Rishabh R

Do our personality type remains the same ?

7 posts in this topic

I remember taking the MBTI personality test 4 years ago and now I took it this year. The result was the same. Mediator  INFP-T.

Could anyone answer why or is it constant ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calling @Joshe for some advices :) 


It is far easier to trick someone, than to convince them they have been tricked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Zeroguy Ok Thanks. Is the test verified ?as last night I surfed the internet and found out that that the test uses some psuedoscientific claims which are prone to confirmation bias .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware personality type in MBTI is reflective of the cognitive functions behind the 4 letter type: Ne, Ni, Se, Si, Te, Ti, Fe, Fi

Each 4 letter type code has a different order and set of preferential functions - your type remains the same, but as you grown and develop you tend to develop each of the functions in stages. So for example, I type as INTJ - Ni, Te, Fi, Se. Ni comes natural to me as a default: I know no other way to be. Te, Fi, Se have later developed and I recall stages of broadening each, making them feel more dominant at different times.

I view MBTI as a frame - I use it to understand certain ways people (and myself) take in information and make decisions. That is all it is - a way of describing how we perceive and make decisions. It is important not to let it limit you as all frames can. I find it useful as it means I can find a way to better communicate to someone IE some people prefer lots of details prior to understanding the overall picture (don't like to assume or read between the lines) - some prefer the general idea before they can nail down details (comfortable with extrapolating on incomplete data).

By scientific standards MBTI is pseudoscience. There is no solid empirical backing, it isn't as strong as a predictor as say, big 5. And it is based on Carl Jung's work which is more philosophical introspection than scientific experiment. That said, I find it useful. Many others do not. I would operate from cognitive functions and not type codes: the j vs p (judging, perceiving) Myers-Briggs uses isn't needed, and causes a lot of confusion IMO.


It is far easier to trick someone, than to convince them they have been tricked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

I type as INTJ

I am almost certain you have mentioned that you type as INFJ, the introvert version of me :D


Connect with me on Instagram: instagram.com/miguetran

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now