Science Podcast Appearance Coming Soon

[Leo Gura]

I will be appearing on a technical science podcast soon. It is run by academics.

Probably within a month. We are still scheduling.

Should be interesting. I already had a friendly chat with them and it went well. They ask good skeptical questions. They are materialists but openminded.

I plan to be doing more interview appearances this year across various channels and platforms.

Edited 18 hours ago by Leo Gura

[LoneWonderer]

Nice! Looking foward!  

[UnbornTao]

👍 

[RisingLane]

Mashallah! It’s great to see you featured on podcasts.

[freddyteisen]

Looking forward!

[SimpleGuy]

Waiting for this. Would you be swearing them?

[OBEler]

Wow !!!!!!

Offer them to take part in your upcoming psychedelic course so they can see for themselves.

[Clarence]

Wow, amazing! Are you a bit nervous about having the interviewer and the audience really get the depth you have to offer? I guess it’s more challenging than speaking for Actualized.org, since the context and aim are different and many people will be hearing about you and your work for the first time.

I love the fact that you're about to reach a wider range of people, especially scientists and academics. I hope it goes well and that it will get through to some people.

I remain in awe simply considering the degree to which you’ve mastered epistemology.

Edited 13 hours ago by Clarence

[Leo Gura]

59 minutes ago, SimpleGuy said:

Waiting for this. Would you be swearing them?

What??

17 minutes ago, Clarence said:

Wow, amazing! Are you a bit nervous about having the interviewer and the audience really get the depth you have to offer?

Nervous, no.

But I cannot control what questions they ask. If they don't ask good questions the thing may be a disorganized mess.

My videos are very organized for a reason. This material is too nuanced to cover in a random manner. Things need laying out in certain sequences. But that is not how interviews work. So I have to adapt to their questions on the fly, and they don't really know how profound the material is. But this is an issue I already faced with Jaimungal. It will be an issue in any interview. Which is why I have avoided interviews for most of this time. The material is too serious for casual interviews.

But I will make the best of it, so no excuses. I am looking forward to it. I will do by best to make it good and deep. They are decent people so there is hope.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[WonderSeeker]

5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I will be appearing on a technical science podcast soon. It is run by academics.

Probably within a month. We are still scheduling.

Should be interesting. I already had a friendly chat with them and it went well. They ask good skeptical questions. They are materialists but openminded.

I plan to be doing more interview appearances this year across various channels and platforms.

Q: What is your goal in this podcast episode? Will it be like Curt Jaimungal, or a different flavor?

As a nerdy ex-scientist I support this. Letter rip!

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, OBEler said:

Wow !!!!!!

Offer them to take part in your upcoming psychedelic course so they can see for themselves.

Dude, don't freak them out.

They need calm rational things, not a blast into cosmic horror.

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, WonderSeeker said:

Q: What is your goal in this podcast episode? Will it be like Curt Jaimungal, or a different flavor?

As a nerdy ex-scientist I support this. Letter rip!

Very similar to Jaimungal.

Ontology, epistemology, limits of science and rationality, God.

They want to understand what Truth is. Well, sorta. I already discussed Truth with them a bit and they were intrigued but also don't see the significance of it.

Edited 12 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Sandroew]

Im looking forward for this.

Hipothetically, would you do an episode with Peter Joseph ? I think it could be productive and interesting.

[Clarence]

8 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Nervous, no.

But I cannot control what questions they ask. If they don't ask good questions the thing may be a disorganized mess.

My videos are very organized for a reason. This material is too nuanced to cover in a random manner. Things need laying out in certain sequences. But that is not how interviews work. So I have to adapt to their questions on the fly, and they don't really know how profound the material is. But this is an issue I already faced with Jaimungal. It will be an issue in any interview. Which is why I have avoided interviews for most of this time. The material is too serious for casual interviews.

But I will make the best of it, so no excuses. I am looking forward to it. I will do by best to make it good and deep. They are decent people so there is hope.

Indeed, it is a very deep and nuanced topic to communicate through interviews. But I think you will do well, regardless of how the questions unfold. You have the skills for that, and you've already done a great job with Jaimungal.

I think it’s really important that you gain more visibility outside of this community, even if it’s less perfect than delivering the content on your own. You have a lot of value to bring to the world, and I believe you can extend your reach while remaining true to yourself and your values of truth, quality, and depth.

I'm really excited as well. And it will be refreshing to hear the content in different forms.

[Oppositionless]

Excellent , this reminds me of how I want a science gf. I actually want my partner to be like 50% as interested in spirituality as me.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

Excellent. I am glad to hear this.

Do you have trepidation you will be misrepresented?

I suppose at the end of the day, there is an element of surrender 'what will be, will be' and you can only do your best.

There would be a fine line to walk, I imagine. Risk/reward. Need to keep expanding, but a risk engaging with another brands platform.

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Do you have trepidation you will be misrepresented?

No. These are decent people and I will speak for myself. They will just be asking questions about my worldview.

The only misrepresentation possible is if they cut out parts of interview.

Edited 1 hour ago by Leo Gura

[Jannes]

Nice!

[Socrates]

It's really interesting to see how you approach this, since the conversation can literally go anywhere depending on where you steer it.

What happened to the destiny talk?

You could've tried for a dr K talk before he went out of your league in subs 

[UnbornTao]

15 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

my worldview.

It's interesting that you would put it like that.