SQAAD

Why Some Men Murder Their Women?

20 posts in this topic

Recently i have been very interested in evolutionary psychology. I've learned some things and there are many more i want to learn.

One of the things that i found super fascinating and counter-intuitive is that men (some men of course) can inflict costs to women (physical and mental abuse) so that they can lower their mate value, and as a result the women feel terrible about themselves , think they don't deserve any better and stay with their abusive partners. This tactic works very well. If it didn't work, it would not even exist.

Also men have a monopoly the more violent the crime is.

It's really incredible how all these very intelligent things work in the background without us even being aware of them.. I guess millions of years of evolution have left us with imprinted wisdom.

Anyways, one of the thing that i don't understand is why (some) men end up killing their women. This does not seem wise from a reproductive standpoint. I don't understand it.

It gets so weird, that some men end up killing their own children as a revenge because of their spouses leaving them...

The guy in the video below, killed his own offsprings because they did not agree with him . If reproduction of ours genes is the goal, murdering your own children or your wife does not make much sense.

 

 

Edited by SQAAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a simple explanation for this. A significant proportion of men (4 percent, I think) are psychopaths or sociopaths, whereas almost no women are. This must have conferred evolutionary advantages, otherwise the genetic code for it would not have survived in modern populations. If you look at modern politics or business, psychopathy is a distinct advantage. It would also seem that a significant proportion of women are naturally attracted to psychopaths. The explanation probably lies somewhere in Richard Dawkins' Selfish Gene theory, whereby our genes act against our own interests, but ensure their own survival in surreptitious ways, by shafting us. A typical example would be a highly violent and/or psychopathic male that ensured the success of his own genetic line by ruthlessly murdering his competition and fathering thousands of children by manipulating women with their emotions, despite the fact they don't have any. Genghis Khan would be a good example from history, but even male lions exhibit this behaviour. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@flowboy 

3 hours ago, flowboy said:

Integrate your shadow.

lol ok xD

Edited by SQAAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JoeVolcano

3 hours ago, JoeVolcano said:

+1 to previous comment.

There isn't much comfort in a man's life aside from woman.

Untrue statement. Men who are clinging to women, end up having terrible lives.

If your statement was true, convicts, Nikola Tesla, The Unabomber and Newton would have killed themselves because of no access to p*ssy. The opposite sex is not the end all be all. 

Human nature is much more complicated to be reduced to that.

Still killing your woman, does not seem to serve any function, besides relieving the anger and difficult emotions.

Edited by SQAAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Dumuzzi

2 hours ago, Dumuzzi said:

I think there is a simple explanation for this. A significant proportion of men (4 percent, I think) are psychopaths or sociopaths, whereas almost no women are. This must have conferred evolutionary advantages, otherwise the genetic code for it would not have survived in modern populations. If you look at modern politics or business, psychopathy is a distinct advantage. It would also seem that a significant proportion of women are naturally attracted to psychopaths. The explanation probably lies somewhere in Richard Dawkins' Selfish Gene theory, whereby our genes act against our own interests, but ensure their own survival in surreptitious ways, by shafting us. A typical example would be a highly violent and/or psychopathic male that ensured the success of his own genetic line by ruthlessly murdering his competition and fathering thousands of children by manipulating women with their emotions, despite the fact they don't have any. Genghis Khan would be a good example from history, but even male lions exhibit this behaviour. 

This is partially true.

The problem is that there are many many men who are not psychopaths or narccisists who still end up killing their wives.

Killing your spouse doesn't seem to serve any functional purpose. And usually these murders come along with rage and are not planned before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their wives have the greatest ability to hurt them socially.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JoeVolcano

5 minutes ago, JoeVolcano said:

@SQAAD Integrate your shadow ;)

Cheers

And that will give me the answer? Is that what you are implying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Devin

12 minutes ago, Devin said:

Their wives have the greatest ability to hurt them socially.

These guys end up hurting themselves socially more than their wives could ever have. Many of them end up in jail serving life sentences. Others commit suicide afterwards.

Also there any many murders among couples who are not even married, and therefore have nothing to separate.

