to awakening. The beliefs are Buddha’s raft to be discarded once the river is crossed. It’s delusional to make an enemy of beliefs because then you tends to believe that you are the special one who doesn’t have any beliefs and those beliefs you aren’t aware of are your reality, making you no different than the cultist.

I have found cannabis to be most effective for doing shadow work. It magnifies my feelings and pulls into awareness repressed emotions, allowing me to explore them and get insights. In contrast, mushrooms construct a narrative with visions which tends to distract me from underlying emotions.