Posted January 13 In my experience, using force never works with beliefs. Ever. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 (edited) I cannot be as bold in interviews as I am in my normal videos. This would freak normies out. I need to be more chill and gentle, otherwise people will just dismiss me as a crackpot. The tone is crucial. People judge interviews by tone, not logical content. An unhinged tone is suicide. So I worked a lot on softening my tone. Edited January 13 by Leo Gura You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 We got PC Leo before GTA 6🗣️ reminder: My life's mission is to help men Completely Heal ALL their Ego Wounds, so they develop a Mature, Healthy, Strong and Integrated Self-Esteem & Ego. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 Self nerfing to get down to normie level It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 We're all operating at different pacing in different things. YouTube Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Leo Gura said: Post interviews, I pushed him a little too hard in private for Awakening. I was hoping he was serious about Awakening so I spoke to him accordingly. I wanted to personally help him Awaken. Never assume someone is ready for Awakening work. Makes sense. “The eye through which I see God is the same eye through which God sees me; my eye and God’s eye are one eye, one seeing, one knowing, one love.” ~ Meister Eckhart Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 9 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said: We're all operating at different pacing in different things. 100% Which is why, in all endeavours, I personally attempt to meet people where they are at. Business, the forum, family, friends, career. All social domains. It does require aptitude reading people. Intuition. Wisdom. Experience. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 22 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: It does require aptitude reading people. I agree with this, but reading people really comes down to meeting them deeper than this format. It is more or less hard to read people on the Internet. It depends on what information they make available to consider. YouTube Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 DemystifySci? Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ² Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 2 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: My GOD. I just googled 'Leo Gura' and selected images (work PC so no duckduckgo before you lance me), only to be presented with these mutant abominations: https://pthibault7823.artstation.com/projects/oOL45J The way you open the link and it just stares at you covering the entire screen, full on jumpscare 😂😂😂😂 Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ² Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Leo Gura said: I cannot be as bold in interviews as I am in my normal videos. This would freak normies out. I need to be more chill and gentle, otherwise people will just dismiss me as a crackpot. The tone is crucial. People judge interviews by tone, not logical content. An unhinged tone is suicide. So I worked a lot on softening my tone. Try priming an AI to argue against you from the materialist scientist perspective to practice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 2 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: Self nerfing to get down to normie level You want me to aim a firehose at a basket of kittens? You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 1 hour ago, Joseph Maynor said: I agree with this, but reading people really comes down to meeting them deeper than this format. It is more or less hard to read people on the Internet. It depends on what information they make available to consider. Hmmmm. Internet is difficult. Text. Online. It gives people time to craft what they want to say, how they want to come across. It can control how we are perceived. Thus, reducing an accurate read. So I find face to face is the only way to truly be able to gauge where someone is at, if I have any hope to be able to at all. On the flip side - text and the formats in online spaces can let us express things we otherwise cannot face to face. There is something special to be said for the sort of stream-of-consciousness style crafting a reply can do for both parties. A pause. A reflection uninterrupted. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 I see the necessity of the disclaimer, but im afraid it would shut peoples mind off from the get go. You come across arrogant when you claim you have answers for what the materialistic world view dont have answers. Yeah, as im evaluating the situation, now i think it is probably better to do a disclaimer. Nevermind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 7 minutes ago, Leo Gura said: You want me to aim a firehose at a basket of kittens? Have mercy on that delicate unprepared audience 💀 Maybe reserve that for when one of the mods brainfarts 🥹 It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 (edited) It's going to be a heavy discussion regardless. Just the tone will be mild. Not the material. The material is kryptonite. Edited January 13 by Leo Gura You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 I call this the Ontological Firewall, proud of that concept, it basically means that the information can be correct but the ontology is skewed, so even if youre precise with your tone and wording the recipient can be so ontologically different it sounds like nonsense. I speak for all the mediocrities in the world, I am their champion, I am their patron saint Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 @Leo Gura Who reached out to whom in this endeavor? It would be very interesting to hear that they reached out to you. @Natasha Tori Maru Great wisdom from you on this thread. Connect with me on Instagram: instagram.com/miguetran Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted January 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Miguel1 said: Who reached out to whom in this endeavor? It would be very interesting to hear that they reached out to you. I reached out to them. However, they then told me they emailed me 2 years ago first, but I missed their email. So it all worked out. Edited January 13 by Leo Gura You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
