Leo Gura

Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

5,734 posts in this topic

13 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Speaking and reading are different things. I am not good at reading long text smoothly. But maybe I will learn.

Professional readers are exceptionally good at it.

I got an Audio Book from Peter Ralston and I could not listen to more then 30 minutes of it as I know Ralstons original voice and that just didnt seem right. 

Same with Alan Watts. 

It would be the same for your book I think. 

Edited by Jannes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answer to Leo IQ test with a wild animal a chair and a rope.

Play Death and Hopefully the animal will lost interest in Killing you, and in case he kills you,well,Now you are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, ChadT said:

@Leo Gura I guess what I struggle with is, if I ( Chad ) die, merge with everything and cease to be,  It seems like that is basically the same thing as just disappering.  As Chad. Nothingness.  Or no thing.   Now, if I merge with everything and have some degree of awarenes of the process, than that would be different.  I guess I am not sure which you are saying.  Perhaps I am misunderstanding, or just not at a point where I can see it. 

Your entire line of reasoning assumes a self.

There just isn't one.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Jannes said:

I got an Audio Book from Peter Ralston and I could not listen to more then 30 minutes of it as I know Ralstons original voice and that just didnt seem right. 

Same with Alan Watts. 

It would be the same for your book I think. 

Okay, good to know.

For people who know me it would feel weird. But for people who never watched my videos it would be fine.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Jannes said:

I got an Audio Book from Peter Ralston and I could not listen to more then 30 minutes of it as I know Ralstons original voice and that just didnt seem right. 

Same with Alan Watts. 

It would be the same for your book I think. 

Really? His off-the-cuff speaking voice is whack as shit in terms of modulation. Sometimes he has a bit of word salad and lots of odd repeated phrasing. In addition, his general speaking tone can be VERY emotive. Aggressive, assertive, incredulous. I am all good with that tbh, doesn't stop me, as it reads like passion and conviction.

In contrast, his audiobooks (I have listened to them many times) are a lot calmer. Thoughts, word pacing and phrasing is a lot more coherent. I am able to focus on the book in a leaner way that enhances digestion. Often I will return and relisten many times. I really enjoy that the audiobook is narrated by Ralston himself. I do not mind the tonal/pace change at all. If it were narrated by anyone else I would not be so captured.

Different strokes ay? ^_^


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there is a self.  I think therefore I am.  Even if the self is an illusion, it's still an illusion then.  It seems to reason it has a purpose.  Even if it is god fooling itself into experiencing reality as the self.  I like the self.  :)  

I'm really not trying to be argumentative.  I just struggle with this.  Sometimes I feel like I almost see it, but never can quite fully buy into it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ChadT said:

Sometimes I feel like I almost see it, but never can quite fully buy into it. 

Maybe it is to see through it, rather than see it :)


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, ChadT said:

But there is a self.  I think therefore I am. 

There is Consciousness, but there is no self.

Without a self you would just be Consciousness.

As a self you imagine that Consciousness belongs to you, is something you have which you can lose. Rather it is Consciousness that will lose you.

Without a self Consciousness is no longer yours, it just is.

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, UnbornTao said:

Add to that the cosmology it is coming from.

Are you agreeing with me or suggesting the cosmology could justify it?


"It is of no avail to fret and fume and chafe at the chains which bind you; you must know why and how you are bound. " - James Allen 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Without a self Consciousness is no longer yours, it just is.

The illusion of my, me & mine.

What stands in its place is Nothing proper. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Loving all the blog posts 

images-140.jpeg


No space, no time, nothing but you/this/here/now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beg for the gruel


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Loveeee said:

Loving all the blog posts 

images-140.jpeg

😂 Textbook


"It is of no avail to fret and fume and chafe at the chains which bind you; you must know why and how you are bound. " - James Allen 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Joshe said:

Are you agreeing with me or suggesting the cosmology could justify it?

Agreeing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now