Edited by SQAAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in Roman law the paterfamilias could kill his wife if he wanted. 200 years ago, the figure of honor killing was in almost all penal codes. the native americans sold their women if they wanted, God took out a rib from adam and created the woman to keep company and serve the man etc etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SQAAD said:

@Devin

These guys end up hurting themselves socially more than their wives could ever have. Many of them end up in jail serving life sentences. Others commit suicide afterwards.

Also there any many murders among couples who are not even married, and therefore have nothing to separate.

There are worse things for a man than jail or death, social shame and rejection, jail is not that for many men, it is often considered manly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dumuzzi said:

I think there is a simple explanation for this. A significant proportion of men (4 percent, I think) are psychopaths or sociopaths, whereas almost no women are. This must have conferred evolutionary advantages, otherwise the genetic code for it would not have survived in modern populations. If you look at modern politics or business, psychopathy is a distinct advantage. It would also seem that a significant proportion of women are naturally attracted to psychopaths. The explanation probably lies somewhere in Richard Dawkins' Selfish Gene theory, whereby our genes act against our own interests, but ensure their own survival in surreptitious ways, by shafting us. A typical example would be a highly violent and/or psychopathic male that ensured the success of his own genetic line by ruthlessly murdering his competition and fathering thousands of children by manipulating women with their emotions, despite the fact they don't have any. Genghis Khan would be a good example from history, but even male lions exhibit this behaviour. 

If you think almost no women are sociopaths, psychopaths you are not doing enough research on the matter. 

Along with cultural biases at play, most female psychopaths and sociopaths avoid detection.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201906/why-female-psychopaths-are-different-breed

Edited by Razard86

The same strength, the same level of desire it takes to change your life, is the same strength, the same level of desire it takes to end your life. Notice you are headed towards one or the other. - Razard86

Your ACTIONS REVEAL how you REALLY FEEL. Want TRUTH? Observe and ADMIT, do the OPPOSITE of what you usually do which is observe and DENY. - Razard86

Think about it.....Leo gave the best definition of the truth I ever heard...."The truth is what is..." so if that is the truth.... YOUR ACTIONS IN THE PRESENT ARE THE TRUTH!! It's what's happening....do you like what you see? Can you accept it? You are just a SENTIENT MIRROR, OBSERVING ITS REFLECTION..... can you accept what appears? -Razard86

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess would be some form of PTSD-like psyche.


Be-Do-Have

Made it out the inner hood

There is no failure, only feedback

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When excess emotions is involved, there is no reason. Low consciousness people don’t think ahead. They just want to get instant gratification which is in this case: release of anger. 
It is Darwinism at play. Extreme low conscious people remove themselves from the gene pool which is not counter intuitive. It is what it is.  


In Tate we trust

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, StarStruck said:

When excess emotions is involved, there is no reason. Low consciousness people don’t think ahead. They just want to get instant gratification which is in this case: release of anger. 
It is Darwinism at play. Extreme low conscious people remove themselves from the gene pool which is not counter intuitive. It is what it is.  

but because they don't think ahead they are likely to have the most number of children with the most number of people so they could spare a few. nature has a way to solve every problem.

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're thinking this from a higher consciousness perspective so it seems absurd. But it's actually not absurd from their perspective.

There's also a cultural/environmental factor. If one is from say an environment that has a very negative stigma around divorce and one had built most of their self-worth (specifically the masculine identity) and identity around having the family together even if superficially. The cultural narrative play a role in how we view these things.

Being very attached to time investment, money and pride and when those are threatened in a seperation/divorce situation it can really trigger the ego.

Killing children that don't agree, well, that also makes sense from a very selfish ego entirely driven by its own interests and sees children as their property to do whatever they want with.

Edited by puporing

I am Lord of Heaven, Second Coming of Jesus Christ. ❣ Warning: nobody here has reached the true God.

         ┊ ┊⋆ ┊ . ♪ 星空のディスタンス ♫┆彡 what are you dreaming today?

                           天国が来る | 私は道であり、真実であり、命であり。

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, integral said:

but because they don't think ahead they are likely to have the most number of children with the most number of people so they could spare a few. nature has a way to solve every problem.

you can't make a lot of children when you are in prison.


In Tate we trust

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, StarStruck said:

you can't make a lot of children when you are in prison.

its ok doe, they more then always get busy making babies young and luckily they tend to be the unlikely to learn from there mistakes so right after prison they'll get back to work making does babies. (i am joking around...)

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now