Drama Alert! Another YTber is calling us a cult! 😈☦️

[Carl-Richard]

20 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

Yeah we now know where your mind has really been at 😀

"You can't know for sure where my mind has been 🤪, I'm such a sophisticated e-piss-temologist stating the most trite rudimentary shit as if nobody has heard it 30 years ago, not just the most obvious Leo bootlicker next in the line to the other Leo bootlicking bots repeating the exact same bootlicking script, not just desperately pulling up literally anything no matter how intellectually squarerooted or contextually devoid that could play in defense for Leo".

Edited 8 hours ago by Carl-Richard

[Joseph Maynor]

Epistemology means theory of knowledge, no?  

[Human Mint]

Humans are God lickers

[Human Mint]

@Carl-Richard I still don't see you outside my door with a dildo 

[zurew]

17 minutes ago, Human Mint said:

@Carl-Richard I still don't see you outside my door with a dildo 

That's only because your consciousness is too low to recognize the dildo outside your door, and/or because you have become too desensitized to the dildo to the point where all of your perceptual faculties have become numb to it.

[Human Mint]

2 minutes ago, zurew said:

That's only because your consciousness is too low to recognize the dildo outside your door, and/or because you have become too desensitized to the dildo to the point where all of your perceptual faculties have become numb to it.

I have a sex shop store around the corner, I don't need Carl to hand me one

[UnbornTao]

14 minutes ago, zurew said:

That's only because your consciousness is too low to recognize the dildo outside your door, and/or because you have become too desensitized to the dildo to the point where all of your perceptual faculties have become numb to it.

How many trips for Dildo Awakening?

[Human Mint]

Dude, you guys making fun for sophistry and are the ones that indulge in that shit every day. @Carl-Richard @zurew

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Human Mint

[zurew]

7 minutes ago, Human Mint said:

Dude, you guys making fun for sophistry and are the ones that indulge in that shit every day. @Carl-Richard @zurew

You don't know what you are talking about. You are self-deceived, and you have yet to become conscious of what I have become conscious of (but only with my permission --- there is no fucking way that you can surpass me or get to my level. Immediately forget that arrogant BS).

 

 

22 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

How many trips for Dildo Awakening?

Its not about trips; its about my permission. I will inform you when you manage to get there (if you behave correctly, and by that I just mean you acknowledge that Im more awake here than everyone in the universe).

[Eskilon]

You guys take Leo completely for granted. What even is a Leo?? Contemplate

Edited 2 hours ago by Eskilon

[Human Mint]

Is sad they can't distinguish truth from falsehood. Too bad, too bad.

[Sugarcoat]

3 minutes ago, shenanigans said:

This was so 5 minutes ago.
 

Can we pause the tread or something, or at least change the title on this tread—It reads as far to well… reactionary.

@lostingenosmaze 
 

Also this does not belong in Personal Development main, this is more suited for Of Topic Entertainment & Fun

@Leo Gura @Miguel1 @UnbornTao @Natasha Tori Maru

Please take this into consideration, thank you.

 

Must be hard when you rely so much on Leo’s work for your own development that it feels you lose something if people derail from threads a little after having contributed with elaborate discussions page after page 😔

[Sugarcoat]

Just now, shenanigans said:

Sorry, that was pre edited. 

I’m too quick 

[shenanigans]

This was so 5 minutes ago.

@lostingenosmaze 

Can we pause the tread or something, or at least change the title on this tread—It reads as far to well… reactionary. [—Thats because it is. Can’t you just laugh accusations off and go about your day?]
 

Also this kinda doesn’t belong on Personal Development main, this is more suited for Of Topic Entertainment & Fun

 

Please take this into consideration, thank you

[zurew]

51 minutes ago, shenanigans said:

Sorry, that was pre edited. I think my assessment and content now is more apt. I don’t think this is on the scale of moderation. I simply don’t want to see reactivity venting as the front page of the personal development section, if Leo hasn’t really posted anything on the blog today.

You mistake some of the trolling and jokes as just empty entertainment, when in reality they are not intended to be just empty jokes (at least not from me), they are jokes  but they are intended to also make legitimate points in response to the absurd standard that some people put forth here (where open-mindedness is defined as something like):

"   I am a Leo fanboy and I affirm that Leo is the most awake being in the universe, and I will hide my cultish,  special privileging of Leo under the label of 'open-mindedness,' and I will label anyone who is even slightly skeptical of Leo being the most awake being in the universe as closed-minded. It's true that I won't ever, in my life, entertain the idea that there is someone other than Leo who is the most awake being in the universe, but the important point is just that I'm open-minded for Leo and thats what open-mindedness means ).   "

I also demonstrated using trolling - how Leo navigates disagreements (labeling you self-deceived, telling you that you dont know what you are talking about, and claiming to be the most awake being in the universe)

 

 

----

And btw, a good chunk of the arguments did not rely on the premise that Leo is not the most awake being in the universe; it's just that some people here have a very hard time tracking the arguments, and some of them don't really give a fuck about adequately and seriously engaging with the arguments or about putting forth a serious argument themselves.

And when it comes to the arguments that do rely on the premise that "Leo is not the most awake being in the universe" and/or that "Leo doesnt know who is the most awake being in the universe," some people will handwave away all those arguments as long as you can't establish with absolute certainty that those premises are true. They are incapable of engaging probabilistically with those premises, and they will pretend and imply that the reasonable attitude towards those propositions is to take them as false as long as their truth cannot be demonstrated with absolute certainty.

The playbook is this: "Do you really want to criticize Leo? Okay, put forth an argument where the conclusion is absolutely true beyond any doubt. If you can't, and if I can mention just one context-detached hypothetical alternative to yours, then I will pretend that my alternative is true and that yours is false, and I won't defend why mine is better than yours."

Edited 1 hour ago by zurew

[Human Mint]

Intellectual masturbation team vs the mystical ninjas:

[Yimpa]

The whole point of this work is to transcend Leo or any humans authority and reach God.

Everything else is poppycock.

[UnbornTao]

1 hour ago, Human Mint said:

Is sad they can't distinguish truth from falsehood. Too bad, too bad.

Said every cult member ever. The exclusiveness isn't exclusive to this place. I'll try to refine your quote, in broad strokes, according to my reading of the situation:

"These people don't share the same beliefs as I or my group does."

The word turns me on.

Edited 52 minutes ago by UnbornTao

[Human Mint]

4 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

Said every cult member ever. The exclusiveness isn't exclusive to this place. I'll try to refine your quote, in broad strokes, according to my reading of the situation:

"These people don't share the same beliefs as we do."

The word turns me on.

I am turned on by truth, not falsehood.