Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. In this video, economist Jeffrey Sachs provides a sharp critique of US foreign policy, specifically regarding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. He characterizes the war as a "joint venture" driven by the megalomania and incompetence of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu rather than legitimate strategic necessity (1:02 - 1:32). Key takeaways from the discussion: Collapse of US Institutions: Sachs argues that the US government lacks functional systematic processes and that Congress is effectively non-existent in its oversight of the executive branch, leading to one-man rule and erratic decision-making (3:42 - 4:04). The Iran Conflict: He places current tensions in a historical context, linking them to the 1953 US-backed coup in Iran. He asserts that the US views the region through a lens of control and views Iran’s independence as a challenge to American imperial dominance (10:06 - 11:44). Israeli Actions: Sachs describes the current Israeli government's approach as "fascistic" and offensive, alleging a systematic attempt to expropriate land and harm the Palestinian population, actions he claims are carried out under the watchful eye of the US (6:57 - 8:24). Critique of NATO and Europe: He suggests that the US is essentially "occupying" Europe through its military bases and that NATO is a tool of American power that has outlived its purpose. He claims European leaders have been conditioned to exhibit "rousophobia" and are currently out of touch with their own publics (13:12 - 15:43). Outlook: Sachs predicts that the war will not result in a decisive victory but will instead lead to prolonged instability and mutual destruction, noting that Iran is a resilient ancient civilization that will not simply disappear due to external pressure (16:06 - 16:46).
  3. Sharing this with @Leo Gura in a hope that this perspective is included in the deconstruction. https://www.instagram.com/p/DXP6xdLGmob/?igsh=MXI5Zmtzb2s3bzIyZg==
  4. Time to Men Step Up and not be silent and not let only Woman to be the ones vocal about this.. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXRW9R4kr9V/?igsh=MTh0YWh3N2FsZzdlYQ==
  5. "We can't be in our full, mature woman power and still be a damsel in distress." Totally, the system wants women to be submissive and weak, which has nothing to do with the divine feminine. Patriarchy wants women to dismantle their power, and even smart women buy this lie that femininity equals weakness. For me, as a feminist, it is painful to see women with internalized patriarchy and misogyny who hate feminists (and compete and compare themselves with other women) just to get approval and protection from men and patriarchy. They don't understand that patriarchy is trying to sperate and isolate us women so we would be more easy to control and police. They don't understand that no woman is protected from patriarchy, not even them. In fact, the more a woman is supportive of patriarchy, the more vulnerable she is to harm.
  6. Why did masculinity become toxic? Could it be that men started to feel more threatened in the traditional era, which caused them to become more rigid and closed?
  7. 45 min meditation today. Deep surrender and quiet joy. This therapy I'm doing has really been empowering. I'm in a big process of integration in my life. Many things seems to be coming together, but in a quiet non-assuming way.
  8. Leo, you say this catch frases like this one up here. Make all us a favor distill in a video how deep corruption goes. Not just the Metaphysical deep like God self decepting itself in order to live a human live an yada yada. If you really want to add to this topic bring data, history. Similar to the information in this post https://www.instagram.com/p/DXQFoh4FlXc/?igsh=MXRwbnJ0NnJwNHV4cw== Not dismissing the going Meta aspects of reality. But come back and understand the murky terrain of the Realative Realm. You live here or are you ready in another planet?
  9. The point is breaking those walls because your nature is not compatible to live between walls. Maybe the absolute horror of the absolute nihilism is what you are going to find when those walls are broken, but anyway, you can't avoid destroying them
  10. This is what has been working for me after lots of trial and error.
  11. I think that masculinity, in its origin, is more balanced with the feminine and more connected to life, intuition, protection, and cooperation, rather than the predatory version of masculinity in patriarchy, which is basically imbalanced masculinity (toxic masculinity).
  12. Pain is the way to depth. Sadness is the way to openess. Lack is the way to creation. The immensity of human suffering is how reality opens it's bleeding heart, where the absolute light is.
  13. For some this silhouette is the final thing to see.
  14. Where do the soaring birds go to soar when they have lost the need for wings? Where is the final flight for them after last exhalation?
  15. The reality is not empty, not full, its unlimited, open. Empty means absence of something. Full means that nothing is lacking. Then in any case we could say that reality is full, not empty. Krishnamurti talks about basic identification. Im Chinese, I'm a man, etc. We are not in that game. I can empty my mind of thoughts in a moment without any anxiety. Empty mind doesn't mean that I'm empty. There is still experience, and the experience is full of sensation, and in another level it could be fear, contraction, need of control. This doesn't depends of the structured thought. Real meditation means to feel that level, see directly your fear without interpretation and be one with it. Then you see directly to death, to the unlimited without form, like an abyss that opens itself in front of you. Terrifying, because means your dissolution, the total absence of control. Then you say ok, yes, kill me. No jokes, destroy me and erase me. Then you realize that you are that abyss . The observer is the observed. Then your system opens itself and you are the absolute unlimited that is and can't be thought, named, remembered or said. That's the game, it's simple but difficult
  16. Sometimes a little bit of sweetness help to clear out the bitterness, if you have that biased preference.
  17. Even Smart Women had Internalized Patriarchy. Basicaly Patriarchy confuses out relational capacity. For a long time we dont live in small community in nature so we lost a lot of how to relate properly with each other, elders,children, man woman. Than we have this https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXG24b5GDei/?igsh=MTY1aXlsanR6ZHQwaQ==
  18. A better question would be if a dog was mauling a child would you try to rescue it (and risk injury) or let nature take its course (better for the climate + genepoolmaxxing).
  19. Good question. It’s actually entirely subjective and arbitrary. People all have their own different opinions on it. I think to an extent we will often subtly frame success in grandiose ways or almost in this deceptive manner where we are “here” and “over there” is success. And where we are here is not enough whereas over there, there is success, where we are enough. This is not true. Success doesn’t define our value. So for me I sort of have a very detached idea of it where I’m always a success and don’t need to prove my worth, that being authentic and being able to express your soul in balanced ways with all the responsibilities of life cause there are a lot of them (bills, family, health). I think this is where success becomes more of a game and something that we can be passionate about. But yeah I think success is not a carrot and stick. Defining it heavily with external stuff causes problems.
  20. Be them imaginary or not, I would appreciate them to stay mostly in place. - Ego
  21. Bro, check the instagram video that I posted. The understanding is there.
  22. That's a very schizo way of saying that it's mostly people you know personally that rape.
  23. I endure my pain alone. Thanks, always have done. There’s no other consciousness who endures the pain of knowing you live.
  1. Load more activity